A game has been released online where the sole objective is to kill Muslims. The player character is an ´ American Hero ´, armed with a variety of heavy weapons. The ´ enemies ´ all appear dressed in head dresses or robes..

A huge ´OHA´ yani..

anyway..

address of the game is  here

 People are sick!

 I agree, and talk about inciting racial hatred!  This would be a punishable offence with several years in prison in the UK.

 Beyond belief!  

when a Muslim does this kind of thing, he is called islamic terrorist. but then again according to the christians all the terrorists are muslims, right? if you`re a christian you can`t be a terrorist even if you go kill 1 millions of muslims.

 Unfortunately, that´s what it is looking like....but being a Peace Activist or Union member is pretty close.

What a prejudiced nonsense. It seems to me there are to you only 2 types of people, good muslims and bad others - amongst them all christians, agnosts, atheists etc. Games like TS mentioned are awful and it does not matter who made them. But if we stick to the 2-types story and the game: maybe you should try to find the several games, articles, toys and other ´funny´ stuff that is made by Hamas and Al Quaida supporters. You think they made nice Barbies when showing the image of westerners? Dream on.

what does this sentence imply to you?

"when a muslim does this kind of thing, he is called a terrorist."

Doesn`t that mean that I accept muslims do this kind of things too?

I wonder if you realy don`t understand what you read or just trying to  attack me pretending  you misinterpret it.

 Next time - when you are making your ´nice´ statements about westerners, Americans, Christians etc. - add ´by me as well´ when writing a sentence like the italic one above.

Tami, I know your obsession but how do you know it´s Christians who are responsible for this sick game? Maybe it was atheists? maybe pagan front? Maybe monetarists who just thought it was funny and could bring profit...

The difference is this is a game and what muslim extremists do is reality. If you are talking about Iraq, no christian army went there in the name of Christ. They went there in the name of "democracy". And more than a half of victims in Iraq (and anywhere on the globe) were killed by muslim extremists in the name of Allah. Now, this is a difference.

admit it, even you don`t believe what you`re saying.

right, that`s why Bush calls the Iraq war a crusade, and says that it`s God`s will.

I wouldn´t rely on what Bush said. He´s also the author of the following:

"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we."

How reliable is that?

Bushisms

Oh, and I always believe what I write Don´t mistake war for money with religion

then we can`t rely on what Laden and all his comrades say either since they are all bums. So we can conclude that no muslim is terrorist. enjoy!

Let´s see...suicide bombers using the idea of jihad to justify murders and westerners using the idea of promoting democracy...there´s a big difference in the reasons (not actions). Democracy is not a religion - and Islam is. Besides, how can you call Bin Laden a bum? That guy could buy you, your family and all the donekeys you may ever want to have. Hardly a bum´s quality

it`s pointless to argue with you daydreamer because you always repeat yourself as if you say smt different. who says that the suicide bombers blow themselfs up for jihad? the suicide bombers themselves.

and who says that America fights for a crusade? the American president himself. why do you believe what the suicide bombers say but not what Bush says?

and you`re just being funny when you say "promoting democracy" in Iraq. even 5 yrs old children would laugh at that lie. You better stop saying the same things over and over again daydreamer, there isn`t even one single reason to justify the Christian terrorism in Iraq.

 Here is the guy who developed the game.

He does not look particularly Christian to me, in fact the name he chose is a Pagan Norse god name....more of a white supremist type name.

I am not sure if you can say that the terorism in Iraq is ´christian terrorism´ weather Bush says it is or not.

It is so obvious that the war in Iraq is nothing to do with the religion.

As long as Iraq is neighbour with Iran and SA , instead country of carrot, they are the country of oil, USA would invade Iraq.

And of course it is nothing to do with democracy either!!

What I am trying to say is that even  Iraqies were worshipping  "Eris, the Goddess of Discord" as opposed to Allah, same thing would have happened to them. (Same thing goes to Bush as well. He could have been worshipping potatoes instead of  God. it would not matter)

But you know very well that bombers blow themselves up for jihad.

