Turkey |
|
|
|
Ramadan in Turkey
|
1. |
22 Aug 2009 Sat 11:34 am |
The holy month of Ramadan is very auspicious to the Muslims the world over. It is celebrated the day after the crescent for the 9th lunar month of the Islamic calendar is sighted. Muslims are ordained to observe a fast for 30 days (sometimes 29 days, owing to the early sighting of the crescent) starting with the sighting of the new moon and ending after seeing the new moon the next month.
Islam uses a lunar calendar, that is, each month begins with the signing of the new moon. The lunar calendar is about eleven days shorter than the solar calendar therefore Islamic holidays "move" each year. This year Ramadan will begin on August 21, 2009.
Oruç (Fasting) is one of the Five Pillars (duties) of Islam and is mandatory for all adult Muslim men and women, except the insane, infirm, sick or traveling and pregnant or feeding mothers. They can complete the prescribed number of fasting days by choosing to fast on some other days. Those who cannot fast, except with great hardship, should arrange to feed at least one needy person in lieu of the days one missed out on fasting.
Fasting means to stop eating and drinking from dawn to sunset. Dawn is the time which is about one hour before the sunrise while sunset is the time of "evening call to prayer". Sahur is the early morning or pre-fast meal eaten before the sun rises. Ramazan Davulcusu (Ramadan drummers) woke up people by walking around the neighborhoods with a big double-headed drum. They beat out variety of rhythms and sometimes may also sing a mani, a rhyming couplet. The drummers may surprise the newcomers. However they try to keep alive an old tradition from the times alarm clocks were non-existent. Just before Bayram and certainly during Bayram the drummer of your district will knock on your door for a tip.
The fast is broken with a meal, which is known as Iftar just after sunset with "evenming call to prayer". Please keep in mind that cannons are fired at Sahur and Iftar times.
For most of the muslims these two meals are more than a ritualistic part of fasting; they are pleasure. Many families have busy lives recently, with both parents working and the kids are in school. Therefore these meals are time for gathering and spend some more time together during Ramadan.
When Ramadan was falling in winter months when the nights are longer it was easier to fast since there is almost 10-11 hours between the meals (sahur and iftar). Now Ramadan begins to fall in summer months and the fasting time gets longer which is almost 17-18 hours in June and July. This year it is around 14 hours. It is wise to have light and simple meals such as breakfast at sahur in summer Ramadans.
Iftar usually begins with dates, sweet drinks, breakfast and soup followed by traditional dinner. Iftar invitations are wide spread in Ramadan. You may have Iftar gathering calls from family members, friends, and neighbors. You can also invite Muslim family and friends who are comfortable interacting with non-Muslims to such events.
During Ramadan, the night praying (yatsý namazý) is followed by a special "namaz" called Teravih. It is a kind of ritual worshipping performed only at Ramadan nights. The Muslims try to visit different mosques to fulfill the teravih praying.
Please also note that some restuarants are closed during the day time and most of the restaurants do not serve alcoholic drinks in the month of Ramadan.
Ramadan is considered holy because Koran was revealed to Prophet Muhammad during this month. Apart from bringing the Muslims face to face with the hard realities of life such as pangs of hunger, thirst and deprivation, Ramadan is an annual training period inculcating discipline and declaration of subservience to the laws of God, enumerated in the holy Koran.
A Muslim is told to give Sadaka (charity) and Fitre (alms given in Ramadan) to the poor before going to say the Bayram prayers. Muslims recite Koran intensively during this holy month.
The last 10 days of Ramadan are more important as the faithful watch for Kadir Gecesi (the Night of Power) during which the revelation of the book to the Prophet was completed. In a way it is considered the climax of Ramadan and Muslims stay awake all night praying or listening to sermons from the Imam (religious leader).
Fasting is practiced by followers of all religions in one form or other. Fasting enables one to understand the deprivations of hunger and thirst, which in turn encourages one to be kind to the poor and the needy. It is also viewed as a health care ritual by many. The establishment of an obedient and disciplined society is also fulfilled when people observe Oruç (Fast). Ramadan is a month of brotherhood, renewal of relationships and festivity and the rigor of fasting ends with the celebration of Þeker Bayramý (Sweet Festival) which is on September 20, 2009.
|
|
2. |
22 Aug 2009 Sat 01:16 pm |
dear its not koran its QURAN.
Thanks
Tc
|
|
3. |
22 Aug 2009 Sat 01:30 pm |
dear its not koran its QURAN.
Thanks
Tc
thanks DEAR, i dont know what i would do without you 
|
|
4. |
22 Aug 2009 Sat 01:34 pm |
dear its not koran its QURAN.
Thanks
Tc
Koran is the English (and international way) of spelling. And while the language on this site is English....
|
|
5. |
22 Aug 2009 Sat 01:42 pm |
thanks DEAR, i dont know what i would do without you 
Kurt - I love you!      
|
|
6. |
22 Aug 2009 Sat 02:04 pm |
i love you too DEAR lir 
|
|
7. |
22 Aug 2009 Sat 02:06 pm |
i love you too DEAR lir 

|
|
8. |
22 Aug 2009 Sat 02:07 pm |
Forum romance? 
|
|
9. |
22 Aug 2009 Sat 02:17 pm |
LIR, i guess it is time to announce some things after all this time 
|
|
10. |
22 Aug 2009 Sat 02:23 pm |
LIR, i guess it is time to announce some things after all this time 
Are you sure you´re ready???? I´m still a bit concerned about the huge age gap (I hope nobody´s watching this conversation )
|
|
11. |
22 Aug 2009 Sat 02:24 pm |
Are you sure you´re ready???? I´m still a bit concerned about the huge age gap (I hope nobody´s watching this conversation )
I am not. <whistle>
|
|
12. |
22 Aug 2009 Sat 07:47 pm |
Are you sure you´re ready???? I´m still a bit concerned about the huge age gap (I hope nobody´s watching this conversation )
I am not. <whistle>
Neither am I..........hehehe, however I can keep a secret LIR 
|
|
13. |
23 Aug 2009 Sun 10:19 pm |
Koran is the English (and international way) of spelling. And while the language on this site is English....
Also Quran is the English word its not Turkish or something, and its more accurate spelling and pronouncing to the Arabic word than Koran.
Actually its pronounced Qur´an...that is the correct way
|
|
14. |
23 Aug 2009 Sun 10:30 pm |
Very nice reading Kurt, thanks for posting it.
Also at Ramadan time its a chance for reunion to those people who have misunderstanding between each other or something, usually Ramadan is the suitable time for they to forgive.
Just small correction
Those who cannot fast, except with great hardship, should arrange to feed at least one needy person in lieu of the days one missed out on fasting
We feed one needy person in lieu of the day one missed.
So if they missed more than one day, they feed at least one needy person for each day, if they can feed more it would increase their hasanat ´rewards´
|
|
15. |
23 Aug 2009 Sun 10:30 pm |
Also Quran is the English word its not Turkish or something, and its more accurate spelling and pronouncing to the Arabic word than Koran.
Actually its pronounced Qur´an...that is the correct way
In any dictionary I find Koran, only in a few Qur´an so I take the most common one.
BTW Canli, how do you call the holy book of Christians? You use it´s original name or just the common known, English name?
|
|
16. |
23 Aug 2009 Sun 10:35 pm |
Well, i use its original name of it.
Ãf i talk in English, i use its English name
You see its different in Christian´s holy book, in Arabic its called Ãngeel ´Ãncil Turkish´, and in English its called Bible.
But in Quran case, we have just one name..by any language its same..
Edited (8/23/2009) by CANLI
|
|
17. |
23 Aug 2009 Sun 10:54 pm |
Well, i use its original name of it.
Ãf i talk in English, i use its English name
You see its different in Christian´s holy book, in Arabic its called Ãngeel ´Ãncil Turkish´, and in English its called Bible.
But in Quran case, we have just one name..by any language its same..
No. It´s not in English and my language.
|
|
18. |
23 Aug 2009 Sun 11:15 pm |
Well, i use its original name of it.
Ãf i talk in English, i use its English name
You see its different in Christian´s holy book, in Arabic its called Ãngeel ´Ãncil Turkish´, and in English its called Bible.
But in Quran case, we have just one name..by any language its same..
It may sound the same but it´s certainly not spelt the same. Koran is most commonly spelt Koran by native English speakers - a fact which kurtlovesgrunge knew as he writes excellent English 
|
|
19. |
23 Aug 2009 Sun 11:28 pm |
LIR, i guess it is time to announce some things after all this time 
Congratulations Kurt and LIR! 
|
|
20. |
23 Aug 2009 Sun 11:33 pm |
Well, i use its original name of it.
Ãf i talk in English, i use its English name
You see its different in Christian´s holy book, in Arabic its called Ãngeel ´Ãncil Turkish´, and in English its called Bible.
But in Quran case, we have just one name..by any language its same..
Yeah? You call it Biblia? I doubt it.
Edited (8/23/2009) by Trudy
[typo]
|
|
21. |
23 Aug 2009 Sun 11:44 pm |
Yeah? You call it Biblia? I doubt it.
Isn´t this all a bit petty?...Koran..Kuran.. Quran we all know what it means. 
Edited (8/23/2009) by bydand
|
|
22. |
23 Aug 2009 Sun 11:48 pm |
Isn´t this all a bit petty?...Koran..Kuran.. Quran we all know what it means. 
Exactly - so we don´t need Canli to tell us we are spelling it the wrong way! 
|
|
23. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 12:07 am |
Yeah? You call it Biblia? I doubt it.
Why would i call it Biblia and our Christians people call it Ãncil/Ãngeel ?!
