General/Off-topic |
|
|
|
Racism in America
|
1. |
15 Nov 2008 Sat 09:56 pm |
It is a vast topic obviously... with a lot of nuanced details... but I would like to just quote an article that proves quite blatantly ´into our faces´ how racist this country still is.
Election spurs ´hundreds´ of race threats and crimes
Cross burnings. Schoolchildren chanting "Assassinate Obama." Black figures hung from nooses. Racial epithets scrawled on homes and cars.
Incidents around the country referring to President-elect Barack Obama are dampening the postelection glow of racial progress and harmony, highlighting the stubborn racism that remains in America.
From California to Maine, police have documented a range of alleged crimes, from vandalism and vague threats to at least one physical attack. Insults and taunts have been delivered by adults, college students and second-graders.
There have been "hundreds" of incidents since the election, many more than usual, said Mark Potok, director of the Intelligence Project at the Southern Poverty Law Center, which monitors hate crimes.
One was in Snellville, Ga., where Denene Millner said a boy on the school bus told her 9-year-old daughter the day after the election: "I hope Obama gets assassinated." That night, someone trashed her sister-in-law´s front lawn, mangled the Obama lawn signs, and left two pizza boxes filled with human feces outside the front door, Millner said.
She described her emotions as a combination of anger and fear.
"I can´t say that every white person in Snellville is evil and anti-Obama and willing to desecrate my property because one or two idiots did it," said Millner, who is black. "But it definitely makes you look a little different at the people who you live with, and makes you wonder what they´re capable of and what they´re really thinking."
(...)
What are your thouths on racism..?
|
|
2. |
15 Nov 2008 Sat 10:07 pm |
Racism (and other forms of discrimination) is horrible because in my view one must not judge people by race, sexe, age, ethniticity or ... but by their own deeds. But, I think that every one, really every one has sometimes a racistic thought. That is not the real problem, as far as one recognises it as bad. It becomes awful when someone with thoughts like that is acting towards his/her thoughts.
|
|
3. |
15 Nov 2008 Sat 11:56 pm |
Any other comments?
|
|
4. |
15 Nov 2008 Sat 11:57 pm |
Yes! I just don´t have time today 
|
|
5. |
16 Nov 2008 Sun 12:01 am |
Yes! I just don´t have time today 
Ok... I do wonder about your thoughts on this topic... 
|
|
6. |
16 Nov 2008 Sun 12:05 am |
Ok... I do wonder about your thoughts on this topic... 
Well, briefly (!) I think we are all guilty of racism. The word racism encompases far more than "black v white". It can include anything from mocking people who live different areas within one country right through to different skin colours and nationalities.
It is something that is "taught". You are not born a racist. Invariably it is handed down to you by your parents.
Essentially, I think it is about judging someone for ANY reason other then for their own merit.
|
|
7. |
16 Nov 2008 Sun 01:37 am |
Well, briefly (!) I think we are all guilty of racism. The word racism encompases far more than "black v white". It can include anything from mocking people who live different areas within one country right through to different skin colours and nationalities.
It is something that is "taught". You are not born a racist. Invariably it is handed down to you by your parents.
Essentially, I think it is about judging someone for ANY reason other then for their own merit.
I think all the things you mentioned have the same bottom line roots as the racism that we know best. It is a form of tribalism, where everybody who visibly is different then the rest is treated/perceived as the "other", not one of us, therefore the group is not protecting her/him. I recommend the book "Demonic Males: Apes and the Origins of human violence" by Dale Peterson. I think they described the roots of tribalism in this book exquisitly.
However, my question about racism was more about the current shape of it in your communities... do you see it? do you think it exists? does it bother you? why do you think it´s there? It would be interesting to compare the views of westerners and Turkish, Egyptian, Lebanese... and all other nationalities that we have, about racism in their countries.
|
|
8. |
16 Nov 2008 Sun 02:14 am |
However, my question about racism was more about the current shape of it in your communities... do you see it? do you think it exists? does it bother you? why do you think it´s there? It would be interesting to compare the views of westerners and Turkish, Egyptian, Lebanese... and all other nationalities that we have, about racism in their countries.
We dont have this kind of racism here
But we have things like what AE has mentioned,mocking people who live at different areas within the country ,sometimes by jokes made just for them,also we exchange them with them,they laugh about them,but still i think or feel that part inside them would be somehow annoyed
But somehow it doesnt make problem in here,because at same time we mock them because of who they are and where they are from,make jokes
We put them at high level/rank/situation too
We believe that the best men to deal with,who are honorable,respectable...etc are from those areas and we lable them by that too.
Ãf i understood that word right ´köyler´ and its usage in Türkiye,so it is same with that...at the time we call them köyler,still köyler is symbol of honorable ,generouse,respectable,kind,...etc people
Ãts a bit complicated to explain,but anyhow racism as you meant ´between black and whites´, we dont have here.
|
|
9. |
16 Nov 2008 Sun 07:33 am |
It is a vast topic obviously... with a lot of nuanced details... but I would like to just quote an article that proves quite blatantly ´into our faces´ how racist this country still is.
Election spurs ´hundreds´ of race threats and crimes
Cross burnings. Schoolchildren chanting "Assassinate Obama." Black figures hung from nooses. Racial epithets scrawled on homes and cars.
Incidents around the country referring to President-elect Barack Obama are dampening the postelection glow of racial progress and harmony, highlighting the stubborn racism that remains in America.
What are your thouths on racism..?
It is very very depressing indeed. Racisism in the US has a long history. The White/Black racisism in particular is "special". What happened to the Black people here is a unique event in human history, and still in living memory, although those who have first hand experience knowing exslaves are very old now, they are still alive. It´s interesting to note that. Michele Obama´s ancestors were slaves.
Race relations have improved a great deal in the last 40 years, but there is still a lot that needs to be done. It does go both ways, but I feel the Blacks have more "cause" to be upset than the "whites".
In the case of the "Whites", it´s like the flailing about of the doomed drowning man. They will take you down with them as they fight assistance, in their ignorance of attempts to assist them. They are afraid their race is dying out, or being overtaken. They are loosing power, so to speak.They were once the masters, the blacks had to defer to them, do their bidding. They were not able to operate independantly.
I discussed this with my friends and one, who is very philisophical, said humans are "pack animals" at the base. They gather in groups they feel commradery with. It´s unfortunate, most don´t see the universiality in all life. We are all one.The well being on one is the well being of all. It´s like a virus, one gets sick and others catch it.
