Turkey |
Thread locked by a moderator or admin. |
|
|
|
|
'Anatolian women''
|
| 150. |
02 Jun 2007 Sat 06:00 pm |
|
I canoot understand what are you talking about?
Do you know history?
Türkiye is the first country in the world to allow woman to vote in the the world history.
Anatolian Women have been electing prime minister, minister, deputy, governor, president of law court, general manager, director, professor...
They are engineer, doctor, teacher, expert, officer, merchant, businesswoman...and housewife...
|
|
| 151. |
02 Jun 2007 Sat 06:00 pm |
|
Quoting azade: qdemir - where did you find these statistics? I'd like to see how it was 20-30 years ago if there are any records of it  |
1927-2000
http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreIstatistikTablo.do?istab_id=202
|
|
| 152. |
02 Jun 2007 Sat 06:04 pm |
|
Quoting yilgun-7: I canoot understand what are you talking about?
Do you know history?
Türkiye is the first country in the world to allow woman to vote in the the world history.
Anatolian Women have been electing prime minister, minister, deputy, governor, president of law court, general manager, director, professor...
They are engineer, doctor, teacher, expert, officer, merchant, businesswoman...and housewife...
|
|
|
| 153. |
02 Jun 2007 Sat 06:08 pm |
|
Thank you for the link
I was just wondering because I was looking to get something confirmed. If you go back to just 75 the percentage living in villages is 56...now I know there are perfectly normal explanations for this but I also think one of the explanations is that the army forced people to move to cities, especially in eastern Anatolia. I know loads and loads of people who have been köylü until 15-20 ago because it was dangerous for them to stay in the villages. It would be interesting to compare it to other countries though to see if there's a statistical connection.
Anyway this is off topic.
|
|
| 154. |
02 Jun 2007 Sat 06:14 pm |
|
Quoting azade: Thank you for the link
I was just wondering because I was looking to get something confirmed. If you go back to just 75 the percentage living in villages is 56...now I know there are perfectly normal explanations for this but I also think one of the explanations is that the army forced people to move to cities, especially in eastern Anatolia. I know loads and loads of people who have been köylü until 15-20 ago because it was dangerous for them to stay in the villages. It would be interesting to compare it to other countries though to see if there's a statistical connection.
Anyway this is off topic. |
Most of those people who had had to leave their villages due to the PKK terror in the late 1980s and early 1990s have returned to their villages in the last ten years.
|
|
| 155. |
02 Jun 2007 Sat 06:21 pm |
|
and yes Turkey has more important social and economical problems.Sure theres a political regime worries to,but i think thats the latest thing which worth to think.joblessness,living difficulties,social injustice,education etc... more imortant things to talk about then the political worries...
|
|
| 156. |
02 Jun 2007 Sat 06:27 pm |
|
Quoting qdemir:
Most of those people who had had to leave their villages due to the PKK terror in the late 1980s and early 1990s have returned to their villages in the last ten years. |
I don't know what they have done in general but very few people have moved back in the far south eastern Turkey because their old homes andlands have been destroyed and they don't have any resources to build it up again. Many have also been forced to move to the other end of Turkey and it's been so many years that they have already built up a new life there.
|
|
| 157. |
02 Jun 2007 Sat 06:29 pm |
|
Quoting azade: Quoting qdemir:
Most of those people who had had to leave their villages due to the PKK terror in the late 1980s and early 1990s have returned to their villages in the last ten years. |
I don't know what they have done in general but very few people have moved back in the far south eastern Turkey because their old homes andlands have been destroyed and they don't have any resources to build it up again. Many have also been forced to move to the other end of Turkey and it's been so many years that they have already built up a new life there. |
|
|
| 158. |
02 Jun 2007 Sat 06:36 pm |
|
Quoting MrX67:
if we love each other a bit more a bet we can fix all the hardest problems,just we have to be aware of values and richness of this great country.. |
I agree
|
|
| 159. |
02 Jun 2007 Sat 07:54 pm |
|
WHAT WE ARE FACING HERE IS STANDARD PKK PROPAGANDA...
1. SPRINKLE FEW RELIGIOUS CRAPS,
2. INSULT TURKISH ARMY,
3. CRY FOR PITY AND HELP FROM OUTSIDERS
THEY NEVER MENTION WHY NON-PKK KURDISH CITIZENS OF SOUTHEASTERN TURKEY HAD TO BE RELOCATED, IN THE FIRST PLACE. BECAUSE OTHER TURKS LIVING IN WESTERN TURKEY LOVED TO HAVE MORE KURDS AROUND?, or BECAUSE THOSE NON PPK KURDS HAD TO FACE PKK TERROR IF THEY DID NOT HELP PKK, YET FACE THE TURKISH ARMY IF THEY DID: A VERY DANGEORUS LIFE IN BOTH CASES.
I ADDRESS YOU ALL ...DO NOT FALL INTO THIS PKK TRAP...JUST IGNORE THEM...
|
|
| 160. |
02 Jun 2007 Sat 08:16 pm |
|
Quoting libralady: It is very sad that a few harmless photos on YouTube can provoke such unreasonable behaviour. Opinions will differ but does that mean everyone is wrong?
Is it not about time this thread was locked??  |
Again LibraLady, these are not harmless photos. It is political propaganada.
|
|
|
