I have no problem with the Gypsies. I might as well use the example of a Black boy growing up in notorious Harlem as has been done by many artists, singers etc.
What is implied here is the need for improving a skill in the absence of a other choices.
As long as you can not present what can be called a more ethical alternative to millions of young people who are forced economically to enter the porn industry you must not complain of the industry itself. Since it actually serves as a last resort to make up for society´s failing ends.
There are probably four kinds of females in the porn industry.
* Those economically forced to enter
* Those considering it as a golden key to a luxourious life.
* Those who are addicted to sex
* Those who are physically forced to enter.
The first one is more specifically a social problem whose cure is elsewhere. The second and the third are the acts of free choice. The fourth one is where the problem lies. Though illegal conduct is not an exclusive problem of the porn industry, since there seems to be a greater potential for crime and other attached moral considerations, it would be normal for this sector to exist under the scrutinity of the government.
Ironically, the porn industry also flourish in small welfare countries like Sweden and Germany where there are fewer economic complaints. In these countries, the general outlook is often different from that in big but not so homogeniously developed nations (e.g. US).
We should now question an age old phenomenon. Females relying on their physical beauty to get things done. While this is not the major incentive there are of course many women who use their bodies although they have no major economical difficulties. These women are like businessmen who trade their bodies in exchange of luxury. If you ask me, there is little difference between them and rich-husband-hunters.
Edited (12/8/2009) by vineyards
|