This aspect of American culture is something I´ve fought for years, and it shames me deeply. It´s something I´ve seen foreigners learn when they come here. It´s really very sad. People who never thought about white, brown or black, learn.....It´s a tragic lesson.
I think the election of Obama shows that most Americans have moved on past this silly racisism, infortunately, we are also seeing that many have not.
I work, hope and pray for the best, and the patience and knowledge to deal with the worst.
|
|
10. |
16 Nov 2008 Sun 09:00 am |
Thank you Alameda for a great post! 
|
|
11. |
16 Nov 2008 Sun 11:04 am |
However, my question about racism was more about the current shape of it in your communities... do you see it? do you think it exists? does it bother you? why do you think it´s there? It would be interesting to compare the views of westerners and Turkish, Egyptian, Lebanese... and all other nationalities that we have, about racism in their countries.
Cat, I almost feel ashamed to say it, but I have no personal experience of racism, which is why I can´t comment!!! I live in a community that is almost 100% white-British so I suppose it is very easy for me to sit here and have my idealist views! When people complain about the vast numbers of immigrants coming to the UK, our community think of the nice Polish cafe in our main town, the ONE corner shop run by a nice family of Pakistanis, or the TWO Turkish kebab shops, and cry "ouh but they fit so well into our community and are so friendly and lovely" !!!!!
I suppose the nearest I get so seeing racism of my OWN race is actually here on this site!!! I suddenly realise that many Turks judge us because we are westerners and because of the reputation of some tourists, and a quick glance at the translation forum reminds us that only the very desparate or liberal of Turks would consider marrying one of "us" and taking us back to their small Turkish village to meet their parents!
Witnessing racism in the media sickens me. I immediately put myself in the place of the individual who is being discriminated against, and it feels worse than bullying - it is victimisation at it´s very worse.
However, I think there is something (as you said) within us that can become territorial. How would I feel to be living in a London suberb that has become almost entirely populated with immigrants who exclude me from their culture? How would I feel to be a "native" (there are no real natives left!) in the Caribbean and watching the rich American/British immigrants buying up land and excluding me from their clubs and bars?
These days I only visit places like London as a tourist. However I recently had to visit a hospital in the centre of London. During my two hour visit, I did not see a single white English person. Some staff were not talking English to eachother, many were in burkas or veils or Sikh headwear, the patients were all of other ethnic origin to my own, and it was hard to understand what the doctor was saying to me. I had not realised I felt uneasy or uncomfortable about it until I went to the X-Ray department and found English staff there, and realised I was much more comfortable. Does this make me a racist? I don´t know - it is an uncomfortable thought.
I believe racism in the US is a unique form, rising as it does from the roots of slavery and born of guilt and power. Racism elsewhere seems to me to be less about the colour of skin and more about clashing of cultures and resentment of change in our community. I can understand both but despise it at the same time 
|
|
12. |
16 Nov 2008 Sun 11:41 am |
it is interesting that people still complain about racism even though their president is black and the first lady is black whos ancestors were slaves.
i think im tired of idiocy written by alameda-like people.
|
|
13. |
16 Nov 2008 Sun 11:48 am |
im a racist, have to admit.
im a racist against certain mentality.
|
|
14. |
16 Nov 2008 Sun 11:50 am |
im a racist, have to admit.
im a racist against certain mentality.
Does that make you a mentalist? 
|
|
15. |
16 Nov 2008 Sun 11:52 am |
Racism elsewhere seems to me to be less about the colour of skin and more about clashing of cultures and resentment of change in our community. I can understand both but despise it at the same time 
True and not true. I can see it daily around me. Unlike you I live in a very multicultural neighbourhood of Rotterdam, with a 75% not-white-Dutch population. In Rotterdam (only 650.000 people) we have 162 nationalities (out of I believe 196 worldwide!) and yes, in some areas there are many problems based on culture, religion but also sometimes on race. It´s a clash between ´old´ citizens and ´new´ ones, both claiming their ´rights´. A clash between ´we Christian Dutch´ (60% of the Dutch is not-religious! but it´s a nice excuse people think) and other religions, mostly Islam. Many times problems are based on ignorance and not wanting to learn from both sides. Radicalism at both sides is growing, the number of gangs and groups of strong-armed guys is increasing. A clash between living indoors and a culture of living outdoors like in more tropical countries. As a consequence of the history of slavery of my country - which I am absolutely not proud of - there are many people from Surinam and the Dutch Antilles - there you have the discrimination based on color.
Like you sometimes I understand but indeed I despise it as well, though I have to admit that sometimes I find myself thinking not so nice thoughts - whenever that happens, I say to myself ´stop it´ and I try to see it in larger view but the fact these thoughts occur is worrying enough. And I was not raised this way! What I wonder many times is: Is it logical that I have these thoughts sometimes, due to many problems - only 3 days ago there was a shooting-affair only 50 meters from my house - not the first this year, most loverboys (pimps, not dudu´s!) have foreign roots, most drugrunners have foreign roots etc. - or am I changing in my views towards the right-wing political side?
NB. I say ´foreign roots´ not because I see them as foreigners but because many people from especially Morocco and Turkey even when they are born here and sometimes not able to speak their ancesters language fluently, call themselves ´Turks´ or Moroccons´ instead of Dutch.
(I find it very difficult to write things like this in another language than my own, so I hope I didn´t say anything confusing.)
|
|
16. |
16 Nov 2008 Sun 11:53 am |
Does that make you a mentalist? 
is it a new word? 
|
|
17. |
16 Nov 2008 Sun 11:54 am |
is it a new word? 
Like Femmenism? 
|
|
18. |
16 Nov 2008 Sun 11:56 am |
Like Femmenism? 
two new words today 
|
|
19. |
16 Nov 2008 Sun 11:56 am |
two new words today 
Stop going off topic, you bed femmenist mentalist 
|
|
20. |
16 Nov 2008 Sun 12:01 pm |
Stop going off topic, you bed femmenist mentalist 
did you become a mod? 
|
|
21. |
16 Nov 2008 Sun 12:02 pm |
did you become a mod? 
