General/Off-topic |
|
|
|
politics and religion on this site
|
1. |
20 Mar 2008 Thu 09:19 pm |
I would like to raise this question again - what do you think about the restriction to discuss politics and religion here ONLY if it is DIRECTLY related to Turkey?
I think that such a restriction will not only keep us focused on the topic of Turkey, which is the purpose of this web site, but also will allow us to avoid many unnecessary arguments about religion and foreign politics that are really not meant to take place here.
|
|
2. |
20 Mar 2008 Thu 09:23 pm |
I really don't think it will help. If people want to fight and be argumentative, they will argue about the politics and religion of any country. Anyone can choose to argue about any topic, catwoman. Want to fight about the best way to make Lentil Soup?
|
|
3. |
21 Mar 2008 Fri 12:27 pm |
Mods and Admins.
You've asked for opinions and suggestions of members. You have formed a new Admin/Mod team with people from different backgrounds.
What you have to do now is take collective ownership of the site . . . discuss the rules between yourselves . . . publish them and enforce them . Review them after an agreed time lapse.
We members are like children . . . we need to know where we stand.
Stop the procrastination and Moderate please.
DETENTE
|
|
4. |
21 Mar 2008 Fri 01:19 pm |
Quoting catwoman: I would like to raise this question again - what do you think about the restriction to discuss politics and religion here ONLY if it is DIRECTLY related to Turkey?
I think that such a restriction will not only keep us focused on the topic of Turkey, which is the purpose of this web site, but also will allow us to avoid many unnecessary arguments about religion and foreign politics that are really not meant to take place here.
|
I think it will be difficult for some members NOT to enter into discussion about other countries and I dont really see that as being A problem or THE problem.
I would like to see the site more Turkey related and less of the rest of the world, but again, there is only so much you can say about any one country. And history tells us that people enjoy the more controversial topics and some of the interesting ones about the country have gone practically unnoticed.
I also agree with Karpusqueen that you need to collectively set the guidelines (rules or whatever you like to call them) and then moderate to those and warn when things get out of hand.
We all know the basic rules of forum use so set the guidelines around the politics and religion and let us see the changes emerge.
I for one would like to add that I appreciate what you (Admin) are trying to achieve and the appointment of new moderators and would like to see this site remain as successful and one to be proud to recommend to friends.
|
|
5. |
21 Mar 2008 Fri 02:03 pm |
Quoting karpusqueen:
We members are like children . . . we need to know where we stand.
Stop the procrastination and Moderate please.
DETENTE |
Speak for yourself Peace Train..
I think most of the members know where they stand.
And, personally, I wont feel happy if some one keeps reminding me what I should do, what topics I should write etc.
There has been a type moderation here and it was a fairly good and democratic one.
I can see no reason why they should change it with the one opiniated 'members are like childeren'!!
This place is not a school!!
|
|
6. |
21 Mar 2008 Fri 02:06 pm |
I want to make an offer about religious topics. If someone wants to say something in his mind, he must put a prove such as a reference link that what he says is really in the religion and really related to Turkey. But the reference must be acredited, or at least not provokable, improper and unacceptable. And then he can say what he thinks about that practice or idea without saying as if that religious idea or practice were "funny"; and the critisizing words must not contain offhand or saucy feelings.
Just an offer, because I am also not sure how much applicable it is.
But I want to say something to catwoman:
As far as I see, you made comments like this: "you muslims see every critisize as if they were bad words". Actually, you (yourself) see the bad words as critics even though everone can see clearly that many of these type posts were trying to say "what you believe is only stupid, unacceptable, not even thinkable/meaningful/reasonable ideas" even though this ideas are hidden inside of the lines. I am very very serious about this. If the words contain saucy impressions, they can't be told "critics".
Or let's do this issue like this much more simply: Everyone can post religious texts only;
- without comment
- with the reference if it is an acceptable source about religion
- the ideas if it is really related to Turkey or Turkish culture
Otherwise, people say many different and unacceptable things without any basis. It brings us to the misunderstanding areas about religion.
|
|
7. |
21 Mar 2008 Fri 02:40 pm |
Quoting caliptrix:
Or let's do this issue like this much more simply: Everyone can post religious texts only;
- without comment
- with the reference if it is an acceptable source about religion
- the ideas if it is really related to Turkey or Turkish culture
|
Well..
I remember, I posted something previously. I dont remember the thread (I think it is locked)now, but it was something about what rules muslims should follow in their bedrooms . I translated personally some parts of the huge list of rules from the website. I gave the link to that website too. It was related to Turkey, because some of my country men really read them and try to follow those rules.
But the first post to my original thread was :
'the handsom, what kind of person you are'
I really think that some muslims think whatever is written about islam is for critisisim.
|
|
8. |
21 Mar 2008 Fri 03:03 pm |
Quoting thehandsom: Quoting caliptrix:
Or let's do this issue like this much more simply: Everyone can post religious texts only;
- without comment
- with the reference if it is an acceptable source about religion
- the ideas if it is really related to Turkey or Turkish culture
|
Well..
I remember, I posted something previously. I dont remember the thread (I think it is locked)now, but it was something about what rules muslims should follow in their bedrooms . I translated personally some parts of the huge list of rules from the website. I gave the link to that website too. It was related to Turksy because some of my country men really read them and try to follow those rules.
But the first post to my original thread was :
'the handsom, what kind of person you are'
I really think that some muslims think whatever is written about islam is for critisisim.
|
I remember you wrote it as a funny way. You made everything as if all of these things are fun for you or the others who don't believe these things (I am not talking about believing in Islam. That is only about believing inside of the text what you write). That is not critisism as I told.
|
|
9. |
21 Mar 2008 Fri 03:21 pm |
Caliptrix, thank you for sharing your opinions. I would like to hear more from other religious people here. I wonder what they are in favor of...
|
|
10. |
21 Mar 2008 Fri 03:51 pm |
Quoting catwoman: I would like to raise this question again - what do you think about the restriction to discuss politics and religion here ONLY if it is DIRECTLY related to Turkey?
I think that such a restriction will not only keep us focused on the topic of Turkey, which is the purpose of this web site, but also will allow us to avoid many unnecessary arguments about religion and foreign politics that are really not meant to take place here.
|
Actually,i dont see how could this be possible,its unrealistic rule from what i see for 2 reasons
First,religion...how would be the discussion in religion related to Türkiye ?!
İslam is the religion of most of Turks,so now we are talking about discussing İslam only ...
Then if we need to compare an issue in İslam by Christianity or Judaism,we wouldnt be in a topic related to Türkiye ?!!!
Beside İslam is not related ONLY to Türkiye,so you would be talking about some issue and you wouldnt continue it in debat when its applied in another country ?!!!
Actually i cant see how this could be !
As for politics,ok assume a discussion has started by event in Türkiye,debat get a bit hot,and if a member,said but also in USA,or UK or Germany,the ....happening and members started to talk about,how would you classify this ?!
Actually you cant !
So both religion and politics will be open discussion at the end,and that is how it is,because İslam not a religion for Türkiye only,and Türkiye is not alone in the world so you can talk about Türkiye only in a political debats
Beside if you allow debating in politics,and a major event happened,or people were killed in some terrorist attack,and we skipped it,we would be like living in another world !
So,i guess if you allow politics and religion debats it will be opened,so the question would be what rules you can put to organize such debats ?
|
|
11. |
22 Mar 2008 Sat 01:09 am |
Quoting thehandsom: Quoting karpusqueen:
We members are like children . . . we need to know where we stand.
Stop the procrastination and Moderate please.
DETENTE |
Speak for yourself Peace Train..
I think most of the members know where they stand.
And, personally, I wont feel happy if some one keeps reminding me what I should do, what topics I should write etc.
There has been a type moderation here and it was a fairly good and democratic one.
I can see no reason why they should change it with the one opiniated 'members are like childeren'!!
This place is not a school!!
|
I never mentioned school handsom, I'm a mother and a grandmother . As a father, don't you set clear boundaries?
Nobody will need to remind you of what you should do if you do as you should do in the first instance i.e. be a good boy and follow the rules.
It seems to me that the reason this site is going through a transition is because people (whoever they are) think it is necessary. Even Admins must think it necessary, otherwise they would not have asked for suggestions and appointed more moderators.
btw Well done Admin, you made good choices for Moderators and thank you for taking the time to listen to members.
I have made my opinion clear. I don't want the topics to be limited. However, if there are rules then the site should be moderated according to them. The point of my post that you refer to was to stop the debate about how the site is managed etc. and get on with it.
|
|
12. |
22 Mar 2008 Sat 03:13 am |
Quoting karpusqueen:
I never mentioned school handsom, I'm a mother and a grandmother . As a father, don't you set clear boundaries?
Nobody will need to remind you of what you should do if you do as you should do in the first instance i.e. be a good boy and follow the rules.
