Welcome
Login:   Pass:     Register - Forgot Password - Resend Activation

Turkish Class Forums / Turkey

Turkey

Add reply to this discussion
Moderators: libralady, sonunda
Negative image of Arabs tied to rising Islamophobia in the West
(17 Messages in 2 pages - View all)
1 2
1.       tunci
7149 posts
 23 May 2011 Mon 10:27 am

Negative image of Arabs tied to rising Islamophobia in the West

22 May 2011, Sunday / TODAY’S ZAMAN, DUBAI

The 10th Arab Media Forum, which took place in Dubai last week, attracted over 2,400 media professionals from 40 countries

 

The lingering perception problem with regard to Arabs in the Western media is very much connected to rising Islamophobia in Europe and in the US, experts at the 10th Arab Media Forum held in Dubai last week said.
 

“Islam has become the new perceived enemy of the West after the fall of the Soviet Union,” said Philip Seib, professor of journalism and public diplomacy at the University of Southern California, during a panel discussion at the forum, which attracted over 2,400 media professionals from 40 countries.

Seib stressed that more continual and balanced news coverage from the region was needed to overcome challenges of stereotyping of Arab citizens. “People want to know about the region, which was reflected when Al Jazeera´s English news website registered a phenomenal increase in the number of hits after Egypt´s revolution,” he added.

Abdullah Bozkurt, Today´s Zaman Ankara bureau chief, also shared Seib´s concerns in his speech and said the anti-Muslim platform in Europe has developed itself from being the agenda of fringe, far-right parties into a mainstream political debate.

“With the minaret ban in Switzerland and the Burqa ban in France, the anti-Muslim rhetoric became part of the law of the land. Islamophobia even became institutionalized with the gains of far-right parties in some European countries, and they are now set to become part of the coalitional governments. This is an alarming development,” he explained.

During the 10th Arab Media Forum there were also discussions on whether or not the recent protest movements that swept the countries in the Middle East and Northern Africa have changed the image of Arabs. It explored whether there were signs of change from references in the Western media of Arabs being “violent, betraying, backward-thinking and women´s rights-snubbing” to that of people who have the same aspirations and expectations as everybody else.

According to a survey released during the forum, Western opinion leaders believed the Arab Spring will transform politics and society in the Middle East. The study, carried out by APCO Worldwide, an opinion research group, and completed early this month, polled 343 former and current diplomats and other opinion leaders in the United States and Europe.

Of those polled, 67 percent said they either significantly or somewhat changed their views of Arab societies as a result of events unfolding in the region. "This is the first study of its kind that has looked at how events in the Middle East are shaping the views of opinion leaders in the West," Mamoon Sbeih, APCO´s Arab region managing director said.

The survey received a lukewarm reception from panelists, who said the results are quite optimistic and caught in the middle of political euphoria. Octavia Nasr, founder of US-based Bridges Media Consulting, said that the perception in the Western world changed because of the people of the Arab region and not due to the higher visibility of the Arab media in the international arena. She said that people in the West rarely watch Arab television channels or read newspapers and magazines from this region.

Jacques Charmelot, editor at Agence France-Presse, also said the perception of the Arab world in the West changes whenever there is a crisis in this region. “Now Israelis are the bad boys, not the Arabs,” he underlined. Farah Al Atassi, a Syrian-American who is the executive director of US-based American Arab Communication and Translation Center, said Arabs have earned their freedom on their own.

Bozkurt underlined that there are many challenges awaiting Arab citizens in the region in the aftermath of the region-wide uprisings. “When the communist regimes fell in Eastern and Central Europe, many people were jubilant and cheerful. Regimes had changed, but the problems continued. For example, the EU still blames Bulgaria and Romania for not battling wide-scale corruption in its reports and threatens to cut EU funds after the two-decade democratic experiment,” he said.

The Today´s Zaman columnist further argued that nations must invest in education to overcome prejudices about Arab citizens. He said historical references in school textbooks that feed into stereotyping must be removed and “reconstructed images” under the political discourse of the Cold War must be removed from books. “We may also develop partnership or internship programs among our young journalists to expose them to other cultures,” he stated.