Yeah 
Why are you modist.....ouhhh hehehehe! Femme modest? Never 
|
|
22. |
16 Nov 2008 Sun 12:57 pm |
I detest racism and I witnessed it first hand in America to such an extent I was completely shocked. There is not just racism against blacks, Hispanics, etc etc but against white trailor trash as they are called. I was shocked to the core. The one reason that I will never go to America again.
|
|
23. |
16 Nov 2008 Sun 08:25 pm |
it is interesting that people still complain about racism even though their president is black and the first lady is black whos ancestors were slaves.
i think im tired of idiocy written by alameda-like people.
Did you read the article in the first post? It´s quite simple-minded to say taht tehre is no racism because the president is black!
|
|
24. |
16 Nov 2008 Sun 08:30 pm |
I detest racism and I witnessed it first hand in America to such an extent I was completely shocked. There is not just racism against blacks, Hispanics, etc etc but against white trailor trash as they are called. I was shocked to the core. The one reason that I will never go to America again.
What is that? Would you mind elaborating a little bit? thanks... 
|
|
25. |
16 Nov 2008 Sun 08:41 pm |
Did you read the article in the first post? It´s quite simple-minded to say taht tehre is no racism because the president is black!
if you read my post carefully, i didnt say that theresnt racism in america. do you really think that racism is still the same like in years 60? the fact that there are lots of black within the governmental positions, almost in every administration shows that the situation of blacks has much improved.
its such a shame, that people arent still satified, in every country theres racism less or more.
so far havent seen black presidents or prime ministers in europe.
|
|
26. |
16 Nov 2008 Sun 08:45 pm |
These days I only visit places like London as a tourist. However I recently had to visit a hospital in the centre of London. During my two hour visit, I did not see a single white English person. Some staff were not talking English to eachother, many were in burkas or veils or Sikh headwear, the patients were all of other ethnic origin to my own, and it was hard to understand what the doctor was saying to me. I had not realised I felt uneasy or uncomfortable about it until I went to the X-Ray department and found English staff there, and realised I was much more comfortable. Does this make me a racist? I don´t know - it is an uncomfortable thought.
I do understand what you mean, and completely empathize. I don´t think that´s racism, but I think that it might turn into one, if the community ralations take a bad turn. And I don´t think it´s anyone´s fault other then the politicians´. Such matters should be taken into consideration before allowing massive numbers of immigrants to come to your country. Any massive cultural changes should be introduced slowly and with an emphasis on mixing together, otherwise, groups and gangs will form and will resent each other...
I believe racism in the US is a unique form, rising as it does from the roots of slavery and born of guilt and power.
Yes... America has been founded on racism and sexism. (British) white, male, rapists and slave-owners are the founding fathers of this country...
|
|
27. |
16 Nov 2008 Sun 08:47 pm |
if you read my post carefully, i didnt say that theresnt racism in america. do you really think that racism is still the same like in years 60? the fact that there are lots of black within the governmental positions, almost in every administration shows that the situation of blacks has much improved.
its such a shame, that people arent still satified, in every country theres racism less or more.
so far havent seen black presidents or prime ministers in europe.
Yes, of course the situation is much better then it used to be. And I think that the issue of race has improved more then the issue of gender, although race has been treated far more despicable then anything else in the past. But it does make me think that we still haven´t had a female president, although women make up 50% of the country, and there´s such huge gender gap in all important areas... But yes, racism is not the same as it used to be, absolutely. It is still there though...
|
|
28. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 12:48 am |
I have no idea if I am a racist or not. Poland is mostly a homogeneous country with people better falling into a stereotypical categories of white catholics. Polish people are often called racists but that stems from the fact that we´re not taught or used to deal with people of different hue. Yes, I imagine a black person would most probably be stared at, probably treated as a weirdo in most cases. In extreme cases there might be violence - I remember when I was in secondary school International House would not bring coloured teachers for fear of their being assaulted. That´s Poles in general - either you fit or you´re persecuted.
These days as our borders have become more open things change - now it´s a "fad" to taste some black coffee as I´ve heard young people say. Polish women often go for affairs with black guys as they consider it a kind of social nobilitation. No wonder an African guy had no problem infecting about 12 Polish women with HIV - they´d screw any black guy to show their open-mindness.
Personally I don´t care what colour people are but I did feel a tad awkward surrounded by Asian and African looking staff in hospital. I´d never have sex with a black guy because I don´t find them attractive - if that makes me a racist, apparently I am one. Yet, I´d have no problem working or being friends with people of colour.
I wonder what accounts for the fact that most people in welfare lines are coloured, even in countries that provide equal chances for all people (US is definitely not one of them as they either have most radical racist organisations like New Order or introduce programmes discriminatory for non-coloured people).
|
|
29. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 12:52 am |
Yes... America has been founded on racism and sexism. (British) white, male, rapists and slave-owners are the founding fathers of this country...
I find it rather amusing that you felt you had to stress the "British" Catwoman. Do you think I don´t know history? 
Perhaps you felt my comment was somehow anti-American, when in fact I was merely stating fact, i.e. that the US has a unique problem with racism compared to the rest of the world due to the slave trade 
|
|
30. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 02:52 am |
I find it rather amusing that you felt you had to stress the "British" Catwoman. Do you think I don´t know history? 
Perhaps you felt my comment was somehow anti-American, when in fact I was merely stating fact, i.e. that the US has a unique problem with racism compared to the rest of the world due to the slave trade 
Well... no, I said British to stress that imperialism is a universal problem. We are talking a lot about the US running the world and exploiting the weaker countries, but US is a country that has been settled by the British who came here, killed all native inhabitants and had their colony here. No, I didn´t feel that your comment is anti-American at all and I did agree with you about the ´special´ nature of the roots of racism in the US.
|
|
31. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 06:37 am |
This topic could go on and on since there are so many forms of racism. What I experience here in the present day U.S. is that racism goes in many directions. You have white hate crimes and black/asian hate crimes. Many of our cities and towns are very much divided by race you have the bad sections..gettos and the white trailer trash type people. People are sterotyped it happens I think it´s natural, whether it´s or right or wrong. What I mostly have a problem with is people playing the race card and profiting off of it. If you only knew how many frivilous lawsuits we have here it´s sickening. It´s a shame this goes on because it only brews more resentment and more racism.
|
|
32. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 06:56 am |
ESSAY SAMPLE ON "THE HISTORY OF PREJUDICE AGAINST NATIVE AMERICANS"
|
The History of Prejudice against Native Americans
These people began migrating thirty thousand years before Christopher Colombus "discovered" the Americas. Native Americans migrated from Asia, crossing a land bridge where the Bering Strait off the coast of Alaska is today. Over the centuries these people spread throughout the continents of North and South America. Since the arrival of the Europeans in 1492 the American Indian has been dehumanized, decivilized and redefined into terms that represent a dominate European view. The Spanish explorers under Colombus were the first to use the terms "Indian" to mean a Native American. These explorers were under the false impression that the had reached the West Indies. This term is still used today.