Ãf they call it Biblia i would be happy to call it same, but they dont !
|
|
24. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 12:10 am |
Isn´t this all a bit petty?...Koran..Kuran.. Quran we all know what it means. 
Well, its simple, your name is bydand, we can also call you baydand, or bydnd and we would assume its same too
But at the end your name will still be bydand not anything else, yes?
|
|
25. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 12:15 am |
Exactly - so we don´t need Canli to tell us we are spelling it the wrong way! 
Well actually LÃR, when you try to pronounce a word or something ´name´ from other language/ religion, and you want to adopt it at your language you would need to ask a native about it first, so you pronounce it correctly, and spell it correctly too
So you may not need me in person but you sure need an Arab / Muslim to spell/pronounce it for you unless you think you ´general term´ know better than us in this too !
|
|
26. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 12:18 am |
Well, its simple, your name is bydand, we can also call you baydand, or bydnd and we would assume its same too
But at the end your name will still be bydand not anything else, yes?
I wasn´t taking any sides CANLI, I was only trying to defuse the situation. By the way bydand is the motto of a well known Scottish regiment and has no english equivalent.
|
|
27. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 12:20 am |
I wasn´t taking any sides CANLI, I was only trying to defuse the situation. By the way bydand is the motto of a well known Scottish regiment and has no english equivalent.
lol So, i cant call it baydand can i ?! 
Anyway, we are in Ramadan and it was a nice reading that Kurt posted
Ramadan Kerim 
|
|
28. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 01:31 am |
It would be quite hard to pronounce all proper names like native speakers, it goes for holy books as well as names or places. If the English equivalent is Koran (so it is in Polish) then why would anybody mind using that term? It reminds me of this Turkiye vs Turkey debate we had here a while ago. As long as the names are not twisted in an insulting manner, let´s use whatever suits us. I don´t mind people calling my country Polonya or Poland although its proper name is Polska. I´m even ok with Dobrowskistan 
|
|
29. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 02:20 am |
I have nothing but admiration for all who fast for one month ,today was my first attempt ,I managed it ,but it was so hard in the heat. Tomorrow I wont fast ,I will prepare myself for the next day. All I seemed to do all day was ask what the time was ,than when iftar came I was so excited about having a glass of water ,how we take these luzuries for granted ,but that glass of water tasted like pure heaven to me ,and this was just one day of fasting ,you guys that fast for a month are unbelievable ,I. admire your strength and commitment.
|
|
30. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 04:36 am |
I have nothing but admiration for all who fast for one month ,today was my first attempt ,I managed it ,but it was so hard in the heat. Tomorrow I wont fast ,I will prepare myself for the next day. All I seemed to do all day was ask what the time was ,than when iftar came I was so excited about having a glass of water ,how we take these luzuries for granted ,but that glass of water tasted like pure heaven to me ,and this was just one day of fasting ,you guys that fast for a month are unbelievable ,I. admire your strength and commitment.
Congratulations Deli!
It was an amazing experience wasn´t it? When you fast, each day is unique.
|
|
31. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 10:48 am |
I´m not sure I understand the whole ´fasting´ part of Ramazan really.
As far as the not eating goes it´s no particular hardship to go without food for a day. I frequently only eat an evening meal and have done so throughout my adult life. And once the iftar gun has gone off the restaurants here are doing big business with special iftar dinners and everywhere you look people are gulping food down as if there was no tomorrow. Wiki says: ´Fasting is meant to teach the Muslim patience, modesty and spirituality´ and ´is a time of reflecting and worshipping God´ - when for a lot of people most of their thoughts seem to be occupied with how soon sundown will come around. (I suppose it keeps the wicked thoughts away to a certain extent!)
It´s the ´not drinking´ that is the difficult thing and it´s not just difficult but, in this heat, seems to me downright dangerous. I´m sure it helps people feel spiritual - they are probably feeling so light-headed they are seeing things.
However - a quick straw poll of people around here showed me that it´s the not being able to smoke that´s the most difficult part and many people seem to not ´do´ Ramazan because they can´t manage without a cigarette for 3/4 of a day! The Evil Tobacco wins over Islam!
(Please Alameda, Canlý and QueenT etc. - no long posts explaining the true meaning of Ramadan/Ramazan to me - I am not disrespecting Muslims, Islam or Ramazan - just voicing my opinion) 
Edited (8/24/2009) by lady in red
Edited (8/24/2009) by lady in red
[forot someone]
|
|
32. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 11:27 am |
I´m not sure I understand the whole ´fasting´ part of Ramazan really.
As far as the not eating goes it´s no particular hardship to go without food for a day. I frequently only eat an evening meal and have done so throughout my adult life. And once the iftar gun has gone off the restaurants here are doing big business with special iftar dinners and everywhere you look people are gulping food down as if there was no tomorrow. Wiki says: ´Fasting is meant to teach the Muslim patience, modesty and spirituality´ and ´is a time of reflecting and worshipping God´ - when for a lot of people most of their thoughts seem to be occupied with how soon sundown will come around. (I suppose it keeps the wicked thoughts away to a certain extent!)
It´s the ´not drinking´ that is the difficult thing and it´s not just difficult but, in this heat, seems to me downright dangerous. I´m sure it helps people feel spiritual - they are probably feeling so light-headed they are seeing things.
However - a quick straw poll of people around here showed me that it´s the not being able to smoke that´s the most difficult part and many people seem to not ´do´ Ramazan because they can´t manage without a cigarette for 3/4 of a day! The Evil Tobacco wins over Islam!
(Please Alameda, Canlý and QueenT etc. - no long posts explaining the true meaning of Ramadan/Ramazan to me - I am not disrespecting Muslims, Islam or Ramazan - just voicing my opinion) 
For you be able to understand the whole fasting part of Ramazan, you should know that from Ãslam not from the behaviour of some Muslims around you.
I agree with you in this ´people are gulping food down as if there was no tomorrow´, and this is a behaviour of people and not the spirit of Ramazan nor the aim behind fasting.
It´s good you are looking forward to understand, I just ask you not to mix between Ãslam and some Muslims and I´m quite sure you´ll understand correctly.
|
|
33. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 11:37 am |
I have nothing but admiration for all who fast for one month ,today was my first attempt ,I managed it ,but it was so hard in the heat. Tomorrow I wont fast ,I will prepare myself for the next day. All I seemed to do all day was ask what the time was ,than when iftar came I was so excited about having a glass of water ,how we take these luzuries for granted ,but that glass of water tasted like pure heaven to me ,and this was just one day of fasting ,you guys that fast for a month are unbelievable ,I. admire your strength and commitment.
Admiration for you too.
And admiration for whom fast the whole year.
|
|
34. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 11:51 am |
While admiring eachother, please be careful with your health 
Dangers of fasting
...
Fasting can harm all organs. It is extremely dangerous to health, especially for those who are malnourished by chronic illness, yet some proponents recommend fasting to treat chronic illnesses. The slimmer the individual, the more dangerous a fast will be. ....
Solid scientific research does not support the claims of fasting advocates. To the contrary, ...
Advocates believe that fasting can produce fatigue, anemia, irregular heartbeat, body aches, nausea, dizziness, and other negative effects. ..
Contrary to advocacy claims, fasting does not and cannot heal medical conditions, assist immune or other physiological function, or play a role in health maintenance. ...
|
|
35. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 12:00 pm |
But I also think it says that if you are not well or in some way sick at all handsom then you do not have to fast at all. It is for those of us who are healthy and able to fast without causing harm to the body.....as far as i am aware. 
|
|
36. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 12:09 pm |
But I also think it says that if you are not well or in some way sick at all handsom then you do not have to fast at all. It is for those of us who are healthy and able to fast without causing harm to the body.....as far as i am aware. 
It is wrong and extremely unhealthy not to eat during the day and eat at night.
And also quite dangerous to feast straight after.
I hope you know that.
|
|
37. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 12:37 pm |
It is wrong and extremely unhealthy not to eat during the day and eat at night.
And also quite dangerous to feast straight after.
I hope you know that.
fair enough..you can have that veiw point. I disagree.
|
|
39. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 01:13 pm |
While admiring eachother, please be careful with your health 
Dangers of fasting
...
Fasting can harm all organs. It is extremely dangerous to health, especially for those who are malnourished by chronic illness, yet some proponents recommend fasting to treat chronic illnesses. The slimmer the individual, the more dangerous a fast will be. ....
Solid scientific research does not support the claims of fasting advocates. To the contrary, ...
Advocates believe that fasting can produce fatigue, anemia, irregular heartbeat, body aches, nausea, dizziness, and other negative effects. ..
Contrary to advocacy claims, fasting does not and cannot heal medical conditions, assist immune or other physiological function, or play a role in health maintenance. ...
à wonder how fast muslims who has diabet ? pure death!
|
|
40. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 01:15 pm |
Diabetics do not have to fast in Islam.
|
|
41. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 01:16 pm |
From what age do people start fasting ?
|
|
42. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 01:19 pm |
The doctor in the article says that ´Ramadan isn´t always thought of as an opportunity to lose weight because the spiritual aspect is emphasised more´.
I would have thought people fasting would be quite unlikely to lose weight - more likely to put it on because of the huge meals they eat at night before sleeping (most diets tell you that it is not a good idea to eat large meals at night) - followed by more food at 4 in the morning often followed again by sleep. And let´s not forget that Ramazan ends with Þeker Bayram - I´ve never seen so many boxes of cakes and sweets disappear from the supermarket shelves so quickly in my life! 
|
|
43. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 01:20 pm |
I beleive it is when they reach puberty. Also the mind of the ´child´ should be mature enough to make their own decision as to whether or not to fast. I have been told, although i have not read this myself...that if they are still not really a mature child by the time they reach puberty...there is still flexibility there with fasting.
|
|
44. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 01:21 pm |
Easy for those to work at night !
|
|
45. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 01:22 pm |
The doctor in the article says that ´Ramadan isn´t always thought of as an opportunity to lose weight because the spiritual aspect is emphasised more´.