Social media versus traditional media

The forum also discussed whether social media is gaining on the traditional media in that the former was credited with leading mass uprisings in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and others. The uprisings prompted a dramatic rise in use of Internet media. In Egypt, Google had a tenfold increase in news searches, while there was a 50 percent increase in video uploads to YouTube at the time of the Egypt uprising.

“The notion that there is a competition between traditional media and social media is inaccurate; but if it were true, you would be up against a website like Facebook that has over 500 million users,” said Faisal J. Abbas, a London-based journalist and blogger.

"The role of social media in the revolutions has been exaggerated," Sultan Al Qassemi, a journalist and Twitter user, said during a panel discussion. "It did play an important role. But social media facilitated -- it did not cause [the uprisings].The cause was corruption, graft, lack of human rights and oppression of young Arabs," he said.

Tunisian blogger Zeid Al Heni, whose blog had been closed by the now ousted Bin Ali regime, said that half the Internet users in Tunisia are on Facebook, stressing the role played by social media during the Tunisian uprising in filling gaps that traditional media had left due to restrictions that were placed on it.

Shadi Hamid, director of research at the Brookings Doha Center, cautioned, however, that most of the people on Twitter are secular and liberal activists. “Americans and the international community start to think that this is a secular revolution, and they were looking only at one small part of a much broader revolution." He described the Muslim Brotherhood as "the most powerful force" in Egypt -- something that might not be apparent from social media. "The majority of Egyptians are not on Facebook. And the vast majority of Egypt and Arabs more generally are not on Twitter,” he said.

The forum tackled the challenges faced by using citizen journalism to cover uprising in some countries when traditional journalists are banned or restricted. Nasr, also a former CNN journalist, said news networks´ reliance on citizen journalists was risky but necessary when they are left with no other choice.

However, the danger of relying on citizen journalists was also highlighted in the forum, during which video footage was shown of errors made by the Reuters, Al Arabiya and Al Jazeera networks where older footage was mistakenly aired, falsely claimed to have been filmed in Yemen and Syria, both of which currently face uprisings. Nabil Al Khatib, editor of the Al Arabiya news channel, said such events are used by regimes to discredit news channels, suggesting that some false news could be planted by governments looking to embarrass the channels and undermine their credibility.

WikiLeaks conspiracy?

The release of American diplomatic cables by whistle-blowing website WikiLeaks was also raised in the Arab Media forum. Some panelists cheered because it shed light on certain events, while others cautioned about hidden agendas behind leaks.

"WikiLeaks has become a source of information in the Arab world because of a lack of transparency," Hasni Abidi, director of Switzerland-based Center for Studies and Research on the Arab and Mediterranean World, said.

"We should ask ourselves why Arab officials speak so openly with US officials. Why shouldn´t we be honest when addressing our people? Honesty does exist in discussion with Arab officials. This is a media revolution," he said.

Wayne Madsen, an investigative journalist from the US, described the leaks as a “neo-conservative conspiracy” aimed to disseminate false information. He said the media needed to be concerned about misinformation and false intelligence. “Data must not be based on conversations or gossip; therefore, vetting of news becomes a responsibility of the media,” he noted.

Le Monde Editor-in-Chief Sylvie Kauffmann said there was some value in the cables, but the information needed to be verified and put into context before it got published. “WikiLeaks was always perceived as a resource of information obtained from gossip and not valuable content. But by using the tool in the right manner, valuable data put in context by the media can reflect positively on the industry,” Kauffman said. Matthew Bostrom, APCO Online director for Europe, the Middle East and Africa (EMEA), said that data available from sources such as WikiLeaks must be verified, particularly when it is political in nature.

 


 

‘Egypt faces economic and security challenges´

In a keynote speech delivered at the 10th Arab Media Forum by Egypt´s minister for culture and antiquities, Emad Abu Ghazi, the focus was on challenges faced by post-revolution Egypt. Abu Ghazi said that his country is facing two major challenges, namely security and the economy. He underlined that time is running out and people´s patience is getting thinner every day. “Unfortunately, situations cannot be changed overnight after getting rid of several decades of despotism,” he said.