From the first interaction with the native peoples the Europeans inatiated dominance and superiority. There are three distinctive reasons that the Europeans were able to dominate and later oppress the Native American culture such as; the Native American relgious beleifs and practices, the lack of interaction between Native Americans ans Europeans and the lack of orginization of the Indian tribes. All of these aspects had a strong influence the Europeans to become dominate figures on the Native American land. These factors can still be attributed for the way that Native Americans are viewed in society today.
After the Revolutionary War the new United States government sought to gain land through treaties. The payment offered for the land was far from fair, however, and when Native Americans resisted the surrender of their homeland the US government simply used superior military power to evict them. The Europenas knew nothing of the new civilizations they encountered. Most Native American tribes viewed the lands they occupied to be no one man´s property. They believied that they were alowed to occupy it by the grace of the "Great Spirit", in return the tribes took care of the land the used. Usually Native Americans harbored a great respect for the land they were allowed to use . When the European leaders attempted to purchase this land from the tribes the Native American leaders often thought they did not have the authority to sell the land. In their view the land wasn´t theirs to sell. Often times, payment offered was refused because of this view The Europeans, on the other hand, did not understand or care to understandthe Native American way of life, culture or philosophy. Instead, they saw the land as a great buisness oppurtunity to be bought and sold. Sometimes payment was accepted because the American Indians did not fully understand the consequence or implications of the sale. It was difficult for the Indians to comprehend the ownership of land because in their view the land would always be avaliable for everyone to use.
Europeans feared these new people with a seemingly savage way of life. The dances and othe cultural traditions that Native Americans practiced were extremely abstract and foreign to the European settlers. These displays of savagery by the Native Americans sparkedf fear within many settlers mainly out of ignoranceto their practices and cultural traditions. The NAtive American lifestyle was, in fact very organized and very practical.
Most American Indians have little or no interaction with the everday lifestyles of the average American citizen. They have been residents of reservations for almost two cennturies. Two hundred years of social oppression has to be overcome inorder for the American Indian socities to become more accepted into our modern culture. The prejudice that American Indians endure rivals that of the African-Americans. In order for the Native American tribal nations to become equal in social standings ther has to be reform and awarness of the prejudice.
Lack of orginization is a strong contributing factor to why Native Americans are dicriminated against. During the 1960´s the African-American population united and fought for reform and equality. This has not yet fully occured in the Native American social setting. Many of the tribes still fued with each othe instead of trying to create social reform. This is especially apparent during the 1800´s when Indian-White relations were especially full of tension. Crazy horse, the great Oglala Sioux leader, expressed his concern for better relations between the American Indian tribes on his death bed (Nabokov 178). The European settlerhad a problem understanding the differances between the tribes. Many times they could not comprehend that one tribe of Native Americans was seperate and sometimes enemies with another tribe.
Another major factor that helped develop the dicriminatory views against Native Americans was the American Indian religious practices. The Europeans settlers during 1700´s and the 1800´s were mainly Christian fundamentalists. They viewed the practices of the Native Americans such as dnaces, sacrifices and other religious ordinances as against traditional Judeo-Christian ethics. The Europeans would recognizethese dances as acts of evil. They did not take into consideration the Native American religious beleifs of harmony, unity and equality in all things.
The last signifigant cause in why the Native Americans are dicriminated against are the terms used to describe their race. The term Native American refers to hundreds of distinct societies- including; Aluets, Eskimos,Cherokee, Zuni, Sioux, Mohawk, Aztec and Incan- who first settled the western hemisphere. Indians in today´s society are often looked down upon as not as productive or not as stable as other cultures. The high alcoholism rates and the third world living conditions found on reservations do not improve the terms used to describe the American Indian. |
|
|
33. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 02:04 pm |
Im so sorry for you ros, alameda and catwoman that you live in such a horrible racist country. is there anything we can do help you out from that slavery country?
if you wanna immigrate to any central asian country, give me a shout.
ESSAY SAMPLE ON "THE HISTORY OF PREJUDICE AGAINST NATIVE AMERICANS"
|
The History of Prejudice against Native Americans
These people began migrating thirty thousand years before Christopher Colombus "discovered" the Americas. Native Americans migrated from Asia, crossing a land bridge where the Bering Strait off the coast of Alaska is today. Over the centuries these people spread throughout the continents of North and South America. Since the arrival of the Europeans in 1492 the American Indian has been dehumanized, decivilized and redefined into terms that represent a dominate European view. The Spanish explorers under Colombus were the first to use the terms "Indian" to mean a Native American. These explorers were under the false impression that the had reached the West Indies. This term is still used today.
From the first interaction with the native peoples the Europeans inatiated dominance and superiority. There are three distinctive reasons that the Europeans were able to dominate and later oppress the Native American culture such as; the Native American relgious beleifs and practices, the lack of interaction between Native Americans ans Europeans and the lack of orginization of the Indian tribes. All of these aspects had a strong influence the Europeans to become dominate figures on the Native American land. These factors can still be attributed for the way that Native Americans are viewed in society today.
After the Revolutionary War the new United States government sought to gain land through treaties. The payment offered for the land was far from fair, however, and when Native Americans resisted the surrender of their homeland the US government simply used superior military power to evict them. The Europenas knew nothing of the new civilizations they encountered. Most Native American tribes viewed the lands they occupied to be no one man´s property. They believied that they were alowed to occupy it by the grace of the "Great Spirit", in return the tribes took care of the land the used. Usually Native Americans harbored a great respect for the land they were allowed to use . When the European leaders attempted to purchase this land from the tribes the Native American leaders often thought they did not have the authority to sell the land. In their view the land wasn´t theirs to sell. Often times, payment offered was refused because of this view The Europeans, on the other hand, did not understand or care to understandthe Native American way of life, culture or philosophy. Instead, they saw the land as a great buisness oppurtunity to be bought and sold. Sometimes payment was accepted because the American Indians did not fully understand the consequence or implications of the sale. It was difficult for the Indians to comprehend the ownership of land because in their view the land would always be avaliable for everyone to use.
