I am not her advocate but she couldn't expressed herself well. There was some miscommunication. The message was garbled during the tranmission.
I don't think she meant she should cast more votes than those who she critised. She wanted to make a point that those people sold their votes for some "kurubaklagiller and kömür vs" (wheat, rice, bulgur, check-pea and coal) which is unfortunately true and their number is huge. She meant she didn't sell her vote like them (hence the question "is my vote the same as theirs?"). AK party bought a lot of votes that way. Look at the reactions by the AK party. They got very angry. Why did they take her this seriously?