Language |
|
|
|
|
|
Another question about the -meden suffix
|
| 1. |
04 Aug 2006 Fri 08:20 pm |
|
Is the -meden suffix really a single suffix or is it actually two separate suffixes -me-den
-me being the verbal noun siffix and -den being the ablative case suffix.
|
|
| 2. |
05 Aug 2006 Sat 02:05 am |
|
if you think that way than everything is suffix in turkish.
you know -me is the negative suffix and -den is suffix to say from so you can understand that it conssists of 2 suffix
|
|
| 3. |
05 Aug 2006 Sat 02:13 am |
|
then its true ? it really consist of 2 suffix ?
|
|
| 4. |
05 Aug 2006 Sat 02:27 am |
|
i am sorry but the suffix -den is not the one i mentioned.it doesnt mean from.i am sorry i am too sleepy  i am sorry again, jusr memorize is as a whole .. -meden
|
|
| 5. |
05 Aug 2006 Sat 06:53 pm |
|
I was more interested in the historic linguistic evolution than the way the suffix is currently used. It was more out of academic interest that I asked the question.
|
|
| 6. |
05 Aug 2006 Sat 10:20 pm |
|
i think its 2 also den is of
|
|
| 7. |
06 Aug 2006 Sun 02:42 am |
|
Quoting bod: Is the -meden suffix really a single suffix or is it actually two separate suffixes -me-den
-me being the verbal noun siffix and -den being the ablative case suffix. |
Please don't leave us without a single example
|
|
| 8. |
07 Aug 2006 Mon 04:38 pm |
|
Quoting caliptrix: Quoting bod: Is the -meden suffix really a single suffix or is it actually two separate suffixes -me-den
-me being the verbal noun siffix and -den being the ablative case suffix. |
Please don't leave us without a single example |
You should be able to provide an example better than I 
|
|
|