It seems to me that the reason this site is going through a transition is because people (whoever they are) think it is necessary. Even Admins must think it necessary, otherwise they would not have asked for suggestions and appointed more moderators.
btw Well done Admin, you made good choices for Moderators and thank you for taking the time to listen to members.
I have made my opinion clear. I don't want the topics to be limited. However, if there are rules then the site should be moderated according to them. The point of my post that you refer to was to stop the debate about how the site is managed etc. and get on with it. |
To be honest, I never thought a transition was necessary for the site and I still think it is NOT.
I think, it started with Keith complaining anti islam and anti turk posts and they are STILL NOT proven. I am still yet to see what is anti-turk and what is anti-islam.
I am one the persons who thinks that 'less rules' as a rule is always better and the rules are necessary for the people who aren't willing to make up their own.
I have my own rules and I am always a good boy.
The site has always been managed I believe, and you rather sanctimoniously telling the mods "stop the debate about how the site is managed etc. and get on with it" is simply irritating.
|
|
13. |
22 Mar 2008 Sat 10:40 am |
Quoting thehandsom: Quoting karpusqueen:
I never mentioned school handsom, I'm a mother and a grandmother . As a father, don't you set clear boundaries?
Nobody will need to remind you of what you should do if you do as you should do in the first instance i.e. be a good boy and follow the rules.
It seems to me that the reason this site is going through a transition is because people (whoever they are) think it is necessary. Even Admins must think it necessary, otherwise they would not have asked for suggestions and appointed more moderators.
btw Well done Admin, you made good choices for Moderators and thank you for taking the time to listen to members.
I have made my opinion clear. I don't want the topics to be limited. However, if there are rules then the site should be moderated according to them. The point of my post that you refer to was to stop the debate about how the site is managed etc. and get on with it. |
To be honest, I never thought a transition was necessary for the site and I still think it is NOT.
I think, it started with Keith complaining anti islam and anti turk posts and they are STILL NOT proven. I am still yet to see what is anti-turk and what is anti-islam.
I am one the persons who thinks that 'less rules' as a rule is always better and the rules are necessary for the people who aren't willing to make up their own.
I have my own rules and I am always a good boy.
The site has always been managed I believe, and you rather sanctimoniously telling the mods "stop the debate about how the site is managed etc. and get on with it" is simply irritating.
|
ha ha ha you are like a dog with a bone. The transition must be happening for a reason. Even political parties reinvent themselves to gain or maintain popularity amongst an electorate. I imagine it is not an easy task, catering for the needs of over 15k members and whilst it's possible to please some of the members all of the time, it's impossible to please all of the members even only some of the time. In any event, if you think about it, any transition that this site may be undergoing is not THAT huge. However, this ongoing debate (which Admin/Mods are contributing to)is blowing matters out of proportion, hence my comment to cease it and simply get on.
Anyway, from what I've seen of your posts in general, you are an advocate of reform. )
There are worse things than sanctimony and irritation, so I thank you . However,I suspect you are observing site rules and don't want to use anything stronger .
I didn't make the rules. They were here long before I came. I still think the rules didn't need to be changed, except to allow political and religious debate. I thought you wanted to be able to debate these things handsom . . .
I know the site has always been managed. My point is that there now seems to be debate about the management of the site, when perhaps it's time to give it a rest. ha ha ha I thought I sounded fed up, not sanctimonious.
Keith has gone to great lengths to explain himself. The issue you cite is not as simple as you are trying to make out. I would spend time explaining it to you but I suspect you already understand.
You'll be pleased to know I'm going to take the advice of many here and stop debating these issues any further.
btw, you better add boring to my repertoire, I fell asleep mid post
|
|
14. |
22 Mar 2008 Sat 01:52 pm |
In my humble opinion, I don't think you can restrict this area. So long as everybody has the right to share their feelings. For example, some people defend their religion when they feel hurt and I have also sometimes sensed "anti-west" "anti-Christian" dialogues, so if I wish to defend myself as our muslims brothers and sisters do, I think EVERYONE is entitled to complete freedom in this area.
Religion & Politics is a huge part of everyone's life - you can't restrict it. This is such a hard issue but I think the key is maturity. Everyone has growing pains, everyone gets a little defensive - me included, everyone has off days, everyone can be over-sensetive sometimes.... perhaps we shouldn't be restricting anything but instead trying to be a bit more understanding of human nature. (I kind of agree with thehandsome in that less rules are better, that self control is more important.)
Oh I will shut up now I am rambling on - hope this makes a little sense. Wishing everyone a peaceful weekend.
|
|
15. |
22 Mar 2008 Sat 08:47 pm |
Ok, since no restrictions on religion and politics seems to be everyone's wish, we will modify the forum rules accordingly. However, I think these topics should still be posted in moderation to maintain the focus on Turkey as much as we can and at the same time we reserve the right to send a warning to a person who is posting too many topics that are unrelated to Turkey. Does that sound fair enough?
However, if it turns out that these topics will lead to many arguments, we will restrict the forum rules again.
|
|
16. |
22 Mar 2008 Sat 09:41 pm |
Quoting catwoman: Ok, since no restrictions on religion and politics seems to be everyone's wish, we will modify the forum rules accordingly. However, I think these topics should still be posted in moderation to maintain the focus on Turkey as much as we can and at the same time we reserve the right to send a warning to a person who is posting too many topics that are unrelated to Turkey. Does that sound fair enough?
However, if it turns out that these topics will lead to many arguments, we will restrict the forum rules again. |
İ dont know why would there be any warning to anyone as long as they dont disrespect anyone,and as long as they are posting it in its proper place?!
Unless there would be technical problems outcoming of it,is there ?
And from our privious experience,i believe there is no place for İF here dear cat
Of course politics and religions will cause many arguments,they are hot topics,so i guess we need strict rules,emphasis that respecting others opinions and believes and not attacking any even if they were not applicable to us by all means,are the main rules of having such debats.
Oh to be honest dear cat,when i think about how should we form rules to be much satisfying to many parts,i be glad that im not admin !
You have hard job to do here really.
|
|
17. |
22 Mar 2008 Sat 10:10 pm |
I explained why we would decide to send a warning. We dont want people to treat this web site as their blog; although we can discuss anything, let's try to stay focused on Turkey as much as possible.
|
|
18. |
28 Mar 2008 Fri 03:11 pm |
I agree with what is said about complete freedom, but unfortunately this complete freedom has resulted in complaints from members about the website.
Therefore we will more strictly moderate the forums on such topics.
Complete restriction is impossible and not favourable, but complete freedom has shown to held double standards at this website, and is therefore not preferable either for the timebeing.
We thank you for your understanding and cooperation and hope to have more peaceful discussions from now on.
DK.
|
|
19. |
28 Mar 2008 Fri 03:46 pm |
so..have the rules changed again?
|
|
20. |
28 Mar 2008 Fri 03:48 pm |
Quoting thehandsom: so..have the rules changed again? |
I gave no rule, did I I just summarized the implications of both options as given by members in this forum, and said that more strict moderation will be a sollution.
|
|
21. |
28 Mar 2008 Fri 07:38 pm |
Quoting caliptrix: I want to make an offer about religious topics. If someone wants to say something in his mind, he must put a prove such as a reference link that what he says is really in the religion and really related to Turkey. But the reference must be acredited, or at least not provokable, improper and unacceptable. And then he can say what he thinks about that practice or idea without saying as if that religious idea or practice were 'funny'; and the critisizing words must not contain offhand or saucy feelings. |
I agree with this 100%. There has been way too much posting of things purported to be Islamic by those who know little about the reality. They are posting opinions as the truth. Theological studies are a very complicated subject.
Quoting caliptrix: But I want to say something to catwoman:
As far as I see, you made comments like this: 'you muslims see every critisize as if they were bad words'. Actually, you (yourself) see the bad words as critics even though everone can see clearly that many of these type posts were trying to say 'what you believe is only stupid, unacceptable, not even thinkable/meaningful/reasonable ideas' even though this ideas are hidden inside of the lines. I am very very serious about this. If the words contain saucy impressions, they can't be told 'critics'. |
Again, I agree 100% with this.
Quoting caliptrix: Or let's do this issue like this much more simply: Everyone can post religious texts only;
- without comment
- with the reference if it is an acceptable source about religion
- the ideas if it is really related to Turkey or Turkish culture |
I'd like to add to this: no discussion of Turkish delicate internal issues. Turkish ethnic issues, in particular, are difficult to know about and understand. Unless one is Turkish, or at least has spent extensive amount of time there, it's doubtful a constructive and informed opinion is forthcoming. The offering of uninformed opinions just adds confusion and chaos to the situation.