I would have thought people fasting would be quite unlikely to lose weight - more likely to put it on because of the huge meals they eat at night before sleeping (most diets tell you that it is not a good idea to eat large meals at night) - followed by more food at 4 in the morning often followed again by sleep. And let´s not forget that Ramazan ends with Þeker Bayram - I´ve never seen so many boxes of cakes and sweets disappear from the supermarket shelves so quickly in my life! 
I quite agree LIR i find it impossible to lose weight during Ramadan ...much to my disappointment. Its just all the late night eating. It would help if i chose more healthy options to be honest so its mostly my own fault 
|
|
46. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 01:25 pm |
When a child reach at puberty he continue growing up. He is not mature yet
|
|
47. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 01:27 pm |
Which i think is why at this point the child/adolescent has the choice. I wonder at what age generally people begin fasting. I am sure it does vary greatly.
|
|
48. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 01:42 pm |
The doctor in the article says that ´Ramadan isn´t always thought of as an opportunity to lose weight because the spiritual aspect is emphasised more´.
I would have thought people fasting would be quite unlikely to lose weight - more likely to put it on because of the huge meals they eat at night before sleeping (most diets tell you that it is not a good idea to eat large meals at night) - followed by more food at 4 in the morning often followed again by sleep. And let´s not forget that Ramazan ends with Þeker Bayram - I´ve never seen so many boxes of cakes and sweets disappear from the supermarket shelves so quickly in my life! 
Yep, thats likely when I disappear from the shelves. 
|
|
49. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 01:46 pm |
Yep, thats likely when I disappear from the shelves. 
and then wake us up a few hours later with excrutiating heartburn 
|
|
50. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 04:25 pm |
While admiring eachother, please be careful with your health 
Dangers of fasting
...
Fasting can harm all organs. It is extremely dangerous to health, especially for those who are malnourished by chronic illness, yet some proponents recommend fasting to treat chronic illnesses. The slimmer the individual, the more dangerous a fast will be. ....
Solid scientific research does not support the claims of fasting advocates. To the contrary, ...
Advocates believe that fasting can produce fatigue, anemia, irregular heartbeat, body aches, nausea, dizziness, and other negative effects. ..
Contrary to advocacy claims, fasting does not and cannot heal medical conditions, assist immune or other physiological function, or play a role in health maintenance. ...
STILL ADMIRING whom fasting.
and I tell you t that we discussed what you call ´dangers of fasting´ last year. And I tell you also that there is no danger from fasting, ill people and travellers can break fast and fast later or pay for not fasting.
why you keep chewing the same words all the time.
|
|
51. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 04:30 pm |
why you keep chewing the same words all the time.
...because he´s not fasting and he can?? (sorry - REALLY couldn´t resist that )
|
|
52. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 04:36 pm |
STILL ADMIRING whom fasting.
and I tell you t that we discussed what you call ´dangers of fasting´ last year. And I tell you also that there is no danger from fasting, ill people and travellers can break fast and fast later or pay for not fasting.
why you keep chewing the same words all the time.
I will remind people that they should be careful about it..
It should be reminded considering how many million diabetic people who has no clue about their medical conditions..
I wonder if there has been a survey about the number of deaths of diabetic people during ramadan.
If it increases or not..
Mine is just reminding..
What is wrong with that?
|
|
53. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 04:43 pm |
I will remind people that they should be careful about it..
It should be reminded considering how many million diabetic people who has no clue about their medical conditions..
I wonder if there has been a survey about the number of deaths of diabetic people during ramadan.
If it increases or not..
Mine is just reminding..
What is wrong with that?
Diabetic people don´t have to fast, they have the excuse not to fast.
How do you remind people saying ´danger of fasting´, people here and there are mature enough to know if they can fast or not.
Were you existing all over the time to remind people for such a danger, people were fasting centuries before Ãslam, since Ãslam people are fasting for centuries too, did you remind people all this time, or your ancestors did .... ( I mean ancestors in ideas)
|
|
54. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 04:46 pm |
STILL ADMIRING whom fasting.
and I tell you t that we discussed what you call ´dangers of fasting´ last year. And I tell you also that there is no danger from fasting, ill people and travellers can break fast and fast later or pay for not fasting.
why you keep chewing the same words all the time.
They say hatred eats ones heart 
And handsom hates Ãslam and dare i say us Muslims much that he couldnt resist lol
Here, i will make it much easier for you handsom
http://www.turkishclass.com/turkish/forum/forumTitle_33932
|
|
55. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 04:48 pm |
...because he´s not fasting and he can?? (sorry - REALLY couldn´t resist that )
lol but all people are not fasting, only Muslims fast
So i guess it should be the other way around...
Because we fast and we can ? 
|
|
56. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 04:48 pm |
...because he´s not fasting and he can?? (sorry - REALLY couldn´t resist that )
poor him can and deosn´t
and poor you for not keeping a secret LIR
|
|
57. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 04:50 pm |
I will remind people that they should be careful about it..
It should be reminded considering how many million diabetic people who has no clue about their medical conditions..
I wonder if there has been a survey about the number of deaths of diabetic people during ramadan.
If it increases or not..
Mine is just reminding..
What is wrong with that?
What was the solution for diabetics in 7th century when Islam was created?
|
|
58. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 04:51 pm |
poor him can and deosn´t
and poor you for not keeping a secret LIR
handsom isnt Muslim Queent, so he´s not fasting and its not a secret.
|
|
59. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 04:54 pm |
handsom isnt Muslim Queent, so he´s not fasting and its not a secret.
I did think so
|
|
60. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 04:56 pm |
What was the solution for diabetics in 7th century when Islam was created?
They would just die and their relatives would consider it as ´faith´!!!!
|
|
61. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 04:59 pm |
They would just die and their relatives would consider it as ´faith´!!!!
|
|
62. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 05:00 pm |
I would NOT jump into any conclusion like that if I were you.
|
|
63. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 05:04 pm |
Diabetic people don´t have to fast, they have the excuse not to fast.
How do you remind people saying ´danger of fasting´, people here and there are mature enough to know if they can fast or not.
Were you existing all over the time to remind people for such a danger, people were fasting centuries before Ãslam, since Ãslam people are fasting for centuries too, did you remind people all this time, or your ancestors did .... ( I mean ancestors in ideas)
I already mentioned that people who are diabetic but dont know they are..
I am trying to remind because ´the uplifting spirit of fasting´ seems quite strong in some of you guys..
You should not forget the dangers of it.. That is all..
And about the history, please read my prevous post..They were most likely considered as ´God gives, god takes..It is faith´
|
|
64. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 05:06 pm |
What was the solution for diabetics in 7th century when Islam was created?
Ãslam was delivered not created and i believe in the 7th century diabetics wasnt known to anyone as many other illness on that time.
Edited (8/24/2009) by CANLI
|
|
65. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 05:08 pm |
I would NOT jump into any conclusion like that if I were you.
Not a conclusion handsom, you didnt make it a secret tho !
Everyone with a little brain in his head would understand this.
|
|
66. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 05:15 pm |
I already mentioned that people who are diabetic but dont know they are..
I am trying to remind because ´the uplifting spirit of fasting´ seems quite strong in some of you guys..
You should not forget the dangers of it.. That is all..
And about the history, please read my prevous post..They were most likely considered as ´God gives, god takes..It is faith´
handsom, who gave you the assumption that we are ignorant and we dont read ?!
Ãt seems to me thats what you think about us, so you try to teach us about our religion and show us the right way !
You dont accept that we may not be ignorant and still believe in Ãslam.
As you had the choice to stop believing in Ãslam, you should accept also our choice that we believe in it and find it the suitable religion for us.
Dont pick on any chance to attack it and fight it even if it was just a debat about entering a mosque !
Have your chioce and let us have ours !
|
|
67. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 05:25 pm |
Not a conclusion handsom, you didnt make it a secret tho !
Everyone with a little brain in his head would understand this.
I think the level of blood suger is abit low around here...
(That was what I was talking about)
So I will stop now..
|
|
68. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 05:28 pm |
I´m not sure I understand the whole ´fasting´ part of Ramazan really.
......
........
(Please Alameda, Canlý and QueenT etc. - no long posts explaining the true meaning of Ramadan/Ramazan to me - I am not disrespecting Muslims, Islam or Ramazan - just voicing my opinion) 
Ãm not sure if you are asking about it, or just expressing /voicing your opinion ´which you said you dont understand the whole ´fasting´ part of Ramazan ´
Fasting is about controlling yourself..the ability of controlling yourself not just about fast over food
But you fast over everything, bad habits, desires, food, water...etc
And try to spend your time for the aim of worshipping ALLAH, not just praying and reading Quran, but worshipping ALLAH at any other form too
To think how to make another family happy, how to help the poor to enjoy Ãftar time as same as you enjoy it, how to try to make no one need anything at that month if we can
That with the hope that spirit will continue through the whole year not only in Ramadan.
How would we control ourselves, our temper and remember that we are fasting even at the crowded traffic when someone may be a cause of an expected accident, how would we control our temper and instead of shout and fight just blame and sort it out and say ´ALLAHUMA Ãnni Sayim´ means ´ ALLAH be witness that im fasting so im controlling myself´
Ãts more than just food issue, and you start Ramadan with the intention of this, and you feel your body more healther after Ramadan, as if you were washing your own blood cells from inside.
