E---T

1-I want to prove to him that i can do that

2-what do you mea?

3-I thought that u told him.

T----E

Görmeyince tükenseydi sevgiler,insan varlığı boyunca görmediği rabbine böylesi bir sevgi duyar miydi...

THAAAAAANKS

 my try at a bit

E---T

1-I want to prove to him that i can do that

ben ona bunu yapabileceğimi kanıtlamak istiyorum

2-what do you mean?

ne demek istiyorsun?

3-I thought that u told him.

ona söylediğini düşündüm 

T----E

Görmeyince tükenseydi sevgiler,insan varlığı boyunca görmediği rabbine böylesi bir sevgi duyar miydi...

THAAAAAANKS

 my try at a bit

I did a bit more tunci

and whats the difference between kanıtlamak and tanıtlamak

 thanks

 what about the turkish one

thanks

 Deli, they are almost same words but we use " kanıtlamak" or " ispat etmek " for " to prove"

 I mean , in daily life I havent heard anyone using " tanıtlamak " , it is more like used by academics and intellectual stuff..

Görmeyince tükenseydi sevgiler,insan varlığı boyunca görmediği rabbine böylesi bir sevgi duyar miydi...

if love was to run out when not seeing each other would it not be the same for god that isnt seen throughout a persons existence 

I agree with the first sentence. For second one my try would be ;

insan varlığı boyunca görmediği rabbine böylesi bir sevgi duyar miydi...

would men since first existed, love to God this much that [although] he has never seen [God].

insan - men, human being

varlığı boyunca -- throughout his [human being ] existence

görmediği --- that he has not seen

rabbine -- to his God

böylesi --- like this

bir sevgi duymak --- to feel love

The moral of the story is that love never run out by not seeing our loved ones. we still love them even if they are not visible to us. Likewise human being throught the history always showed affection and love to God despite of  he [human being ] never seen Him[God] . [ although God is invisible to us, we are not run out of love for Him ]

 Fine, it just sounds a bit "stiff" or "stilted" in English

Making it freer:

Could a man love God like this, whom he has never seen throughout his life?

(a) I changed would to could, as the sentence implies would he be able to

(b) the Turkish says "his Lord". We would more naturally use either "the Lord" or "God" here

(c) "throughout his existence" sounds really odd. "throughout his life" more natural.

(d) varlığı boyunca must relate to a man, not God, as God has no beginning and no end (ezelden beri, sonsuzluklar boyunca var olanı so I used a small letter for his, not a capital (we use capitals for God).

So the whole thing, in a free translation reads:

If true love were to fail when you don´t see the object of your love, could a man love God , whom he has never seen throughout his life?