Europeans feared these new people with a seemingly savage way of life. The dances and othe cultural traditions that Native Americans practiced were extremely abstract and foreign to the European settlers. These displays of savagery by the Native Americans sparkedf fear within many settlers mainly out of ignoranceto their practices and cultural traditions. The NAtive American lifestyle was, in fact very organized and very practical.
Most American Indians have little or no interaction with the everday lifestyles of the average American citizen. They have been residents of reservations for almost two cennturies. Two hundred years of social oppression has to be overcome inorder for the American Indian socities to become more accepted into our modern culture. The prejudice that American Indians endure rivals that of the African-Americans. In order for the Native American tribal nations to become equal in social standings ther has to be reform and awarness of the prejudice.
Lack of orginization is a strong contributing factor to why Native Americans are dicriminated against. During the 1960´s the African-American population united and fought for reform and equality. This has not yet fully occured in the Native American social setting. Many of the tribes still fued with each othe instead of trying to create social reform. This is especially apparent during the 1800´s when Indian-White relations were especially full of tension. Crazy horse, the great Oglala Sioux leader, expressed his concern for better relations between the American Indian tribes on his death bed (Nabokov 178). The European settlerhad a problem understanding the differances between the tribes. Many times they could not comprehend that one tribe of Native Americans was seperate and sometimes enemies with another tribe.
Another major factor that helped develop the dicriminatory views against Native Americans was the American Indian religious practices. The Europeans settlers during 1700´s and the 1800´s were mainly Christian fundamentalists. They viewed the practices of the Native Americans such as dnaces, sacrifices and other religious ordinances as against traditional Judeo-Christian ethics. The Europeans would recognizethese dances as acts of evil. They did not take into consideration the Native American religious beleifs of harmony, unity and equality in all things.
The last signifigant cause in why the Native Americans are dicriminated against are the terms used to describe their race. The term Native American refers to hundreds of distinct societies- including; Aluets, Eskimos,Cherokee, Zuni, Sioux, Mohawk, Aztec and Incan- who first settled the western hemisphere. Indians in today´s society are often looked down upon as not as productive or not as stable as other cultures. The high alcoholism rates and the third world living conditions found on reservations do not improve the terms used to describe the American Indian. |
|
|
34. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 02:06 pm |
I detest racism and I witnessed it first hand in America to such an extent I was completely shocked. There is not just racism against blacks, Hispanics, etc etc but against white trailor trash as they are called. I was shocked to the core. The one reason that I will never go to America again.
yeah, all brits say so, however they love touring in that racist dummies country. 
|
|
35. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 02:08 pm |
Mmmmm,Femm dear,i wonder what is your problem ! heh
|
|
36. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 02:10 pm |
Mmmmm,Femm dear,i wonder what is your problem ! heh
why? you wanna solve it? 
|
|
37. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 02:14 pm |
why? you wanna solve it? 
Naahhh,not really,you can have all the fun,and i will have mine watching lol
you just reminded me of another member 
Beside,i know you dont like it this way
You solve your problems by yourself 
|
|
38. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 02:20 pm |
Naahhh,not really,you can have all the fun,and i will have mine watching lol
you just reminded me of another member 
Beside,i know you dont like it this way
You solve your problems by yourself 
no comment...
|
|
39. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 04:56 pm |
white&black,poor&rich,pretty&ugly,woman&man ,Muslim&Cristianetc...i think discrimination a part of human nature,and economical-cultural-social,religional,regional reasons feeding this discriminations by we don´t be aware of,so thats so easy to see all sort discriminations on every country less or more,and i believe thats fix is unconditional respect and to love everything without any reason And to looking for realities on the dusty shelfs of history so wrong while today and tomorrow waiting us with its all charm away from all prejudicies or bad experiences of past...
|
|
40. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 06:29 pm |
Im so sorry for you ros, alameda and catwoman that you live in such a horrible racist country. is there anything we can do help you out from that slavery country?
if you wanna immigrate to any central asian country, give me a shout.
just because they live in America, they have no right to criticize it right?cool, but I don`t think you can encounter this much of fascism even in those central Asian countries you`re slagging.
|
|
41. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 07:39 pm |
just because they live in America, they have no right to criticize it right?cool, but I don`t think you can encounter this much of fascism even in those central Asian countries you`re slagging.
i bet they criticize it 24/7 esp. ros and alameda both of them are professional america haters 
|
|
42. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 07:46 pm |
Do they get paid for this???
|
|
43. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 08:00 pm |
Do they get paid for this???
im sure they even sell their own souls to do this job. 
|
|
44. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 08:05 pm |
But they can criticise it BECAUSE they live there. Probably they wouldn´t have many chances to do that if they lived in Islamic countries. They´re free to travel, why don´t they pack their bags and leave they country they hate for a country they might love (even if it means being subordinate to men and wearing a burka). Is that some kind of psycho-masochism? It´s not like they don´t have a choice...
|
|
45. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 08:17 pm |
I have no idea if I am a racist or not. Poland is mostly a homogeneous country with people better falling into a stereotypical categories of white catholics. Polish people are often called racists but that stems from the fact that we´re not taught or used to deal with people of different hue. Yes, I imagine a black person would most probably be stared at, probably treated as a weirdo in most cases. In extreme cases there might be violence - I remember when I was in secondary school International House would not bring coloured teachers for fear of their being assaulted. That´s Poles in general - either you fit or you´re persecuted.
These days as our borders have become more open things change - now it´s a "fad" to taste some black coffee as I´ve heard young people say. Polish women often go for affairs with black guys as they consider it a kind of social nobilitation. No wonder an African guy had no problem infecting about 12 Polish women with HIV - they´d screw any black guy to show their open-mindness.
Personally I don´t care what colour people are but I did feel a tad awkward surrounded by Asian and African looking staff in hospital. I´d never have sex with a black guy because I don´t find them attractive - if that makes me a racist, apparently I am one. Yet, I´d have no problem working or being friends with people of colour.
I wonder what accounts for the fact that most people in welfare lines are coloured, even in countries that provide equal chances for all people (US is definitely not one of them as they either have most radical racist organisations like New Order or introduce programmes discriminatory for non-coloured people).
