News articles, events, announcements |
|
|
|
|
|
Gay pleas for help fall on deaf ears
|
| 50. |
18 May 2009 Mon 01:34 pm |
|
Normal, natural heterosexual sex is sex with someone of the opposite sex. One version of unnatural sex is sex with someone of the same sex - simple as that!  . (Do homosexuals normally have sex on top of the blankets in daylight then? I admit I didn´t know that
  only if you are called George
|
|
| 51. |
18 May 2009 Mon 03:47 pm |
|
Hey! That one´s much better than Google translator! Pity it doesn´t do Turkish 
Check this one out.....it is the most complete one I´ve seen.
|
|
| 52. |
18 May 2009 Mon 06:09 pm |
|
For me the love of two adults who both agree with their relationship is fine even though some of these relationships are not my personal choice. Who am I, who are you (general) to deny two adults to have their relationship seeing formalised? If one denies it for religious reasons, I personally think that person is sitting on God´s throne. So yes, gay marriage should be allowed - or at least gay relationships should be allowed - but to compare it with polygamy is comparing on non-equal base because then there will be always at least one person loosing.
I guess I could pose the same question back..who am I or who are we to deny someone to have more than 1 wife or husband? What makes it any different? If your saying it´s ok to marry the same sex, why would we put conditions on how many you can marry? Polygamists could use the same arguement as gays do to obtain legal rights. This opens a door for many more people who feel their rights are restricted. I personally don´t think there is anything wrong with following God´s intention for men and women.
|
|
| 53. |
18 May 2009 Mon 07:09 pm |
|
I guess I could pose the same question back..who am I or who are we to deny someone to have more than 1 wife or husband? What makes it any different? If your saying it´s ok to marry the same sex, why would we put conditions on how many you can marry? Polygamists could use the same arguement as gays do to obtain legal rights. This opens a door for many more people who feel their rights are restricted. I personally don´t think there is anything wrong with following God´s intention for men and women.
I have to agree with you here - not a great fan of same sex marriages and all the fuss that is made about them - some famous ones have now "divorved" so not a lot different from straights. And yes, what right is going to next, the right to have sex with animals has not been mentioned yet! 
|
|
| 54. |
18 May 2009 Mon 09:13 pm |
|
the right to have sex with animals has not been mentioned yet!
Don´t be ridiculous....handsom hasn´t been around in weeks!!
|
|
| 55. |
18 May 2009 Mon 09:28 pm |
|
Don´t be ridiculous....handsom hasn´t been around in weeks!!
Elisabeth! I´m shocked!! What do you mean???? 
|
|
| 56. |
18 May 2009 Mon 09:37 pm |
|
Normal, natural heterosexual sex is sex with someone of the opposite sex. One version of unnatural sex is sex with someone of the same sex - simple as that! . (Do homosexuals normally have sex on top of the blankets in daylight then? I admit I didn´t know that
Nope. What you describe is heterosexual sex. Not specifically ´normal´. I´m very interested to hear what Alpha calls normal. Is it normal to do ´it´ outside your bedroom, in public, to like SM, to use toys, to read/watch porn, to have several partners at the same time or in a continuously row of lovers, to have an age gap of decades between partners, etc? Still, all these things are practised by people who call themselves ´normal heterosexuals´. Anyone who can enlighten me?
|
|
| 57. |
18 May 2009 Mon 09:40 pm |
|
I guess I could pose the same question back..who am I or who are we to deny someone to have more than 1 wife or husband? What makes it any different? If your saying it´s ok to marry the same sex, why would we put conditions on how many you can marry? Polygamists could use the same arguement as gays do to obtain legal rights. This opens a door for many more people who feel their rights are restricted. I personally don´t think there is anything wrong with following God´s intention for men and women.
Your last sentence is problematic for me. As holy books are written by people, it is for me as an agnost, very difficult to see why people - centuries later - shouls put themselves in his place and tell others what THEY think HE wants.
|
|
| 58. |
18 May 2009 Mon 09:42 pm |
|
I shall stop even "hellos" to Trudy, if she picks "insest" as the next taboo to be broken...
As you never ´hellood´ me before, there´s nothing to stop. BTW incest is something I never will see as a taboo that needs to be broken.
|
|
| 59. |
18 May 2009 Mon 09:57 pm |
|
Nope. What you describe is heterosexual sex. Not specifically ´normal´. I´m very interested to hear what Alpha calls normal. Is it normal to do ´it´ outside your bedroom, in public, to like SM, to use toys, to read/watch porn, to have several partners at the same time or in a continuously row of lovers, to have an age gap of decades between partners, etc? Still, all these things are practised by people who call themselves ´normal heterosexuals´. Anyone who can enlighten me?
Trudy,
have you ever heard of discretion.....
Shakespeare, in Henry IV, Part One, 1596:
Falstaff: ´The better part of valour is discretion; in the which better part I have saved my life.´
Something to think about....maybe?
|
|
| 60. |
18 May 2009 Mon 10:18 pm |
|
Trudy,
have you ever heard of discretion.....
Shakespeare, in Henry IV, Part One, 1596:
Falstaff: ´The better part of valour is discretion; in the which better part I have saved my life.´
Something to think about....maybe?
The answer is no. I´m not a prude hypocrite.
|
|
|
