General/Off-topic |
|
|
|
|
|
One Sided "Turkish Class" Administration!!!
|
| 30. |
02 Jul 2009 Thu 07:12 pm |
|
But when thehandsom wrote the column he probably knew that others would want to comment, so why did he disable the comments and not allow people to reply in the proper place? 
thehandsom probably knew who would comment what on his column and maybe he just wanted to spare you the trouble.
once again -- that is the nature of our columns -- columnists post their articles and they may choose to have comments or not. if any of you want to be serious columnists, you will have the same option.
|
|
| 31. |
02 Jul 2009 Thu 08:02 pm |
|
I haven´t seen too many comments on thehandsome´s post..for those of you who are complaining about not being able to comment. All I see is many complaints...so where are your comments to his post? It´s quite easy to start a topic and quote the person. How about the topic "Follow TheJanissary on a Tour of the Real Turkey" .
|
|
| 32. |
02 Jul 2009 Thu 08:06 pm |
|
I haven´t seen too many comments on thehandsome´s post..for those of you who are complaining about not being able to comment. All I see is many complaints...so where are your comments to his post? It´s quite easy to start a topic and quote the person. How about the topic "Follow TheJanissary on a Tour of the Real Turkey" .
I think you hit the nail right on the head here teaschip - the question is ´are they complaining about not being able to comment or commenting about not being able to complain´?? 
|
|
| 33. |
02 Jul 2009 Thu 09:31 pm |
|
I haven´t seen too many comments on thehandsome´s post..for those of you who are complaining about not being able to comment. All I see is many complaints...so where are your comments to his post? It´s quite easy to start a topic and quote the person. How about the topic "Follow TheJanissary on a Tour of the Real Turkey" .
That is why I posted the comment in this thread; I would have posted with the article had the option been there.
|
|
| 34. |
02 Jul 2009 Thu 09:33 pm |
|
 neigh! why does everything have to be a conspiracy!
|
|
| 35. |
02 Jul 2009 Thu 09:55 pm |
|
...
3. insulting Ataturk, with a reference (the reference is a street hooligan´s speech and that man is not a normal man as u can see from the picture) cant be accepted.
4. Principles of Ataturk can not be insulted in this way.
...
This is what I was refering to, sekerim 
|
|
| 36. |
02 Jul 2009 Thu 10:05 pm |
|
that means only compliments are accepted to columns
|
|
| 37. |
03 Jul 2009 Fri 12:57 am |
|
that means only compliments are accepted to columns
I wonder how much YOU love being criticized!!! 
|
|
| 38. |
03 Jul 2009 Fri 01:16 am |
|
I wonder how much YOU love being criticized!!!
I think we all know the answer to that one kitty!
|
|
| 39. |
03 Jul 2009 Fri 02:22 am |
|
that means only compliments are accepted to columns
Off ya, if he wanted compliments, he´d have enabled comments and then deleted negative ones. It´s his right to choose whether or not he wants others to comment, isn´t it? Like it was said, you may copy his article and comment on it in the forum. I suppose he wanted to avoid that "You cannot insult Ataturk" constructive remarks  . Nowhere does it say you cannot criticise Handsom´s article, do it here is you please...
|
|
| 40. |
03 Jul 2009 Fri 09:38 am |
|
I wonder how much YOU love being criticized!!!
Im the most criticized person on this site caným.
and this man is always flattered by mods but only I criticized his one sided negative thoughts about turkey and as usual u supportted him
|
|
|
