Welcome
Login:   Pass:     Register - Forgot Password - Resend Activation

Turkish Class Forums / Turkey

Turkey

Add reply to this discussion
Moderators: libralady, sonunda
remembering Greeks of Istanbul
(33 Messages in 4 pages - View all)
1 [2] 3 4
10.       metehan2001
501 posts
 10 Jan 2007 Wed 02:26 am

1.The quotation made by kadersokak was written in a book whose author is a greek nationalist, therefore he is not objective in his judgements.
2. No one likes fighting between communities, but unfortunately it happens. When we analyze a historical event, we also try to understand why it has happened and what reasons caused that event. So, belowed passages explains the reasons behind that event. If you go to the belowed WEB PAGE addres from where I quoted the following passages, you will see how Greeks had tortured and tyrannized Turkish people, before 1955 Istanbul incidents. Let's be objective, please.

http://www.charm.net/~trnc/h9.html#3

3. And finally, a question to Kadersokak: What was your aim, kadersokak, when you decide to send that message to the site members? To improve the relations between the Grek and Turkish people? Or to develop the dialogs between this site memebers who are Turkish and foreigners from different countries? I mean what will be the use of that message you sent? You should also read the folloving informations, I think.

THE GREEK ONSLAUGHT

The most dramatic and tragic Greek offensive was launched on the Christmas eve on the Turkish positions in Kumsal area of Nicosia and particularly on the mixed suburb of Kaimakli (Omorphita).

The three children of a Turkish Major who was serving as a doctor in the Turkish mainland contingent and his wife were killed in the bath tub where they hide themselves. The Greek armed gangs riddled them with machine-gun bullets.



At midday Sampson, Who was the leader of a notorious EOKA assassination group during 1950's, with his private militia made an all-out attack against the Turks of Küçük Kaimakli (Omorphita). They attacked with much superior weapons, including light anti-aircraft machine-guns. The Turkish Cypriots' resistance was exhausted and resulted in heavy losses. 700 Turkish hostages, mostly women and children were taken away by Sampson's gang and imprisoned in a Greek school.

"The Greek irregulars ran wild, killing scores of Turks, including women and children, smashing and looting Turkish houses and taking hundreds of hostages" .

Here are a few selected pieces from the international press reporters who witnessed the Greek onslaught during the bloody Christmas days of 1963:

"The 70 year old Turkish Imam of Omorphita was also killed together with his crippled son who were shot on sight".

The following is how S. Gibbons described the Greek attacks on two Turkish villages of Mathiati and Kochatis:

As the terrified Turks shuffled along, cowering from the blows from rifle butts, the mob rushed into the houses, dragged the blazing logs from the fireplaces and threw them at curtains and on beds. The wooden roof beams, dried out over many years, smoked then crackled into flames.

Along the street the Turks were driven, dragging their wounded; women, many in their night dress and bare feet.

Before some of the buildings had fully caught fire, groups of them dashed inside, smashing furniture and dishware, grabbing valuables and stuffing them them into their pockets.

Terrified noises from behind the houses drew the attention of the attackers to the Turkish livestock.

Breaking into the barns, they machine-gunned milk cows, goats and sheep. Hens were thrown into the air and blasted by bullets as they squawked and fluttered, their pathetic bodies exploding in feathered puffs. The mob roared in blood-crazed delirium.

The Turks were driven out of the village, along the freezing open road. Near the next village, Kochatis, an all Turkish area the tormented refugees were left.

While the Turks of Kochatis rushed out to help their neighbours, the mob... returned to Mathiati to continue their orgy of shooting, burning and pillaging".

H. Scott Gibbons, Peace without Honour, p.10




INTERNATIONAL

11.       SuiGeneris
3922 posts
 10 Jan 2007 Wed 07:39 am

here we started again...

First of all, we have to accept that both events were written to our communities pages with black inks... both events are sad...

if you comment after such post in your way... i may ask a few questions to you...

-being nationalist doesnt make a people subjective on a topic... everyone has that somehow as much as you, i and others have.

-being objective cant be named as they killed us so we can kill them... no i cant accept that...

