Welcome
Login:   Pass:     Register - Forgot Password - Resend Activation

Forum Messages Posted by alameda

(3499 Messages in 350 pages - View all)
<<  ... 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 [296] 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 ...  >>


Thread: No tolerance even for Say's Web site

2951.       alameda
3499 posts
 29 Dec 2007 Sat 04:50 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

I have to confess I knew little about Blackwater - thanks chaps! TC is a little mine of information (for those who can bear reading arguments without bursting into tears)



That's why I post links, for the few who actually have the interest to read them. The private security sector is a very controversial issue here lately. Most had little knowledge of them until recently.

Private Military Company

Private military companies supply bodyguards for the Afghan president, build detention camps at Guantanamo Bay, and pilot armed reconnaissance planes and helicopter gunships to destroy coca crops in Colombia.[citation needed] They operate the intelligence and communications systems at the United States Northern Command in Colorado, which is responsible for coordinating a response to any attack on the United States.[citation needed] And licensed by the State Department, they are contracting with foreign governments, training soldiers and reorganizing militaries in Nigeria, Bulgaria, Taiwan, and Equatorial Guinea. The PMC industry is now worth over $100 billion a year.



Thread: No tolerance even for Say's Web site

2952.       alameda
3499 posts
 29 Dec 2007 Sat 06:51 am

Quoting teaschip1:

This has been proved to be a myth, Alameda. Please do your research and come up with some factual truth instead of posting links you just happen to read. Your really making yourself look real good here lately with all of your stupid responses and links that have no relative value.



Excuse me teaschip1...read more:

International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries

The Convention defines a mercenary as any person who:

* Is specially recruited locally or abroad in order to fight in armed conflict
* Is motivated to take part in the hostilities essentially by the desire for private gain and, in fact, is promised, by or on behalf of a party to the conflict, material compensation substantially in excess of that promised or paid to combatants of similar rank and functions in the armed forces of that party
* Is neither a national of a party to the conflict nor a resident of territory controlled by a party to the conflict
* Is not a member of armed forces of a party to the conflict
* Has not been sent by a State which is not a party to the conflict on official duty as a member of its armed forces

States party to the convention affirm "that the recruitment, use, financing and training of mercenaries should be considered as offences of grave concern to all States and that any person committing any of these-offences should be either prosecuted or extradited"; and

Are concerned "at new unlawful international activities linking drug traffickers and mercenaries in the perpetration of violent actions which undermine the constitutional order of the States"; and

Are convinced that the adoption of this convention "would contribute to the eradication of these nefarious activities and thereby to observance of the purposes and the principles enshrined in the Charter"; and

Are "convinced of the necessity to develop and enhance international co-operation among the States for the prevention, prosecution and punishment of such offenders."[4]

The twenty-two States that have completed the constitutional procedures that bind them to the Convention are: Azerbaijan, Barbados, Belarus, Cameroon, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cyprus, Georgia, Italy, Libya, Maldives, Mauritania, Qatar, saudi Arabia, Senegal, Seychelles, Suriname, Togo, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uruguay and Uzbekistan.

The nine other States that have signed but not ratified it are: Angola, Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, Germany, Morocco, Nigeria, Poland, Romania and Yugoslavia. The United States has not signed.



Thread: No tolerance even for Say's Web site

2953.       alameda
3499 posts
 29 Dec 2007 Sat 02:59 am

Quoting teaschip1:


Specifically, the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) applies to contractors accompanying the total force and the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act (MEJA) creates jurisdiction for federal court trials. Any wrongdoing is covered under statutes such as the War Crimes Act, the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act, the Anti-Torture Statute, the Defense Base Act, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and many other domestic and international regulations. Blackwater advocates stricter enforcement of existing laws.



Actually that is not true....

Standish hits on a critical point- “Blackwater’s diplomatic security people are employed by the State Department and accompany diplomats - not the armed forces. No such law exists to prosecute for the September 16 incident. That’s not Blackwater’s fault. It’s the fault of Congress.”

Prosecuting Blackwater guards raises legal questions



Thread: SABAH News

2954.       alameda
3499 posts
 29 Dec 2007 Sat 02:44 am

Quoting AlphaF:

Remember what happened to Lakota Indians...

Missionaries got all the land and shot the buffalos... Lakotians were left holding the bibles...))))))))

Double standard, eh?



Hmmm...so far you have only spoken about the Indians who are recognized....there are many who don't even have that.

U.S. Federally Non-Recognized Indian Tribes

Quarter Blood laws



Thread: please, dont betray us!

2955.       alameda
3499 posts
 29 Dec 2007 Sat 01:31 am

Quoting AEnigma III:

....Well...actually you DID say that women have no pleasure



Well, actually I did not say any such a thing. Perhaps in your mind you confused my comment regarding the artificial insemination of cows with "women? Next time I'll make my post more easily understood. I should have made been more clear as to what I was commenting on.

Oh, sorry, maybe the cows enjoy this process, although I doubt it.



Thread: please, dont betray us!

2956.       alameda
3499 posts
 29 Dec 2007 Sat 01:13 am

Quoting girleegirl:

............This simple comment gives a really sad insight into your life.
I know I am not alone in being a woman who enjoys sex and doesn't see it with the same distorted view you seem to see it with.



I think it's more a matter of you not being able to read. I stated some very basic and simple to understand facts. It has nothing to do with your enjoyment of sex.

I never said I have a daughter.



Thread: please, dont betray us!

2957.       alameda
3499 posts
 28 Dec 2007 Fri 11:51 pm

catwoman said: "Alameda, wow - I hope you're not saying that it's ok for women to be abused and discriminated because they are smaller.."