Stressing that the regional media industry had not witnessed the growth seen in other parts of the world, Abu Ghazi partly attributed this to "repressive laws" and government control of media channels. "Some governments had brought repressive laws and codes against the media," he said, adding, "With the totalitarian regimes, Arab countries have witnessed years where the media were under the control of censorship."

"During the past months in the region we have witnessed such historical events, which have highlighted the role of the media, especially new media. The street cannot be isolated from the media. There was an independent media that came forth through the Internet. It cannot be controlled by anyone," he explained. The Egyptian minister underlined that the new government has introduced various measures to ensure that people have other forums to highlight their demands, instead of taking to the streets each time. He revealed that more than 25 political parties have been formed so far as well as new trade unions and civil society organizations have been established.

Abu Ghazi said the government is determined to bring everyone responsible for corruption to justice. “Right now only investigations [against former President Hosni Mubarak] have been carried out; the trial has not started yet. A number of people will be tried following the investigation, but we have to start from the head,” he said.

When asked about recent turmoil in Egypt, Abu Ghazi said it was due to a lack of awareness. He said certain forces do not want the revolution to succeed. Thus they have been trying to destroy unity because coherent unity of the people is a guarantee of success. However, he expressed optimism that his countrymen will remain united and will not fall victim to such ploys.

2.       barba_mama
1629 posts
 23 May 2011 Mon 10:56 pm

And nobody noted that the negative image of Islam and Arabs might be (in other words IS) connected to regular bombings by Islamic extremists?



Edited (5/23/2011) by barba_mama

3.       Elisabeth
5732 posts
 24 May 2011 Tue 05:28 pm

 

Quoting barba_mama

And nobody noted that the negative image of Islam and Arabs might be (in other words IS) connected to regular bombings by Islamic extremists?

 

 I agree with you in part, barba.  Hoever, I think much of the islamaphobia comes from the media as well.  You ONLY hear about the extremists...never about the average muslim.  It makes for good ratings when a news entity reports only on extreme behavior and radicals.  I have a feeling that in Arab countries they are only seeing the worst of us too.  As a matter of fact, I see very few news reports about human beings doing good or showing compassion for other human beings.   

 

Maybe I am naive, but I feel all people, on all sides, are being manipulated for the sake of politics and TV ratings. 

tunci, Daydreamer, scalpel and alameda liked this message
4.       alameda
3499 posts
 25 May 2011 Wed 05:19 pm

Excellent post Elisabeth. It´s an old tactic called divide and rule It has been used for millennia and will probably go on as long as humans exist. It´s a telling commentary on the malleability of society...."when will they ever learn?"

Quoting Elisabeth

 

 

 I agree with you in part, barba.  Hoever, I think much of the islamaphobia comes from the media as well.  You ONLY hear about the extremists...never about the average muslim.  It makes for good ratings when a news entity reports only on extreme behavior and radicals.  I have a feeling that in Arab countries they are only seeing the worst of us too.  As a matter of fact, I see very few news reports about human beings doing good or showing compassion for other human beings.   

 

Maybe I am naive, but I feel all people, on all sides, are being manipulated for the sake of politics and TV ratings. 

 

 



Edited (5/25/2011) by alameda [fix link]

5.       barba_mama
1629 posts
 25 May 2011 Wed 07:54 pm

 

Quoting Elisabeth

 

 

 I agree with you in part, barba.  Hoever, I think much of the islamaphobia comes from the media as well.  You ONLY hear about the extremists...never about the average muslim.  It makes for good ratings when a news entity reports only on extreme behavior and radicals.  I have a feeling that in Arab countries they are only seeing the worst of us too.  As a matter of fact, I see very few news reports about human beings doing good or showing compassion for other human beings.   

 

Maybe I am naive, but I feel all people, on all sides, are being manipulated for the sake of politics and TV ratings. 