A lot of people have left this site, they have either asked to be deleted, or they have just left with no comments. I myself do not come here to get involved in debates on sensitive issues. I came here to learn Turkish language, find out more about Turkish music and food. I do not come here to get into religious debates and political arguments.
|
|
22. |
28 Mar 2008 Fri 07:59 pm |
Quoting alameda:
I'd like to add to this: no discussion of Turkish delicate internal issues. Turkish ethnic issues, in particular, are difficult to know about and understand. Unless one is Turkish, or at least has spent extensive amount of time there, it's doubtful a constructive and informed opinion is forthcoming. The offering of uninformed opinions just adds confusion and chaos to the situation. |
I'm sorry but I disagree. I wrote here earlier that Turkey's internal politics affects not only Turkey. If there's something stirring up in Turkey, I'd like to know about it. If Turkey is to join EU, I'd like to know how it deals with internal conflicts. I'd like to know how human rights and freedom of speech work there. Besides, very often it is Turks debating with other Turks about ethnical issues. Are you trying to say that Turks shouldn't comment on the situation either?
Quote: A lot of people have left this site, they have either asked to be deleted, or they have just left with no comments. I myself do not come here to get involved in debates on sensitive issues. I came here to learn Turkish language, find out more about Turkish music and food. I do not come here to get into religious debates and political arguments.
|
And she just can't let go, can she? For whoever's sake! Wake up girl! This site has changed and your moaning and whining added to it. The result now is that nobody talks about anything. Even you come here to comment only on threads that talk about freedom of speech in this site. If you come here only to learn Turkish and find out about food and music it's your choice. Some people have interests that go beyond kitchen! And you're trying to make everybody talk only about your hobbies. Not really fair, is it? I learn language as well but I don't care about 99 ways of grilling eggplants. Instead, I love exchanging ideas about this world and religions with people from all over the world, people I have no chance of meeting every day. And you're telling me that I should either talk about cooking or not talk at all...that's really low...
|
|
23. |
28 Mar 2008 Fri 08:21 pm |
I think its been agreed and widely understood that this place would get pretty stale without talking current events and politics. Sharing views and ideas is the road to mutual understanding. As far as those that go to far, "flamers" are dealt with properly and quickly.
|
|
24. |
28 Mar 2008 Fri 08:28 pm |
Quoting Daydreamer: ......And she just can't let go, can she? For whoever's sake! Wake up girl! This site has changed and your moaning and whining added to it. The result now is that nobody talks about anything. Even you come here to comment only on threads that talk about freedom of speech in this site. If you come here only to learn Turkish and find out about food and music it's your choice. Some people have interests that go beyond kitchen! And you're trying to make everybody talk only about your hobbies. Not really fair, is it? I learn language as well but I don't care about 99 ways of grilling eggplants. Instead, I love exchanging ideas about this world and religions with people from all over the world, people I have no chance of meeting every day. And you're telling me that I should either talk about cooking or not talk at all...that's really low... |
You see, your comment is exactly the type of comments that are disrespectful and confrontational. I posted a very measured and thought out analysis of the situation.
For you to then denigrate my comments as "This site has changed and your moaning and whining added to it" do nothing to elevate the discourse. It's what is called a Knee-jerk response
My post was only up a few minutes before you posted your response. That was not much time to actually read and deliberate on my thoughts.
|
|
25. |
28 Mar 2008 Fri 09:23 pm |
That was your 1000th post
-
Anyway, discussing Turkish politics and internal Turkish situations, is beyond discussion: not discussing these would take away the fundaments of the website: TURKEY.
|
|
27. |
28 Mar 2008 Fri 09:36 pm |
Quoting alameda:
I agree with this 100%. There has been way too much posting of things purported to be Islamic by those who know little about the reality. They are posting opinions as the truth. Theological studies are a very complicated subject. |
And what makes you the expert on everyone else's knowledge level alameda? You seem to think you are THE authority on the subject....well, guess what honey…..just because you post links and articles that support your point of view, doesn’t make you any more of an expert than anyone else here.
I think everyone here is smart enough to understand that just because someone posts a link or an article, that doesn't make it fact. But yet again, you diminish the intelligence level of the members of this site.
Quoting alameda:
I'd like to add to this: no discussion of Turkish delicate internal issues. Turkish ethnic issues, in particular, are difficult to know about and understand. Unless one is Turkish, or at least has spent extensive amount of time there, it's doubtful a constructive and informed opinion is forthcoming. The offering of uninformed opinions just adds confusion and chaos to the situation. |
YOU doubt that someone can develop an informed opinion if they haven’t spent an extensive amount of time in Turkey? Ok…so…what’s your definition of “extensive� Shall we make a new rule? If you have lived in Turkey for 3+ years, you are allowed to post opinions on great places to visit in Turkey. If you have lived there 20+ years, you are allowed to have an opinion on politics?
Shall we elect some kind of committee to determine who actually has an informed opinion???
Thank god this isn’t your decision to make!
|
|
28. |
28 Mar 2008 Fri 09:38 pm |
Quoting alameda:
My post was only up a few minutes before you posted your response. That was not much time to actually read and deliberate on my thoughts.
|
I think daydreamer is smart enough to read and post an opinion in a very short period of time. It doesn't take 3 hours for some people to digest what has been said and come up with a response.
|
|
29. |
28 Mar 2008 Fri 09:42 pm |
Quoting girleegirl: Quoting alameda:
My post was only up a few minutes before you posted your response. That was not much time to actually read and deliberate on my thoughts.
|
I think daydreamer is smart enough to read and post an opinion in a very short period of time. It doesn't take 3 hours for some people to digest what has been said and come up with a response. |
Well of course GG, that all depends has Daydreamer lived in Turkey for more than 3+ years? She may not have met the qualifications to post an opinion.
|
|
30. |
28 Mar 2008 Fri 09:44 pm |
Quoting teaschip1:
Well of course GG, that all depends has Daydreamer lived in Turkey for more than 3+ years? She may not have met the qualifications to post an opinion. |
|
|
31. |
28 Mar 2008 Fri 09:54 pm |
Wooow,i wish alameda would post more then to keep TLC THAT enthusiasm hee hee
|
|
32. |
28 Mar 2008 Fri 10:18 pm |
Cut it out guys..
|
|
33. |
28 Mar 2008 Fri 10:37 pm |
Quoting Deli_kizin: Cut it out guys.. |
M'am, Yes M'am
(Haven't I replied too fast? I hope you won't think that I didn't spend enough time thinking your command through...)
Alameda - it doesn't take a genius to understand what you wanted to say in your post. My reply was 20 min after yours. And that's enough time to read it and get your point How long does it take you to read a post like that? A minute is enough. To ponder? As if there was something to ponder! Just one and the same thing over and over again...
GG & Teas - who knows...perhaps I am Turkish...
|
|
34. |
28 Mar 2008 Fri 10:44 pm |
Perhaps, perhaps, perhaps
|
|
35. |
29 Mar 2008 Sat 01:00 pm |
Quoting girleegirl: Quoting alameda:
My post was only up a few minutes before you posted your response. That was not much time to actually read and deliberate on my thoughts.
|
I think daydreamer is smart enough to read and post an opinion in a very short period of time. It doesn't take 3 hours for some people to digest what has been said and come up with a response. |
It does for some of us! At work, lunch time, read post, log off, log on at night and write a reply post! Could be 5 hours!
|
|
36. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 01:44 am |
There is absolutely no problem in posting links in order to inform others. It can save a great deal of time in a debate because it negates the need to back up a point 2 or 3 posts later. I don't think people who post links are patronizing those involved in the debate and in fact other members may find the links useful/informative. Lighten up everyone and stop using this issue as a stick to beat someone with. I'm sure the site advises that links be posted when appropriate anyway.
|
|
37. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 03:34 am |
I don't believe anyone was being critical about posting links..I firmly stated that I found what people write here more useful than googleing. I don't have a problem with links when it's necessary, however just because a link is posted doesn't necessarily mean it's factual. You must consider the resources.
So why don't you take your own advice and lighten up yourself Peace Train....
|
|
38. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 05:48 am |
Maybe I have not read enough threads, but from what I see, whenever Alemeda posts something, the same people find a reason to be critical of her and her post.
I don't think Peacetrain posting a positive statement about Alemeda deserves the kind of response that you posted Tea. From my chair, very rude....
|
|
39. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 08:23 am |
Well peace train, you missed the point. The comments that I make about the posting of links is strictly to make the case that anyone can find a link that will support their way of thinking. It’s not really about links…it is about alameda stating that people here know nothing about Islam….well at least the people that post anything that questions Islam.
The question to alameda….which she has always avoided answering is….what qualifications does she have that make her opinion right while everyone else’s opinions just “add confusion and chaos to the situation“. What credentials give alameda the right to proclaim that what she posts are the “truth†while the rest of know nothing about the “reality†of Islam and only post opinions.
|
|
40. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 08:30 am |
Quoting KeithL: Maybe I have not read enough threads, but from what I see, whenever Alemeda posts something, the same people find a reason to be critical of her and her post.
I don't think Peacetrain posting a positive statement about Alemeda deserves the kind of response that you posted Tea. From my chair, very rude.... |
How is it that you would find teas post to be rude but you don't find peace trains to be rude?