-i am sorry but does what its written on the link you gave and what you post really gives you a right to murder not only greeks any civillian from other nations?

if so can this be any different from "blood fued"?
again if so? these people can go till Malazgirt War to 1071 if you start to search why its started... or maybe more past...

their killing you, order murdering you doesnt mean that you can kill them... whatever it happens you cant have any right to do such things... also this doesnt decrease and makes you release from what you have done...
if they kill your people as a government... you should ask from your people lives those areas to move your own country... so the government was working well? (actually we cant ever say that it was and is working well after Ataturk)

- not only in this book or sentences Orhan Pamuk hisself also says the same statements... so its useless to search any aim under this topic...

if we continue like that this will be no different that a competition to be preeminent in something trifling.
Better to look forward instead of looking the blacks to histories pages...

12.       sophie
2712 posts
 10 Jan 2007 Wed 10:48 am

Dear metehan2001,

You say that “If you go to the below WEB PAGE address, you will see how Greeks had tortured and tyrannized Turkish people, before 1955 Istanbul incidents” but the events described there, are referring to the year 1963 and after (however, for what its worth, know that I feel ashamed as a Greek to read this info).

You say that this book is written by a Greek nationalist and thus it can’t be objective. Is this information also partial? Wikipedia

Finally, you suggest that we should all be objective. I know I am. Can you be?

I’ve been trying to find an explanation (not today but for quite sometime now) for the events of September 1955, something that would sustain this tragedy, but I have come up with nothing.

There was only a bomb explosion in Ataturk’s house in Selanik, which bomb – as it was proved later – was put there by a Turk, who was following orders from the Turkish government. I’m not blaming the people who committed these acts of violence. They didn’t know. Your authorities are the ones to blame.

I have found reasonable excuses for every other dark incident in the history of Greece and Turkey. And in fact, I always tend to put the blame on us, Greeks. We took what we deserved in 1922, maybe the expulsion of the Greek minority in 1964 was justified (!?) and maybe we forced our luck too later in Cyprus and so on (although all these subjects are under discussion). But this particular event was absolutely unjustified and unfair.

Admitting the mistakes that our own countries have made, doesn’t make us traitors. It only means that we are healthy minded persons, who want to understand the motives and the reasons, follow the events, count the losses and finally be able to come to an objective conclusion, which will help us avoid the same mistakes in the future. Burying the hatred without analyzing it, can only work temporarily. One day though, it will dig its way out again and the same mistakes will be repeated.

13.       metehan2001
501 posts
 10 Jan 2007 Wed 03:06 pm

Quoting sophie:

Dear metehan2001,

You say that “If you go to the below WEB PAGE address, you will see how Greeks had tortured and tyrannized Turkish people, before 1955 Istanbul incidents” but the events described there, are referring to the year 1963 and after (however, for what its worth, know that I feel ashamed as a Greek to read this info).

You say that this book is written by a Greek nationalist and thus it can’t be objective. Is this information also partial? Wikipedia

Finally, you suggest that we should all be objective. I know I am. Can you be?

I’ve been trying to find an explanation (not today but for quite sometime now) for the events of September 1955, something that would sustain this tragedy, but I have come up with nothing.

There was only a bomb explosion in Ataturk’s house in Selanik, which bomb – as it was proved later – was put there by a Turk, who was following orders from the Turkish government. I’m not blaming the people who committed these acts of violence. They didn’t know. Your authorities are the ones to blame.

I have found reasonable excuses for every other dark incident in the history of Greece and Turkey. And in fact, I always tend to put the blame on us, Greeks. We took what we deserved in 1922, maybe the expulsion of the Greek minority in 1964 was justified (!?) and maybe we forced our luck too later in Cyprus and so on (although all these subjects are under discussion). But this particular event was absolutely unjustified and unfair.

Admitting the mistakes that our own countries have made, doesn’t make us traitors. It only means that we are healthy minded persons, who want to understand the motives and the reasons, follow the events, count the losses and finally be able to come to an objective conclusion, which will help us avoid the same mistakes in the future. Burying the hatred without analyzing it, can only work temporarily. One day though, it will dig its way out again and the same mistakes will be repeated.



