Welcome
Login:   Pass:     Register - Forgot Password - Resend Activation

Turkish Class Forums / General/Off-topic

General/Off-topic

Add reply to this discussion
Global Warming - Make a statement today :)
(97 Messages in 10 pages - View all)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10
80.       aenigma x
0 posts
 02 Feb 2007 Fri 02:05 pm

"In my view, climate change is the most severe problem that we are facing today -- more serious even than the threat of terrorism."

With this warning to an international science meeting in February 2004, David A. King, Chief Scientific Advisor to the British Government, brought the issue of global warming into sharp focus.

81.       Elisa
0 posts
 02 Feb 2007 Fri 02:34 pm

Quoting aenigma x:

The Alliance for the Planet [a group of environmental associations] is calling on all citizens to create 5 minutes of electrical rest for the planet. http://www.lalliance.fr



I also participated in this symbolic action. Put out the lights and went up my roof to have a look at my town in the darkness, although from what I saw, the local authorities could have made a bigger effort

But guess what I found in my mailbox today! A letter from the electricity and gas company saying that they will put more than 400 euros back into my account because I paid too much in proportion to what I consumed over the last year!! 400 euros!!
Part of it must have sth to do with the fact that I never leave things in standby mode, I always switch them off completely. And I use low-energy light bulbs.
And of course, the numerous candle light dinners I had over the past year!

(not )

82.       Elisa
0 posts
 02 Feb 2007 Fri 02:45 pm

Quoting aenigma x:

I am always a bit puzzled about asthma. I can't believe it is caused by air pollution. It is obviously aggravated by it, but is it the cause?

I was a child of the 1970s and during that time the air pollution was far worse. However, at my school I knew of only one pupil with asthma. At that time it was very very rare.

Similarly even longer ago, during the 'smog' era, asthma was almost unheard of. As you say, it is increasing at an alarming rate (1 in 10 children have it now) Its very strange...

I had always thought it was genetic?



I read an article about allergies a while ago. It said that 100 years ago allergies were almost non-existing. The reason for the increase now is that people are "too clean", which makes them more vulnerable for allergies. Back then, kids used to play in areas where they came in touch with animals all the time for example. People were much more resistant to all kinds of influences. They didn't use soap and shower stuff and deodorant like we do now.
I'm not a scientist, and surely genetic features must have something to do with allergies as well. Maybe some people back then did have them, but they weren't recognised as such. But the explanation in the article sounded plausible to me.

83.       Elisa
0 posts
 02 Feb 2007 Fri 02:48 pm

Quoting KeithL:

Quoting aenigma x:

Quoting KeithL:

I would get kicked off the bus with my smelly hockey bag.



Hahaha that bag is probably the cause of global warming



Actually, it would be quite the alternative fuel...



KeithL, I'm sure you'll get rewarded one day for recycling the stuff that's in the microcosmos AKA your "hockey bag"

84.       aenigma x
0 posts
 02 Feb 2007 Fri 02:51 pm

Quoting Elisa:

Quoting aenigma x:

I am always a bit puzzled about asthma. I can't believe it is caused by air pollution. It is obviously aggravated by it, but is it the cause?

I was a child of the 1970s and during that time the air pollution was far worse. However, at my school I knew of only one pupil with asthma. At that time it was very very rare.

Similarly even longer ago, during the 'smog' era, asthma was almost unheard of. As you say, it is increasing at an alarming rate (1 in 10 children have it now) Its very strange...

I had always thought it was genetic?



I read an article about allergies a while ago. It said that 100 years ago allergies were almost non-existing. The reason for the increase now is that people are "too clean", which makes them more vulnerable for allergies. Back then, kids used to play in areas where they came in touch with animals all the time for example. People were much more resistant to all kinds of influences. They didn't use soap and shower stuff and deodorant like we do now.
I'm not a scientist, and surely genetic features must have something to do with allergies as well. Maybe some people back then did have them, but they weren't recognised as such. But the explanation in the article sounded plausible to me.



It certainly would help explain why people lived in thick smoke from factories and coal fires without developing asthma. Sounds a plausable theory Elisa.

85.       CANLI
5084 posts
 02 Feb 2007 Fri 02:51 pm

Quoting aenigma x:

Quoting CANLI:

aenigma,
İf you have any,i need some links about the global warming in general.
İ checked this thread late,but its never too late to spread a word about it.
But i need some easy,simple essays to reach simple people,kids,some of those categories.
Maybe if i can post in some public places.
İf you have something like that,i would really appreciate it .



