I think it goes without saying that tortures are hideous and should not take place in ANY part of the world. I can´t see how a country resorting to torture (US in this case) can call itself righteous. Tortures are never justified or morally acceptable.
As for the gang/club/camp part, I wonder why some people find it hard to understand that some other people have sense of humour and are not afraid to show it.
Not only is torture hideous, it is not effective in getting true actionable information. Under torture, victims will say anything to make it stop. It´s a totaly inefficient and counter productive method. I can´t see any positive rational for it´s use. It´s sadistic gratification.
It is shocking seeing how easily people can be led to commit such acts. In this I´m referring to the Stanford Prison Experiment.
Torturers exist because they feel their actions have aproval of their surperiors and the larger society. It seems that only by very loudly and clearly proclaiming it is NOT acceptable, it will stop.
"Officers´ messages
In light of this point it is interesting to ask what messages were being provided by fellow and, more critically, senior officers in the units where torture took place? Did those who didn´t approve fail to speak out for fear of being seen as weak or disloyal? Did senior officers who knew what was going on turn a blind eye or else simply file away reports of misbehaviour? "
One important part of that process is the dehumanization of the torture victim....and that takes place through making fun, belittling, attributing false attributes and objectifying others with little regard for the feelings of the victim.
We all have to be vigilent of our conduct.
Edited (5/31/2009) by alameda
[format]
Edited (5/31/2009) by alameda
|