Dear Sophie,
In the passage which I quoted it is clearly said that the Greek attacked towards Turkish people started in the beginning of 1950's. During this period, Turkish people in Turkey had heard from radios daily the cruel crimes towards Turkish by Greek EOKA militants in Cyprus supported by The Government of Greece. At the same time, very tragic news related to Turkish people living in Greece were coming to Turkey from Greece through newspapers. The last thing which made Turkish peoples's patience came to an end was the bomb attact on Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's House in Selanik. So, as I try to summarize here, there were so many reasons which caused 1955 Istanbul events.
As I told in my first message, my opinion is nobody defends wars and fights and no one should. But if someone doesn't try to study a historical event without searching the reasons behind it, can not claim that he/she is objective. If we study near historical events and conflicts between Turkish and Greek people, we should see and talk what both side done. In the quoted passage made by kadersokak from the mentioned book of Greek author, is given some information from his perspective and is never said what were the real reasons which had forced Turkish people to take such an unpleasant action to Greeks living in Istanbul. During the same period and a little before that what were happening in Cyprus and Greece towards poor Turkish people? Without mentioning Greek attacts to Turkish people, if someone talks about what Turkish people done in history what will the readers think? Ooo, look at this Turks? How cruel and barbarian they were? But the truth is we are not barbarians and cruels. If you kill my brother, I will be angry. If you behave well, I will be nice towards you. This is human nature.
We are fed up with the lies of Armenians who are accusing us continuously. It seems to me that now Greek people's turn. Some international powers tries to give such a role Greeks too, as they gave to Armenians.

But the ideal is no nation shouldn't be eachother's enemy. In addition, we are neighbour countries and we can not change this reality. Therefore we must search new ways to improve and develop our relations. And, we must give up to accuse eachother insistently because of what has happened in the past.

Finally, there is no need and use of such messages as kadersokak sent, in this site. Because it causes needless discussions. We are here just for dialog and to share the feelings of friendship.
Regards.

14.       sophie
2712 posts
 10 Jan 2007 Wed 04:28 pm

Quoting metehan2001:

...there were so many reasons which caused 1955 Istanbul events.



Exactly that’s what I’m saying. That the “reasons” were planned in advance, by the Turkish media and authorities. The “motive”, also fake, was ready to explode, in Oktay Engin’s hands. I could give you hundreds of links to justify my opinion, but I think that wikipedia’s article is summarizing all in one page. That’s why I gave you that particular link.

The rioters, were not even Istanbulians(Thanks to their Istanbulian Turkish neighbors some Greeks survived and saved their properties). The rioters were gathered there, during the last days before the events, from different places of Anatolia with only one plan: to exterminate the Greeks and their properties (although killing was not in the actual orders but was not forbidden as well). This ferocity was so well organized that -according to the evidence that was given in the Trial against Menderes and Zorlu which was held afterwards- “a mob of 300,000 was marshaled in a radius of 40 miles around the city for the pogrom”. These are not in my imagination you know. These are FACTS.

As for the Turkish minority in Greece, about whom you were “receiving tragic news from the newspapers”, how come their population, from 86.000 in 1922 increased to 120.000 in 2005, when the Greek population in Turkey from 200.000 then, decreased to only 5.000 at the same time? If they were abused, they would be back in Turkey by now.

We can go on talking about these forever, but that’s not my intention. If you take a look in my profile, you’ll see that my reason for joining TC, is that “I adore this country”. This fact however, doesn’t make me ignorant, as far as history is concerned. Unlike you, I enjoy discussing these subjects and I congratulated Kadersokak for posting this article here. Not because I have hostile feelings against Turks and he gave me the opportunity to show them. Just because I want to tell my side and hear the story from their side as well. Only this way we can learn and understand what really happened in the past. Not by hiding behind our fingers.

By all means, history belongs to the past and that’s where it should remain. But knowing, facing and accepting it, can help us get better and avoid making the same mistakes in the future.

15.       qdemir
811 posts
 10 Jan 2007 Wed 05:09 pm

In the course of the history states have always tended to find real or virtual enemies to keep their armies energetic and alert all the time, and also to give their nations a cause to be united. States also do this to distract their nations' attentions when they have some internal troubles.

The virtual enemy for the west used to be communism. On the other hand it was capitalism for the communist states.
Following the collapse of ex-USSR the US have found for herself some other virtual enemies; terrorism, nuclear threats. Lets remember Clinton ordered the army to blast Iraq when he had the infamous trouble with Monica.

Both Turkey and Greece have made each other their own virtual enemies. I don't think the vast majorities in both nations don't have hostile feelings against each other.
Both nations had some bad experiences in the past. What happened on the 6th and 7th September in İstanbul was very sad. Except some marginal minds nobody is happy with the incidents. What happened in Cyprus before 1974 was also very sad. And I don't think the large number of people in Greece apart from some minority is happy with that.

We aren't politicians we can be friends and love each other. We don't have to admit what the politicians try to impose on us.

16.       metehan2001
501 posts
 10 Jan 2007 Wed 06:29 pm

Quoting sophie:

Quoting metehan2001:

...there were so many reasons which caused 1955 Istanbul events.



