It doesn´t relate. I just meant to say that you also, always point fingers at others and never accept any criticism of your own country or traditions. In a way similarly to zhang ziyi.

So does killing of children in China justify killing of women in Arab countries? Now that´s hypocrisy. But also the only way Tami arguments his opinions - he calls everyone hypocrites without giving reasons and if somebody criticises his part of the world/culture he points the finger. Very mature and convincing.

I already told that my post wasn`t meant to justify anything, so you better read the posts before attacking people personally.

I didn´t attack you personally, I just can´t help commenting and laughing on your debating methods

"That is if anybody still considers you a serious debate partner"

How am I supposed to interpret this sentence if not attacking smn personally?

I just expressed my doubt, didn´t attack you. How should I know if other people want to spend time providing arguments for somebody who, eventually, will end up saying - you are not clear, christians/chinese/westerners did bad things - that´s basically how you end all your "debates." You don´t debate but dig out something that has nothing to do with the subject and consider the thing done.

İ think tamikidakika was applying the principle ,

´´İf you arent sinful,then you can throw the rock  ´´

He was pointing it out to ZZ in a practical way by showing him that the same exist there.

Not by saying he is justifying it,or by saying they are right actions either way.

ZZ try to show Muslims are the devils by all means,and in every thread too related or not related to that thread.

tam and handsom too tried to say,the devil can be every where !