Hi Canli I am more than happy to give you links. I have numerous sites I could direct you to, but have given just three for now, two of which are mainly pictorial. Amazingly, there are some people who still dont take this problem seriously or even believe that it is happening. I have heard ignorant comments like "global warming is a myth" or even worse "so what? I am looking forward to hotter summers"



Thank You aenigma,

İf its only about ignorance,then maybe spreading a word may help!

But the thing is in some counties,people are soo poor they think about what to eat the next day,so you can hardly succeed in convincing them to worry about global warming.
And in other rich countries,worrying about global warming will coast them billions of profits they were gaining through the years ,and the still want to keep gaining them !

Anyway,we would do what we can,and hope for the better.

86.       qdemir
813 posts
 02 Feb 2007 Fri 05:02 pm

Blame for global warming placed firmly on humankind
Updated 12:28 02 February 2007
NewScientist.com news service
Catherine Brahic, Paris


The 2nd of February 2007 will one day hopefully be remembered as the day the question mark was removed from the debate on whether human activities are driving climate change, said the head of the UN Environment Programme at the launch of the most authoritative scientific report on climate change to date.

The new Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report says there is 90% certainty that the burning of fossil fuels and other human activities are driving climate change.

“The word unequivocal is the key message of this report,” said Achim Steiner, executive director of UNEP, adding that those who have doubts about the role of humans in driving the climate “can no longer ignore the evidence”.

The IPCC report says the rise in global temperatures could be as high as 6.4°C by 2100. The report also predicts sea level rises and increases in hurricanes. It is the work of 1200 climate experts from 40 countries, who have spent six years reviewing all the available climate research. It was released in Paris, France, on Friday (read the 21-page summary here, pdf format). Listen to audio from today's press conference.

The last IPCC report, issued in 2001, predicted that temperatures would rise by 1.4°C to 5.8°C by 2100, relative to 1990 temperatures.

But the new report says temperature rises by 2100 could, in the most extreme scenarios, range from 1.1°C and 6.4°C. The most likely range is 1.8°C to 4.0°C (see figure 1, right), with the report predicting that 4°C is most likely if the world continues to burn fossil-fuels at the same rate (read the The impacts of rising global temperatures).

Melting, moving ice
Rises in sea levels are predicted by the new report, threatening low-lying areas of land around the world. As the oceans warm, their waters expand, while rising temperatures also increase the melting of the ice sheets that cover Greenland and Antarctica.

In 2001, the IPCC predicted that sea levels would rise by between 9 and 88 centimetres by 2100, relative to 1990 levels. The new report says rises could range from 18 cm to 59 cm. The top end of the range corresponds to a fossil-fuel intensive future (see A1F1 scenario in Modelling the future climate: the baseline scenarios).

But predictions of sea level rise are one of the most contentious areas of the report - very recent research has suggested that rises of up to 140 cm are possible (see Shorelines may be in greater peril than thought.

The problem is that the understanding of how warming affects Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets remains limited, and they are predicted to be the most important contributors to change. Estimates of the straightforward melting of ice are incorporated in the IPCC report. But warming may also accelerate the movement of ice in glaciers into the ocean, perhaps by meltwater lubricating the undersides of ice streams.

Susan Solomon, one of the report's lead authors, said there was no published research that quantified this effect, and so it was not included. But she added: “If temperatures exceed 1.9°C to 4.6°C above pre-industrial temperatures, and were to be sustained for thousands of years, eventually we would expect the Greenland ice sheet to melt. That would raise sea level by 7 metres.”

Climate change is also expected to affect the frequency and strength of tropical storms and hurricanes. The latest IPCC report says the activity of tropical cyclones is “likely” to increase over the 21st century. It says “likely” indicates a probability of more than 66%. This is a bolder statement than the World Meteorology Organisation issued in January.

Precipitation patterns will change too by 2100, according to IPCC predictions (see figure 2, right). Mid- to high-latitude regions will see up to 20% more rain and snow, while the tropical regions will see less.

Humans to blame
Considering the human role in causing climate change, the IPCC report is damning: "The understanding of [human] influences on climate has improved since the [2001] report, leading to a very high confidence that human activities" are responsible for most of the warming seen since 1950, says the report’s summary for policymakers. “Very high confidence” is described as “at least a 9 out of 10 chance of being correct”.

