I find it totally weird that the writters of even the biggest newspapers do no check if what they are writing is correct.

It says "Moğolistan´da 6 kadına bir erkek düşüyor. ", so there is only 1 man for 6 women in Mongolian population.

Let´s check CIA factbook:

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/mg.html

the question is...do we trust the cia Or perhaps this is an evil plan from the Chinese! They have a population that is too big anyway, with too many men. So, take the men out of Turkey, and then put the Chinese men in their place! AHA! I see it now. And since Mongolia has vast areas of nothing in it, those Turkish men will just be standing there with a bunch of horses in the middle of nowhere... conspiracy!

the question is...do we trust the cia Or perhaps this is an evil plan from the Chinese! They have a population that is too big anyway, with too many men. So, take the men out of Turkey, and then put the Chinese men in their place! AHA! I see it now. And since Mongolia has vast areas of nothing in it, those Turkish men will just be standing there with a bunch of horses in the middle of nowhere... conspiracy!

Ehm; should I remind you that it was probably those same empty steppes in Mongolia that Turks first emerged from. So they definitely know better to do than just standing with horses.

(Orkhon valley inscriptions, the earliest trace of Turkic languages is in the middle of current day Mongolia)

have your facts, first, canim. you ve got nothing to do with mongolians (nor central asians) genetically. linguistically, yes.

turks are greeks. they are europeans, not asians.

have your facts, first, canim. you ve got nothing to do with mongolians (nor central asians) genetically. linguistically, yes.

turks are greeks. they are europeans, not asians.

You can have your paternal DNA checked for a mere 300 $ canım. Just google "23andme" and take the test there, as I have taken and I know who or what I am related to. But still thanks for your concern, albeit useless.

Btw. you might wanna read some recent papers since all those elite dominance theorems are being reconsidered and the conclusion is there was significant genetic flow Central Asia to Turkey.

 I read somewhere that Mongolian genes are commonly present in Kazakhs and Uzbeks. In Turkey, the Mongolian gene is about as much as it is in the DNA of central and eastern Europeans. So, what lemon says makes sense. A further study indicated, Turkish gene pool comprised a mixture of all the neighboring countries. The least observed genes in Turks are the central Asian related ones.  

There are numerous problems(or dirty tricks should I say) involved when comparing Turkish DNA to Central Asia. The most significant one is; in all of the studies I´ve encountered; none was carried on ethnic Turks only. We know Turkey has Kurds, Circassians, Arabs, Rums, Laz etc. who do not have any connection anyway; these groups must be excluded from such tests. This is no different than taking samples from a black British citizen and concluding British people are from Congo. Anyway; I have a lot of other things to say on this matter but I don´t think the topic is very suitable.