If we based on as strict rules as say Catwoman bases on when determining whether someone is sexist or not I´d say you are a racist. Some of the examples that you give such as categorically not finding black people sexy are proving this point. If you ask me what I think about Halle Berry, I´d say she is probably one of the sexiest persons in the world... Anything that categorically singles out a certain race is a tad racist. Our intention must be removing the roots of racism.
|
|
46. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 08:18 pm |
But they can criticise it BECAUSE they live there. Probably they wouldn´t have many chances to do that if they lived in Islamic countries. They´re free to travel, why don´t they pack their bags and leave they country they hate for a country they might love (even if it means being subordinate to men and wearing a burka). Is that some kind of psycho-masochism? It´s not like they don´t have a choice...
i dont know, i never managed to understand alameda types. but i truly believe there are lots of masochist women in this world.
you see thats why you dont see here and anywhere any turkish or muslim women criticising their countries, culture and religion.
|
|
47. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 08:20 pm |
i dont know, i never managed to understand alameda types. but i truly believe there are lots of masochist women in this world.
you see thats why you dont see here and anywhere any turkish or muslim women criticising their countries, culture and religion.
That is a very rude way to describe someone: Alameda types...
|
|
48. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 08:24 pm |
That is a very rude way to describe someone: Alameda types...
i absolutely agree with you.
Im a rude, wild, emotional woman, not like alameda type.
i know i could count on your post. lets praise now cuba!
|
|
49. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 08:27 pm |
Excuse me? I have never said I hate the US. I might not like some of the actions taken in the name of the citizens of the US. I am not an America hater, I resent and protest your saying such.
In fact I love (and keep a copy with me at all times of) the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights. What I do criticize is when the Constitution and Bill of Rights are not respected and followed.
|
|
50. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 08:28 pm |
Could you try to be a bit relevant. Where is the connection between my liking and admiring Cuban people and your labeling people like Alameda types etc. To say the least, that is not polite at all. Even if I was wrong in the message you are talking about you cannot justify a mistake with another one... Agreed?
|
|
51. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 08:31 pm |
If we based on as strict rules as say Catwoman bases on when determining whether someone is sexist or not I´d say you are a racist. Some of the examples that you give such as categorically not finding black people sexy are proving this point. If you ask me what I think about Halle Berry, I´d say she is probably one of the sexiest persons in the world... Anything that categorically singles out a certain race is a tad racist. Our intention must be removing the roots of racism.
Halle Berry is not an African woman, please... you are not proving that you are not racist, you are proving to be sexist VY, by an objectifying, narrow, sexist standards of female ´beauty´. Berry is a hollywood made ´star´ that copies exactly the same beauty ideas as every other woman in hollywood is supposed to and as teh world is trained to find attractive. this has absolutely nothing to do with real women, and especially real black women.
not finding black men sexy, I don´t think that´s racist, because our attitudes towards attractiveness are very much cultural and based on socialization and conditioning. it has nothing to do with racism.
|
|
52. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 08:31 pm |
If we based on as strict rules as say Catwoman bases on when determining whether someone is sexist or not I´d say you are a racist. Some of the examples that you give such as categorically not finding black people sexy are proving this point. If you ask me what I think about Halle Berry, I´d say she is probably one of the sexiest persons in the world... Anything that categorically singles out a certain race is a tad racist. Our intention must be removing the roots of racism.
Sorry Vineyards, in this case I don´t agree. Why can´t anyone say they find a certain group not attractive? I´ve heard many men say they don´t like blondes, only brunettes (v.v.). What are they? You probably have your ideas of what is attractive as well, you probably rule(d) out many types of women.
|
|
53. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 08:33 pm |
i dont know, i never managed to understand alameda types. but i truly believe there are lots of masochist women in this world.
you see thats why you dont see here and anywhere any turkish or muslim women criticising their countries, culture and religion.
that is quite shallow. I think you are really an example of what you criticize...
|
|
54. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 08:34 pm |
not finding black men sexy, I don´t think that´s racist, because our attitudes towards attractiveness are very much cultural and based on socialization and conditioning. it has nothing to do with racism.
Thanks for this, cat...I was trying to articulate the thought in my head...this is perfect. I personally gravitate toward a certain look...but I have never felt any contempt for any other look. I just definately have my preferences.
|
|
55. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 08:35 pm |
Could you try to be a bit relevant. Where is the connection between my liking and admiring Cuban people and your labeling people like Alameda types etc. To say the least, that is not polite at all. Even if I was wrong in the message you are talking about you cannot justify a mistake with another one... Agreed?
look, vineyards, i hate being silenced. i do know that i have a i right to express my thoughts about alameda´s opinions. or you are gonna limit my rights? you yourslef in the past used various types of expressions. then i didnt jump on you. save your politeness for your own majesty.
call me impolite, i prefer being so instead of a perfidious manipulative snake whos more harmful and dangerous (you know whom i mean).
|
|
56. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 08:36 pm |
Well, I am not like certain men and I do think I can find a brunette or blonde sexy. I never thought race would be a determining factor. I could fall for a Chinese or an Ethiopian just as well. I am ready for all possibilities 
|
|
57. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 08:38 pm |
Thanks for this, cat...I was trying to articulate the thought in my head...this is perfect. I personally gravitate toward a certain look...but I have never felt any contempt for any other look. I just definately have my preferences.
I think the word ´contempt´ is the keyword here. Finding group X not attractive because you hold them in contempt is quite something different than finding group X not attractive just because of different preferences.
|
|
58. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 08:39 pm |
that is quite shallow. I think you are really an example of what you criticize...
in which way. didnt understand. what is shallow? oh, you are doing something here, you are playing with me at the cost of myself.
|
|
59. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 08:40 pm |
I think the word ´contempt´ is the keyword here. Finding group X not attractive because you hold them in contempt is quite something different than finding group X not attractive just because of different preferences.
Well, when it comes to the opposite sex....I have very little contempt!
|
|
60. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 08:41 pm |
look, vineyards, i hate being silenced. i do know that i have a i right to express my thoughts about alameda´s opinions. or you are gonna limit my rights? you yourslef in the past used various types of expressions. then i didnt jump on you. save your politeness for your own majesty.
call me impolite, i prefer being so instead of a perfidious manipulative snake whos more harmful and dangerous (you know whom i mean).
