I tried to do it the way you suggeted but I am not confident about it...but gave it a shot...It took me more than 30 minutes to comprehend it ...plz let me know how is it? Thank you...
"I knew Ali understood what they said was not heard which he thought was obvious."
Not exactly!
First of all you need to work backward, so:
Ali´yi tanıdığımı anladığında söylediklerinin duyulmadığını sandığı belliydi.
Call the underlined a
a belliydi = it was obvious that a
That is the main clause.
Another hint:
subj obj verb -> obj which subj verb (in English)
subj obj verb -> subj + -(n)in verb + -dik+ POSS obj
when you work reversely, you need to restore:
subj + -(n)in verb + -dik+ POSS obj -> subj obj verb
a may be difficult for you to decode because:
subj obj verb -> subj + -(n)in verb + -dik+ POSS obj
work the following way sometimes:
gitti = he has gone (no object here and subject is not given explicitly but we know that it´s 3rd grammatical person he/she/it)
gittiği = (the fact) that s/he has gone
gittiği belliydi= (the fact) that s/he had gone was obvious
or
gittiği belliydi= it was obvious that s/he had gone
the a is a similar form above
Ali´yi tanıdığımı anladığında söylediklerinin duyulmadığını sandığı belliydi.
Now say the underlined is b
b sandığı belliydi. = it was obvious that s/he thought that b
Can you proceed from there?
|