 

True, but I find it strange that when people debate the reasons behind the negative image, they only blame the media. If people don´t acknowledge that there are bad muslims who give all muslims a bad name, they will never be able to battle the whole problem of negative image. Extremes always make the best tv.

rahma17 liked this message
6.       Elisabeth
5732 posts
 25 May 2011 Wed 08:45 pm

Absolutely there are bad Muslims...there are bad Christians, Jews, Athiests, Budhists...there are just bad people in the world.  But for us to deny that the concept that Arabs and/or Muslims are evil is perpetuated by the media and politics is somewhat unfair.  I do agree with you that terrorist who kill in the name of Islam make it very hard to see Muslims or Arabs in any other light. 

I think it would help if people got out from in front of the TV, got out of their homes and started socializing more within their communities.  People might realize that there is so much diversity in thier own backyard and that (at least here in the US) we all live and work among Muslims everyday and NEVER have any problems.  One of the biggist problems is that most Westerners want to look at this as a "Muslim" problem or an "Arab" problem because it is easier to understand people if you put them into a catagory. 

In my opinion, human beings will never achieve peace until we root out causes of terrorism...poverty, inequality and injustice. 

Just my thoughts...

 

barba_mama, scalpel, tunci, Daydreamer and alameda liked this message
7.       alameda
3499 posts
 26 May 2011 Thu 12:10 am

Well Barba... You have heard of propaganda, public relations, brainwashing, have you not?

For some reason, and I think I have a good idea why, there is constantly a popular enemy to rally everyone against.....while those pulling the strings others rob the shirts off the rest of us.

I´m not going to dignify this ugly and hateful thing by counting who did the most ugly deeds. Lord knows, there are plenty to go around.  It´s an old tactic, divide and rule. Nothing new here, been going on a long time.

I REFUSE to hate anyone based on the group they belong to. In fact, I don´t want to hate anyone. I do hate deeds. The universe is just too small for this, we are all interdependant on one another, so let´s get along.

 

Quoting barba_mama

True, but I find it strange that when people debate the reasons behind the negative image, they only blame the media. If people don´t acknowledge that there are bad muslims who give all muslims a bad name, they will never be able to battle the whole problem of negative image. Extremes always make the best tv.

 

 

scalpel liked this message
8.       Daydreamer
3743 posts
 27 May 2011 Fri 03:48 pm

I couldn´t agree more with Elisabeth here. You´d think that in 21st century we´d go beyond the "us" and "them" thinking but no, the curtain might not be iron anymore, but it still exists

tunci liked this message
9.       alameda
3499 posts
 28 May 2011 Sat 02:26 am

Awww...you couldn´t agree with me too....? Why do you think the curtain exists? 

Quoting Daydreamer

I couldn´t agree more with Elisabeth here. You´d think that in 21st century we´d go beyond the "us" and "them" thinking but no, the curtain might not be iron anymore, but it still exists

 

 

10.       Daydreamer
3743 posts
 28 May 2011 Sat 10:59 am

 

Quoting alameda

Awww...you couldn´t agree with me too....? Why do you think the curtain exists? 

 

 

 

Tabii ki Alameda You agreed with Elisabeth and so did I so logically, I agreed with you

Why does the curtain exist? Lots of reasons, just to name a few, there´s our tribal instinct where anyone outside the tribe is menace; there´s misinformation on both sides, fear of the unknown, money, and belief that "us" stands for better values and/or civilisational advancement

11.       barba_mama
1629 posts
 29 May 2011 Sun 02:30 pm

 

Quoting alameda

Well Barba... You have heard of propaganda, public relations, brainwashing, have you not?

For some reason, and I think I have a good idea why, there is constantly a popular enemy to rally everyone against.....while those pulling the strings others rob the shirts off the rest of us.

I´m not going to dignify this ugly and hateful thing by counting who did the most ugly deeds. Lord knows, there are plenty to go around.  It´s an old tactic, divide and rule. Nothing new here, been going on a long time.

I REFUSE to hate anyone based on the group they belong to. In fact, I don´t want to hate anyone. I do hate deeds. The universe is just too small for this, we are all interdependant on one another, so let´s get along.

