"Madonna plans to have 10 schools built in the African country Malawi."

Madonna on okul Afrika ülkesi Malavisi’nde inşa edilmiş planla eder.

1. If you are naming a specific country, is this the correct way to identify where the country is? Or should possesive be on Afrika and -ülkesi ?

2. Can the auxillary verb etmek be used first passivly then with aorist? I wasn´t sure as both verbs use etmek.

3. And for the passive form of build, "to have built", would the -miş (edilmiş tense be used if its in a news story?

(btw, the sentence is true fact, I read the  news article earlier today 

I used future tense" inşa edilecek" because I guess they havent been built yet. If so, we cant say "inşa edilmiş" here.

As for 3:

To have x V-pp = x yaptırmak/ettirmek

So

Madonna plans to have 10 schools built in the African country Malawi.

Madonna, Afrika ülkesi Malawi´de 10 okul yaptırmayı (or inşa ettirmeyi) planliyor.

Gokuyum seems to bring up a good point. And using a future tense here would seem to make sense since the schools will be constructed in the future. However, if right now they are only "planned" to be built, its difficult for me to know for sure and why I guessed it´d be -miş.

Oh, hmm. I had thought "plan" is an imported word, so to make it a verb, it needed etmek? And I think I understand that -tir use this way is causative, i.e. to "have built". So yaptırmayı would be understood through context I presume? or I can use inşa ettirmeyi that way.

One question though. Why doesn´t the location (Malavi) take on the suffix -´nde However, you would use that to say for example;

"We´ve been living in Kuşadası for 2 months" 

Which, from another post of mine, was determined to be:

iki aydır Kuşadası´nda yaşıyoruz.

Just saying that sometimes, the native speakers here give different corrections for the same things. But i do understand from Abla´s topic, that its good to learn the literal meanings of words of the language, so we understand them better. But for this case, can I presume that both corrections (from Gokuyum and Si+) are correct?

I thought "built" as an adjective but your explanation makes more sense. Peace.

Because Malavi and Kuşadası are not the same kind of propers. Kuş adası is a compound noun, remember? And when you add case endings to a compound pronominal -n- is needed in the middle. Otherwise not.

Ah I understand now, thanks Abla! I keep forgetting that rule about compound nouns. I should go study and research that a bit more I think.