Practice Turkish |
|
|
|
Negative
|
10. |
14 Sep 2008 Sun 10:11 pm |
What confuses me why the difference with onlar ...lar
Güzeller mi?
Güzel değiller mi?
|
|
11. |
14 Sep 2008 Sun 10:28 pm |
What confuses me why the difference with onlar ...lar
Güzeller mi?
Güzel değiller mi?
I didn´t get what confuses you here CANLI.
|
|
12. |
14 Sep 2008 Sun 10:37 pm |
yes i understan u CANLI me too have the same q
pleas let me make it more clear
we mean in ben for ex:
u put (mi) between değil and im
and the same in the rest except onlar?
why?
|
|
13. |
14 Sep 2008 Sun 10:43 pm |
yes i understan u CANLI me too have the same q
pleas let me make it more clear
we mean in ben for ex:
u put (mi) between değil and im
and the same in the rest except onlar?
why?
I hope I undestood it correctly, the reason is probably because of the difference between the suffixes. "ler" and "-im, -sin, -iz, -siniz" suffixes are not the same type of suffixes. "-ler" is a plural suffix, and the others are personal suffixes (or possessive). "Onlar" and "o" do not take personal suffixes, words for these are in the non suffix forms. -ler is added for "onlar" just to make the nouns plural. I hope I gave a right explanation.
|
|
14. |
14 Sep 2008 Sun 10:48 pm |
I hope I undestood it correctly, the reason is probably because of the difference between the suffixes. "ler" and "-im, -sin, -iz, -siniz" suffixes are not the same type of suffixes. "-ler" is a plural suffix, and the others are personal suffixes (or possessive). "Onlar" and "o" do not take personal suffixes, words for these are in the non suffix forms. -ler is added for "onlar" just to make the nouns plural. I hope I gave a right explanation.
yes that was so clear
thank u so much
|
|
15. |
14 Sep 2008 Sun 11:30 pm |
I hope I undestood it correctly, the reason is probably because of the difference between the suffixes. "ler" and "-im, -sin, -iz, -siniz" suffixes are not the same type of suffixes. "-ler" is a plural suffix, and the others are personal suffixes (or possessive). "Onlar" and "o" do not take personal suffixes, words for these are in the non suffix forms. -ler is added for "onlar" just to make the nouns plural. I hope I gave a right explanation.
Yes mltm,thats what i meant
İ never thought about it this way,i thought its another suffix ´personal´ takes the same form of the plural lAr
Thanks
İ dare to think then,onlar is also the plural of o then !
|
|
|