And when Ãftar comes and you start eat, as deli said, it feels like Heaven, you would appreciate what you already have every day, and you would understand what others feel when they cant have them at other days
When you feel hungry during the day, you remember, and telling yourself, now you feel how poor would feel when he´s hungry? People at Somalia....etc
And you would discover another abilities in yourself, that you can survive with less than you thought you would.
Anyway, its joy and only Muslims would understand it.
Ãts hot in our countries, and we fast, dont eat and dont drink, and we wait for Ramadan from year to year eager for it to come, sad when its finished.
We love Ramadan, and we celebrate it as much as we can.
Ps: Post dedicated to handsom 
Edited (8/24/2009) by CANLI
Edited (8/24/2009) by CANLI
|
|
69. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 05:39 pm |
Ãm not sure if you are asking about it, or just expressing /voicing your opinion ´which you said you dont understand the whole ´fasting´ part of Ramazan ´
Fasting is about controlling yourself..the ability of controlling yourself not just about fast over food
But you fast over everything, bad habits, desires, food, water...etc
And try to spend your time for the aim of worshipping ALLAH, not just praying and reading Quran, but worshipping ALLAH at any other form too
To think how to make another family happy, how to help the poor to enjoy Ãftar time as same as you enjoy it, how to try to make no one need anything at that month if we can
That with the hope that spirit will continue through the whole year not only in Ramadan.
How would we control ourselves, our temper and remember that we are fasting even at the crowded traffic when someone may be a cause of an expected accident, how would we control our temper and instead of shout and fight just blame and sort it out and say ´ALLAHUMA Ãnni Sayim´ means ´ ALLAH be witness that im fasting so im controlling myself´
Ãts more than just food issue, and you start Ramadan with the intention of this, and you feel your body more healther after Ramadan, as if you were washing your own blood cells from inside.
And when Ãfrat comes and you start eat, as deli said, it feels like Heaven, you would appreciate what you already have every day, and you would understand what others feel when they cant have them at other days
When you feel hungry during the day, you remember, and telling yourself, now you feel how poor would feel when he´s hungry? People at Somalia....etc
And you would discover another abilities in yourself, that you can survive with less than you thought you would.
Anyway, its joy and only Muslim would understand it.
Ãts hot in our countries, and we fast, dont eat and dont drink, and we wait for Ramadan from year to year eager for it to come, sad its finished.
We love Ramadan, and we celebrate it as much as we can.
Muslims are not the only people who understand this concept. Lent is very similar to Ramadan and although many christians do not celebrate it in the old ways (fasting, prayer and service) it can be a kind of enlightenment for the one participating. I think many religions participate in ritual fasting and do lots of charity work and I know some people who actually fast for the sake of fasting (some think it is healthy or cleansing) and many people I know donate to charities...these are not specifically muslim traits although I do respect that muslims do this, I would hope that the intentions of Ramadan are followed by all man/woman kind. I think deep spiritual reflection can be very fulfilling if it is done with the right intention.
Edited (8/24/2009) by Elisabeth
|
|
70. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 05:43 pm |
Ãm not sure if you are asking about it, or just expressing /voicing your opinion ´which you said you dont understand the whole ´fasting´ part of Ramazan ´
Fasting is about controlling yourself..the ability of controlling yourself not just about fast over food
But you fast over everything, bad habits, desires, food, water...etc
And try to spend your time for the aim of worshipping ALLAH, not just praying and reading Quran, but worshipping ALLAH at any other form too
To think how to make another family happy, how to help the poor to enjoy Ãftar time as same as you enjoy it, how to try to make no one need anything at that month if we can
That with the hope that spirit will continue through the whole year not only in Ramadan.
How would we control ourselves, our temper and remember that we are fasting even at the crowded traffic when someone may be a cause of an expected accident, how would we control our temper and instead of shout and fight just blame and sort it out and say ´ALLAHUMA Ãnni Sayim´ means ´ ALLAH be witness that im fasting so im controlling myself´
Ãts more than just food issue, and you start Ramadan with the intention of this, and you feel your body more healther after Ramadan, as if you were washing your own blood cells from inside.
And when Ãfrat comes and you start eat, as deli said, it feels like Heaven, you would appreciate what you already have every day, and you would understand what others feel when they cant have them at other days
When you feel hungry during the day, you remember, and telling yourself, now you feel how poor would feel when he´s hungry? People at Somalia....etc
And you would discover another abilities in yourself, that you can survive with less than you thought you would.
Anyway, its joy and only Muslim would understand it.
Ãts hot in our countries, and we fast, dont eat and dont drink, and we wait for Ramadan from year to year eager for it to come, sad its finished.
We love Ramadan, and we celebrate it as much as we can.
See I was right about the extra spritual lifting you get during ramadan..
And also, it is glorifying ´the fasting´ to me..
And that is wrong!!!!!
Possibly no washing of blood cells in reality..
It is all in your head..
Eating after a long time not eating woulf give the same joy..It is not related to religious activity at all..You can be AE, believe in pasta monster, starve yourself 15 hours and then eat , you get the same feeling basically.
Basically, do not forget the damage fasting might be causing to your internal organs..
(And also actually, with this spritiuality it is hard to see these people will stop childeren of 13-14-15 years old from fasting when those kids say they want to fast..Becasue they will feel obliged to fast with that glorifying feeling around them)
|
|
71. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 05:53 pm |
See I was right about the extra spritual lifting you get during ramadan..
And also, it is glorifying ´the fasting´ to me..
And that is wrong!!!!!
Possibly no washing of blood cells in reality..
It is all in your head..
Eating after a long time not eating woulf give the same joy..It is not related to religious activity at all..You can be AE, believe in pasta monster, starve yourself 15 hours and then eat , you get the same feeling basically.
Basically, do not forget the damage fasting might be causing to your internal organs..
(And also actually, with this spritiuality it is hard to see these people will stop childeren of 13-14-15 years old from fasting when those kids say they want to fast..Becasue they will feel obliged to fast with that glorifying feeling around them)
Haaaa, haaaa, haaaaaaaaaaaaaaa lolllllllllllllll
Ohhhh, handsom, you couldnt resist lol
à knew it lollllllllll
Even you said you will stop, but you couldnt... lollllllll
And i knew it lollllllllllll
That post actually was dedicated to you lol
You cant stand it, even i am muslim myself, and im fasting now too, and im saying im enjoying it, and loveing it, and how its related of cource to my religion..islam
STÃLL, you deny it lollllllllll
You DARE to deny me what i feel in order to correct the wrong in glorifying ´the fasting lollllllllll
Even you try to redirect the issue about children now so we start another debat about it, and you try your best to attack it lol
Nope, not now...im enjoying the glory of my Ãslam now, manybe later when i have more time for fighting after Ãftar , reading Quran, and maybe also praying Teravih too 
Ohhh Man, accept it
Our Ãslam is our glory to us...like it or not lolllllllllllllllllllll
And i will dedicate the post for you lol
|
|
72. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 06:03 pm |
Muslims are not the only people who understand this concept. Lent is very similar to Ramadan and although many christians do not celebrate it in the old ways (fasting, prayer and service) it can be a kind of enlightenment for the one participating. I think many religions participate in ritual fasting and do lots of charity work and I know some people who actually fast for the sake of fasting (some think it is healthy or cleansing) and many people I know donate to charities...these are not specifically muslim traits although I do respect that muslims do this,
But you dont fast till specific time of the day, right ?!
à mean what i understand, you dont eat some sort of food, and you cook your food with oil not with butter or alike
And that would be for 40 days or something, yes ?!
I would hope that the intentions of Ramadan are followed by all man/woman kind. I think deep spiritual reflection can be very fulfilling if it is done with the right intention.
Totally agree
|
|
73. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 06:08 pm |
Haaaa, haaaa, haaaaaaaaaaaaaaa lolllllllllllllll
Ohhhh, handsom, you couldnt resist lol
à knew it lollllllllll
Even you said you will stop, but you couldnt... lollllllll
And i knew it lollllllllllll
That post actually was dedicated to you lol
You cant stand it, even i am muslim myself, and im fasting now too, and im saying im enjoying it, and loveing it, and how its related of cource to my religion..islam
STÃLL, you deny it lollllllllll
You DARE to deny me what i feel in order to correct the wrong in glorifying ´the fasting lollllllllll
Even you try to redirect the issue about children now so we start another debat about it, and you try your best to attack it lol
Nope, not now...im enjoying the glory of my Ãslam now, manybe later when i have more time for fighting after Ãftar , reading Quran, and maybe also praying Teravih too 
Ohhh Man, accept it
Our Ãslam is our glory to us...like it or not lolllllllllllllllllllll
And i will dedicate the post for you lol
So many lols Canli..i THINK It is much related to your blood sugar level..
As you know, all your glory is in your head..
And I am not attacking you..I can assure you 
What I am saying is that you are glorifying fasting.
And in my blief IT IS WRONG!!!
What do you mean I can not stand it? of course after all those years I can..
But it does not look like you used to someone coming up and saying ´IT IS WRONG´ to you..
Well anyway...
I hope you are keeping your kids away from this..
You keep feeling uplifted while i keep saying that ´it is wrong and the feelings you have are just in your head..You can have the same feelings with other drugs or group theraphy´
|
|
74. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 06:31 pm |
..You can have the same feelings with other drugs or group theraphy´
Yes actually handsom, and im still laughing too lol
Ohhh boy you REALLY cant stand it lol
Dont worry about my blood sugar level, im healthy and strong elhamdülillah, i can fast .