Quoting karpusqueen:
Lighten up everyone and stop using this issue as a stick to beat someone with. I'm sure the site advises that links be posted when appropriate anyway. |
Quoting teaschip1:
So why don't you take your own advice and lighten up yourself Peace Train.... |
From my chair, a double standard...
|
|
42. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 11:55 am |
I don't think anyone criticizes Alameda for posting links. Some find it useful, some pointless or patronising, it's all up to personal likes. What I think most people hold against Alameda is that she has a specific type of debating. Personally, I don't find it debating at all, namely, whenever an argument is posted, she never bothers to refute it with her own words, she posts something absolutely different that her best friend Google finds. If we discuss women's rights in Islam she posts all the hits from women's rights in Christianity instead of creating a separate thread for their discussion. It's a bit like talking to the wall. You say Hitler was a murderer and she rushes to provide you with Stalin's atrocities. Of course she is right about the latter being a murderer, but little does it have to do with the fact that Hitler was not a very nice person himself.
|
|
43. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 01:46 pm |
Quoting KeithL: Maybe I have not read enough threads, but from what I see, whenever Alemeda posts something, the same people find a reason to be critical of her and her post.
|
İ see it this way too,even its very obviouse that you dont need to go through old posts to be sure of it !
İ just wonder ,WHY?!
|
|
44. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 01:55 pm |
Good that you now provide links for the words or things you are saying
And you are also using your friend google!
Maybe now you understand its not easy and alameda pay efforts and take time to provide such links and you would appreciate it !
İf you dont appreciate it,if you dont wish to read more about it,then dont click on the link,other people do you know ?!
But,i find it inappropriate to make fun of it!
İt shouldnt really be the spirit among us here !
|
|
45. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 04:30 pm |
Quoting girleegirl: Quoting KeithL: Maybe I have not read enough threads, but from what I see, whenever Alemeda posts something, the same people find a reason to be critical of her and her post.
I don't think Peacetrain posting a positive statement about Alemeda deserves the kind of response that you posted Tea. From my chair, very rude.... |
How is it that you would find teas post to be rude but you don't find peace trains to be rude?
Quoting karpusqueen:
Lighten up everyone and stop using this issue as a stick to beat someone with. I'm sure the site advises that links be posted when appropriate anyway. |
Quoting teaschip1:
So why don't you take your own advice and lighten up yourself Peace Train.... |
From my chair, a double standard... |
It certainly is GG..it seems to be a continual problem with Keith..double standards. He can attack Israel, but anyone defends Palestein...we are anti-islam and anti-turkish.. If someone tells us to lighten up on Alameda and we clearly have not be critical on this post..but defend ourselves we are being rude...
I really hold little value or respect for such a mod...no kudos here.
|
|
47. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 04:51 pm |
Quoting Deli_kizin: Cut it out guys.. |
Is DK also allowing double-standards? Or am I pulling strings?
|
|
48. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 04:53 pm |
Quoting teaschip1: It certainly is GG..it seems to be a continual problem with Keith..double standards. He can attack Israel, but anyone defends Palestein...we are anti-islam and anti-turkish.. If someone tells us to lighten up on Alameda and we clearly have not be critical on this post..but defend ourselves we are being rude...
I really hold little value or respect for such a mod...no kudos here. |
Your sentence isn't exactly clear but I think I get your meaning. You can say anything you want about Palestine. And I am free to defend them. Simple...
|
|
49. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 04:56 pm |
Quoting teaschip1:
I really hold little value or respect for such a mod...no kudos here. |
I think respecting mods is not compulsory..
I did not see anything in the rules section..
|
|
50. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 04:59 pm |
Quoting KeithL: Quoting Deli_kizin: Cut it out guys.. |
Is DK also allowing double-standards? Or am I pulling strings? |
Please don't try to shift focus. I would appreciate a real response to a specific and valid question I asked of you. How is teas post any more rude than peace trains?
|
|
51. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 05:08 pm |
Quoting KeithL: Quoting teaschip1: It certainly is GG..it seems to be a continual problem with Keith..double standards. He can attack Israel, but anyone defends Palestein...we are anti-islam and anti-turkish.. If someone tells us to lighten up on Alameda and we clearly have not be critical on this post..but defend ourselves we are being rude...
I really hold little value or respect for such a mod...no kudos here. |
Your sentence isn't exactly clear but I think I get your meaning. You can say anything you want about Palestine. And I am free to defend them. Simple... |
Thanks for pointing that out. Maybe you were being helpful as a mod by doing that or simply wanting to embarrass me. But I'm sure you have GOOD motives, right. I mean that's part of being a mod to be helpful.
To make things clearer...You can say anthing you want about Israel, which you have..but when someone comes back and criticizes Palestine you get upset and start a stupid anti poll...
Do you see me resorting to this level of behavior...also calling out members rude isn't real appropriate in my book as being a mod. Maybe handsom's book could be of help to you, or better yet "First Time Mods".
|
|
52. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 05:41 pm |
I'm going to make this simple. I think that some of you here enjoy having fun at the expense of others. If I see posts like this, I may choose to comment.
Deli stepped in before I did and said to stop. And then when it continued, I also commented.
Teaschip, you have free-speech. I don't expect you to agree with me on most political subjects. This does not bother me. Feel free to post as you wish...
|
|
53. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 05:45 pm |
Quoting karpusqueen: There is absolutely no problem in posting links in order to inform others. It can save a great deal of time in a debate because it negates the need to back up a point 2 or 3 posts later. I don't think people who post links are patronizing those involved in the debate and in fact other members may find the links useful/informative. Lighten up everyone and stop using this issue as a stick to beat someone with. I'm sure the site advises that links be posted when appropriate anyway. |
I have re-read this post multiple times. GG (and anyone else), find me where this thread is anyway rude.
Unlike many posts here that just insert a sarcastic comment, this post actually makes a point. And the lighten up sentence, this was her way of saying play nice. This offends you? I'm sorry but I can't help you...
|
|
54. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 05:54 pm |
Quoting KeithL:
I have re-read this post multiple times. GG (and anyone else), find me where this thread is anyway rude.
Unlike many posts here that just insert a sarcastic comment, this post actually makes a point. And the lighten up sentence, this was her way of saying play nice. This offends you? I'm sorry but I can't help you... |
Gosh keith, I really didn't think it was that difficult. I never said that peace trains post was rude. The question was....how is teas any more rude than peace trains? I hope I have made that simple enough for you to understand this time.
|
|
55. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 05:55 pm |
Quoting KeithL: Quoting karpusqueen: There is absolutely no problem in posting links in order to inform others. It can save a great deal of time in a debate because it negates the need to back up a point 2 or 3 posts later. I don't think people who post links are patronizing those involved in the debate and in fact other members may find the links useful/informative. Lighten up everyone and stop using this issue as a stick to beat someone with. I'm sure the site advises that links be posted when appropriate anyway. |
I have re-read this post multiple times. GG (and anyone else), find me where this thread is anyway rude.
Unlike many posts here that just insert a sarcastic comment, this post actually makes a point. And the lighten up sentence, this was her way of saying play nice. This offends you? I'm sorry but I can't help you... |
Then please site where on this post where I was being critical of Alameda? So your saying that my response to PeaceTrain was being rude telling her to lighten up, but you see no problem with her telling everyone else to lighten up. Come on Keith are you that blind?
|
|
58. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 06:20 pm |
Quoting teaschip1: Quoting Elisabeth: OK, I was on holiday for 4 days....nothing has changed...GOOD! Keith arguing with Teas and GG...all is right in the world! |
Welcome back Elisabeth! Hope your vacation was good...
Yes, somethings never change here.. Just make sure you lighten up or we'll beat you with a stick. |
AHHHH!! Not again!!
|
|
60. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 06:38 pm |
And always the same people with the same boring responses. So why don't you post something worth discussing then? I'm looking forward to your most enlightening post.
Bye the way, you honestly MUST be bored if you still come here and read our posts.
|
|
61. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 06:55 pm |
Quoting teaschip1: Why post your opinion alameda if you have little interest in this topic? Doesn't make sense, unless you wanted to get a reaction. But on second thought you stated you didn't care to participate in debating.
For the record, I have taken away more from this site from other classmates regarding various religions & politics than reading a link or googleing. |
This is where it starts. This thread had been moving along without Teaschip's involvement. Her first post into this thread had nothing to do with the topic being discussed. Her only intent was to jump in and say something negative about Alameda. This is rude and childish behavior.
|
|
62. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 08:06 pm |
I'm not bored at all now, thank you. Perhaps if people would give straight answers to questions, things could be sorted out a bit quicker for you but I see no problem with discussing an issue that keeps resurfacing. And I won't stop being true to myself and my thoughts because it makes someone else uncomfortable. I tried that for about a minute...and....well.....it just didn't work for me.
|
|
63. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 08:11 pm |
Quoting KeithL:
This is where it starts. This thread had been moving along without Teaschip's involvement. Her first post into this thread had nothing to do with the topic being discussed. Her only intent was to jump in and say something negative about Alameda. This is rude and childish behavior. |
Wow!! You are unbelievable! Are you gonna call out every single person that posts an unrelated comment on a thread here on TC or is it just gonna be teas? I guess your list would have to include everyone on this site, including you, so that's probably just too much work for you!!
|
|
64. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 08:21 pm |
Quoting KeithL: Quoting teaschip1: Why post your opinion alameda if you have little interest in this topic? Doesn't make sense, unless you wanted to get a reaction. But on second thought you stated you didn't care to participate in debating.