Sticking to everyday English, I would like to say again that I find people using phrases like Alemada types, Vineyards types etc very shallow and impolite. Excuse me if I hurt your feelings. You are of course free to accept or reject this view of mine. I am not limiting you in any way unless you openly attack people. In my opinion, remarks such as yours can be considered the last stop before a personal attack and they surely invite it.
|
|
61. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 08:44 pm |
Well, when it comes to the opposite sex....I have very little contempt!
All? 
|
|
62. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 08:45 pm |
All? 
I didn´t say I have NO contempt......there are a few that quite deserve it.....I am not mentioning any names.
|
|
63. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 08:48 pm |
Sticking to everyday English, I would like say again that I find people using phrases like Alemada types, Vineyards types etc very shallow and impolite. Excuse me if I hurt your feelings. You are of course free to accept or reject this view of mine. I am not limiting you in anyway unless you openly attack people. In my opinion, remarks such as yours can be considered the last stop before a personal attack and they surely invite them.
and i keep telling you, that i accept the definitions you called me and it doesnt hurt me. you wish i suppose you are so deep that you often prefer to close your eyes on problems and join with more deep and meaningful words dressing them with philosophic mannerish icing and change the core of forums in order to present yourself so articulate sound and polite.
|
|
64. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 09:07 pm |
Halle Berry is not an African woman, please... you are not proving that you are not racist, you are proving to be sexist VY, by an objectifying, narrow, sexist standards of female ´beauty´. Berry is a hollywood made ´star´ that copies exactly the same beauty ideas as every other woman in hollywood is supposed to and as teh world is trained to find attractive. this has absolutely nothing to do with real women, and especially real black women.
not finding black men sexy, I don´t think that´s racist, because our attitudes towards attractiveness are very much cultural and based on socialization and conditioning. it has nothing to do with racism.
OK Catwoman, I always though she won the best black actress prize (several times) but anyway I would say the same thing about Beyonce. Hope this time I have hit the target.
|
|
65. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 09:31 pm |
look, vineyards, i hate being silenced. i do know that i have a i right to express my thoughts about alameda´s opinions. or you are gonna limit my rights? you yourslef in the past used various types of expressions. then i didnt jump on you. save your politeness for your own majesty.
call me impolite, i prefer being so instead of a perfidious manipulative snake whos more harmful and dangerous (you know whom i mean).
Perfidious ???? You have expanded your vocabularly! Congratulations.
Expressing one´s thoughts and committing libel are different. If you have exptapolated to an unfounded and unsubstantiated conclusion, I would be careful.
Free Speech does not give the right to commit defamation of another.
That said, I seem to bother you quite a lot. I´m not sure there is much I can do about that. Sorry if, somehow inadvertently and without intention, I´ve hurt your feelings.
|
|
66. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 09:36 pm |
Perfidious ???? You have expanded your vocabularly! Congratulations.
Expressing one´s thoughts and committing libel are different. If you have exptapolated to an unfounded and unsubstantiated conclusion, I would be careful.
Free Speech does not give the right to commit defamation of another.
OMG if the shoe fits take it 
|
|
67. |
17 Nov 2008 Mon 10:48 pm |
Perfidious ???? You have expanded your vocabularly! Congratulations.
Expressing one´s thoughts and committing libel are different. If you have exptapolated to an unfounded and unsubstantiated conclusion, I would be careful.
Free Speech does not give the right to commit defamation of another.
That said, I seem to bother you quite a lot. I´m not sure there is much I can do about that. Sorry if, somehow inadvertently and without intention, I´ve hurt your feelings.
+1
It is also against our forum rules, so I would like to ask femme to stop this ridiculous bullying.
|
|
68. |
18 Nov 2008 Tue 12:57 am |
However, my question about racism was more about the current shape of it in your communities... do you see it? do you think it exists? does it bother you? why do you think it´s there? It would be interesting to compare the views of westerners and Turkish, Egyptian, Lebanese... and all other nationalities that we have, about racism in their countries.
We have racism in Lebanon, all sorts of racism. Yes it bothers me and I have to admit that sometimes I have racist thoughts;
Many lebanese dont accept if their son/daughter marry a black or a chinese whereas
they most likely accept a white american, a swedish, a british into their family. Also, many lebanese think they are superior to palestinians, syrians, sudanese and
egyptians. This is mostly due to the fact that there is a huge influx of workers from
these countries into Lebanon. The jobs they hold are mainly in construction, trash
collection and in gas stations.
There is a big discrimination also against sri lankians and ethiopians. Most maids in
lebanon come from these two countries. (recently "envoyee speciale" did a special episode about lebanon "Liban le pays des
esclaves" (slaves in lebanon) concerning the maids condition in lebanon. It was a big
scandale but few weeks later everyone forgot about it and nothing changed)
So basically, yes there is racism in lebanon. The law formally forbids
all sorts of racism but then no one is there to enforce this law. That was for color and ethnic background.
Regarding religion that is another issue. There are 18 officially recognized
religious groups in lebanon, 4 Muslim, 12 Christian, 1 Druze, and 1 Jewish. During
the 15 years civil war basically everyone fought against everyone. So religion is a
sensitive issue. Moreover, Lebanese constitution is based on discrimination. Only a christian maronite can be a president, only a muslim sunni can be a prime
minister and only a shi´ite can be the speaker of the parliament. Some groups are classified as a cult and are forbidden, example: jehovah´s witnesses
and mormons.
Homosexuality is considered a crime in Lebanon and it is clearly stated in the
lebanese penal code that male homosexuality along with adultery are prohibited.
In short, yes there is discrimination in Lebanon. That´s my country and I love it despite its faults.
|
|
69. |
18 Nov 2008 Tue 01:18 am |
We have racism in Lebanon, all sorts of racism. Yes it bothers me and I have to admit that sometimes I have racist thoughts;
Many lebanese dont accept if their son/daughter marry a black or a chinese whereas
they most likely accept a white american, a swedish, a british into their family. Also, many lebanese think they are superior to palestinians, syrians, sudanese and
egyptians. This is mostly due to the fact that there is a huge influx of workers from
these countries into Lebanon. The jobs they hold are mainly in construction, trash
collection and in gas stations.
