General/Off-topic |
Thread locked by a moderator or admin. |
|
|
GAZZE - WHAT IS GOING ON ?
|
140. |
05 Feb 2008 Tue 11:15 pm |
and they dont make any sense to you?
|
|
141. |
05 Feb 2008 Tue 11:19 pm |
Quoting thehandsom: No further question and no more reading for you femme..
next time, I will try to find youtube links for you..
|
read this article, sort of a sensational type. to draw peoples attention that have already foreseen it as an oil war.
nothing new. actually we dont know for sure if it would go further, thats first.
second, you wanted usa walk away from iraq after spending billions just like that? like in vietnam? or korea?
so, iraq will not profit from oil at all? usa will just drink it away without paying a pennie to iraq?
interesting
|
|
142. |
05 Feb 2008 Tue 11:20 pm |
Quoting thehandsom: and they dont make any sense to you? |
the articles make perfect sense. no joke
they just confirm my thoughts not yours, handsome.
|
|
143. |
05 Feb 2008 Tue 11:24 pm |
Quoting femme_fatal: Quoting thehandsom: and they dont make any sense to you? |
the articles make perfect sense. no joke
they just confirm my thoughts not yours, handsome. |
And you did not see below then?
This is oil robbery silly girl
"production-sharing agreements", or PSAs, oil majors such as BP and Shell in Britain, and Exxon and Chevron in the US, would be able to sign deals of up to 30 years to extract Iraq's oil.
PSAs allow a country to retain legal ownership of its oil, but gives a share of profits to the international companies that invest in infrastructure and operation of the wells, pipelines and refineries. Their introduction would be a first for a major Middle Eastern oil producer. Saudi Arabia and Iran, the world's number one and two oil exporters, both tightly control their industries through state-owned companies with no appreciable foreign collaboration, as do most members of the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries, Opec.
|
|
144. |
05 Feb 2008 Tue 11:40 pm |
Quoting thehandsom: Quoting femme_fatal: Quoting thehandsom: and they dont make any sense to you? |
the articles make perfect sense. no joke
they just confirm my thoughts not yours, handsome. |
And you did not see below then?
This is oil robbery silly girl
"production-sharing agreements", or PSAs, oil majors such as BP and Shell in Britain, and Exxon and Chevron in the US, would be able to sign deals of up to 30 years to extract Iraq's oil.
|
silly boy, my country has loads of long term agreements with chevron, shell and bp. oh those evil westerners are robbing my country along with my government
Quoting thehandsom:
PSAs allow a country to retain legal ownership of its oil, but gives a share of profits to the international companies that invest in infrastructure and operation of the wells, pipelines and refineries. Their introduction would be a first for a major Middle Eastern oil producer. Saudi Arabia and Iran, the world's number one and two oil exporters, both tightly control their industries through state-owned companies with no appreciable foreign collaboration, as do most members of the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries, Opec.
|
to whom they sell the oil? who anyway exploires, drills, sells and buys? who would buy the oil if not the west?
the oil market/business has its own rules.
|
|
145. |
06 Feb 2008 Wed 02:22 am |
semitic craps are on the play which titled dog eat dog. Who cares.
|
|
146. |
06 Feb 2008 Wed 05:02 am |
Thread locked because of political discussion and personal attacks.
|
|
|