For the record, I have taken away more from this site from other classmates regarding various religions & politics than reading a link or googleing. |
This is where it starts. This thread had been moving along without Teaschip's involvement. Her first post into this thread had nothing to do with the topic being discussed. Her only intent was to jump in and say something negative about Alameda. This is rude and childish behavior. |
Unbelievable Keith. Shame on you! You should no what harassment is more than anyone. So please quit harassing me. This mod crap has definately gotten to your head! I like how you selectively posted my response rather than what instigated it in the first place, which was Alameda.
So why don't you be a man, instead of this whimpering crap you dish out. Bye the way...you are way out of line and OFF TOPIC.
And to continue slamming me only shows how rude and childish you ARE!
|
|
65. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 09:14 pm |
Quoting KeithL: Is DK also allowing double-standards? |
I hope I don't...
|
|
66. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 09:23 pm |
Anyway people, this is enough.
1. If you have any complaints about a member, solve it with the person him/herself through PM, or if that doesn't work out you can contact one of the administrators or moderators. We will see what we can do.
2. If you have complaints about a moderator, you can contact one of the administrators and we will discuss with moderator in question.
3. If you have complaints about a specific administrator you can address one of the other two.
Please no public mudfight about who did what and when and who is stubborn, and who does or who does not post and read links, because this way you are never going to find a sollution for it. You will only create a bigger feeling of discontent on the website, which is exactly what we are trying to fight here!
Thank you for your cooperation.
|
|
67. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 09:35 pm |
Quote: Unless one is Turkish, or at least has spent extensive amount of time there, it's doubtful a constructive and informed opinion is forthcoming. The offering of uninformed opinions just adds confusion and chaos to the situation.
A lot of people have left this site, they have either asked to be deleted, or they have just left with no comments. I myself do not come here to get involved in debates on sensitive issues. I came here to learn Turkish language, find out more about Turkish music and food. I do not come here to get into religious debates and political arguments.
|
My last comment on this, quote by Alameda. I simply asked her why she was giving an opinion on a topic "Religion and Politics" if her intent was not to participate in these discussions. I added that I mearly enjoyed hearing people opinions rather than links. PeaceTrain then posts a message that we should lighten up and quit using people as a stick to beat them up with. I again gave a response in which I thought was very clear that I felt them to be ok when necessary and for her to lighten up herself.
I am certainly going to defend myself and found Alameda's post along with other members as insulting. I have every right to give my opinion here without backing it up with a LINK. In return I have a Mod here calling me rude, immature and childish. Wow what an improvement to this site! Now were into name calling by the Mods..how professional.
I hear the same people griping about consistency, however those same people should learn to apply it themselves.
|
|
68. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 09:37 pm |
Quoting Deli_kizin: Anyway people, this is enough.
1. If you have any complaints about a member, solve it with the person him/herself through PM, or if that doesn't work out you can contact one of the administrators or moderators. We will see what we can do.
2. If you have complaints about a moderator, you can contact one of the administrators and we will discuss with moderator in question.
3. If you have complaints about a specific administrator you can address one of the other two.
Please no public mudfight about who did what and when and who is stubborn, and who does or who does not post and read links, because this way you are never going to find a sollution for it. You will only create a bigger feeling of discontent on the website, which is exactly what we are trying to fight here!
Thank you for your cooperation. |
This needs to begin with the mods at this site....lead by example please.
|
|
69. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 09:38 pm |
Quoting Deli_kizin: Please no public mudfight |
I love mudfights....
|
|
70. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 09:39 pm |
Even discussing the discussion of religion and politics kicks up a lot of dust! I personally don't find ANYONE being rude....just BORED! Next topic please!
|
|
71. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 09:41 pm |
Quoting Elisabeth: Even discussing the discussion of religion and politics kicks up a lot of dust! I personally don't find ANYONE being rude....just BORED! Next topic please! |
Your pick Lis... Hey what about reporter Lis, I miss all of your reports. Where has Femme & Aenigma been? Is Femme still out of the country?
|
|
72. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 09:49 pm |
Quoting girleegirl: Quoting KeithL:
This is where it starts. This thread had been moving along without Teaschip's involvement. Her first post into this thread had nothing to do with the topic being discussed. Her only intent was to jump in and say something negative about Alameda. This is rude and childish behavior. |
Wow!! You are unbelievable! Are you gonna call out every single person that posts an unrelated comment on a thread here on TC or is it just gonna be teas? I guess your list would have to include everyone on this site, including you, so that's probably just too much work for you!! |
I was the second moderator who posted here to stop. Then, I was asked to explain my actions and I did.
And if I see other people jumping into a thread, without the intent to add to discussion, only to attack someone, I will do it again. This isn't about changing a topic in a thread, this was about soley entering a thread to demean someone. No one should do this. This thread was ponted out to me in a PM by a member. I did not respond until I felt DK's request was ignored.
|
|
73. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 09:52 pm |
Quoting KeithL: Quoting girleegirl: Quoting KeithL:
This is where it starts. This thread had been moving along without Teaschip's involvement. Her first post into this thread had nothing to do with the topic being discussed. Her only intent was to jump in and say something negative about Alameda. This is rude and childish behavior. |
Wow!! You are unbelievable! Are you gonna call out every single person that posts an unrelated comment on a thread here on TC or is it just gonna be teas? I guess your list would have to include everyone on this site, including you, so that's probably just too much work for you!! |
I was the second moderator who posted here to stop. Then, I was asked to explain my actions and I did.
And if I see other people jumping into a thread, without the intent to add to discussion, only to attack someone, I will do it again. This isn't about changing a topic in a thread, this was about soley entering a thread to demean someone. No one should do this. This thread was ponted out to me in a PM by a member. I did not respond until I felt DK's request was ignored.
|
You are so full of it Keith..How do you know what MY intent was? Once again, I was merely pointing out that I PREFER OPINIONS, rather than links all of the time. So quit ASSUMING you know what MY intent was.
|
|
74. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 09:56 pm |
Quoting teaschip1: Quoting Elisabeth: Even discussing the discussion of religion and politics kicks up a lot of dust! I personally don't find ANYONE being rude....just BORED! Next topic please! |
Your pick Lis... Hey what about reporter Lis, I miss all of your reports. Where has Femme & Aenigma been? Is Femme still out of the country? |
They found a couple of dudus and are living it up in Marmaris.
As far as my TC Enquirer posts, I don't think humor is allowed anymore. I try to post what I am listening to, how I feel, what ticked me off, what made me smile...ect...you know all the non-controversial stuff.
|
|
75. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 10:04 pm |
Quoting Elisabeth: Quoting teaschip1: Quoting Elisabeth: Even discussing the discussion of religion and politics kicks up a lot of dust! I personally don't find ANYONE being rude....just BORED! Next topic please! |
Your pick Lis... Hey what about reporter Lis, I miss all of your reports. Where has Femme & Aenigma been? Is Femme still out of the country? |
They found a couple of dudus and are living it up in Marmaris.
As far as my TC Enquirer posts, I don't think humor is allowed anymore. I try to post what I am listening to, how I feel, what ticked me off, what made me smile...ect...you know all the non-controversial stuff. |
So in other words they'll be back soon, after the dudus take all of their money. I'm beginning to feel that way too, no humor, no disagreeing, no opinions. But heck isn't it the new and improved TC? Sorry, don't answer that would be giving your opinion.
|
|
76. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 10:54 pm |
Quoting teaschip1: Your pick Lis... Hey what about reporter Lis, I miss all of your reports. Where has Femme & Aenigma been? Is Femme still out of the country? |
+10000000000
I also want to know!!!!
|
|
77. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 11:07 pm |
Quoting teaschip1: Quoting Elisabeth: Quoting teaschip1: Quoting Elisabeth: Even discussing the discussion of religion and politics kicks up a lot of dust! I personally don't find ANYONE being rude....just BORED! Next topic please! |
Your pick Lis... Hey what about reporter Lis, I miss all of your reports. Where has Femme & Aenigma been? Is Femme still out of the country? |
They found a couple of dudus and are living it up in Marmaris.