Ãt doesnt effect us, but sure it effect people who couldnt take it lolll
Ãts MY head, and its MY glory and its MY religion, what is YOUR problem then ?! lol
We are talking about Fasting in Ramadan in Ãslam faith, and you say its wrong in your belief, what belief if i may ask ?
Anti Ãslam belief ?! lol
Sure thats what it seems!
And no, you cant stand it, you cant stand having people proud of their religion, Ãslam and holding tight on it and see it their glory
You keep talking and repeating yourself about freedom, human rights..bla bla ...etc
But when it comes to Ãslam you wipe all of this...the issue to you that Muslims should stop believing in Ãslam, and how can we corrupt it by reforming it.
Anything...but the main thing is...we stop believing in it...!
Didnt i tell you, that you had your choice...let us having ours and dont try to impose your guardianship over us
We are not kids, and we are smart, intelligent, have minds and able to use them AND we choose to be muslims still
Just accept it !
And have i told you that i have kids so you worry about them ?! 
Let´s worry about our kids and you worry about yours.
Or do you want to convert our kids in order be bring them up properly as non muslims ?!!!
And ohhhh, Ã will pick the fasting to enjoy those feelings and will leave drugs and group theraphy to you ! 
Btw, that was low !
à didnt force you to believe in my religion, so you SHOULD respect my choice in believing in it !
And not compare it to having drugs !
Ãm not mentally ill handsom !
Edited (8/24/2009) by CANLI
|
|
75. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 06:50 pm |
lol but all people are not fasting, only Muslims fast
So i guess it should be the other way around...
Because we fast and we can ? 
....I don´t think you got what I meant at all
|
|
76. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 06:51 pm |
poor him can and deosn´t
and poor you for not keeping a secret LIR
.....and neither did you 
....clearly my career as a stand-up comedian(ienne) is over before it started 
|
|
77. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 07:02 pm |
(Please Alameda, Canlý and QueenT etc. - no long posts explaining the true meaning of Ramadan/Ramazan to me - I am not disrespecting Muslims, Islam or Ramazan - just voicing my opinion)
Ãm not sure if you are asking about it, or just expressing /voicing your opinion ´which you said you dont understand the whole ´fasting´ part of Ramazan ´
Post dedicated to handsom 
Glad to hear that! 
|
|
78. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 07:02 pm |
While admiring eachother, please be careful with your health 
Dangers of fasting
...
Fasting can harm all organs. It is extremely dangerous to health, especially for those who are malnourished by chronic illness, yet some proponents recommend fasting to treat chronic illnesses. The slimmer the individual, the more dangerous a fast will be. ....
Solid scientific research does not support the claims of fasting advocates. To the contrary, ...
Advocates believe that fasting can produce fatigue, anemia, irregular heartbeat, body aches, nausea, dizziness, and other negative effects. ..
Contrary to advocacy claims, fasting does not and cannot heal medical conditions, assist immune or other physiological function, or play a role in health maintenance. ...
I have to agree with you here. Every health expert I have encountered promotes either 3 balanced meals or 5 small meals a day. I understand the spirtuality aspect of it since Catholics also give up meat on Fridays through Lent and occassionaly fast. But times have changed and over the years fasting is not a mandated practice of our faith, it´s more free will for those who find spirtuality in it. The only thing I have ever taken away from it..is the appreciation to have food. Mabye there is more to it!
I can understand how this could be dangerous for some people, even those who aren´t aware they could have an underlying medical condition. That´s why it should only be for those who volunteer but not mandated as part of their faith.
|
|
79. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 07:20 pm |
It actually sounds funny to me to read about fasting while it is not really fasting but waiting for a huge meal. I don´t mean to insult anybody but if Ramadan was about living on bread and water it would make more sense. Yet it is not eating or drinking anything all day long and making up for it in the evening. It makes as little sense as not eating meat on Fridays that Christians do. How on Earth is it supposed to bring you closer to God? Is your rumbling stomach God´s favourite tune? I think the idea is great, I mean, if you feel hunger you´re more likely to understand people who can´t afford food. Still, the fact that your fast lasts some 12 hours ridicules their pain.
Anyway, I don´t understand strong objections some members have here about Ramadan - since it´s entirely up to you whether you want to fast or not, what´s the problem? As for children, well, if their parents are so stupid that they risk not starvation but dehydration, it means the parents are fools, not that the whole fasting idea is stupid. Nobody healthy will die of not eating for 12 hours...If you have a condition you don´t know about you´ll likely discover it and go to hospital. It´s not 7th century
To fast or not to fast? - Big Ado About Nothing
|
|
80. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 07:22 pm |
Not attacking, not hating, just a few questions that I´ve got during the many years I am a teacher with 60% Muslim students now:
1. Diabetics do not HAVE to fast, but I know several who do. Partly out of ignorance, they simply don´t believe what the (Western!) doctor says, partly because of ´social pressure´ - everyone around them fasts so they say they feel like ´outcasts´ if they don´t. Why this pressure, why this not believing the doctor?
2. Children are forced (!!) by their parents to fast. I have at least 3 students with young children who have to fast, girls from the age of 9 and boys from 14. Children at that age have not matured, it can´t be healthy for them. Besides, is force allowed? I bet not.
3. I´ve been told that fasting should be like a sacrifice, feeling what less fortunate people have all life for just 28/29 days a year. Half of my Muslim students take a holiday, are not working, not going to school during Ramazan because ´it is too hard to do´. What sacrifice? What compassion?
4. A few (happily a minority) of my students refuse to come to school because we have coffee/tea breaks during 3 hour class and they expect all of us to give that up because they are fasting. (All of us = Catholic, Protestant, Hindu, Agnost and Atheist students/teachers).
I´m not making this up, this is what has happened/happens each year. Anyone who can explain?
|
|
81. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 07:23 pm |
It actually sounds funny to me to read about fasting while it is not really fasting but waiting for a huge meal. I don´t mean to insult anybody but if Ramadan was about living on bread and water it would make more sense. Yet it is not eating or drinking anything all day long and making up for it in the evening. It makes as little sense as not eating meat on Fridays that Christians do. How on Earth is it supposed to bring you closer to God? Is your rumbling stomach God´s favourite tune? I think the idea is great, I mean, if you feel hunger you´re more likely to understand people who can´t afford food. Still, the fact that your fast lasts some 12 hours ridicules their pain.
Anyway, I don´t understand strong objections some members have here about Ramadan - since it´s entirely up to you whether you want to fast or not, what´s the problem? As for children, well, if their parents are so stupid that they risk not starvation but dehydration, it means the parents are fools, not that the whole fasting idea is stupid. Nobody healthy will die of not eating for 12 hours...If you have a condition you don´t know about you´ll likely discover it and go to hospital. It´s not 7th century
To fast or not to fast? - Big Ado About Nothing
DD - you are far too sensible to be a member of this site!! (I am sure theH will be agreeing with me) 
|
|
82. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 07:28 pm |
DD - you are far too sensible to be a member of this site!! (I am sure theH will be agreeing with me) 
Hwhat? Sensible? Moi?
Ahm, ok, I´ll add some silly emoticons in order to prove my lack of common sense
 
see? The above is not sensible at all 
|
|
83. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 07:30 pm |
Hwhat? Sensible? Moi?
Ahm, ok, I´ll add some silly emoticons in order to prove my lack of common sense
 
see? The above is not sensible at all 
OK - you can lurk in the disguise of ´unsensibility´ 
(NB English learners - there is really no such word as ´unsensibility´ )
Edited (8/24/2009) by lady in red
[Help for non-natives]
|
|
84. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 07:32 pm |
(Please Alameda, Canlý and QueenT etc. - no long posts explaining the true meaning of Ramadan/Ramazan to me - I am not disrespecting Muslims, Islam or Ramazan - just voicing my opinion)
Ummm....Excuse me???? Now is that prejudice or what? I have made one 16 word comment in this thread...............and it was only in response to Deli´s comment about attempting to fast.
I have NEVER attempted to explain the "true" meaning of anything here....much less Ramazan. I have only attempted to focus a ray of light on some aspects of truth, as I understand it.
|
|
85. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 07:34 pm |
Ummm....Excuse me???? Now is that prejudice or what? I have made one 16 word comment in this thread...............and it was only in response to Deli´s comment about attempting to fast.
I have NEVER attempted to explain the "true" meaning of anything here....much less Ramazan. I have only attempted to focus a ray of light on some aspects of truth, as I understand it.
Oh OK - sorry (she says entering into the Ramadan spirit of thinking nice thoughts) 
|
|
86. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 07:41 pm |
I personally feel much closer to Allah this ramadan because i am fasting. and when i am fasting i feel quite peaceful, i never swear, i try not to be angry, i try not break heart, i pray 5 times a day, i read quran every day, i help poor people etc.. if you think fasting is just to stay hungry all day, it is ignorance of you. maybe it would be better to search about what Prophet Muhammed says about fasting what it should be like. maybe then you would understand its spirit.and i just dont understand why some non-muslim members of this site are so indisposed with fasting. just let people do it. just a bit respect would be nice of you. To criticize religions about anything doesnt make you look more intelligent we are happy with that. and also i have been fasting every ramadan since i was 11 years old and i have never felt ill because of it.
|
|
87. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 08:11 pm |
How many muslims who are fasting thinks on poor people or pray to Allah? Ãm living in Turkey from some years but i heard only : ´im fasting, i feel very week, is so hard, what is the time...there are xx hours left..´ and so on.
|
|
88. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 08:21 pm |
I personally feel much closer to Allah this ramadan because i am fasting. and when i am fasting i feel quite peaceful, i never swear, i try not to be angry, i try not break heart, i pray 5 times a day, i read quran every day, i help poor people etc.. if you think fasting is just to stay hungry all day, it is ignorance of you. maybe it would be better to search about what Prophet Muhammed says about fasting what it should be like. maybe then you would understand its spirit.and i just dont understand why some non-muslim members of this site are so indisposed with fasting. just let people do it. just a bit respect would be nice of you. To criticize religions about anything doesnt make you look more intelligent we are happy with that. and also i have been fasting every ramadan since i was 11 years old and i have never felt ill because of it.