Exactly that’s what I’m saying. That the “reasons” were planned in advance, by the Turkish media and authorities. The “motive”, also fake, was ready to explode, in Oktay Engin’s hands. I could give you hundreds of links to justify my opinion, but I think that wikipedia’s article is summarizing all in one page. That’s why I gave you that particular link.

The rioters, were not even Istanbulians(Thanks to their Istanbulian Turkish neighbors some Greeks survived and saved their properties). The rioters were gathered there, during the last days before the events, from different places of Anatolia with only one plan: to exterminate the Greeks and their properties (although killing was not in the actual orders but was not forbidden as well). This ferocity was so well organized that -according to the evidence that was given in the Trial against Menderes and Zorlu which was held afterwards- “a mob of 300,000 was marshaled in a radius of 40 miles around the city for the pogrom”. These are not in my imagination you know. These are FACTS.

As for the Turkish minority in Greece, about whom you were “receiving tragic news from the newspapers”, how come their population, from 86.000 in 1922 increased to 120.000 in 2005, when the Greek population in Turkey from 200.000 then, decreased to only 5.000 at the same time? If they were abused, they would be back in Turkey by now.

We can go on talking about these forever, but that’s not my intention. If you take a look in my profile, you’ll see that my reason for joining TC, is that “I adore this country”. This fact however, doesn’t make me ignorant, as far as history is concerned. Unlike you, I enjoy discussing these subjects and I congratulated Kadersokak for posting this article here. Not because I have hostile feelings against Turks and he gave me the opportunity to show them. Just because I want to tell my side and hear the story from their side as well. Only this way we can learn and understand what really happened in the past. Not by hiding behind our fingers.

By all means, history belongs to the past and that’s where it should remain. But knowing, facing and accepting it, can help us get better and avoid making the same mistakes in the future.



Dear Sophie,
You say that you like Turkey and I say more than that: 'I like your country too and let's look the future to make it more bright.' But on the other hand, you are trying to give other examples and still blaming us with the past events. Therefore, I will also give more information about how badly threated Greeks towards Turkish people and still they have been going on, in these days.

Please read the following passages.

http://www.atmg.org/MinoritiesGreece.html

WESTERN THRACE TURKISH MINORITY


As of the beginning of the 1950’s Greece has been denying the presence of the Western Thrace Turks and has been introducing these people who are genuine Turks as "Greek Muslims". Within the framework of this policy, Greek courts have prohibited the use of the word "Turkish" in names of organizations such as the "Union of Turkish Teachers" or "Xanthi Turkish Union". In April 1991, the Greek Supreme Court by decision number 1729/1987 approved the closure of associations which had the word "Turkish" in their names. In the 1990’s the problem in Western Thrace became more serious when those who claimed to be Turkish were imprisoned, deprived from their properties, dismissed from their jobs and expelled from citizenship on various pretexts.


The 19th article of the Greek Citizenship Law stipulates that citizens who are not of Hellenistic origin and who are believed not to return back to Greece can be deprived of citizenship. Although this law has been abolished in 1998, approximately 60.000 Western Thrace Turks have been deprived in the meantime. It is worth attention that most of these people were expelled from citizenship when leaving Greece for visiting relatives or having a journey. Turks, who go to Europe to find work as a EU member Greek citizen, are deprived from citizenship and the authorities of the relevant country is requested to expel these people. On the other hand, the risk of losing citizenship for the reason of leaving the country has naturally restricted the freedom of movement of the members of the minority.


Within the framework of the Athens Agreement signed in 1913 and the Lausanne Treaty of 1923, the Turks in Western Thrace were given the right to elect by free will their mufti and accordingly the people have elected the mufti until 1990. However, this practice has been lifted without any reason. The Greek Administration appointed muftis to Komotini and Xanthi who were not received with favor by the minorities. Mehmet Emin Aga, the mufti of Komotini, and Ibrahim Serif, the mufti of Xanthi, who were elected by the Turkish community, were repeatedly brought to court and imprisoned for unlawfully using the title of "mufti" and opposing the Greek Administration. Today this practice is still going on; Ibrahim Serif has applied to the European Court of Human Rights for not being recognized by the Greek Administration although they have been elected by the minority. Greece has been sentenced for "violating the 9th article of the European Human Rights Convention that stipulates freedom of thought, religion and opinion".