As far as my TC Enquirer posts, I don't think humor is allowed anymore. I try to post what I am listening to, how I feel, what ticked me off, what made me smile...ect...you know all the non-controversial stuff. |
So in other words they'll be back soon, after the dudus take all of their money. I'm beginning to feel that way too, no humor, no disagreeing, no opinions. But heck isn't it the new and improved TC? Sorry, don't answer that would be giving your opinion. |
Oh,Teas, don't be so disagreable...we are all getting along so well now...all of us with our hands neatly folded and our thoughts pure as the driven snow! You're just a bed Amerikan trying to express your opinion...well guess what...TC doesn't care, so put on your uniform and happy face and join the new regime! We would love for you to join the new politically correct politeness brigade...it's all the rage here on TC.
|
|
78. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 11:23 pm |
I would love to lock the thread now. Though I have asked you all to stop it, you keep on discussing. Yet, if I close it, I will be accused of making people 'mouth dead' and that this wasn't even worth it to be locked. Or you will accuse me of not letting you practise your freedom of speech, or that I am one-sided. There is always a complaint. Apparantly I can never moderate well enough. Lead by example? I did not enter this debate, I only asked you all to give a break. But nobody listens. So what does my example matter, really?
So this is your last call: Stop this useless discussion. As I have said Teaschip, if you have any problems with a moderator for any reason whatsoever, let me know.
Thank you. That was enough mud for today I'd say
|
|
79. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 11:43 pm |
I dont think this thread should be locked at all..
|
|
80. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 11:51 pm |
Quoting thehandsom: I dont think this thread should be locked at all..
|
Well İ didnt (yet )
|
|
81. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 11:55 pm |
Quoting thehandsom: I dont think this thread should be locked at all..
|
I don't think it will be locked. The message that is trying to be conveyed is that pointless, personal attacks are not appreciated. There is still plenty of latitude to have fun here. But if fun for some is limited to abusing other members, then it will not continue to be fun for those members that practice this.
|
|
82. |
31 Mar 2008 Mon 11:56 pm |
Very clever post Handsom...2 thumbs up...
|
|
83. |
01 Apr 2008 Tue 12:03 am |
...
|
|
84. |
01 Apr 2008 Tue 01:03 am |
Quoting girleegirl: Quoting KeithL: Maybe I have not read enough threads, but from what I see, whenever Alemeda posts something, the same people find a reason to be critical of her and her post.
I don't think Peacetrain posting a positive statement about Alemeda deserves the kind of response that you posted Tea. From my chair, very rude.... |
How is it that you would find teas post to be rude but you don't find peace trains to be rude?
Quoting karpusqueen:
Lighten up everyone and stop using this issue as a stick to beat someone with. I'm sure the site advises that links be posted when appropriate anyway. |
Quoting teaschip1:
So why don't you take your own advice and lighten up yourself Peace Train.... |
From my chair, a double standard... |
Dear GG
My comment was a general one teaschip's was personal . . . and besides . . . her tone was all wrong
So please, calm down dear
Another point I would like to make is that I agree with Keith, everytime Alameda posts something the same old clan come out and respond to her posts with such a scathing tone at times. OK so you don't need educating, don't take the posts so personally, other people reading the posts but not participating may find them useful. Alameda is not doing any harm at all, it's simply her style. We're all different. You don't have to read the links, just ignore them. I just don't see the point in sniping about them . . . it's unkind.
( Be my guest and do your worst with the above)
|
|
85. |
01 Apr 2008 Tue 01:12 am |
Quoting teaschip1: Quoting girleegirl: Quoting KeithL: Maybe I have not read enough threads, but from what I see, whenever Alemeda posts something, the same people find a reason to be critical of her and her post.
I don't think Peacetrain posting a positive statement about Alemeda deserves the kind of response that you posted Tea. From my chair, very rude.... |
How is it that you would find teas post to be rude but you don't find peace trains to be rude?
Quoting karpusqueen:
Lighten up everyone and stop using this issue as a stick to beat someone with. I'm sure the site advises that links be posted when appropriate anyway. |
Quoting teaschip1:
So why don't you take your own advice and lighten up yourself Peace Train.... |
From my chair, a double standard... |
It certainly is GG..it seems to be a continual problem with Keith..double standards. He can attack Israel, but anyone defends Palestein...we are anti-islam and anti-turkish.. If someone tells us to lighten up on Alameda and we clearly have not be critical on this post..but defend ourselves we are being rude...
I really hold little value or respect for such a mod...no kudos here. |
There's absolutely nothing wrong with disagreeing with somebody's point of view but why oh why do some people think there is value in criticising someone for providing links?
This thread is getting to look like a kindergarten and I know for a fact that Catwoman hates such activity ( )
|
|
86. |
01 Apr 2008 Tue 01:23 am |
Quoting teaschip1: Quoting KeithL: Quoting teaschip1: Why post your opinion alameda if you have little interest in this topic? Doesn't make sense, unless you wanted to get a reaction. But on second thought you stated you didn't care to participate in debating.
For the record, I have taken away more from this site from other classmates regarding various religions & politics than reading a link or googleing. |
This is where it starts. This thread had been moving along without Teaschip's involvement. Her first post into this thread had nothing to do with the topic being discussed. Her only intent was to jump in and say something negative about Alameda. This is rude and childish behavior. |
Unbelievable Keith. Shame on you! You should no what harassment is more than anyone. So please quit harassing me. This mod crap has definately gotten to your head! I like how you selectively posted my response rather than what instigated it in the first place, which was Alameda.
So why don't you be a man, instead of this whimpering crap you dish out. Bye the way...you are way out of line and OFF TOPIC.
And to continue slamming me only shows how rude and childish you ARE! |
I don't see that he is continuously slamming you teas. He is only answering all the questions about a comment he made about you. It simply looks worse than it really is
"Whimpering crap" tut tut shame on you
|
|
87. |
01 Apr 2008 Tue 01:25 am |
Quoting Deli_kizin: Anyway people, this is enough.
1. If you have any complaints about a member, solve it with the person him/herself through PM, or if that doesn't work out you can contact one of the administrators or moderators. We will see what we can do.
2. If you have complaints about a moderator, you can contact one of the administrators and we will discuss with moderator in question.
3. If you have complaints about a specific administrator you can address one of the other two.
Please no public mudfight about who did what and when and who is stubborn, and who does or who does not post and read links, because this way you are never going to find a sollution for it. You will only create a bigger feeling of discontent on the website, which is exactly what we are trying to fight here!
Thank you for your cooperation. |
Dear DK Please don't think I disregarded your above post. I have been away and was responding to posts as I read them. I've only just got to this one.
|
|
88. |
01 Apr 2008 Tue 01:26 am |
Quoting karpusqueen: This thread is getting to look like a kindergarten |
A kindergarten where all kids think they are the teacher.
|
|
89. |
01 Apr 2008 Tue 01:31 am |
Quoting Deli_kizin: Quoting karpusqueen: This thread is getting to look like a kindergarten |
A kindergarten where all kids think they are the teacher. |
But who is the principal?
|
|
90. |
01 Apr 2008 Tue 02:44 am |
Quoting karpusqueen: There is absolutely no problem in posting links in order to inform others. It can save a great deal of time in a debate because it negates the need to back up a point 2 or 3 posts later. I don't think people who post links are patronizing those involved in the debate and in fact other members may find the links useful/informative. Lighten up everyone and stop using this issue as a stick to beat someone with. I'm sure the site advises that links be posted when appropriate anyway. |
Quoting teaschip1: I don't believe anyone was being critical about posting links..I firmly stated that I found what people write here more useful than googleing. I don't have a problem with links when it's necessary, however just because a link is posted doesn't necessarily mean it's factual. You must consider the resources.
So why don't you take your own advice and lighten up yourself Peace Train.... |
Quoting KeithL: Maybe I have not read enough threads, but from what I see, whenever Alemeda posts something, the same people find a reason to be critical of her and her post.
I don't think Peacetrain posting a positive statement about Alemeda deserves the kind of response that you posted Tea. From my chair, very rude.... |
Keith, I cannot find ANYTHING rude in teaship's reply to peace train. I have no idea what it is you think was rude in her post... I think she was extremely clear and polite in what she said. I find it quite unfair to point her out as the example of why some discussions go out of hand, especially when me and many other people see nothing wrong here.
I haven't responded to karpusqueen's post because it just looked to me that she completely didn't get why we complain about some of alameda's links. She's talking about apples, while we talk about oranges. And that's how most of our conversations with them are anyway.
I think I am one of the people you are referring to who comment on alameda's posts. Actually, really, that is just too bad for alameda. I happen to disagree with her a lot and I have a problem with the things she says and the way she says them. I try to tell her what bothers me, but she almost universally doesn't listen and just keeps on talking about her own thing. I am not being unfair to her, I am only saying what I think.