I know I couldn´t remain peaceful if I fasted - there would be plenty of swering and grumpiness, that´s for sure.
What I resent is your statement that criticizing religion about anything doesn´t make people look intelligent. I think it´s far more intelligent to question and criticize everything, including religion (why should religion be immune to it?) than to accept everything without questioning its merit and truthfullness - that to me seems like being brainwashed. I can respect people´s decision and practice to fast, but don´t ask me to respect the idea of fasting itself if I have a different opinion (which I really don´t, I couldn´t care less, not my stomach).
|
|
89. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 08:22 pm |
à wonder how fast muslims who has diabet ? pure death!
In Islam , only the healthy can fast. Babies, the old, women menstruating, and the sick are not asked to fast. You´´re only supposed to fast if you can. They dont force people with diabetes or any sickness or weakness to fast. 
|
|
90. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 08:28 pm |
In Islam , only the healthy can fast. Babies, the old, women menstruating, and the sick are not asked to fast. You´´re only supposed to fast if you can. They dont force people with diabetes or any sickness or weakness to fast. 
why is it that islam keeps on treating menstruating women as if they were sick? can you update your books and learn that menstruation is a NORMAL physiological process? kind of similar to urinating when your bladder is full.. maybe some muslims need a bit of enlightement this ramadan.
|
|
91. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 08:31 pm |
they still have to fast those days after
|
|
92. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 08:32 pm |
Also, everyone on here who is criticizing Ramadan/Ramazan shouldn´t be. You´re not Muslim, you don´t have to do it so why are you making a fuss? Everyone is allowed to believe whatever they want. It´s their religion, their beliefs, and you must respect that no matter what your opinion is. There is no harm in fasting. It´s not going to kill you, or anyone else for that matter. If that´s what someone wants to do - then let them do it. Even if you say you´re not meaning to disrespect any islam followers, you still are by questioning their belief or criticizing it. It´s not like they´re forcing you to fast along with them, so there is no need to be critical.
Ramazan Kerim! 
|
|
93. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 08:35 pm |
For us foreigners looks more exotic like this 
|
|
94. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 08:35 pm |
why is it that islam keeps on treating menstruating women as if they were sick? can you update your books and learn that menstruation is a NORMAL physiological process? kind of similar to urinating when your bladder is full.. maybe some muslims need a bit of enlightement this ramadan.
Because, it is a time of weakness when we are menstruating. For example, we feel pain in cramps, we may have a bigger appetite, etc. It is a normal physiological process, yes, but it is still a time of weakness. It´s to make it easier for women.
|
|
95. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 08:37 pm |
What about pregnant women ?
|
|
96. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 08:43 pm |
What about pregnant women ?
Pregnant and nursing women can leave fasting if they want to. They have to make it up for the next year though. So instead of fasting for 30 days, they´d fast for 30 days PLUS the days that they missed the next Ramadan. 
|
|
97. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 08:45 pm |
Who can give me a statistic of car accidents on..lets say Ãstanbul during Ramazan and on a normal month ?
|
|
98. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 09:08 pm |
How many muslims who are fasting thinks on poor people or pray to Allah? Ým living in Turkey from some years but i heard only : ´im fasting, i feel very week, is so hard, what is the time...there are xx hours left..´ and so on.
I could care less if people choose to starve themselves and dehydrate during the day. But I don´t want to hear how courageous and great this is in the same breath that these people are complaining and bitching how hungry they are. If your doing it for the right reasons..and not just because your told by the Koran and have no appreciation or value to it, then I think it´s quite ridiculous. If you get meaning out of it, then I applaud you.
|
|
99. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 10:02 pm |
Also, everyone on here who is criticizing Ramadan/Ramazan shouldn´t be. You´re not Muslim, you don´t have to do it so why are you making a fuss? Everyone is allowed to believe whatever they want. It´s their religion, their beliefs, and you must respect that no matter what your opinion is. There is no harm in fasting. It´s not going to kill you, or anyone else for that matter. If that´s what someone wants to do - then let them do it. Even if you say you´re not meaning to disrespect any islam followers, you still are by questioning their belief or criticizing it. It´s not like they´re forcing you to fast along with them, so there is no need to be critical.
Ramazan Kerim! 
I must absolutely nothing, not from anyone, not even the law. It is ALWAYS my own choice to obey a law or to pay respect to people I think who deserve it (and that´s NOT automatically). Demanding my respect makes me only more critical.
|
|
100. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 10:03 pm |
why is it that islam keeps on treating menstruating women as if they were sick? can you update your books and learn that menstruation is a NORMAL physiological process? kind of similar to urinating when your bladder is full.. maybe some muslims need a bit of enlightement this ramadan.

|
|
101. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 11:35 pm |
I must absolutely nothing, not from anyone, not even the law. It is ALWAYS my own choice to obey a law or to pay respect to people I think who deserve it (and that´s NOT automatically). Demanding my respect makes me only more critical.
Well, if you dont respect us, and our belief, how would expect that we can have any sort of communication between us ?!
Ãf you dont respect us, how would you expect us to care more or less to answer any question or to share any appropriate debat at anything with each other ?!
|
|
102. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 11:40 pm |
Well, if you dont respect us, and our belief, how would expect that we can have any sort of communication between us ?!
Ãf you dont respect us, how would you expect us to care more or less to answer any question or to share any appropriate debat at anything with each other ?!
Where did Trudy say she didn´t respect you and your beliefs? She said she did not agree that respect should be ´demanded´ of her.
|
|
103. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 11:47 pm |
why is it that islam keeps on treating menstruating women as if they were sick? can you update your books and learn that menstruation is a NORMAL physiological process? kind of similar to urinating when your bladder is full.. maybe some muslims need a bit of enlightement this ramadan.
à believe iLoVetHaTx3 has already answered your question .
And as for updating our books, we just have one book which is Quran to set the rules for us and thats the one we follow and sorry we dont do that, we dont update or change what God sent, its same book since the time it was delivered till now and till eternity inþallah.
And as for enlightenment, why would you expect that muslims will accept enlightenment from non muslim about something related to our religion ?
Do you find that logic ?!
Wouldnt be more logic that we know more about our religion and why ALLAH order us that and for what reason better than non muslims ?!
|
|
104. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 11:53 pm |
Where did Trudy say she didn´t respect you and your beliefs? She said she did not agree that respect should be ´demanded´ of her.
Thats what Trudy were replying to
Also, everyone on here who is criticizing Ramadan/Ramazan shouldn´t be. You´re not Muslim, you don´t have to do it so why are you making a fuss? Everyone is allowed to believe whatever they want. It´s their religion, their beliefs, and you must respect that no matter what your opinion is. There is no harm in fasting. It´s not going to kill you, or anyone else for that matter. If that´s what someone wants to do - then let them do it. Even if you say you´re not meaning to disrespect any islam followers, you still are by questioning their belief or criticizing it. It´s not like they´re forcing you to fast along with them, so there is no need to be critical
As you see iLoVetHaTx3 wasnt asking for anything other than respect the other´s belief and that is what Trudy were objecting to
So, you tell me !
|
|
105. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 11:55 pm |
They would just die and their relatives would consider it as ´faith´!!!!
It is called ´fate´, ´destiny´, ´predestination´ and not ´faith´.
I see clearly that Canlý is completely right about you, you´re just against ´faith´ and Ãslam as well, till you mixed between faith and fate...
I agree with Canlý again when she asked if you don´t know English and if so, you should ask for translation...
Edited (8/24/2009) by Queent
[know]
|
|
106. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:01 am |
It is called ´fate´, ´destiny´, ´predestination´ and not ´faith´.
I see clearly that Canlý is completely right about you, you´re just against ´faith´ and Ãslam as well, till you mixed between faith and fate...
I agree with Canlý again when she asked if you don´t English and if so you should ask for translation...
I decided not to reply...
This shows how you ´strong´ muslims respect people when they make a spelling mistake..!!
Then you turn around and cry ´they are not respecting my religion´ 
Edited (8/25/2009) by thehandsom
|
|
107. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:02 am |
And when Ãftar comes and you start eat, as deli said, it feels like Heaven, you would appreciate what you already have every day, and you would understand what others feel when they cant have them at other days
When you feel hungry during the day, you remember, and telling yourself, now you feel how poor would feel when he´s hungry? People at Somalia....etc
And you would discover another abilities in yourself, that you can survive with less than you thought you would.
I just read this post properly. How can you possibly equate not eating during the day with how the starving of Somalia feel? How can you say that by not eating for 15/16 hours you are feeling like they do?? When you know at the end of this period you are able to eat ´and it feels like Heaven´ When they don´t know when or if the next ´meal´ is going to appear? Fast if you want to by all means but don´t try to pretend its the same thing as starvation.
|
|
108. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:04 am |
As you see iLoVetHaTx3 wasnt asking for anything other than respect the other´s belief and that is what Trudy were objecting to
So, you tell me !
iLoVeHatx3 didn´t ask for respect, she said you must respect and that is what Trudy was objecting to.
|
|
109. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:04 am |
I decided not to reply...
I still say Canlý is right right right right
I love you Canlý sister 
|
|
111. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:09 am |
I still say Canlý is right right right right
I love you Canlý sister 
About what, what, what, what????
|
|
112. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:15 am |
I still say Canlý is right right right right
I love you Canlý sister 
You can love your sister Canli..
