Practice Turkish |
|
|
|
Negative
|
1. |
14 Sep 2008 Sun 08:41 pm |
I had a look at the lessons but I couldn´t figure out where to put the ´değil´ part in sentences like these:
My sweetheart - Canım. You are so beautiful - Çok güzelsin.
Is that:
canım değilim
pek güzelsin değilsin
Anyone please?
|
|
2. |
14 Sep 2008 Sun 09:23 pm |
I had a look at the lessons but I couldn´t figure out where to put the ´değil´ part in sentences like these:
My sweetheart - Canım. You are so beautiful - Çok güzelsin.
Is that:
canım değilim
pek güzelsin değilsin
Anyone please?
canım -my dear,darling
You are so beautiful - Çok güzelsin
you are not beautiful - sen guzel degilsin
canım degildir- she isn´t my dear
|
|
3. |
14 Sep 2008 Sun 09:32 pm |
canım -my dear,darling
canım degildir- she isn´t my dear
Thanks Nisreen, but what is the negative of my first sentence? (You are not my darling/dear)
|
|
4. |
14 Sep 2008 Sun 09:34 pm |
Canim değilsin
|
|
5. |
14 Sep 2008 Sun 09:34 pm |
Thanks Nisreen, but what is the negative of my first sentence? (You are not my darling/dear)
the negative is değil ( canim means my darling or my dear ,canim degilsin you are not my dear)(değil not )(sin you )so değilsin means you are not
hope you got it
|
|
6. |
14 Sep 2008 Sun 09:38 pm |
the negative is değil ( canim means my darling or my dear ,canim degilsin you are not my dear)(değil not )(sin you )so değilsin means you are not
hope you got it
Yes, I got it, I just didn´t know where to put the -sin/-im etc, just after değil or as well after the noun. It is clear now. And I asked again because you answered me with ´she´s not...´
And before I forget: Thanks again.
|
|
7. |
14 Sep 2008 Sun 09:49 pm |
Simple forms to apply them.
Olumlu...affirmative:
ad/sıfat ´nouns/adjectives´ + kişi eki (´y´Im,sIn,-,´y´Iz,sInIz,lAr )
Güzelim.....i am beautiful
Güzelsin
Güzel
Güzeliz
Güzelsiniz
Güzel / güzeller ´both are correct´
Olumsuz...negative:
ad/sıfat değil + kişi eki
Güzel değilim.....i am not beautiful
Güzel değilsin
Güzel değil
Güzel değiliz
Güzel değilsiniz
Güzel değiller
Olumlu Soru... question:
ad/sıfat mI + kişi eki ?
Güzel miyim?....am i beautiful ?
Güzel misin?
Güzel mi?
Güzel miyiz?
Güzel misiniz?
Güzel mi ? / Güzeller mi ?
Olumsuz Soru...questions with nagative:
ad/sıfat değil mi +kişi eki?
Güzel değil miyim?.....am i not beautiful ?
Güzel değil misin?
Güzel değil mi?
Güzel değil miyiz?
Güzel değil misiniz?
Güzel değiller mi?
|
|
8. |
14 Sep 2008 Sun 10:03 pm |
Simple forms to apply them.
Güzelim
Güzel değilim
Güzel miyim?
Güzel değil miyim?
Simpel? Sorry, your explanation I find confusing with the olum-parts. Is it correct that the four sentences I quoted mean: I am beautiful, I am not beautiful, am I beautiful? and am I not beautiful? In that case I understand them.
|
|
9. |
14 Sep 2008 Sun 10:06 pm |
Yes,right
İ will add the translation beside them
|
|
10. |
14 Sep 2008 Sun 10:11 pm |
What confuses me why the difference with onlar ...lar
Güzeller mi?
Güzel değiller mi?
|
|
11. |
14 Sep 2008 Sun 10:28 pm |
What confuses me why the difference with onlar ...lar
Güzeller mi?
Güzel değiller mi?
I didn´t get what confuses you here CANLI.
|
|
12. |
14 Sep 2008 Sun 10:37 pm |
yes i understan u CANLI me too have the same q
pleas let me make it more clear
we mean in ben for ex:
u put (mi) between değil and im
and the same in the rest except onlar?
why?
|
|
13. |
14 Sep 2008 Sun 10:43 pm |
yes i understan u CANLI me too have the same q
pleas let me make it more clear
we mean in ben for ex:
u put (mi) between değil and im
and the same in the rest except onlar?
why?
I hope I undestood it correctly, the reason is probably because of the difference between the suffixes. "ler" and "-im, -sin, -iz, -siniz" suffixes are not the same type of suffixes. "-ler" is a plural suffix, and the others are personal suffixes (or possessive). "Onlar" and "o" do not take personal suffixes, words for these are in the non suffix forms. -ler is added for "onlar" just to make the nouns plural. I hope I gave a right explanation.
|
|
14. |
14 Sep 2008 Sun 10:48 pm |
I hope I undestood it correctly, the reason is probably because of the difference between the suffixes. "ler" and "-im, -sin, -iz, -siniz" suffixes are not the same type of suffixes. "-ler" is a plural suffix, and the others are personal suffixes (or possessive). "Onlar" and "o" do not take personal suffixes, words for these are in the non suffix forms. -ler is added for "onlar" just to make the nouns plural. I hope I gave a right explanation.
yes that was so clear
thank u so much
|
|
15. |
14 Sep 2008 Sun 11:30 pm |
I hope I undestood it correctly, the reason is probably because of the difference between the suffixes. "ler" and "-im, -sin, -iz, -siniz" suffixes are not the same type of suffixes. "-ler" is a plural suffix, and the others are personal suffixes (or possessive). "Onlar" and "o" do not take personal suffixes, words for these are in the non suffix forms. -ler is added for "onlar" just to make the nouns plural. I hope I gave a right explanation.
Yes mltm,thats what i meant
İ never thought about it this way,i thought its another suffix ´personal´ takes the same form of the plural lAr
Thanks
İ dare to think then,onlar is also the plural of o then !
|
|
|