| 1240. |
16 May 2008 Fri 04:46 am |
|
Quoting thehandsom: I am not sure about your defence about article 301 and the way you look at the changes Turkey is trying to do to its consutition right now. |
Im not trying to defend the law, im just pointing out the double standards.
Quoting thehandsom: I guess you are supporting one of these strange groups which try to associate the changes to the consitutition to sevr. |
Which group? I do not support any group, i only tell my opionions. And about the sevr, u cannot blame people to think like that when they see the double standards of EU or maps of middle east which published in US military journals, simply people do not trust and believe their sincerity. So mr thehandsom which strange group do you fall into? the group of flatterers?
Quoting thehandsom: It was ambiguous, confusing, open to interptretation, cloudy, vague. |
Agreed. It should be stated clearly.
Quoting thehandsom: I quite like know how many court cases opened against its intellects in half way decent europen countries for insulting 'britishness/germanness/polishness etc'. |
It is not our point here i think…
Quoting thehandsom: We should have changed those anti democratic laws (many from the army times from 1983) by ourselves. |
Agreed but by ourselves, i think we do not need anyone to teach anything by meddling in our internal affairs.
Quoting thehandsom: And I still dont get the hatred people feel about Orhan Pamuk.. |
I do not mind Pamuk, he can do whatever he want but not provoking people.
Quoting thehandsom: I am sorry but I can show you many many surets from Kuran here and your only defence will be 'wrong interpretation' for them. |
I am sorry but i can show you refutations to them and then you will come with new questions. So it is better for u to research, actually you can find ur answers from net, if u make a good research. If u are interested, i can give u somelinks . Islam do not need reform as u cant change Kuran but for sure people needs.
|
|