She is still not right.
She is just repeating herself and confessing that she can not defend her beliefs logically and going to last resort: ´that is my belief and you can not question it´ .
That is a confession!! Why it is a confession because no religion can be defended logically and scientifically, because in the end, they all are dogmas..
And all dogmas can ONLY be defended the way Canli is defending ´it is what I believe´ ( You are also adding that ´you can not critisize it´
I added some more into that line :
I decided not to reply...
This shows how you ´strong´ muslims respect people when they make a spelling mistake..!!
Then you turn around and cry ´they are not respecting my religion´ 
|
|
113. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:15 am |
About what, what, what, what????
Read properly before sending a chain of wh
|
|
114. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:17 am |
I just read this post properly. How can you possibly equate not eating during the day with how the starving of Somalia feel? How can you say that by not eating for 15/16 hours you are feeling like they do?? When you know at the end of this period you are able to eat ´and it feels like Heaven´ When they don´t know when or if the next ´meal´ is going to appear? Fast if you want to by all means but don´t try to pretend its the same thing as starvation.
à fast for 15/16 a day as you say, and you dont, so sure i can have better idea than you.
Ãf you want to know how would it make you sympathise more with Somalia and the poors, try to fast for a month and find the answer for yourself !
|
|
115. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:18 am |
Read properly before sending a chain of wh
Ha ha,
Well of course, fasting is finished, you can be as nasty as you can now..
I was right all along about ´how everything is in your head´..
Yours is a kind of group therapy really..
And People all around you (millions of people maybe) joining this does not change that fact!!
|
|
116. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:20 am |
à fast for 15/16 a day as you say, and you dont, so sure i can have better idea than you.
Ãf you want to know how would it make you sympathise more with Somalia and the poors, try to fast for a month and find the answer for yourself !
Well
That is the real face now..
Because you fast, you are more compassioanate than the people who do not fast?
That is a revelation!!!
Edited (8/25/2009) by thehandsom
|
|
117. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:20 am |
You can love your sister Canli..
She is still not right.
She is just repeating herself and confessing that she can not defend her beliefs logically and going to last resort: ´that is my belief and you can not question it´ .
That is a confession!! Why it is a confession because no religion can be defended logically and scientifically, because in the end, they all are dogmas..
And all dogmas can ONLY be defended the way Canli is defending ´it is what I believe´ ( You are also adding that ´you can not critisize it´
I added some more into that line :
I decided not to reply...
This shows how you ´strong´ muslims respect people when they make a spelling mistake..!!
Then you turn around and cry ´they are not respecting my religion´ 
you say that Canlý repeats
As if you are saying new word of new age every second.
you´re repeating too
the difference Canlý is respectful and doesn´t show hate and rancour, that you show clearly towards our religion Ãslam.
YES I love my sister, do you have a problem with that too?
|
|
118. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:21 am |
So only muslims should respect others, and others shouldnt respect them UNLESS they feel like it ?!
No sorry !
|
|
119. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:22 am |
So only muslims should respect others, and others shouldnt respect them UNLESS they feel like it ?!
No sorry !
I do not THINK you are not respecting others ideas here..
|
|
120. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:24 am |
Ha ha,
Well of course, fasting is finished, you can be as nasty as you can now..
I was right all along about ´how everything is in your head´..
Yours is a kind of group therapy really..
And People all around you (millions of people maybe) joining this does not change that fact!!
Ah Ah
you seem to show how clever you are.
no success for you
as long as you have that black rancour inside your heart, you can still say all kinds of insults
I don´t say insults all over the year, as you can
|
|
121. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:25 am |
Read properly before sending a chain of wh
...sorry - I thought I was back in Kindergarten.
|
|
122. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:27 am |
Well
That is the real face now..
Because you fast, you are more compassioanate then the people who do not fast?
That is a revelation!!!
à believe im not a new member and you just knew me and read my thoughts now so you say that is the real face
Ãf after all that time you are able to know and judge the person in front of you just now, im afraid you have many things you need to learn in life and non could relay on your judgement !
At least not me !
You can ask around ´seems you not able to know it by yourself´ im the same person now and 3 years ago !
|
|
123. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:28 am |
à fast for 15/16 a day as you say, and you dont, so sure i can have better idea than you.
Ãf you want to know how would it make you sympathise more with Somalia and the poors, try to fast for a month and find the answer for yourself !
THAT is what I was trying to say since the begining:
Because she fasts she thinks ´she can understand somalian people better ´ or she thinks ´ she has better idea about those people than a person who does not fast´
|
|
124. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:29 am |
...sorry - I thought I was back in Kindergarten.
far from it
|
|
125. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:30 am |
à believe im not a new member and you just knew me and read my thoughts now so you say that is the real face
Ãf after all that time you are able to know and judge the person in front of you just now, im afraid you have many things you need to learn in life and non could relay on your judgement !
At least not me !
You can ask around ´seems you not able to know it by yourself´ im the same person now and 3 years ago !
I did not say you have changed at all!!!!
Could you tell us what you meant by then? :
à fast for 15/16 a day as you say, and you dont, so sure i can have better idea than you.
Ãf you want to know how would it make you sympathise more with Somalia and the poors, try to fast for a month and find the answer for yourself !
|
|
126. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:31 am |
THAT is what I was trying to say since the begining:
Because she fasts she thinks ´she can understand somalian people better ´ or she thinks ´ she has better idea about those people than a person who does not fast´
of course
It´s obvious true
|
|
127. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:32 am |
of course
It´s obvious true
Thanks for the confirmation Queent..
|
|
128. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:32 am |
So only muslims should respect others, and others shouldnt respect them UNLESS they feel like it ?!
No sorry !
Did I (or anyone non-Muslim here) ever said we DEMAND you to respect us / our ideas / beliefs? No. I won´t DEMAND that and I don´t think anyone will. You, on the other hand, do. And if I not immediately say I do, you are whining about disrespect. Believe what you believe but don´t expect me to accept everything (including what you do) as if it is normal for me, because it is not. I am and will critisize religions (all, yes!) as long as I live, I will continue saying that I think they are men-invented and not of this time. And no-one can stop me from doing that, especially not with DEMANDING respect.
|
|
129. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:32 am |
I do not THINK you are not respecting others ideas here..
Well thehandsom, you aren´t exactly respectful either. In fact it seems you take special delight in trying to break people´s iman.
Of course, you can not prove there is, or there is not. As I have said before, iman is like an extra sense, it´s like seeing, hearing, tactile sensation....some are born deaf and blind.
|
|
130. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:34 am |
Well thehandsom, you aren´t exactly respectful either. In fact it seems you take special delight in trying to break people´s iman.
Of course, you can not prove there is, or there is not. As I have said before, iman is like an extra sense, it´s like seeing, hearing, tactile sensation....some are born deaf and blind.
You are not making sense at all with above...I am not breaking anybody´s iman at all here..
|
|
131. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:42 am |
Thanks for the confirmation Queent..
The confirmation is for Canlý not for you
I was telling you that she is RIGHT
|
|
132. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:43 am |
THAT is what I was trying to say since the begining:
Because she fasts she thinks ´she can understand somalian people better ´ or she thinks ´ she has better idea about those people than a person who does not fast´
Well, if i think that, its my problem not yours, still i have an idea for you
Why dont you ask a little boy/girl if you dont eat for a long time would you feel/understand the meaning of hunger more than the one who eats or not...
And tell me what would he/she say !
And before you criticise me for having my own believes which i dont impose them on others, you can look at yourself first you think because you are not muslim any more, you know better about Ãslam and you can breach us about Ãslam and muslims and guide us to the light if you believe there is one !
|
|
133. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:44 am |
à fast for 15/16 a day as you say, and you dont, so sure i can have better idea than you.
Ãf you want to know how would it make you sympathise more with Somalia and the poors, try to fast for a month and find the answer for yourself
Canli - I think this emoticon - - was invented for you. I think handsom has posted something on the lines of what I was going to say if my connection wasn´t so annoyingly erratic/slow, i.e. why does fasting make you so superior?
Anyway - life´s too short, and I´m too far from the Kindergarten to be really bothered so I´ll say goodnight and leave others to continue banging their heads against a brick wall.
|
|
134. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:48 am |
à fast for 15/16 a day as you say, and you dont, so sure i can have better idea than you.
Ãf you want to know how would it make you sympathise more with Somalia and the poors, try to fast for a month and find the answer for yourself
Canli - I think this emoticon - - was invented for you. I think handsom has posted something on the lines of what I was going to say if my connection wasn´t so annoyingly erratic/slow, i.e. why does fasting make you so superior?
Anyway - life´s too short, and I´m too far from the Kindergarten to be really bothered so I´ll say goodnight and leave others to continue banging their heads against a brick wall.
Sorry to say that this is really Disrespectful LIR
Have sweet dreams
|
|
135. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:53 am |
Well, if i think that, its my problem not yours, still i have an idea for you
Why dont you ask a little boy/girl if you dont eat for a long time would you feel/understand the meaning of hunger more than the one who eats or not...
And tell me what would he/she say !
And before you criticise me for having my own believes which i dont impose them on others, you can look at yourself first you think because you are not muslim any more, you know better about Ãslam and you can breach us about Ãslam and muslims and guide us to the light if you believe there is one !
I have no intention to ´breach´ you and Queent 
The point here that you, because of fasting, seeing yourself as a BETTER person than the others who do not fast..
Sorry but that is nothing to do with Islam you believe..( It looks like I can really ´breach´ you about Islam. Because you really do not know what you believe.)
Sorry guys..I think that is kind of ´enough´..