You know it, I know it, a guy in Patagonia knows it.

 Actually I don´t know it...and the more I know the more I know I don´t know....

...this whole thing sort of reminds me of smoke and mirrors....One thing I do know is a lot of innocent people´s lives are ruined...and some people are making a lot of money....

IMHO....it´s about power....

, Tami, don´t you think it´s you who is constantly trying to blame Christians for what money-driven US is responsible for? Crusades are over, no religious wars are on on behalf of Church. Bush´s words are unreliable because he´s often proven not to understand what he says. Besides, American president does not represent Christians, he represents the American society - all of it - Christians, Pagans, Atheists, Mormons and Muslims too.

And of course it is not about democracy - read my post number 14 - I stated pretty clearly there it is about money and democracy is merely an excuse they´re using.

The world is about money. Only fools think that there´s an underlying deeper reson of anything as far as politics is concerned. It´s always been so and it always will be.

this thread is getting pointless. here is what I originally said;

"when a Muslim does this kind of thing, he is called islamic terrorist. but then again according to the christians all the terrorists are muslims, right? if you`re a christian you can`t be a terrorist even if you go kill 1 millions of muslims."

and that`s 100% true.

(:

Nope. Ever heard of IRA, ETA, RAF, some pro-life activists in the US etc? All Christians, all terrorists. You shouldn´t be so offended when something negative is said about some Muslims, it doesn´t mean that all are bad. You are the one who is generalising.

none of the groups you mentioned killed Muslims, and those Christian terrorist groups that killed Muslims such as eoka, asala, tashnak are never considered to be terrorist by the west.

 THE west? Who is/are that?

Well I know it - and as I type this I am actually watching a TV program about a plan to blow up planes over the Atlantic (post 9/11) that was foiled after surveillance by MI5 and this surveillance shows the terrorists recording the ´martyrdom´ messages to be posted on the internet after their deaths.

As Trudy said, there are Christians who are recognised terrorists. Why doesn´t the West (whoever they are) recognise US and EU troops in Iraq as terrorists? The answer is simple - because there are there not for religious resons and they are not all Christians - I´m sure if you surveyed troops in Iraq and Afghanistan on the religion of individual soldiers you´d find all kinds.

 Whatever you say DD, remember that ´we´ are always bad!

what does this have to do with their being terrorists? since when do you have to represent a religious group to be considered terrorist?

I have to agree with that - Bader-Meinhof for example - no religious connection there as far as I remember.

Who said you have to represent a religious group to be a terrorist? Definitely not me! I was just responding to your comment about Christian terrorists. First you claim there aren´t any that are recognised by the evil west, then when you´re proven wrong by Trudy you change your initial charge against west saying that you meant Christians killing Muslims. So, as INITIALLY you spoke about Bush and crusades, I commented on the situation in Iraq - even if you want to call them (the US and EU forces) terrorists, you can´t make them religious terrorists for the reason I stated.

So they are terrorists, evil west

 And we are always racist

how come I`m proven wrong? has someone proven that Bush didn`t call the Iraq war
"god`s will"? what`s going on in Iraq is christian terrorism but even if you don`t agree with its being christianity related, it`s still terrorism. and the christian west will never accept that.

haha

Ya.. the war in Iraq is nothing to do with the religion.!!!

It is terrorism I agree but "it is nothing to do with the religionnnnnnnnn"

And it does not matter what Bush said..

You should really stop looking at the events from ONLY Christian-muslim point of view..

(It is what Osama wants everybody to think that way.)

Because most of the the wars are about  economical interests of some  countries.

Again -

1. Bush has been proven to use wrong words or not understanding what he says million of times

2. Bush doesn´t represent Christianity as the USA is made up of Christians,Pagans, Atheists, Muslims etc - so if they are on war, so are all religions

3. No Church or religious organisation stands behind it

4. It is not an act of terrorism - it is a war and the US & EU are aggressors. They don´t blow up people at random quoting Bible.

