General/Off-topic |
|
|
|
|
|
Wipe out muslim race (a game)
|
| 30. |
13 Sep 2008 Sat 12:10 pm |
|
As Trudy said, there are Christians who are recognised terrorists. Why doesn´t the West (whoever they are) recognise US and EU troops in Iraq as terrorists? The answer is simple - because there are there not for religious resons and they are not all Christians - I´m sure if you surveyed troops in Iraq and Afghanistan on the religion of individual soldiers you´d find all kinds.
what does this have to do with their being terrorists? since when do you have to represent a religious group to be considered terrorist?
|
|
| 31. |
13 Sep 2008 Sat 07:25 pm |
|
what does this have to do with their being terrorists? since when do you have to represent a religious group to be considered terrorist?
I have to agree with that - Bader-Meinhof for example - no religious connection there as far as I remember.
|
|
| 32. |
13 Sep 2008 Sat 11:20 pm |
|
what does this have to do with their being terrorists? since when do you have to represent a religious group to be considered terrorist?
Who said you have to represent a religious group to be a terrorist? Definitely not me! I was just responding to your comment about Christian terrorists. First you claim there aren´t any that are recognised by the evil west, then when you´re proven wrong by Trudy you change your initial charge against west saying that you meant Christians killing Muslims. So, as INITIALLY you spoke about Bush and crusades, I commented on the situation in Iraq - even if you want to call them (the US and EU forces) terrorists, you can´t make them religious terrorists for the reason I stated.
|
|
| 33. |
14 Sep 2008 Sun 12:22 am |
|
Who said you have to represent a religious group to be a terrorist? Definitely not me! I was just responding to your comment about Christian terrorists. First you claim there aren´t any that are recognised by the evil west, then when you´re proven wrong by Trudy you change your initial charge against west saying that you meant Christians killing Muslims. So, as INITIALLY you spoke about Bush and crusades, I commented on the situation in Iraq - even if you want to call them (the US and EU forces) terrorists, you can´t make them religious terrorists for the reason I stated.
So they are terrorists, evil west 
|
|
| 34. |
14 Sep 2008 Sun 12:24 am |
|
Whatever you say DD, remember that ´we´ are always bad!
And we are always racist 
|
|
| 35. |
14 Sep 2008 Sun 12:39 am |
|
Who said you have to represent a religious group to be a terrorist? Definitely not me! I was just responding to your comment about Christian terrorists. First you claim there aren´t any that are recognised by the evil west, then when you´re proven wrong by Trudy you change your initial charge against west saying that you meant Christians killing Muslims. So, as INITIALLY you spoke about Bush and crusades, I commented on the situation in Iraq - even if you want to call them (the US and EU forces) terrorists, you can´t make them religious terrorists for the reason I stated.
how come I`m proven wrong? has someone proven that Bush didn`t call the Iraq war
"god`s will"? what`s going on in Iraq is christian terrorism but even if you don`t agree with its being christianity related, it`s still terrorism. and the christian west will never accept that.
|
|
| 36. |
14 Sep 2008 Sun 12:52 am |
|
how come I`m proven wrong? has someone proven that Bush didn`t call the Iraq war
"god`s will"? what`s going on in Iraq is christian terrorism but even if you don`t agree with its being christianity related, it`s still terrorism. and the christian west will never accept that.
haha
Ya.. the war in Iraq is nothing to do with the religion.!!!
It is terrorism I agree but "it is nothing to do with the religionnnnnnnnn"
And it does not matter what Bush said..
You should really stop looking at the events from ONLY Christian-muslim point of view..
(It is what Osama wants everybody to think that way.)
Because most of the the wars are about economical interests of some countries.
|
|
| 37. |
14 Sep 2008 Sun 12:56 am |
|
Again -
1. Bush has been proven to use wrong words or not understanding what he says million of times
2. Bush doesn´t represent Christianity as the USA is made up of Christians,Pagans, Atheists, Muslims etc - so if they are on war, so are all religions
3. No Church or religious organisation stands behind it
4. It is not an act of terrorism - it is a war and the US & EU are aggressors. They don´t blow up people at random quoting Bible.
5. The war is about MONEY not religion
But you may still decie to think that the whole west is Christian (not true) and that Christianity has a decisive voice in the action against Iraq (it doesn´t - money does). Choose to believe in whatever you want, but Crusades ended ages ago. And talking about West you can´t say it equals Christianity - there´s too many a denomination and non-Christian beliefs that it hardly is a Christian world. If you claim the terrorists are Christian - which denomination do you mean? Baptists? Methodists? Catholics? They´d rather fight against each other than go arm in arm on war against Muslims.
|
|
| 38. |
14 Sep 2008 Sun 01:09 am |
|
Again -
1. Bush has been proven to use wrong words or not understanding what he says million of times
2. Bush doesn´t represent Christianity as the USA is made up of Christians,Pagans, Atheists, Muslims etc - so if they are on war, so are all religions
3. No Church or religious organisation stands behind it
4. It is not an act of terrorism - it is a war and the US & EU are aggressors. They don´t blow up people at random quoting Bible.
5. The war is about MONEY not religion
But you may still decie to think that the whole west is Christian (not true) and that Christianity has a decisive voice in the action against Iraq (it doesn´t - money does). Choose to believe in whatever you want, but Crusades ended ages ago. And talking about West you can´t say it equals Christianity - there´s too many a denomination and non-Christian beliefs that it hardly is a Christian world. If you claim the terrorists are Christian - which denomination do you mean? Baptists? Methodists? Catholics? They´d rather fight against each other than go arm in arm on war against Muslims.
believe what you want dd, Im tired of replying to your pathetic posts saying "Bush doesn`t know what he is talking about so there is no terrorism".
|
|
| 39. |
14 Sep 2008 Sun 01:29 am |
|
I´m not soaying there´s no terrorism because Bush is an idiot who doesn´t know what he is saying - I´m saying that US and EU are aggressors in Iraq and shouldn´t have gone there. I said that it had nothing to do with religion - which is a notion you keep bringing up over and over again.
|
|
| 40. |
14 Sep 2008 Sun 01:34 am |
|
Again -
1. Bush has been proven to use wrong words or not understanding what he says million of times
İ just want to comment on this,if that was true,then what about Plain ?!
İ think there is more into it than just misusing the words claim.
İm sorry,but now after what Sarah Plain said,that was nothing but claims !
http://www.turkishclass.com/forumTitle_33694
|
|
|
