General/Off-topic |
|
|
|
Defend Bülent Ersoy
|
20. |
05 Mar 2008 Wed 05:39 pm |
then freedom to terrorism,long live chaos.....
|
|
21. |
05 Mar 2008 Wed 05:41 pm |
long Live anarchy, No God No goverment
|
|
22. |
05 Mar 2008 Wed 05:42 pm |
Quoting LCT: You do seem to have a problem with peace.
Bülent Ersoy spoke out against war.
You say she has no right to do so.
Who gave you the right to tell anyone what they can and cannot say?
I feel sorry for those killed on both sides of this conflict.
If you don't then I think you ought to have a think about what you mean by peace. |
and who gave you the right to say terrorsim can burn many innocent people???
|
|
23. |
05 Mar 2008 Wed 05:43 pm |
Quoting boradiz: long Live anarchy, No God No goverment |
seems life realities a bit large or narrow for you??
|
|
24. |
05 Mar 2008 Wed 05:50 pm |
Terror is defined as: a violent action which causes extreme fear.
There are many perpetrators.
Usually governments are the best at this as they have the most resources to do so. The "terrorists" are often ill-equipped and in dire circumstances.
Neither are right to do so, but there is a difference of scale.
|
|
25. |
05 Mar 2008 Wed 05:51 pm |
Quoting CANLI: Quoting teaschip1: This poor mother... Threatened with 3 years imprisonment...what a bunch of bull. |
She is not a mother,she cant be one. |
I just noticed that, however it should still give her a right to her opinion...without being imprisoned.
|
|
26. |
05 Mar 2008 Wed 06:05 pm |
Quoting teaschip1: Quoting CANLI: Quoting teaschip1: This poor mother... Threatened with 3 years imprisonment...what a bunch of bull. |
She is not a mother,she cant be one. |
I just noticed that, however it should still give her a right to her opinion...without being imprisoned. |
İ agree with that
|
|
27. |
05 Mar 2008 Wed 06:28 pm |
Quoting LCT: You do seem to have a problem with peace.
Bülent Ersoy spoke out against war.
You say she has no right to do so.
Who gave you the right to tell anyone what they can and cannot say?
I feel sorry for those killed on both sides of this conflict.
If you don't then I think you ought to have a think about what you mean by peace. |
yes she can talk whatever she likes. but wrong place and wrong time. her/his speech just gave more pain to mothers. nothing else. in my opinion she was trying to be more populer and she successed. but it s not a peaceful way. it would be very nice if she gave some messages about the unity of this country at that time.
|
|
28. |
05 Mar 2008 Wed 06:35 pm |
Quoting janissary:
yes she can talk whatever she likes. but wrong place and wrong time. her/his speech just gave more pain to mothers. nothing else. in my opinion she was trying to be more populer and she successed. but it s not a peaceful way. it would be very nice if she gave some messages about the unity of this country at that time. |
See, that's the point. You may not like her opinion, you may disagree with it, you may even strongly feel against it, but you cannot forbid her to have one nor imprison her for saying she's against war.
I understand it's hard time for Turks, especially for those who lost their relatives. I do sympathise with them. However, sentencing someone for jail just because she said she wouldn't want her son to die if she had any, is a serious violation of her right to have her own opinion.
|
|
29. |
05 Mar 2008 Wed 06:51 pm |
Quoting janissary:
yes she can talk whatever she likes. but wrong place and wrong time. her/his speech just gave more pain to mothers. nothing else. in my opinion she was trying to be more populer and she successed. but it s not a peaceful way. it would be very nice if she gave some messages about the unity of this country at that time. |
İ do agree with you
But also i think ignoring her was the best way to reply on what she've said
Threatening to imprison her is what made her more popular.
|
|
30. |
05 Mar 2008 Wed 08:02 pm |
Quoting CANLI: Quoting janissary:
yes she can talk whatever she likes. but wrong place and wrong time. her/his speech just gave more pain to mothers. nothing else. in my opinion she was trying to be more populer and she successed. but it s not a peaceful way. it would be very nice if she gave some messages about the unity of this country at that time. |
İ do agree with you
But also i think ignoring her was the best way to reply on what she've said
Threatening to imprison her is what made her more popular. |
I, 100% disagree with you both actually!!
What did she do in the end?
Just said those words!!.
So what?
what is wrong with what she said?
In the end, almost an entire generation (from 1978 to 2008) grew up with this rhetoric and the result is 40.000 dead people ..
No peace, no solution in the near future..
|
|
|