The Junta Administration that took over power in 1967, has - completely controversial to the Lausanne Treaty - officially abolished the partially preserved legal and conceptual identities and functions of the communities, dismissed the elected executive boards of the foundations established by the minorities, and replaced them with individuals serving their own purpose. The Greek Administration did not only take back the right of the minorities to manage and control their own foundations but also took over the assets of the foundations. To give an example, in Komotini there used to be a graveyard totaling an area of 21 acres; now it has become a "war museum". On the other hand, from time to time tax payment is demanded for the real estates and assets of the foundations and when these taxes are not paid these assets and real estates are put under a mortgage. However, these foundations are exempt from tax and thus the minorities do not pay the demanded taxes.


The Greeks, who do not permit the restoration of the mosques, also show disrespect to the religious values by continuously destructing the grave stones that belong to the Turks.





Another target of Greece’s policy concerning the assimilation of Turks in Western Thrace is "education". The 40th Article of the Lausanne Treaty gives the Turkish minority the right to establish educational institutions that will give education in the mother tongue provided that the Turkish minority will cover all the expenditures. The 41st Article stipulates that the Greek government has to open primary schools in the regions where the Muslim minority constitutes the majority of the population. In spite of this, Greece has taken the Turkish schools under her own control, appointed to these schools teachers who are graduates of the Thessaloniki Pedagogy Academy where they are educated according to Greece’s own policy and whose Turkish are insufficient, and has not appointed any of the teachers who are from the minority and have received the same education.


Greek authorities also close the schools before the beginning of the education year on the pretext that renovation is going to take place and thus cause delays in the curriculum. In 1983 a law was issued stipulating that it is obligatory to get a license for construction and repair activities in the border regions. The Greek administration exploited this law to prevent the repair and expansion of schools and other buildings belonging to the minority. In most of the schools in Western Thrace belonging to the minorities the various grades have their classes together in few classrooms that are available. In some places there are two classrooms and at some other places only one classroom. This situation decreases the quality of the given education.


The Turkish minority, that is of considerable importance in Western Thrace because of its population, is not able to carry this importance to the political field. Greece, being in an effort to avoid the minority’s participation, impedes the election of the independent minority candidates by means of various arrangements. In 1993 new arrangements were made according to which candidates, including the independent ones as well, had to receive 3 % of the valid votes of the whole country so as to be able to be elected as deputy. The threshold of 3 % means a total of approximately 200.000 votes and such a procedure impedes the political will of the Turkish minority that has a total population of around 120.000 and a total of nearly 50.000 votes.


The initiative of the party for Friendship, Equality and Peace and the election of its leader Dr.Sadık AHMET as independent deputy on June 18, 1989 has brought a new dimension to the political line of the minority. However the suspicious traffic accident of S.AHMET on July 24, 1995 did not allow this initiative to continue.


According to official records, at the time when the Lausanne Treaty was signed, 84 % of the land in Western Thrace belonged to the Turks, but as a result of the policy conducted by Greece this has decreased to 25 %. Over the years the Greek Administration has taken over possession of the most valuable parts of land belonging to Turks and has built universities, prisons and military facilities on them. The Turkish minority made their living with agriculture and could not find any job in official institutions for being a minority member. For this reason the Turkish minority got into a bad economic situation. Therefore, Western Thrace is defined as the most underdeveloped region of Europe and Greece.


In spite of all this pressure, the Greek Administration could not succeed to assimilate the Turks. Hereupon, Greeks resorted to the tactic of causing divisions among the members of the minority. Greece attempted to create an artificial Pomak and Gypsy culture and continuously tried to divide the minority as Turks, Pomaks and Gypsies. They also used the EU funds to finance the conduct of these activities. Within the framework of the Lausanne Treaty, the minority whose rights have been taken under guarantee is defined as "Muslim". Greece claims that this minority does not only consist of Turks but also of Pomaks and Gypsies. Throughout history there is not any literature mentioning the language or culture of Pomaks and Gypsies. However, Greece has been in an effort to create a new culture by preparing new dictionaries, grammar books, novels, music cassettes and other material. While doing all these activities, Greece maintains to claim that all the Orthodox people living on her territory or in the neighboring countries are of "Greek" origin by which she gives the clue of Greek propaganda.


Although the Greek Administration, in spite of all the legal rights given to them by international agreements, wants to eliminate the Western Thrace Turks in Greece, this minority maintains its struggle to survive and to use their minority and citizenship rights by.