Before the industrial revolution, human greenhouse gas emissions were small, and the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide – the main greenhouse gas – was about 280 parts per million (ppm).

Thanks largely to the burning of fossil fuels and changes in land use, such as agricultural exploitation and deforestation, the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide reached 379 ppm in 2005, says the IPCC.

Gold standard
The IPCC draws together the world's leading climate experts to review and assess all available research, under the auspices of UN Environment Programme and the World Meteorology Organization.

The result of their assessment, which is done every five to six years, establishes what is considered the gold standard of consensus on climate change science.

The latest IPCC report was written by hundreds of experts and reviewed by hundreds more, from 113 countries. It is being released in stages during 2007. The first chapter, released on Friday, deals with the scientific basis for climate change.

The next two parts of the IPCC's 2007 assessment, plus a synthesis, will be released throughout the year. Part 2, dealing with the impacts of climate change and our vulnerability to those impacts, will be released in April. Part 3, to be released in May, deals with how we might mitigate these impacts.

Check back for further updates and reaction from Paris during the day.

Climate Change - Want to know more about global warming – the science, impacts and political debate? Visit our continually updated special report.

87.       bliss
900 posts
 03 Feb 2007 Sat 09:12 am

TEN THINGS YOU CAN DO TO HELP CURB GLOBAL WARMING

Responsible Choices

The choices we make and the products we buy test our commitment to maintain a healthy planet. When we burn fossil fuels—such as oil, coal, and natural gas—to run our cars and light our homes, we pump carbon dioxide (CO2) into the air. This thickens the heat-trapping blanket that surrounds the planet, causing global warming.
Choosing modern technology can reduce our use of fossil fuels and help protect the planet. These ten steps will help curb global warming, save you money, and create a safer environment for the future.

1.Drive Smart!
A well-tuned car with properly inflated tires burns less gasoline—cutting pollution and saving you money at the pump. If you have two cars, drive the one with better gas mileage whenever possible. Better yet, skip the drive and take public transit, walk, or bicycle when you can.

2.Write your leaders now. Urge them to raise fuel economy standards to 40 miles per gallon.
Modern technology can make our cars and trucks go farther on a gallon of gas. It's the biggest single step we can take to curb global warming. The less gasoline we burn, the less CO2 we put into the air. Taking this step would also save nearly 4 million barrels of oil a day — more oil than we currently import from the Persian Gulf and could ever extract from the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge combined. And by saving gas, you save nearly $2,000 at the pump over the life of your car.

3.Support clean, renewable energy.
Renewable energy solutions, such as wind and solar power, can reduce our reliance on coal-burning power plants, the largest source of global warming pollution in the United States. Call your local utility and sign up for renewable energy. If they don't offer it, ask them why not?

4.Replace incandescent light bulbs with compact fluorescent bulbs.
Especially those that burn the longest each day. Compact fluorescents produce the same amount of light as normal bulbs, but use about a quarter of the electricity and last ten times as long. Each switch you make helps clean the air today, curb global warming, and save you money on your electricity bill.

5.Saving energy at home is good for the environment and for your wallet.
Start with caulking and weather-stripping on doorways and windows. Then adjust your thermostat and start saving. For each degree you lower your thermostat in the winter, you can cut your energy bills by 3 percent. Finally, ask your utility company to do a free energy audit of your home to show you how to save even more money.

6.Become a smart water consumer.
Install low-flow showerheads and faucets and you'll use half the water without decreasing performance. Then turn your hot water heater down to 120°F and see hot-water costs go down by as much as 50 percent.

7.Buy energy-efficient electronics and appliances.
Replacing an old refrigerator or an air conditioner with an energy-efficient model will save you money on your electricity bill and cut global warming pollution. Look for the Energy Star label on new appliances or visit their website at www.energystar.gov to find the most energy-efficient products.

8.Plant a Tree, protect a forest.
Protecting forests is a big step on the road to curbing global warming. Trees 'breathe in' carbon dioxide, but slash-and-burn farming practices, intensive livestock production, and logging have destroyed 90 percent of the native forests in the United States. And you can take action in your own backyard — planting shade trees around your house will absorb CO2, and slash your summer air-conditioning bills.