5. The war is about MONEY not religion

But you may still decie to think that the whole west is Christian (not true) and that Christianity has a decisive voice in the action against Iraq (it doesn´t - money does). Choose to believe in whatever you want, but Crusades ended ages ago. And talking about West you can´t say it equals Christianity - there´s too many a denomination and non-Christian beliefs that it hardly is a Christian world. If you claim the terrorists are Christian - which denomination do you mean? Baptists? Methodists? Catholics? They´d rather fight against each other than go arm in arm on war against Muslims.

believe what you want dd, Im tired of replying to your pathetic posts saying "Bush doesn`t know what he is talking about so there is no terrorism".

I´m not soaying there´s no terrorism because Bush is an idiot who doesn´t know what he is saying - I´m saying that US and EU are aggressors in Iraq and shouldn´t have gone there. I said that it had nothing to do with religion - which is a notion you keep bringing up over and over again.

 İ just want to comment on this,if that was true,then what about Plain ?!

İ think there is more into it than just misusing the words claim.

İm sorry,but now after what Sarah Plain said,that was nothing but claims !

http://www.turkishclass.com/forumTitle_33694

This is all that there is from Alameda´s link about the guy that created the game:

"An Apology

I would like to make a public apology for any offense that I might have caused through releasing this game, and to Muslims in particular. My intentions when releasing this project were to mock the foreign policy of the United States and the commonly held belief in the United States that Muslims are a hostile people to be held with suspicion. I would like to make it clear that I have never shared such a belief and my intention was to mock those who actually do believe these things.

It quickly became obvious to me that releasing this game did not achieve its intended effect and instead only caused hurt to hospitable, innocent people. I believe removing this game and website will do much more to attain my desired effect than leaving it on the internet, so I am doing just that.

I would like to ask for the forgiveness of Muslims around the world and to make it clear that I did not release this game with ill intent. So without further ado, I would like to say that I am truly apologetic for what I have done and will take full responsibility for all offense that has been caused. I can only hope that any further misgivings can be laid to rest.

Sincerely,
- Sigvatr"

sorry folks, the page has widened a great deal because of my previous post. I don´t know why it´s done that because that´s not what it looked like in my "add message" window.    I´ll try and sort it.

seems somebody has done something for me ?

Well..it was not me this time..I swear

 I didn´t see a photo on the link, only this statement:

Actually, I checked his site yesterday and there was a picture of him. But it seems his blogs have been removed from his site. Some members from his site called him "crazy" others "psyco" ....I might be wrong, but I am not sure if he is American since there was a member who called him crazy Australian...again...not sure.

Modified: I just found this other site with his personal information http://sigvatr.deviantart.com/

Nope seems I did it myself, but I don´t know how I managed to get the quote where it is !!!

oops 

MR ADMIN !!   PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAASE  HELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLP !!!

The message is still in my window when I modify, but it´s not in my box on the page, it´s in it´s own little box.

I told you ´be nice to me´ did not I?

ps I sent you a pm about how you might correct it

 And I´ve carried out the first part but I still have a big fat page!!!!!

yes...and it is kind of annoying

 Even when I deleted the offending post, the page remains wide.  I have been reliably informed it is because you quoted me.  So, please can you delete my quote from your post (number 45 I think) ?

Thanks

 oops!

 DONE!!!

Havent you know,handsom was spreading a virus şııııııtttttttt  lol

 Thank you

There are a few minor details that need to be added. When those neutral American soldiers went to invade Iraq, they took thousands of people to their Guantanamo base in Cuba. Those well-intentioned folks spat on their holy books, dumped it in the toilet, when they were on a break from the tortures they exerted on Muslims captured in Afghanistan, Iraq and elsewhere. Before the American President began physically democratizing the country, he had already publicly revealed his intentions.

For your information, the US is the only country in the world with a defense doctrine stating that the country can resort to military means if it feels it may be threatened by another country not necessarily now but in the future. To understand the significance of this article, it is enough to remember that even Hitler did not attempt to pass such a defense doctrine in his heyday. Did he have such a document at hand he would not have to elaborate the Danzig dispute among others into an argument supporting Germany´s entrance into the war.