General/Off-topic |
Thread locked by a moderator or admin. |
|
|
Who Says Ataturk was a Dictator; Kurdish Propaganda 101
|
10. |
30 Oct 2009 Fri 02:30 pm |
no it`s all about hypocrisy versus being consistent.
The title of the thread was not "let´s make a list of dictators" I believe - the question was regarding Ataturk
|
|
11. |
30 Oct 2009 Fri 02:32 pm |
I was talking about the text that I posted on the definition of a dictator
Pay attention!
and you pay attention to this
it`s interesting that the only thing you picked as wrong from the text is the definition of dictator. so eveything else in it is true?
I`m showing you what else those who call Ataturk a dictator say, who they are, and what`s behind propaganda.
|
|
12. |
30 Oct 2009 Fri 02:35 pm |
I`m showing you what else those who call Ataturk a dictator say, who they are, and what`s behind propaganda.
It is clear that the piece you posted was propaganda, I do not need you to "show me" that! However, as I said, with regard to Ataturk being defined as a "dictator", they may well have a point, if you read the definition of "dictator" I posted above.
I am not saying he was a bad dictator - he may well have been a good dictator, but it is clear to me that he CAN be described as one
Edited (10/30/2009) by _AE_
Edited (10/30/2009) by _AE_
|
|
13. |
30 Oct 2009 Fri 02:39 pm |
It is clear that the piece you posted was propaganda, I do not need you to "show me" that! However, as I said, with regard to Ataturk being defined as a "dictator", they may well have a point, if you read the definition of "dictator" I posted above.
I am not saying he was a bad dictator - he may well have been a good dictator, but it is clear to me that he CAN be described as one
from the definition you sent, it`s obvious that George Washington was a dictator, and he wasn`t even a good dictator but one who genocided tens of thousands of Native Americans and who personally had Black slaves.
|
|
14. |
30 Oct 2009 Fri 02:41 pm |
from the definition you sent, it`s obvious that George Washington was a dictator, and he wasn`t even a good dictator but one who genocided tens of thousands of Native Americans and who personally had Black slaves.
It is true that George Washington can be deemed responsible for the genocide of tens of thousands of Native Americans and he personally had slaves. However, I am interested to know what, from the definition, makes him a "dictator". Interesting theory though, if true
However, it does not take away from the fact that Ataturk was a dictator!
Edited (10/30/2009) by _AE_
|
|
15. |
30 Oct 2009 Fri 02:45 pm |
It is true that George Washington can be deemed responsible for the genocide of tens of thousands of Native Americans and he personally had slaves. However, I am interested to know what, from the definition, makes him a "dictator". Interesting theory though, if true
However, it does not take away from the fact that Ataturk was a dictator!
as I said If you call Saddam a dictator like what all the christians does to defend the genocide in Iraq, then by the same criteria George Washington was a dictator too because he didn`t come to power with a legitimate election.
on the other hand, Ataturk let the opposition form their own party in his life time. which other dictator did that?
|
|
16. |
30 Oct 2009 Fri 02:47 pm |
as I said If you call Saddam a dictator like what all the christians does to defend the genocide in Iraq, then by the same criteria George Washington was a dictator too because he didn`t come to power with a legitimate election.
on the other hand, Ataturk let the opposition form their own party in his life time. which other dictator did that?
Ahh ok well you are basing all this on just one point -whether or not they are in power from legitimate election? In that case, yes ALL THREE are dictators!
|
|
17. |
30 Oct 2009 Fri 02:50 pm |
as I said If you call Saddam a dictator like what all the christians does to defend the genocide in Iraq, then by the same criteria George Washington was a dictator too because he didn`t come to power with a legitimate election.
on the other hand, Ataturk let the opposition form their own party in his life time. which other dictator did that?
Ahh ok well you are basing all this on just one point -whether or not they are in power from legitimate election? In that case, yes ALL THREE are dictators!
wow, finally I made you say George washington was a dictator! am I not always right? what`s the point of opposing?
|
|
18. |
30 Oct 2009 Fri 02:51 pm |
wow, finally I made you say George washington was a dictator! am I not always right? what`s the point of opposing?
WOw and I finally made you agree that Ataturk was a dictator? Am I not always right? What is the point of opposing - especially as I have no loyalities to the US
|
|
19. |
30 Oct 2009 Fri 02:54 pm |
WOw and I finally made you agree that Ataturk was a dictator? Am I not always right? What is the point of opposing - especially as I have no loyalities to the US
no that`s what you`ve always said based on the Kurdish propaganda you`re exposed to, but I also made you say George Washington was a dictator. I`m glad you`ve started to see the light. don`t worry, when you are fully enlightened you will drop the notion that Ataturk was a dictator.
|
|
20. |
30 Oct 2009 Fri 02:58 pm |
no that`s what you`ve always said based on the Kurdish propaganda you`re exposed to, but I also made you say George Washington was a dictator. I`m glad you`ve started to see the light. don`t worry, when you are fully enlightened you will drop the notion that Ataturk was a dictator.
Yes it is my aim to become as brainwashed enlightened as you!
|
|
|
(22 Messages in 3 pages - View all)
1 [2] 3
|
Thread locked by a moderator or admin. |
|
|