Of course not....

catwoman said: "How can you say that it's only males who enjoy sex?"

That's not what I said, read again.

catwoman said: "Yes, males can get away with no responsibility from raising children. Women can also if they want."

Yes, it's possible, but they still have a belly full. Men don't.

catwoman said: "Look, the problem is that women are less educated then men, make less money and have less power in the society. If these things were equal, we'd demand more equality, but for now, it's them who decide about our rights and freedom. That is also the case in the West! (for example in the US parliment, women make up only 16%)"

Yes, women are less educated. That is a big problem. Why is that? Maybe the tactics being used thus far are not working as well as we may like?

catwoman said: "What do you say to a woman whose family condemns her because her husband rapes her? Do you say - "be useful" or "fight for your freedom"?

People don't do things that make shame in society. What needs to happen is the consciousness needs to be raised as to why that is wrong.

Raising consciousness is the way to fight for one's freedom. Showing and proving the worth of the female contribution and value to society is what I see as the way to fight.

Shame in society

Shame is considered one aspect of socialization in all societies.

Shame is enshrouded in legal precedent as a pillar of punishment and ostensible correction.

Shame has been linked to narcissism in the psychoanalytic literature. It is one of the most intense emotions. The individual experiencing shame may feel totally despicable, worthless and feel that there is no redemption.

According to the anthropologist Ruth Benedict, cultures may be classified by their emphasis of using either shame or guilt to regulate the social activities of their members.


I'm pointing out the realities of the situation catwoman. Read again. You didn't get it. What I stated is the base reality of the situation.



Thread: No tolerance even for Say's Web site

2958.       alameda
3499 posts
 28 Dec 2007 Fri 11:08 pm

Quoting teaschip1:

I recall Cheney admitting to having some ownership prior to him becoming Vice President. I also never denied Blackwater...So what is your point..



The fact is a wonderful, beautiful woman has been assasinated. She knew it was dangerous situation, but she went anyway. She deserves our respect and admiration.

Her family has so far seen the death of too many, her father and two brothers. We are all grieving. May they all rest in peace.

I don't see this doing Musharraf any good. It looks like his days are numbered as well. He's been holding on by a thread for a while now.

Bhutto's End Could Mean Musharraf's As Well

The fact is, we don't know who was responsible. Jumping to conclusions fosters a lynch mob mentality.

This is a very dangerous situation and it doesn't need any outside provocation.

Here's another fact:
U.S. Troops to Head to Pakistan



Thread: please, dont betray us!

2959.       alameda
3499 posts
 28 Dec 2007 Fri 10:52 pm

Quoting femme_fatal:

....alameda,
is that your so called thoughtful contribution that you made me wait so long?
.............why do you clap your hands towards the traditons/customs/religions that opress us?
why are you so mindless? why dont you look beneath all the culture and then speak your mind? you betrayed us, alameda. you prefered to pretend and play a wise aunt from the west whos "cultural" and polite and supports the culture....
thank you for selling us for your own convinient position.



No, you read the wrong post...my response was here:
http://www.turkishclass.com/forumTitle_7_26021_16
Now on to the grim realities of the female situation.
Women can best increase their status by consciousness raising, by making men realize how much better life is with female cooperation.

I think you fantasize as to just how "free" women in the "free" world are. They are "free" by the permission of the males. They are "free" as long as they are entertaining and useful. They are "free" as long as the males deem it in their best interest. It matters not if you or I like it or not. This is the reality of the situation.

In general females are smaller than males. Men are stronger then women, Boys are stronger than girls. I don't know if it was always that way, but it is now.

There have been some instances of "strong" females. I read a story in The Travels of Marco Polo where he talks about the daughter of the daughter of King Kaidu how strong and valiant she was. We must admit this is an unusual situation.

In regards to sexual matters, it's the woman who bears children. Men can have their pleasure and not have any responsibilities or even know they have fathered a child. Women always know.

The propagation of the species does not depend on females enjoyment of sex, but for every newborn some male had pleasure. That's a fact weather we like it or not. One bull can have hundreds of offspring, and that bull had pleasure, the cows didn't, but the cows still had the pain of birthing process.

Females have to be diplomatic and clever. History is full of societal changes regarding the status of females. The best way to be valued is to be useful. It is up to every female to impress the males on how important the female contribution is, being abrasive and demanding does not work well in many matters. It only works when there is a conscience realization as to the value of what is being lost.



Thread: No tolerance even for Say's Web site

2960.       alameda
3499 posts
 28 Dec 2007 Fri 09:39 pm

Quoting femme_fatal:

...i will go and check your post.
and i absolutely dont care for your spelling mistakes.
to me important is the thought behind, not the form its written in.



I agree with you, it was tasteless on my part to have pointed out your errors. Please excuse my rudeness.

However, form is not to be discounted. Imagine your food thrown on a plate in a haphazard manner, or arranged in a pleasing and appetizing manner.



(3499 Messages in 350 pages - View all)
<<  ... 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 [296] 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 ...  >>



Turkish Dictionary
Turkish Chat
Open mini chat
New in Forums
Crossword Vocabulary Puzzles for Turkish L...
qdemir: You can view and solve several of the puzzles online at ...
Giriyor vs Geliyor.
lrnlang: Thank you for the ...
Local Ladies Ready to Play in Your City
nifrtity: ... - Discover Women Seeking No-Strings Attached Encounters in Your Ci...
Geçmekte vs. geçiyor?
Hoppi: ... and ... has almost the same meaning. They are both mean "i...
Intermediate (B1) to upper-intermediate (B...
qdemir: View at ...
Why yer gördüm but yeri geziyorum
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much, makes perfect sense!
Random Pictures of Turkey
Most commented