Living - working in Turkey |
|
|
|
homosexuality in Turkey
|
30. |
03 Dec 2005 Sat 01:45 am |
Quoting evilhermit: Bod, you so rock! |
I'm not sure I rock.......although I might wobble a little when I am drunk
|
|
31. |
03 Dec 2005 Sat 01:49 am |
Quoting oeince: hi bod..i wanna answer u by asking a question if u allow..what would happen if all the males were homosexual? |
oeince I would like to pose the same question myself!
|
|
32. |
03 Dec 2005 Sat 02:00 am |
so can i ask ur answer?did u able to find an answer?
|
|
33. |
03 Dec 2005 Sat 02:09 am |
Oh to see the world in such a brilliant, blissful, bi-polar state
|
|
34. |
03 Dec 2005 Sat 02:11 am |
Quoting Joey: Quoting oeince: hi bod..i wanna answer u by asking a question if u allow..what would happen if all the males were homosexual? |
oeince I would like to pose the same question myself! |
It would put a question mark over the future of mankind.
|
|
35. |
03 Dec 2005 Sat 02:32 am |
Quote: Quoting oeince: hi bod..i wanna answer u by asking a question if u allow..what would happen if all the males were homosexual? |
It would put a question mark over the future of mankind. |
What utter drivel!!!
Sexual preference is all about who we as human beings are attracted to. And it is about who we choose to get sexual pleasure from. With the exception of dophins, there is not another creature on the planet that shows any sign of having sex for pleasure - indeed for several creature, mostly insects, sex results in death.
Do the rest of the creatures on this planet have a question mark over them because they do not enjoy sex????? Of course they don't!!! *IF* the impossible were to happen and every woman and every man were to turn gay then men and women would still have sex - not for enjoyment perhaps but for the survival of the species.
But it is nonsense to ask the question in the first place!
By the very fact that you have asked the question you have shown that you know nothing about the intrinsic sexual needs of human beings and how those needs are expressed and fufilled - the idea of one man with one woman is not a natural state for human existance. It is something enforced by social rules and largely propagated by quasi-social doctrine.
|
|
36. |
03 Dec 2005 Sat 02:45 am |
i respect ur labor..thanks for sharing ur ideas..and answering me (a man who knows nothing about sexual pleasure as ur scene) so long..take care..
|
|
37. |
03 Dec 2005 Sat 02:48 am |
Quoting oeince: i respect ur labor..thanks for sharing ur ideas..and answering me (a man who knows nothing about sexual pleasure as ur scene) so long..take care..
|
As my scene???
Perhaps I should point out that I am not gay.......my girlfriend will testify to that in case there is any doubt!
|
|
38. |
03 Dec 2005 Sat 02:50 am |
Bod you amaze me! Lucky old dolphins!
|
|
39. |
03 Dec 2005 Sat 02:53 am |
Quoting Joey: Bod you amaze me! |
I have been known to amaze and surprise people before.....
In fact it is a bit of a speciality of mine
|
|
40. |
03 Dec 2005 Sat 02:59 am |
Quoting bod:
But it is nonsense to ask the question in the first place!
By the very fact that you have asked the question you have shown that you know nothing about the intrinsic sexual needs of human beings and how those needs are expressed and fufilled - the idea of one man with one woman is not a natural state for human existance. It is something enforced by social rules and largely propagated by quasi-social doctrine. |
what is being natural? all thought in biology is wrong then... we, turks, not againts to ppl according to their choices, we accept them as human beings and behave them as so... but when they glomorize this and carries this as like a world problem... as ppl are not dying in africa coz of starvation in any second... this is the thing that is nonsense...
|
|
|