General/Off-topic |
|
|
|
You have to kill terrorists. Nothing else works.. (really?)
|
80. |
14 Jan 2009 Wed 12:42 am |
Smart enough to know its not !
|
|
81. |
14 Jan 2009 Wed 12:43 am |
so you post comments on a thread, but don´t actually read the other posts?
Quoting from Tam
Here you go :-
he first written attestation of the ethnonym "Arab" occurs in an Assyrian inscription of 853 BCE, where Shalmaneser III lists a King Gindibu of mâtu arbâi (Arab land) as among the people he defeated at the Battle of Karkar. Some of the names given in these texts are Aramaic, while others are the first attestations of Proto-Arabic dialects. In fact several different ethnonyms are found in Assyrian texts that are conventionally translated "Arab": Arabi, Arubu, Aribi and Urbi. The Hebrew Bible occasionally refers to Arvi peoples (or variants thereof), translated as "Arab" or "Arabian." The scope of the term at that early stage is unclear, but it seems to have referred to various desert-dwelling Semitic tribes in the Syrian Desert and Arabia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab
Hahah...there is little mention in the Hebrew Bible of Arvi...I follow the King James Bible however and once again very little mention..
|
|
82. |
14 Jan 2009 Wed 12:44 am |
Smart enough to know its not !
Then be my guest and start reading the King James bible my dear. Unless of course you follow the Hebrew Bible.
|
|
83. |
14 Jan 2009 Wed 12:49 am |
so you post comments on a thread, but don´t actually read the other posts?
Quoting from Tam
Here you go :-
he first written attestation of the ethnonym "Arab" occurs in an Assyrian inscription of 853 BCE, where Shalmaneser III lists a King Gindibu of mâtu arbâi (Arab land) as among the people he defeated at the Battle of Karkar. Some of the names given in these texts are Aramaic, while others are the first attestations of Proto-Arabic dialects. In fact several different ethnonyms are found in Assyrian texts that are conventionally translated "Arab": Arabi, Arubu, Aribi and Urbi. The Hebrew Bible occasionally refers to Arvi peoples (or variants thereof), translated as "Arab" or "Arabian." The scope of the term at that early stage is unclear, but it seems to have referred to various desert-dwelling Semitic tribes in the Syrian Desert and Arabia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab
so arabs are mentioned in the list of shalmaneser and allegedly in bible doesnt make them to be related to jews. i mean nobody seriously was engaged with tribes living in arabia. there was no need to establish any political or economical relations with them until they emerged out of sands to start their conquest.
|
|
84. |
14 Jan 2009 Wed 12:52 am |
Then be my guest and start reading the St. James bible my dear. Unless of course you follow the Hebrew Bible.
First,why do i need to read the bible to know it,when i can read Qur´an for same reason ?
Second,seems the bible say different things !
Third,how old is the bible ? and how old are human kind ?
à can read een just my own history ´sure older than the bible´,and it gives me good idea also about people living near by
So i guess i made my share of readings...the point... did you ?!
|
|
85. |
14 Jan 2009 Wed 01:04 am |
There are no mention of Arabs in the Bible...I don´t need to read Tami´s post to know this. Maybe his bible...
I don´t know how you feel about science....but....
"Jews and Arabs are genetic brothers"
The study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, found that Jewish
men shared a common set of genetic signatures with non-Jews from the Middle East, including Palestinians, Syrians, and Lebanese.
These signatures were significantly different from non-Jewish men outside of the Middle East. This means Jews and Arabs have more in common with each other, genetically speaking, than they do with any of the wider communities in which they might live.
|
|
86. |
14 Jan 2009 Wed 01:08 am |
I don´t know how you feel about science....but....
"Jews and Arabs are genetic brothers"
The study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, found that Jewish
men shared a common set of genetic signatures with non-Jews from the Middle East, including Palestinians, Syrians, and Lebanese.
These signatures were significantly different from non-Jewish men outside of the Middle East. This means Jews and Arabs have more in common with each other, genetically speaking, than they do with any of the wider communities in which they might live.
I read this article before and their Y chromosone is very similar.
|
|
87. |
14 Jan 2009 Wed 01:09 am |
First,why do i need to read the bible to know it,when i can read Qur´an for same reason ?
oh, no, dont read bible, it will bite you, you will lose your mind. she invited you to read it in order to find out about arabs being mentioned in it. you dont have to. anyway, knowledge never was a friend to muslims.
Second,seems the bible say different things !
yes, how do you know that?
Third,how old is the bible ? and how old are human kind ?
so?
à can read een just my own history ´sure older than the bible´,and it gives me good idea also about people living near by
excuse me, whose history? the history of arabs or of ancient egypt? who do you think wrote the history of egypt? who discovered and decoded it all? if not western historians you would know nothing about your so called "history".
So i guess i made my share of readings...the point... did you ?!
so far, you never made a point. its better when you talk about cakes, there you can make some good points.
|
|
88. |
14 Jan 2009 Wed 01:10 am |
I don´t know how you feel about science....but....
"Jews and Arabs are genetic brothers"
The study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, found that Jewish
men shared a common set of genetic signatures with non-Jews from the Middle East, including Palestinians, Syrians, and Lebanese.
These signatures were significantly different from non-Jewish men outside of the Middle East. This means Jews and Arabs have more in common with each other, genetically speaking, than they do with any of the wider communities in which they might live.
What does it matter really if jews and arabs are from the same family or not.
Or in the same context, why it should make any difference to the people if jesus was an arab or not?
Why do some people get irritated about the idea ´jesus was an arab´?
|
|
89. |
14 Jan 2009 Wed 01:11 am |
buff, i share genetypes with many unrelated ethnities away from my location. that doesnt prove anything.
I don´t know how you feel about science....but....
"Jews and Arabs are genetic brothers"
The study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, found that Jewish
men shared a common set of genetic signatures with non-Jews from the Middle East, including Palestinians, Syrians, and Lebanese.
These signatures were significantly different from non-Jewish men outside of the Middle East. This means Jews and Arabs have more in common with each other, genetically speaking, than they do with any of the wider communities in which they might live.
|
|
90. |
14 Jan 2009 Wed 01:13 am |
What does it matter really if jews and arabs are from the same family or not.
Or in the same context, why it should make any difference to the people if jesus was an arab or not?
Why do some people get irritated about the idea ´jesus was an arab´?
who exactly got irritated?
ah, btw, Jesus was not an arab. what a nonsense!
|
|
|