If you are pointing out a group of people "attacking" alameda every time she posts something, I think it's equally important to say that there is a group of people who continuously attack me, girleegirl or handsom whenever we post something. I'm not crying about it though because it just looks like certain people happen to disagree on everything, and that's also the case with me and alameda. So please, try to understand that nobody is being intentionally mean here.
|
|
91. |
01 Apr 2008 Tue 02:47 am |
Quoting karpusqueen: I don't see that he is continuously slamming you teas. He is only answering all the questions about a comment he made about you. It simply looks worse than it really is
"Whimpering crap" tut tut shame on you |
I would be surprised if you did see!
|
|
92. |
01 Apr 2008 Tue 02:48 am |
Quoting KeithL: Quoting teaschip1: Why post your opinion alameda if you have little interest in this topic? Doesn't make sense, unless you wanted to get a reaction. But on second thought you stated you didn't care to participate in debating.
For the record, I have taken away more from this site from other classmates regarding various religions & politics than reading a link or googleing. |
This is where it starts. This thread had been moving along without Teaschip's involvement. Her first post into this thread had nothing to do with the topic being discussed. Her only intent was to jump in and say something negative about Alameda. This is rude and childish behavior. |
This is only your opinion Keith and I believe teaship has as much right to post here as everybody else. And personally, I find her posts to be very much in line with the topic and very interesting. And actually, I find your post to be rude.
|
|
93. |
01 Apr 2008 Tue 02:52 am |
Quoting catwoman:
Keith, I cannot find ANYTHING rude in teaship's reply to peace train. I have no idea what it is you think was rude in her post... I think she was extremely clear and polite in what she said. I find it quite unfair to point her out as the example of why some discussions go out of hand, especially when me and many other people see nothing wrong here.
I haven't responded to karpusqueen's post because it just looked to me that she completely didn't get why we complain about some of alameda's links. She's talking about apples, while we talk about oranges. And that's how most of our conversations with them are anyway.
I think I am one of the people you are referring to who comment on alameda's posts. Actually, really, that is just too bad for alameda. I happen to disagree with her a lot and I have a problem with the things she says and the way she says them. I try to tell her what bothers me, but she almost universally doesn't listen and just keeps on talking about her own thing. I am not being unfair to her, I am only saying what I think.
If you are pointing out a group of people "attacking" alameda every time she posts something, I think it's equally important to say that there is a group of people who continuously attack me, girleegirl or handsom whenever we post something. I'm not crying about it though because it just looks like certain people happen to disagree on everything, and that's also the case with me and alameda. So please, try to understand that nobody is being intentionally mean here. |
Nicely stated kitty.
|
|
94. |
01 Apr 2008 Tue 02:52 am |
Quoting Deli_kizin: Quoting thehandsom: I dont think this thread should be locked at all..
|
Well İ didnt (yet ) |
Actually this thread should stay to show us how BAD a moderator can be.
It should stay as an example to show that how a moderator cant not earn respect without being just.
It should stay to show all of us how a moderator's personal grudges blind the impartiality of a mod.
And in the end,
This thread should stay as a supreme example of why some people should NOT be a mod.
|
|
95. |
01 Apr 2008 Tue 04:09 am |
Even moderators can disagree. I have discussed this thread with other moderators, so I know there are at least 3 of us agree that the comments by Tea were taken as disrespectful.
Power trip by the way? Hardly. I have never even considered deleting or closing a thread. My comments were as much as a user than as a mod. But so you know, I would be just as happy at TC to not be a moderator as I am being one. Catwoman knows that at any moment if she feels I am not an appropriate moderator, I will step aside, no questions asked.
Coming in, I know who my detractors are (I can count them on on one hand), so the hostility does not surprise me, much less bother me.
Find me another thread where a 3rd party jumps in and is only there to insult and not add anything to the discussion and I will tell them as well it is inappropriate.
|
|
96. |
01 Apr 2008 Tue 05:58 am |
Quoting KeithL: Even moderators can disagree. I have discussed this thread with other moderators, so I know there are at least 3 of us agree that the comments by Tea were taken as disrespectful. |
Absolutely true. The rules that moderators need to follow are very clear and their job is to enforce forum rules, no more no less. They can express their own opinions as users and they can disagree with each other.
However, I do disagree that teaschip's comment was disrespectful, I see none of it whatsoever in her post.
Quoting KeithL: Power trip by the way? Hardly. I have never even considered deleting or closing a thread. My comments were as much as a user than as a mod. But so you know, I would be just as happy at TC to not be a moderator as I am being one. Catwoman knows that at any moment if she feels I am not an appropriate moderator, I will step aside, no questions asked. |
I do agree that Keith has been very fair as a moderator at least until now. I don't see that he has ever abused his power.
Quoting KeithL: Coming in, I know who my detractors are (I can count them on on one hand), so the hostility does not surprise me, much less bother me.
Find me another thread where a 3rd party jumps in and is only there to insult and not add anything to the discussion and I will tell them as well it is inappropriate. |
I really don't see any hostility there, people are simply expressing their views and I think they sense as much hostility towards them as you sense towards yourself . I do think we should try to get be beyond that...
At the same time I do believe that Keith is just being honest about what he believes, although I wholeheartedly disagree with him and even find his response to teaschip to be rude and hurtful.
|
|
97. |
01 Apr 2008 Tue 09:55 pm |
let me ask this to the members of whats left of "the gang"
If you are free to be critical of Alameda, why do you cry when I am critical of you??
|
|
98. |
01 Apr 2008 Tue 10:13 pm |
Quoting KeithL: let me ask this to the members of whats left of "the gang"
If you are free to be critical of Alameda, why do you cry when I am critical of you?? |
You are so predictable!!! Uhh who had the closest time to 2:55 PM in the TC betting pool on when keith to jump to alameda's defense? Do we have a winner???
I think it is hilarious how people refer to "the gang" as though it were something real!!! It was a joke...it was a group who could lighten up and have some fun!
|
|
99. |
01 Apr 2008 Tue 10:17 pm |
Quoting girleegirl: You are so predictable!!! Uhh who had the closest time to 2:55 PM in the TC betting pool on when keith to jump to alameda's defense? Do we have a winner???
I think it is hilarious how people refer to "the gang" as though it were something real!!! It was a joke...it was a group who could lighten up and have some fun!
|
hahaha 
|
|
100. |
01 Apr 2008 Tue 11:04 pm |
Quoting thehandsom: Quoting girleegirl: You are so predictable!!! Uhh who had the closest time to 2:55 PM in the TC betting pool on when keith to jump to alameda's defense? Do we have a winner???
I think it is hilarious how people refer to "the gang" as though it were something real!!! It was a joke...it was a group who could lighten up and have some fun!
|
hahaha   |
GG and handsom you owe me 20 dollars...please send it to me in USD..THANKS!!
|
|
101. |
01 Apr 2008 Tue 11:05 pm |
Quoting girleegirl: Quoting KeithL: let me ask this to the members of whats left of "the gang"
If you are free to be critical of Alameda, why do you cry when I am critical of you?? |
You are so predictable!!! Uhh who had the closest time to 2:55 PM in the TC betting pool on when keith to jump to alameda's defense? Do we have a winner???
I think it is hilarious how people refer to "the gang" as though it were something real!!! It was a joke...it was a group who could lighten up and have some fun!
|
That's what I said . . . lighten up everybody.
|
|
102. |
01 Apr 2008 Tue 11:12 pm |
Quoting Elisabeth:
GG and handsom you owe me 20 dollars...please send it to me in USD..THANKS!! |
only 20dlls? is that all? I think you doubted you were going to win and just in case you lost.. you only betted $20...girl not even for 1/4 tank of gasoline
|
|
103. |
01 Apr 2008 Tue 11:15 pm |
Quoting thehandsom: Quoting Deli_kizin: Quoting thehandsom: I dont think this thread should be locked at all..
|
Well İ didnt (yet ) |
Actually this thread should stay to show us how BAD a moderator can be.
It should stay as an example to show that how a moderator cant not earn respect without being just.
It should stay to show all of us how a moderator's personal grudges blind the impartiality of a mod.
And in the end,
This thread should stay as a supreme example of why some people should NOT be a mod.
|
"BAD moderator" ? You'd have to take that up with the people who appointed him. They obviously saw something in Keith that you didn't, not that hard I think.
However, let this thread stay, you are right. This thread should stay as evidence of how childish WE can all be at times on this site.
Kirsty was absolutely right in her post and there was no sense in criticising her for what she said. Sometimes the truth hurts.
A few people are annoyed with the recent changes but those changes were made for a reason and there must have been more than a few asking for them, otherwise the Admin team would not have made them. Anyway, the changes are minimal. Now we are all arguing about the rules and the changes, who said what and how they said it.
Some people thing Alameda gets unfair treatment from certain quarters and others don't . . . looks like a stand off to me.
Shall we dance?
