General/Off-topic |
|
|
|
|
|
what caught my eye today
|
| 3270. |
20 Mar 2009 Fri 10:05 pm |
|
Actually AE, that is not the case at all, seems you didnt get what i mean
Ãf you went through my post here and other posts before regarding cynic´s insulting posts, you would find i havent agreed with them too.
But im also against the idea that the bads erase the goods.
And i believe it is his right to take the credit for that.
His posts in the language forum are there and people still get benefit from them.
They are useful to learners, so that was a loss to us .
His posts in political forum were also informative and strike some point that i wasnt paying attention to.
So i cant just skip an eye on all this as if they are not there.
Ãt isnt fair.
Yes many of his posts caused disruption and also were flammable, crude and this everyone already know and said it
But he also has informative posts and was helpful to others in language/translation forums and that what i am adding.
Ãts his right.
I did not want to talk about this subject but let me put my a few pennies:
I will disagree with you what you said above apart from his contribution into language section.
As I mentioned before, you can find a few interesting posts from him in political section (at least from my perspective) but that is all.. He had great writing skills and he put the quite common ideas (mostly nationalistic) into nicely written posts (several times).
But apart from that he was a person who sweared publicly..He insinuated beastilaity about one of the girls.
And I must say that it was horrible to see ´not very many´ objected to that incident..Even some clapped that post publicly!!
Because many of you did not object enough, you gave him encouragaments.
Because the person whom he was refering to, was not you or you disliked the person he was swearing at..Many times, I have seen him posting quite low or insinuating posts about certain people here, many of you did not even post a word of disagreement!! A quite low level of hypocrasy went on and on..
There was nothing to provoke him most of the time.. But there were some encouragements from some people here..
He did not have much moral levels about what to post what to say to the people he disagreed.
He had to be stopped before but unfortunately that was not the case..
Because of that level confusion and and because he showed that he did not have any levels at all, there was only one way of dealing with him and it was going down to his level. The level was not a very pleasant level. He would use anything he knew about the person he was arguing regardless it was a private information or not..That was very nasty.
Although he should have ben deleted long ago but now, he is gone for good..And gone is gone.
|
|
| 3271. |
20 Mar 2009 Fri 11:52 pm |
|
I did not want to talk about this subject but let me put my a few pennies:
Well, actually i´d preferred if you didnt talk about it too, specially the exchange was mostly between you two and the man isnt here anymore .
Quoting thehandsom
I will disagree with you what you said above apart from his contribution into language section.
Again i dont know how would you agree or disagree with me on what i have said
To me, his posts were informative and raised some points i wasnt paying attention to, so i dont imagine how this can be arguable ?!
Ãts my own evaluation !
As I mentioned before, you can find a few interesting posts from him in political section (at least from my perspective) but that is all.. He had great writing skills and he put the quite common ideas (mostly nationalistic) into nicely written posts (several times).
But apart from that he was a person who sweared publicly..He insinuated beastilaity about one of the girls.
And I must say that it was horrible to see ´not very many´ objected to that incident..Even some clapped that post publicly!!
Because many of you did not object enough, you gave him encouragaments.
Because the person whom he was refering to, was not you or you disliked the person he was swearing at..Many times, I have seen him posting quite low or insinuating posts about certain people here, many of you did not even post a word of disagreement!! A quite low level of hypocrasy went on and on..
There was nothing to provoke him most of the time.. But there were some encouragements from some people here..
He did not have much moral levels about what to post what to say to the people he disagreed.
He had to be stopped before but unfortunately that was not the case..
Because of that level confusion and and because he showed that he did not have any levels at all, there was only one way of dealing with him and it was going down to his level. The level was not a very pleasant level. He would use anything he knew about the person he was arguing regardless it was a private information or not..That was very nasty.
As i said, the man isnt here to reply, and as im not his lawyer or something so i cant talk on his behalf.
But i must say, it isnt nice that you criticize him like this now and he is gone and cant reply .
So again , yes i wished if you´d stayed as you were.
´´I did not want to talk about this subject ´´
Edited (3/20/2009) by CANLI
|
|
| 3272. |
21 Mar 2009 Sat 12:36 am |
|
As i said, the man isnt here to reply, and as im not his lawyer or something so i cant talk on his behalf.
But i must say, it isnt nice that you criticize him like this now and he is gone and cant reply .
So again , yes i wished if you´d stayed as you were.
´´I did not want to talk about this subject ´´
well I did not want to talk and i have still no intention to talk about it..
|
|
| 3273. |
21 Mar 2009 Sat 12:59 am |
|
well I did not want to talk and i have still no intention to talk about it..
