General/Off-topic |
|
|
|
What happened to Burka thread?
|
110. |
22 May 2010 Sat 12:54 am |
You are fighting against TLC oligarchy !!!
Hahaha!... You made me laugh!... So straightforward, direct!.. Though open to discussion, I like it!
|
|
111. |
22 May 2010 Sat 01:34 am |
Too much bla bla about a picture that was supposed to be a joke. I didn´t think it was super funny, but humor is personal. There was no comment on the freedom, or anything like that of the burka´d women, so the discussion was pointless.
|
|
112. |
22 May 2010 Sat 03:44 am |
I don´t want to argue anymore. I think spritzer will come back with a new nick. She can defend herself. Bye.
I suggest that she reads the forum rules next time (when starting an account you agree to follow our rules). One of the rules says that if you were deleted for breaking the rules, you can return once more, but if you continue to break the rules and end up deleted again, you can´t return again.
|
|
113. |
22 May 2010 Sat 03:46 am |
Only once i skimmed through that thread yesterday and the last post i saw was from girlegirl containing heavy personal insults to spritzer. If spritzer deleted for personal insults in forum, girlegirl must be deleted too with same reason. Just my understanding...
You know what (and sorry for the delayed response but I was in meetings this afternoon), if admin feels that I should be deleted for stating I thought spritzer was being an arrogant bully, then so be it. I can guarantee you I won’t whine to my friends about it. I would accept as my own responsibility for my actions and comments. I know the rules here.
What I would point out the difference between spritzer and I. And that is that I don’t attack just because I disagree with someone. I read their tone and respond in kind so that I can be sure I am at a level that person will understand.
Am I always right in how I respond, absolutely not. Will I tone it down if asked to…..absolutely. Spriter chose her own fate.
|
|
114. |
22 May 2010 Sat 09:50 am |
Your posts are still here, so obviously it is not negative opinions that is deleted.
As for the insults, you don´t see the deleted messages so you don´t know the full extent of the things said and done after multiple warnings.
Come on admin. My posts in the deleted thread are gone now and I don´t think there was anything wrong with them. I spent some time on them and you deleted the whole thread (as strange as it seems it was started by yourself) so I feel like you have stolen my time. You should give us an explaination at least why you have done so.
Why delete the thread you started yourself? Why not just lock it? I am curious.
|
|
115. |
23 May 2010 Sun 12:44 am |
Come on admin. My posts in the deleted thread are gone now and I don´t think there was anything wrong with them. I spent some time on them and you deleted the whole thread (as strange as it seems it was started by yourself) so I feel like you have stolen my time. You should give us an explaination at least why you have done so.
Why delete the thread you started yourself? Why not just lock it? I am curious.
I think they asked a question and didn´t like the answers. 
|
|
116. |
23 May 2010 Sun 01:43 am |
I suggest that she reads the forum rules next time (when starting an account you agree to follow our rules). One of the rules says that if you were deleted for breaking the rules, you can return once more, but if you continue to break the rules and end up deleted again, you can´t return again.
If the rules were always followed in this case then sev yanliz/ bos sevdim/ nefretebilir would no longer be here but ohh she is .. The rules seem to vary a bit from person to person as far as I can see
|
|
117. |
23 May 2010 Sun 02:46 am |
The rules seem to vary a bit from person to person as far as I can see
Well said! I would say ´quite´, though.
|
|
118. |
23 May 2010 Sun 03:06 am |
If the rules were always followed in this case then sev yanliz/ bos sevdim/ nefretebilir would no longer be here but ohh she is .. The rules seem to vary a bit from person to person as far as I can see
I start to believe she is not a person. She might be a computerized chat programme which picks up a word from the previous poster and makes a sentence with random words.
I know most of you guys are rightly agitated with her but she is quite funny really. And I am sure she does not know the meaning of what she is typing..
|
|
119. |
23 May 2010 Sun 04:56 am |
Come on admin. My posts in the deleted thread are gone now and I don´t think there was anything wrong with them. I spent some time on them and you deleted the whole thread (as strange as it seems it was started by yourself) so I feel like you have stolen my time. You should give us an explaination at least why you have done so.
Why delete the thread you started yourself? Why not just lock it? I am curious.
Fair point, that thread is restored.
|
|
120. |
23 May 2010 Sun 04:58 am |
If the rules were always followed in this case then sev yanliz/ bos sevdim/ nefretebilir would no longer be here but ohh she is .. The rules seem to vary a bit from person to person as far as I can see
We deleted this user twice and now that she may be back with a new account we are being accused of treating her in a privileged way. This is a really interesting way of looking at things.
Edited (5/23/2010) by admin
|
|
|