 

 

 

 

 My point is this. Some Muslims in my country point a finger towards the media for depicting a bad image of Muslims. They say the media is bad bad bad, because they report on Islamist terrorists and report on the high crime rates amongst Muslim teens in my countries. These people never go to those criminal kids and say "WHAT are you doing? Go home, go to school, and stop bullying people in the name of Islam". They never say in public "what is wrong with those terrorists, stop defying the name of Islam!" They always blame the media. I have a problem with these people. The media is making the problems worse, yes, but it is not the root of the problems. The root of the problems is the terrorist who hurt others in the first place. After 9/11 I wasn´t checked at the airport for a pen or camera, I was checked for bombs. The root of the problem is that those kids are out on the street making problems, because their parents are badly integrated and have no idea what their kids are doing.

I have watched the way the Dutch media reports on Muslims and terrorist attacks closely, because my Muslim friend said she was boycotting the news because of bad reporting. So, for a month I closely watched the two main news programs we have in Holland, to see which language they used. Guess what, the word Muslim terrorist was never used. They said "a member of Al-quaida did this" and "a member of the Taliban did that"... "The police forces in the 4 largest cities of Holland are asking for help to deal with street gangs"... I realized that the news reports aren´t such a big issue as people might think, it´s the actual actions of the crazy people that do stupid stuff in the name of Islam that hurt everybody the most. I won´t judge all Muslims on the actions of those few crazies, but you can´t blame the media for the people who generalize. That´s just a lack of intelligence on the part of those people.

12.       vineyards
1954 posts
 29 May 2011 Sun 09:08 pm

Some Islamists, bad Muslims, media, complaints and stuff like that... The real problem here is the wrong perception of the Western governments and media who consider Muslims as a potential threat. In many countries, the prophet of Islam is depicted as a terrorist; Islam as an evil religion, people are seriously questioning the entire belief system and all this is happening with a complete denial of the fact that Islam is one of the largest three religions in the world. When you take into account the conflicts happening in these countries and those initiated or intervened by the venerable US and its allies you will conclude that the real evil is elsewhere. The real evil is currently bombing innocent civilians in Afghanistan. I am sorry if these sad news don´t make the headlines in your country´s newspapers but this is more or less what is going on in the world.

True there are terrorist who call themselselves as mujaheddin and they claim they are doing this in the name of God but believe me they don´t have wide spread support. If this wasn´t the case every country being assulted would not have some energy resource or some geopolitical significance.

There are good Muslims and they form the majority, you don´t have to try to tame them any further. They are already humiliated sufficiently. Just close the doors of your boring country to all Muslims and enjoy life the best you can. If this is what you are trying to achieve.

13.       Daydreamer
3743 posts
 30 May 2011 Mon 10:45 am

It´s unfair Vineyards to speak like that. I can´t speak for all western countries but news about bombing civilians definitely make it to the news in Poland and Ireland. There is no agitation here for the war in Afghanistan, on the contrary, the only reason Polish MPs give for our troops being there is "to support our ally" and there are plenty of lobbists in favour of bringing our boys back home (Polish soldiers are on missions all around the world). Recently soldiers responsible for accidental shooting of civilians got prison sentences. The "anti-Muslim" programmes are only on youtube, never on tv. On all occassions, celebrations, the main imam of Polish Muslims (although there are just about 5,00 Muslims in Poland) is invited together with catholic and orthodox heads of religions.

Not once have I heard the phrase "bad Muslims" but, like BM said, members of this-and-that.

14.       vineyards
1954 posts
 30 May 2011 Mon 11:41 am

To make a long story short: there is currently a wide spread anti-Islam sentiment in the Western world and this manifests itself not only among people but also in the bureaucratic formalities and political decisions made by these countries.

Let me tell you a story, when you watch Hollywood movies from the 50´s, you´ll find countries like Russia complete with the entire "iron curtain" countries, Germany and Japan were satanized. You can´t deny the government´s role in manipulating a desired hatred reaction against these countries. It is something cultural, it is in the mindset of these nations and their leaders to satanize the enemy.

The same thing happened to the Ottoman Empire. There was a satanic Turk image which precedes the partly bad image of Turks even today. British agents provoked uprisals in the once Ottoman territory forcing the empire to fight wars on all possible fronts. The movies were depicting a terrible Turk image. Agents operating in East Turkey provoked Armenians to form alliance with the Russians and revolt against the country.