There is a big discrimination also against sri lankians and ethiopians. Most maids in
lebanon come from these two countries. (recently "envoyee speciale" did a special episode about lebanon "Liban le pays des
esclaves" (slaves in lebanon) concerning the maids condition in lebanon. It was a big
scandale but few weeks later everyone forgot about it and nothing changed)
So basically, yes there is racism in lebanon. The law formally forbids
all sorts of racism but then no one is there to enforce this law. That was for color and ethnic background.
Regarding religion that is another issue. There are 18 officially recognized
religious groups in lebanon, 4 Muslim, 12 Christian, 1 Druze, and 1 Jewish. During
the 15 years civil war basically everyone fought against everyone. So religion is a
sensitive issue. Moreover, Lebanese constitution is based on discrimination. Only a christian maronite can be a president, only a muslim sunni can be a prime
minister and only a shi´ite can be the speaker of the parliament. Some groups are classified as a cult and are forbidden, example: jehovah´s witnesses
and mormons.
Homosexuality is considered a crime in Lebanon and it is clearly stated in the
lebanese penal code that male homosexuality along with adultery are prohibited.
In short, yes there is discrimination in Lebanon. That´s my country and I love it despite its faults.
Nice post Cedars...and very honest too. Humans, at our most base, are pack creatures, ie we form groups like a pack of wolves or a flock of birds. In ancient times we formed small tribes that were outgrowths of family members. Outsiders were to feared. The process of joining a group was not easy. A lot of blood was shed.
Look at nature. I recently saw a documentary on two orphaned male cheetah cubs. The persons who fostered them tried to introduce them back to the wild, the result being one was killed by other male cheetahs who were afraid of competition. The other had to be brought back into a reserve. Lions also form prides. and so it goes.
Humans have been trying to grow beyond that to realize a larger family. In some ways we have had success, in others we have failed.
|
|
70. |
18 Nov 2008 Tue 11:11 am |
+1
It is also against our forum rules, so I would like to ask femme to stop this ridiculous bullying.
there are perfidious manipulative people, believe it or not. they speak to you nice words right into your face at the same time stab your back. i think i often fall prey of such people.
i do shout out my opinion thus becoming an emotional bully.
|
|
71. |
18 Nov 2008 Tue 11:16 am |
lebanon is a victim of its own hospitable policy. once a paris of middle east, opening gates to palestinians didnt realize that it was opening for own destruction.
the same racism exists in my country and in many many other countries. we just dont talk about it like it is exposed in the west, instead we brush it under the carpet and join the anti-racist campaign held in the west. because our mass media brainwashes us telling that our own countries are perfect and innocent.
We have racism in Lebanon, all sorts of racism. Yes it bothers me and I have to admit that sometimes I have racist thoughts;
Many lebanese dont accept if their son/daughter marry a black or a chinese whereas
they most likely accept a white american, a swedish, a british into their family. Also, many lebanese think they are superior to palestinians, syrians, sudanese and
egyptians. This is mostly due to the fact that there is a huge influx of workers from
these countries into Lebanon. The jobs they hold are mainly in construction, trash
collection and in gas stations.
There is a big discrimination also against sri lankians and ethiopians. Most maids in
lebanon come from these two countries. (recently "envoyee speciale" did a special episode about lebanon "Liban le pays des
esclaves" (slaves in lebanon) concerning the maids condition in lebanon. It was a big
scandale but few weeks later everyone forgot about it and nothing changed)
So basically, yes there is racism in lebanon. The law formally forbids
all sorts of racism but then no one is there to enforce this law. That was for color and ethnic background.
Regarding religion that is another issue. There are 18 officially recognized
religious groups in lebanon, 4 Muslim, 12 Christian, 1 Druze, and 1 Jewish. During
the 15 years civil war basically everyone fought against everyone. So religion is a
sensitive issue. Moreover, Lebanese constitution is based on discrimination. Only a christian maronite can be a president, only a muslim sunni can be a prime
minister and only a shi´ite can be the speaker of the parliament. Some groups are classified as a cult and are forbidden, example: jehovah´s witnesses
and mormons.
Homosexuality is considered a crime in Lebanon and it is clearly stated in the
lebanese penal code that male homosexuality along with adultery are prohibited.
In short, yes there is discrimination in Lebanon. That´s my country and I love it despite its faults.
|
|
72. |
18 Nov 2008 Tue 11:18 am |
oh, another boring lecture 
Humans, at our most base, are pack creatures, ie we form groups like a pack of wolves or a flock of birds. In ancient times we formed small tribes that were outgrowths of family members. Outsiders were to feared. The process of joining a group was not easy. A lot of blood was shed.
Look at nature. I recently saw a documentary on two orphaned male cheetah cubs. The persons who fostered them tried to introduce them back to the wild, the result being one was killed by other male cheetahs who were afraid of competition. The other had to be brought back into a reserve. Lions also form prides. and so it goes.
Humans have been trying to grow beyond that to realize a larger family. In some ways we have had success, in others we have failed.
|
|
73. |
18 Nov 2008 Tue 12:24 pm |
lebanon is a victim of its own hospitable policy. once a paris of middle east, opening gates to palestinians didnt realize that it was opening for own destruction.
Although I am off topic discussing the lebanese situation here since the discussion is about racism.
But I have to comment on the above statement first because I am a supporter of the palestinian cause and second because it wouldnt be fair blaming the palestinians for all the problems in lebanon. Yes lebanon was "switzerland of the middle east" as they used to teach us in school but this was only for tourists.
We have a cosntitution based on discrimination and it was inevitable that one day we will have a war. Lebanese dont share the same idea of "identity". Some see themselves as arabs, others as pheonicians and they hate arabs, some think that lebanese identity is fake and we all should be syrians, others prefer to be iranians...With 18 different religious groups that have ties to "foreign" countries you can imagine how many identities we have.
Our lebanese identity is manifested and we stand by each other only when it comes to food, tabbouleh & kibbe nayye 
So honnestly I dont think we should blame anyone for our problems and for the destruction of our country, we should only blame ourselves. We will not learn the importance of being Lebanese until we loose the country. who knows what the americans/russians/syrians/israelis/iranians are preparing for us....and we follow like sheeps...sad and hard to admit we are weak.
|
|
74. |
18 Nov 2008 Tue 01:43 pm |
if racism a sort of discrimination which one of us all innocent and pure about that?i want to repead again,thats a social sickness and big danger when feeded with strong prejudicies...
|
|
|