9.Reduce! Reuse! Recycle!
Producing new paper, glass, and metal products from recycled materials saves 70 to 90 percent of the energy and pollution, including CO2, that would result if the product came from virgin materials. Recycling a stack of newspapers only 4 feet high will save a good-sized tree. Please...buy recycled products!

10.Mount a local campaign against global warming.
Educate your community about how it can cut global warming pollution. Support measures at the national, state, and local level that:

.Make automobiles go further on a gallon of gas;
.Accelerate the use of clean, renewable energy sources,
such as solar and wind;
.Increase energy efficiency and conservation; and
Preserve forests around the world.




I think it is our responsibility to think about the future of this beautiful planet!

88.       juliacernat
424 posts
 16 Feb 2007 Fri 01:24 pm


"Leading international politicians have reached a new agreement on tackling climate change, at a Washington summit.

Delegates agreed that developing countries will have to face targets for cutting greenhouse gas emissions as well as rich countries.

The informal meeting also agreed that a global market should be formed to cap and trade carbon dioxide emissions.

The non-binding declaration is seen as vital in influencing a replacement for the Kyoto Protocol, correspondents say.

The forum's closing statement said man-made climate change was now "beyond doubt".

"Climate change is a global issue and there is an obligation on us all to take action, in line with our capabilities and historic responsibilities," said the statement from the Global Legislators Organisation for a Balanced Environment (Globe).

'Tipping point'

The two-day meeting brought together legislators from countries including the Group of Eight rich nations, plus Brazil, China, India, Mexico and South Africa.

The BBC's environment analyst Roger Harrabin was at the meeting and says that although the declaration carries no formal weight, it indicates a real change in mood.

The legislators agreed that developing countries had to face targets on greenhouse gas emissions, in the same way rich countries do.

They said they wanted a successor to the Kyoto Protocol - which expires in 2012 - in place by 2009.

US senator Joe Lieberman forecast that the US Congress would enact a law on cutting emissions by the end of next year, possibly this year.

And presidential candidate John McCain, who is co-sponsoring climate legislation with Mr Lieberman, was emphatic on the need for new initiatives.

"I am convinced that we have reached the tipping point and that the Congress of the United States will act, with the agreement of the administration," he told the forum.

But Dr John Holdren, the head of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), said President George W Bush needed to appreciate that the US economy would not suffer unnecessarily if emission were capped.

"The economic damage from not addressing climate change is much larger than the economic cost of addressing it," he said.

Meanwhile, the Canadian parliament moved to force the government to meet its Kyoto Protocol target for reducing emissions.

The ruling Conservative party argues that meeting the target, of reducing emissions by 6% from 1990 levels by the period 2008-2012, is impossible.

The parliamentary vote gives the government 60 days to formulate a plan for getting back on track.

With United Nations climate negotiations in November failing to agree a timetable for mandating new cuts in emissions when the current Kyoto targets expire in 2012, the British-led Globe set up the Washington meeting in the hope of stimulating progress in a less formal setting.

The UN's panel on climate change said earlier this month that higher global temperatures caused by man-made pollution would melt polar ice, worsen floods and droughts and cause more devastating storms".

BBC News, 16.02.2007

89.       aenigma x
0 posts
 16 Feb 2007 Fri 01:28 pm

Its great that they are finally taking it seriously - about 50 years too late. I am sad to say that its too late. I still fight for change, but only becaues it will DELAY the effects.

We have a saying, "shutting the stable door AFTER the horse has bolted"

90.       robyn :D
2640 posts
 16 Feb 2007 Fri 03:52 pm

on a turkish channel today the news stated that sea levels have risen by around 7 metres..

(97 Messages in 10 pages - View all)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10
Add reply to this discussion




Turkish Dictionary
Turkish Chat
Open mini chat
New in Forums
Crossword Vocabulary Puzzles for Turkish L...
qdemir: You can view and solve several of the puzzles online at ...
Giriyor vs Geliyor.
lrnlang: Thank you for the ...
Local Ladies Ready to Play in Your City
nifrtity: ... - Discover Women Seeking No-Strings Attached Encounters in Your Ci...
Geçmekte vs. geçiyor?
Hoppi: ... and ... has almost the same meaning. They are both mean "i...
Intermediate (B1) to upper-intermediate (B...
qdemir: View at ...
Why yer gördüm but yeri geziyorum
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much, makes perfect sense!
Random Pictures of Turkey
Most liked