Well you two  have to decide what sort of complex I have really!!

One of you kept saying the other one but you are copying the one I said about you..

Look you are neither  the  brightest star in the sky nor the sharpest tool in the shed..

Stop embarresing yourself and Turkey here..

Don´t expect to be taken seriously when you talk about things like genocide light heartedly.

There are people from different nations, totally different walks of life. There is unfortunately one thing that is common to most users, we like fighting.  It doesn´t matter what we are fighting about.  People need to learn a new thing everyday, we should really learn not to fight over every little thing sooner than later.

Both catwoman and muhsin are making unsubstantiated accusations.  Webster dictinory  explains the word genocide as : "the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group".  In order for a genocide exist there must be "destruction". We can blame the coup d´Etat of the early 80´s and the Ciller period where torture and murders committed by unknown perpetrators. It is true that thousands of people lost their lives. Nonetheless, the primary motive behind all these murders and torture was not eradicating the Kurdish population.  The two periods in the recent history were dominated by nationalist leaders who waged a war against anyone whom they had considered as terrorists and seperatists. Therefore, while it was certainly not a genocide, it did not target  exclusively the Kurds but all the citizens who defended what the government refered to as a seperatist policy.

There is probably no decent nation in the world. I can´t claim ours is among the best. Nevertheless, it is improbable that a genocide has occured in our recent history.

There were several genocide attempts in the 20th century. One of them was committed by the Germans. They completely accepted this. The massacre of muslims in Bosnia, this was also accepted by the international public and the perpetrators were convicted (though there is still some bad smell about this incident). The large scale oppression and forced emigration of Turks in Bulgaria. While this was not a genocide, all the precursors of one was present. God only knows what would happen if they did not leave Bulgaria.  We can also add to those Hutu-Tutsi conflict and the deeds of the Khmer Rouge regime.

Dude, you´re missing the point. I´m not going to get into a debate over the Armenian genocide with you, I don´t know enough about it to have an educated opinion, the point I´m making is a) your hypocrysy and b) what label you slap on things depends on what side of the conflict you´re on - not to mention you have no idea what the definition of the genocide is (and you´re calling me ignorant, ha!).

And didn´t you say "Muslim genocide" - so now what, it´s not Muslims, it´s Iraqis? Why don´t you make up your mind, are Americans killing Muslims because they are Muslims (hmmm, amazing how the Muslism in the USA are not being executed on a daily basis <insert sarcasm here> or are they killing Iraqis who happen to be Muslims?

 As I am SURE this is a subject to which you have an educated opinion, I would like to ask you a question Melek - why exactly are they killing Iraqis?

Excuse my ignorance please

What a stupid question!!!

they are killing to bring democracy

 Are you able to tell me why they are at war with Iraq?

People should really read the definition of genocide  

 Yes forgive me for going off topic, I am just really interested to know why they are killing Iraqis and what the war is about

Spare me the sarcasm.

You know as well as anybody that there´s a multitude of unjustified reasons why Iraq was invaded. I´m sure you are familiar with those due to your own country´s involvement. I´m sure neither you nor I are proud or approve of them.

It is however NOT a genocide of Muslims BECAUSE they are Muslims.

first you have to tell us why UK are at war with US