But you did just that all the same.
|
|
| 3274. |
21 Mar 2009 Sat 05:01 am |
|
| |
 |
| Dead Palestinian babies and bombed mosques - IDF fashion 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
The office at the Adiv fabric-printing shop in south Tel Aviv handles a constant stream of customers, many of them soldiers in uniform, who come to order custom clothing featuring their unit´s insignia, usually accompanied by a slogan and drawing of their choosing. Elsewhere on the premises, the sketches are turned into plates used for imprinting the ordered items, mainly T-shirts and baseball caps, but also hoodies, fleece jackets and pants. A young Arab man from Jaffa supervises the workers who imprint the words and pictures, and afterward hands over the finished product.
Dead babies, mothers weeping on their children´s graves, a gun aimed at a child and bombed-out mosques - these are a few examples of the images Israel Defense Forces soldiers design these days to print on shirts they order to mark the end of training, or of field duty. The slogans accompanying the drawings are not exactly anemic either: A T-shirt for infantry snipers bears the inscription "Better use Durex," next to a picture of a dead Palestinian baby, with his weeping mother and a teddy bear beside him. A sharpshooter´s T-shirt from the Givati Brigade´s Shaked battalion shows a pregnant Palestinian woman with a bull´s-eye superimposed on her belly, with the slogan, in English, "1 shot, 2 kills." A "graduation" shirt for those who have completed another snipers course depicts a Palestinian baby, who grows into a combative boy and then an armed adult, with the inscription, "No matter how it begins, we´ll put an end to it."
There are also plenty of shirts with blatant sexual messages. For example, the Lavi battalion produced a shirt featuring a drawing of a soldier next to a young woman with bruises, and the slogan, "Bet you got raped!" A few of the images underscore actions whose existence the army officially denies - such as "confirming the kill" (shooting a bullet into an enemy victim´s head from close range, to ensure he is dead), or harming religious sites, or female or child non-combatants.
 |
|
| A |
haaretz.com today
|
|
|
| 3275. |
21 Mar 2009 Sat 08:03 am |
|
Roswitha, why do you post exactly the same article twice, in different threads?
|
|
| 3276. |
21 Mar 2009 Sat 08:25 am |
|
As i said, the man isnt here to reply, and as im not his lawyer or something so i cant talk on his behalf.
But i must say, it isnt nice that you criticize him like this now and he is gone and cant reply .
So again , yes i wished if you´d stayed as you were.
´´I did not want to talk about this subject ´´
Canli, the man isn´t here for a reason! Handsom´s criticism of cynic isn´t something he is only doing now that the man is gone and cynic certainly doesn´t need to be here to "defend" himself....everyone saw what he was like and what got him deleted. I wonder how many of this guys posts you actually read. 
Edited (3/21/2009) by girleegirl
[Formatting is funky tonight!!!]
|
|
| 3277. |
21 Mar 2009 Sat 11:21 am |
|
Canli, the man isn´t here for a reason! Handsom´s criticism of cynic isn´t something he is only doing now that the man is gone and cynic certainly doesn´t need to be here to "defend" himself....everyone saw what he was like and what got him deleted. I wonder how many of this guys posts you actually read.
bosver, gg, she doesnt understand basic facts. canli speaks as if cynic was dead and we all killed him.
whats wrong with criticising the person who is no longer here? did he join the deads?
i grew up hearing that was not good to say bad about a person who passed away. and i question this tradition.
canli and her friends almost worshipped that young man. the credits were given even from the opposite side.
i personally dont judge people by their knowledge, career or education, i judge them by their mentality, personality. what´s good of the knowledge if you are still an idiot, rude and very simplistic in thinking, judging and expressing?
so, GG let it go. you will never convince these people. they are made of a different clay.
|
|
| 3278. |
21 Mar 2009 Sat 01:08 pm |
|
Cynic is alive and well . He is using his enforced sabbatical to travel the world tand carry out research about donkeys.
His remit? To prove that a donkey´s behaviour is affected by the environment in which it lives.
Even away from TLC, he is determined to discredit theH. 
Edited (3/21/2009) by peacetrain
[forgot to post photo]
|
|
| 3279. |
21 Mar 2009 Sat 01:11 pm |
|
and you are his postwoman?
Cynic is alive and well . He is using his enforced sabbatical to travel the world tand carry out research about donkeys.
His remit? To prove that a donkey´s behaviour is affected by the environment in which it lives.
Even away from TLC, he is determined to discredit theH.
|
|
| 3280. |
21 Mar 2009 Sat 01:15 pm |
|
" DD has already told evrything about you." I have never had any private messages with DD, so she really doesn´t know anything about me other than what I posted, you or anyone can see that. What I have done is express my ideas, in a few posts (very few) I wrote about personal experience. I have kept that to a minimum....but knock yourself out if it rocks your boat.
You and others are the ones who keep bringing up speculation regarding my personal information.
Alameda, I posted what I found in your posts only because you stated that you´re a mysterious person whose gender, background etc has not been revealed. I wanted to show you that it wasn´t true. For all it matters, none of us is really interested in your personal life, were it otherwise we´d PM you asking about the details.
|
|
|