17.       karekin04
565 posts
 10 Jan 2007 Wed 07:17 pm

Quoting sophie:

Dear metehan2001,

You say that “If you go to the below WEB PAGE address, you will see how Greeks had tortured and tyrannized Turkish people, before 1955 Istanbul incidents” but the events described there, are referring to the year 1963 and after (however, for what its worth, know that I feel ashamed as a Greek to read this info).

You say that this book is written by a Greek nationalist and thus it can’t be objective. Is this information also partial? Wikipedia

Finally, you suggest that we should all be objective. I know I am. Can you be?

I’ve been trying to find an explanation (not today but for quite sometime now) for the events of September 1955, something that would sustain this tragedy, but I have come up with nothing.

There was only a bomb explosion in Ataturk’s house in Selanik, which bomb – as it was proved later – was put there by a Turk, who was following orders from the Turkish government. I’m not blaming the people who committed these acts of violence. They didn’t know. Your authorities are the ones to blame.

I have found reasonable excuses for every other dark incident in the history of Greece and Turkey. And in fact, I always tend to put the blame on us, Greeks. We took what we deserved in 1922, maybe the expulsion of the Greek minority in 1964 was justified (!?) and maybe we forced our luck too later in Cyprus and so on (although all these subjects are under discussion). But this particular event was absolutely unjustified and unfair.

Admitting the mistakes that our own countries have made, doesn’t make us traitors. It only means that we are healthy minded persons, who want to understand the motives and the reasons, follow the events, count the losses and finally be able to come to an objective conclusion, which will help us avoid the same mistakes in the future. Burying the hatred without analyzing it, can only work temporarily. One day though, it will dig its way out again and the same mistakes will be repeated.

Sophie I am suprised that anyone even bothered to keep trying to make a point to you after this post. I think this post of yours was very mature and strong, and to say these things without any hate in your heart takes alot of guts. I am very impressed with your ability to not hold a grudge. I hope others can follow in your footsteps... you deserve these.... p.s. I do think everyone made excellant points from both sides though. Great research and passion from both sides, however what a terrible and sad history, thanks for informing.

18.       sophie
2712 posts
 10 Jan 2007 Wed 07:18 pm

I was not aware of most of the points you made above. I know that the Turkish minority in Greece is not living a dream life, but it seems that they are suffering more than I thought. You just gave me a new subject to read and learn about. (And by the way, I have admitted many times, that I'm not always proud of my country's policies)

I do have a couple of Turkish friends who live in Komotini (Gümülcine) with their families and they are very successful business people, with lots of money and a big property in their possession. But they have told me how they suffered in the previous years, when things were tough for them, their university degrees were not recognized by the Greek government and they couldn’t find a job or start something of their own.

However, when I mentioned the Turkish minority in a previous post and assumed that they must be ok living in my country, I meant that at least their lives were not and are not in danger, which was not the case with the Greek minority in Turkey.

Anyway, that's what this is all about. To hear, search and learn. And again, I ll say that I’m happy that this discussion took place here, cause both me and you learnt something new today.

So I’ll stick to your first paragraph and I’ll sign my name under it, cause I agree with it 100%, as I also agree with Qdemir's post.

Quoting metehan2001:

You say that you like Turkey and I say more than that: 'I like your country too and let's look the future to make it more bright.'



Quoting qdemir:

What happened on the 6th and 7th September in İstanbul was very sad. Except some marginal minds nobody is happy with the incidents.What happened in Cyprus before 1974 was also very sad. And I don't think the large number of people in Greece apart from some minority is happy with that.

We aren't politicians we can be friends and love each other.


19.       metehan2001
501 posts
 10 Jan 2007 Wed 07:25 pm

Sophie,
Thanks for your sincerety.

20.       zbrct
90 posts
 10 Jan 2007 Wed 08:59 pm

(33 Messages in 4 pages - View all)
1 [2] 3 4
Add reply to this discussion




Turkish Dictionary
Turkish Chat
Open mini chat
New in Forums
Why yer gördüm but yeri geziyorum
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much, makes perfect sense!
Etmeyi vs etmek
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much!
Görülmez vs görünmiyor
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much, very well explained!
Içeri and içeriye
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much for the detailed ...
Present continous tense
HaydiDeer: Got it, thank you!
Hic vs herhangi, degil vs yok
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much!
Rize Artvin Airport Transfer - Rize Tours
rizetours: Dear Guest; In order to make your Black Sea trip more enjoyable, our c...
What does \"kabul ettiğini\" mean?
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much for the detailed ...
Kimse vs biri (anyone)
HaydiDeer: Thank you!
Random Pictures of Turkey
Most commented