It wasn´t the pro-freedom sentiment that caused them to do all these. Humanistic ideals were out of question too. These war lords created small nationalistic countries which are impossible to defy their power. Many of those countries had dictators in place and their people were kept ignorant and powerless.

I am inviting you to undo my judgements about the West rather than find excuses or put the blame on the other party. It is obvious that the West has set its mind on the Islam these days. They are doing their best to polarize the world into haves and have nots.

 

15.       Daydreamer
3743 posts
 30 May 2011 Mon 02:14 pm

The slight note of dislike for the Ottoman Empire might have something to do they got north as far as Vienna, looting and slaughtering people along the way

I´m not trying to find excuses, just say what it´s like in here. You have to look at the problem on many levels: the political ones and the social ones. Some people here protest against the western intervention in the east, some do not care, some are in favour of it. Some people do not care who their neighbour is, some do not want a Pole, a black or a Muslim. Are you trying to say Muslims applications for visas are rejected on the basis of their religion? I hardly think so.

16.       vineyards
1954 posts
 30 May 2011 Mon 02:35 pm

Well, if it were the massacres, torture and cruelty that form the negative image of a nation then I can ask you about the medieval times in Europe. I could go on to inquire about the cruelties the Jewish communities of Spain were subjected to. I might also ask you about Dracula (Vlad). Sectarian wars, crusades and their barbarism. Indeed, crusaders gave the biggest harm to Istanbul than anybody else. Even Hagia Sophia still bears the signs of their vandalism.

Of course, you were taught in schools like that. There is no denying we were taught the other way around. Wouldn´t it be naive to think Ottomans or Europeans deserve such a bad image.

Assimilation? The world is full of assimilated people. Slavized Bulgarians, Islamized Serbs, Russified or Germanized Poles you name it. Who is completely innocent?

 



Edited (5/30/2011) by vineyards

17.       Daydreamer
3743 posts
 30 May 2011 Mon 05:03 pm

 

Quoting vineyards

Well, if it were the massacres, torture and cruelty that form the negative image of a nation then I can ask you about the medieval times in Europe. I could go on to inquire about the cruelties the Jewish communities of Spain were subjected to. I might also ask you about Dracula (Vlad). Sectarian wars, crusades and their barbarism. Indeed, crusaders gave the biggest harm to Istanbul than anybody else. Even Hagia Sophia still bears the signs of their vandalism.

Of course, you were taught in schools like that. There is no denying we were taught the other way around. Wouldn´t it be naive to think Ottomans or Europeans deserve such a bad image.

Assimilation? The world is full of assimilated people. Slavized Bulgarians, Islamized Serbs, Russified or Germanized Poles you name it. Who is completely innocent?

 

 

You´re absolutely right and hence nobody sane claims that Crusades or Pogroms were ok but they just had bad press Times were cruel and so were people, regardless of faith or country of origin. We are taught that at school, just as we are taught modern history. If you´re trying to say the Ottomans didn´t brutally march into Europe but danced instead and everybody loved them, then you´re plain wrong. The crescent moon wanted Europe but failed, just like crusaders did trying to gain Middle East. Neither party was better than the other.

 

The world as we know today was built on corpses, blood and wars and there isn´t a nation that is innocent.

(17 Messages in 2 pages - View all)
1 2
Add reply to this discussion




Turkish Dictionary
Turkish Chat
Open mini chat
New in Forums
Why yer gördüm but yeri geziyorum
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much, makes perfect sense!
Etmeyi vs etmek
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much!
Görülmez vs görünmiyor
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much, very well explained!
Içeri and içeriye
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much for the detailed ...
Present continous tense
HaydiDeer: Got it, thank you!
Hic vs herhangi, degil vs yok
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much!
Rize Artvin Airport Transfer - Rize Tours
rizetours: Dear Guest; In order to make your Black Sea trip more enjoyable, our c...
What does \"kabul ettiğini\" mean?
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much for the detailed ...
Kimse vs biri (anyone)
HaydiDeer: Thank you!
Random Pictures of Turkey
Most commented