Hark I hear the sound of tapping fingers heading this way . . . AGAIN
|
|
104. |
01 Apr 2008 Tue 11:28 pm |
Quoting karpusqueen:
That's what I said . . . lighten up everybody.  |
Tell it to your own gang...it is obvious that THIS gang has been having fun all along!
|
|
105. |
01 Apr 2008 Tue 11:39 pm |
Quoting Elisabeth:
GG and handsom you owe me 20 dollars...please send it to me in USD..THANKS!! |
Handsom as long as you are STILL under me I think you should do my bidding. Please be a good boy and pay Elisabeth for both of us will you?
|
|
106. |
01 Apr 2008 Tue 11:45 pm |
Quoting girleegirl: Quoting Elisabeth:
GG and handsom you owe me 20 dollars...please send it to me in USD..THANKS!! |
Handsom as long as you are STILL under me I think you should do my bidding. Please be a good boy and pay Elisabeth for both of us will you? |
He left as soon as he realized he owed money!
|
|
107. |
02 Apr 2008 Wed 12:15 am |
Quoting girleegirl: Quoting KeithL: let me ask this to the members of whats left of "the gang"
If you are free to be critical of Alameda, why do you cry when I am critical of you?? |
You are so predictable!!! Uhh who had the closest time to 2:55 PM in the TC betting pool on when keith to jump to alameda's defense? Do we have a winner???
I think it is hilarious how people refer to "the gang" as though it were something real!!! It was a joke...it was a group who could lighten up and have some fun!
|
Its true though. You post 50 times criticizing Alemeda to my 1 time to defending her. And when I jump in and even say the smallest thing, you cry to your "protector".
You want to be able to say whatever you want, about whomever you want and not be challenged.
You can dish it out, but can't take it....
|
|
108. |
02 Apr 2008 Wed 01:27 am |
Quoting girleegirl: Quoting karpusqueen:
That's what I said . . . lighten up everybody.  |
Tell it to your own gang...it is obvious that THIS gang has been having fun all along! |
Your posts are always amusing to read GG. There's only one "gang" on this site as far as I know dear and the members labelled themselves, nobody else did it. "Chewing Gum" . . . starts of so refreshing but after a few chews . . . becomes tasteless and boring . . . I'm talking about chewing gum you understand, please don't read anything into what I just said (I learned that technique from Handsom )
Night deary
|
|
109. |
02 Apr 2008 Wed 01:43 am |
Do you people all really care who is right or wrong?
|
|
110. |
02 Apr 2008 Wed 01:50 am |
Peacetrain/karpusqueen... it's impossible to respect your views when you always express yourself in this self righteous, condescending way... :-S
|
|
111. |
02 Apr 2008 Wed 01:52 am |
Quoting Deli_kizin: Do you people all really care who is right or wrong? |
That's the problem DK . . . people seeing things as black or white, right or wrong. Not everything is so clear cut. There's a great deal of playing around with words on these forums and the situation invariably ends up the same. When you mix all the colours of playdough together and work it, it always ends up a nasty brown colour. That's what we have here sometimes. No I'm not being sanctimonious, I'm being honest about my own and everyone else's behaviour at times.
It's not always a question of right or wrong but opposing views. People are always going to view things differently, depending on the perspective they have. I guess we're all good people underneath but this TC place seems to change our characters.
|
|
112. |
02 Apr 2008 Wed 01:56 am |
I don't know really.. if somebody tries to tell me who I am over internet, or makes a personal comment, ofcourse I shall respond. And if somebody says something that is against my thoughts of freedom, women rights, religious perception whatsoever, ofcourse I shall respond. But all these discussions? Everybody seems to feel the need to have the last word. Please somebody, respond. I dont feel the need to have the last word anyway
|
|
113. |
02 Apr 2008 Wed 01:58 am |
Quoting karpusqueen: That's the problem DK . . . people seeing things as black or white, right or wrong. Not everything is so clear cut. There's a great deal of playing around with words on these forums and the situation invariably ends up the same. When you mix all the colours of playdough together and work it, it always ends up a nasty brown colour. That's what we have here sometimes. No I'm not being sanctimonious, I'm being honest about my own and everyone else's behaviour at times.
It's not always a question of right or wrong but opposing views. People are always going to view things differently, depending on the perspective they have. I guess we're all good people underneath but this TC place seems to change our characters.  |
And the biggest word player is you canim . You have another crown, this time from me!
|
|
114. |
02 Apr 2008 Wed 03:02 am |
Sanctimonious
Aenigma would use this word very often.
|
|
115. |
02 Apr 2008 Wed 03:09 am |
Quoting vineyards: Sanctimonious
Aenigma would use this word very often. |
Yes. I'm really surprized that she managed to really stay away! But I bet she is like the others from the 'old club' who left.. they take a look whats going on here every once in a while
|
|
116. |
02 Apr 2008 Wed 12:40 pm |
Quoting Deli_kizin: Quoting vineyards: Sanctimonious
Aenigma would use this word very often. |
Yes. I'm really surprized that she managed to really stay away! But I bet she is like the others from the 'old club' who left.. they take a look whats going on here every once in a while  |
Deli - can we lock this thread now on the grounds that it has become incredibly BORING!!!
|
|
117. |
02 Apr 2008 Wed 12:43 pm |
Quoting lady in red: Quoting Deli_kizin: Quoting vineyards: Sanctimonious
Aenigma would use this word very often. |
Yes. I'm really surprized that she managed to really stay away! But I bet she is like the others from the 'old club' who left.. they take a look whats going on here every once in a while  |
Deli - can we lock this thread now on the grounds that it has become incredibly BORING!!!
|
Oop! Sorry! Just my personal opinion of course!
|
|
118. |
07 Apr 2008 Mon 11:28 am |
Quoting catwoman: Quoting karpusqueen: That's the problem DK . . . people seeing things as black or white, right or wrong. Not everything is so clear cut. There's a great deal of playing around with words on these forums and the situation invariably ends up the same. When you mix all the colours of playdough together and work it, it always ends up a nasty brown colour. That's what we have here sometimes. No I'm not being sanctimonious, I'm being honest about my own and everyone else's behaviour at times.
It's not always a question of right or wrong but opposing views. People are always going to view things differently, depending on the perspective they have. I guess we're all good people underneath but this TC place seems to change our characters.  |
And the biggest word player is you canim . You have another crown, this time from me!  |
Nah . . . thank you for the kind gesture but I will decline this crown on the grounds we are thinking of different styles of word play . The word play I am referring to is played best by Handsom, so he can be it's Queen.
|
|
119. |
07 Apr 2008 Mon 11:32 am |
Quoting vineyards: Sanctimonious
Aenigma would use this word very often. |
Yes, it was her special way of showing her affection for me (peacetrain). Please don't tell me she used it towards others too some people are so fickle, you can't trust anybody these days
|
|
120. |
08 Apr 2008 Tue 02:45 pm |
Quoting catwoman: Peacetrain/karpusqueen... it's impossible to respect your views when you always express yourself in this self righteous, condescending way... :-S |
You are right . . . it is impossible to respect someone's views sometimes. I thought my response to GG was quite fitting as a reply to her reference to "gangs". There have been several references recently to "gangs", "groups", "sides". One only has to agree with someone on a point or defend them and suddenly a "gang" or "group" is formed and lines are drawn by others.
btw I noticed your posts are much less aggressive than they used to be and more fitting for a site owner. . . well done!
|
|
121. |
09 Apr 2008 Wed 10:45 pm |
Quoting karpusqueen: Quoting catwoman: Peacetrain/karpusqueen... it's impossible to respect your views when you always express yourself in this self righteous, condescending way... :-S |
You are right . . . it is impossible to respect someone's views sometimes. I thought my response to GG was quite fitting as a reply to her reference to "gangs". There have been several references recently to "gangs", "groups", "sides". One only has to agree with someone on a point or defend them and suddenly a "gang" or "group" is formed and lines are drawn by others. |
I do expect you to think that what you said was right.... But why are you offended when someone doesn't think the same way? Don't complain about gangs canim any more, cause that would mean criticizing yourself.
|
|
122. |
10 Apr 2008 Thu 01:49 pm |
Quoting catwoman: Quoting karpusqueen: Quoting catwoman: Peacetrain/karpusqueen... it's impossible to respect your views when you always express yourself in this self righteous, condescending way... :-S |
You are right . . . it is impossible to respect someone's views sometimes. I thought my response to GG was quite fitting as a reply to her reference to "gangs". There have been several references recently to "gangs", "groups", "sides". One only has to agree with someone on a point or defend them and suddenly a "gang" or "group" is formed and lines are drawn by others. |
I do expect you to think that what you said was right.... But why are you offended when someone doesn't think the same way? Don't complain about gangs canim any more, cause that would mean criticizing yourself.  |
I haven't a clue what point you are making here. I haven't mentioned being offended, probably because I'm not. What am I supposed to be offended by? I've never mentioned myself being in a gang or group or on a side either, so how can I criticise myself when I mention others do? It is a fact that a few people here let references to gangs, groups and sides slip into their posts and, in my opinion, it speaks volumes.
You are scraping the bottom of the barrel here.
|
|
|