Edited (8/25/2009) by thehandsom
|
|
136. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:55 am |
à fast for 15/16 a day as you say, and you dont, so sure i can have better idea than you.
Ãf you want to know how would it make you sympathise more with Somalia and the poors, try to fast for a month and find the answer for yourself
Canli - I think this emoticon - - was invented for you. I think handsom has posted something on the lines of what I was going to say if my connection wasn´t so annoyingly erratic/slow, i.e. why does fasting make you so superior?
Anyway - life´s too short, and I´m too far from the Kindergarten to be really bothered so I´ll say goodnight and leave others to continue banging their heads against a brick wall.
And Why not being Muslim would make you so superior ?!
ôve expressed what i feel while im fasting, its my fasting, and my feelings and you didnt like that !
And you started to question ME about what à feel !
I just read this post properly. How can you possibly equate not eating during the day with how the starving of Somalia feel? How can you say that by not eating for 15/16 hours you are feeling like they do?? When you know at the end of this period you are able to eat ´and it feels like Heaven´ When they don´t know when or if the next ´meal´ is going to appear? Fast if you want to by all means but don´t try to pretend its the same thing as starvation
Night !
|
|
137. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:57 am |
You are not making sense at all with above...I am not breaking anybody´s iman at all here..
Who knows? Do you really know the effect of your words? Do you know who reads your words? Now as I write there are 44 online users, 22 logged on...........then there are those who will come later and read your words....do you know how your words effect them?
|
|
138. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:57 am |
Sorry to say that this is really Disrespectful LIR
Have sweet dreams
Well then, no more than you and Canli would have expected is it? Is ´banging your head against a brick wall´ a disallowed expression all of a sudden - its quite common in the UK when a person refuses to see any point but there own. I am sure Canli doesn´t need you to speak for her btw, she is more than capable of speaking for herself.
|
|
139. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:58 am |
I have no intention to ´breach´ you and Queent 
The point here that you, because of fasting, seeing yourself as a BETTER person than the others who do not fast..
Sorry but that is nothing to do with Islam you believe..( It looks like I can really ´breach´ you about Islam)
Sorry guys..I think that is kind of ´enough´..
Or maybe its your own feelings and that is what its all about !
And since you are not a muslim yourself, so sorry you cant lecture us/me about Ãslam, even i wont accept it from any muslim except from the one that is able convince me...and that would double it, its sure not you !
Edited (8/25/2009) by CANLI
Edited (8/25/2009) by CANLI
|
|
140. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 01:05 am |
Sorry to say that this is really Disrespectful LIR
Have sweet dreams
Absolutely not. LIR is only expressing her ideas. Wanting her to stop that, well yes, by denying someone their expressive rights, THAT is disrespectful. You should learn to stop moaning about ´respect´ and ´disrespect´ when someone does not say Amen to your ideas and beliefs. Grow up.
|
|
141. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 01:05 am |
Well then, no more than you and Canli would have expected is it? Is ´banging your head against a brick wall´ a disallowed expression all of a sudden - its quite common in the UK when a person refuses to see any point but there own. I am sure Canli doesn´t need you to speak for her btw, she is more than capable of speaking for herself.
Here we consider ´bang your head against a brick wall´ a rude expression, it is street language, and for sure it´s not appropriate for a high level conversation
|
|
142. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 01:06 am |
I have no intention to ´breach´ you and Queent 
The point here that you, because of fasting, seeing yourself as a BETTER person than the others who do not fast..
Hmmm....I didn´t read anyplace where Canli or Queent claimed to be superior to others not fasting. Rather, they showed gratitude and thankfulness as a result of their fasting. IOW they showed an increase in compassion.
|
|
143. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 01:09 am |
Hmmm....I didn´t read anyplace where Canli or Queent claimed to be superior to others not fasting. Rather, they showed gratitude and thankfulness as a result of their fasting. IOW they showed an increase in compassion.
Nope..
It wont work Alameda..
Pls go back and read..
|
|
144. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 01:12 am |
You are not making sense at all with above...I am not breaking anybody´s iman at all here..
If the faith is so easy to destroy, then there wasnt any faith at all.
It must be such a weak and faulty full of errors religion that needs so many furious defenders.
|
|
145. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 01:12 am |
Absolutely not. LIR is only expressing her ideas. Wanting her to stop that, well yes, by denying someone their expressive rights, THAT is disrespectful. You should learn to stop moaning about ´respect´ and ´disrespect´ when someone does not say Amen to your ideas and beliefs. Grow up.
According to you I should grow up??
Hmm, I´m grown up enough to know the respect from the disrespect, I didn´t ask anyone to say Amen to my ideas and beliefs
AGAIN I´m saying to you Trudy that I´ll count your words in front of Allah (swt) in Judgment day, this is for thehandsom and LÃR and everyone whom chewing bitter words always and always.
Those are my last words in this thread.
Edited (8/25/2009) by Queent
|
|
146. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 01:13 am |
Absolutely not. LIR is only expressing her ideas. Wanting her to stop that, well yes, by denying someone their expressive rights, THAT is disrespectful. You should learn to stop moaning about ´respect´ and ´disrespect´ when someone does not say Amen to your ideas and beliefs. Grow up.
And that ÃS the whole point
We did NOT demand anyone to say amen to our ideas and beliefs, we just say WE believe in them.
And YOU want to deny US that, by saying how not logic , dangerouse and not logic it is !
Fine...i accept
You believe in what you like and let me believe in what i like without ÃMPOSÃNG YOUR ideas on me or my belief !
|
|
147. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 01:14 am |
According to you I should grow up??
Hmm, I´m grown up enough to know the respect from the disrespect, I didn´t ask anyone to say Amen to my ideas and beliefs*
AGAIN I´m saying to you Trudy that I´ll count your words in front of Allah (swt) in Judgment day, this is for thehandsom and LÃR and everyone whom chewing bitter words always and always.
Those are my last words in this thread.
Be my guest.
|
|
148. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 01:14 am |
Here we consider ´bang your head against a brick wall´ a rude expression, it is street language, and for sure it´s not appropriate for a high level conversation
It seems to me that ´there´ you consider everything rude. If you don´t like mixing with us rude Brits/Americans/Europeans, nobody is forcing you. Perhaps we should opt for 2-tier membership here - one for ´high-level´ people and one for the rest.
|
|
149. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 01:15 am |
According to you I should grow up??
Hmm, I´m grown up enough to know the respect from the disrespect, I didn´t ask anyone to say Amen to my ideas and beliefs*
AGAIN I´m saying to you Trudy that I´ll count your words in front of Allah (swt) in Judgment day, this is for thehandsom and LÃR and everyone whom chewing bitter words always and always.
Those are my last words in this thread.
Well it is better if they are your last words really..
Because you are getting more and more bitter and it is not going well with the earlier promotions..
|
|
150. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 01:17 am |
It seems to me that ´there´ you consider everything rude. If you don´t like mixing with us rude Brits/Americans/Europeans, nobody is forcing you. Perhaps we should opt for 2-tier membership here - one for ´high-level´ people and one for the rest.
Can I join the restgroup? I´m sure there are members who aren´t that easily upset.
|
|
151. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 01:20 am |
If the faith is so easy to destroy, then there wasnt any faith at all.
It must be such a weak and faulty full of errors religion that needs so many furious defenders.
Yes its weak and faulty full of errors religion that about 1,525,532,460 - 1,559,728,143 person believe in, but sure you know better !
We have something called ´´respecting the religion´ its a muslim thing, thats why you dont find us make fun of our religion or other´s religions or prophets.
|
|
152. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 01:25 am |
Yes its weak and faulty full of errors religion that about 1,525,532,460 - 1,559,728,143 person believe in, but sure you know better !
We have something called ´´respecting the religion´ its a muslim thing, thats why you dont find us make fun of our religion or other´s religions or prophets.
Respecting the religion? You´re funny. Tell that to all Muslims who are calling names to non-Muslims (not to talk about physical violence).
|
|
153. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 01:28 am |
Well it is better if they are your last words really..
Because you are getting more and more bitter and it is not going well with the earlier promotions..
Yes as you said it yourself many times but you always coming back not resisting a chance to attack Ãslam or Muslims 
And she is getting bitter ?!
All of you are getteing over her, attacking her for just being Muslim and practicing her religion and stating that she is loving, convencing about it !
A Christian, agnostic, and you
And all of you lecture us many, many time about so many things i didnt see you practice here...
Well, at least not with us muslims.
|
|
154. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 01:28 am |
Nope..
It wont work Alameda.. Pls go back and read..
Please excuse me, I am pretty busy and must admit I have not gone over each and every post in this thread with a fine tooth comb. I do agree, pride and feeling superior are not the most elevated emotions in any circumstance, however I did not see that in Queent or Canli´s posts. Couldyou point to any specific one, or is it your opinion?
IMHO, one shoule feel privileged and grateful to have been able to perform the Ramazan fast. I think feeling prideful and superior would cancel much of the (sevap) benefits of fasting.
Edited (8/25/2009) by alameda
[spell]
|
|
155. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 01:30 am |
Respecting the religion? You´re funny. Tell that to all Muslims who are calling names to non-Muslims (not to talk about physical violence).
Well, we wont go far, search TLC and tell me about it, who is respecting others religion more than who ?!
And Please, dont start talking about physical violence
Remember, our souls are dear to us same as yours to you...so they are counted too !
|
|
156. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 01:34 am |
Rule 10 of Turkish Class : Discussion on politics or religion and religious matters is allowed as long as the topic does not get personal or agressive. I guess there should be an additional sentence "unless you are a mod, an admin, a friend of a mod".
Has anyone EVER criticised Christmas here? The fact that you stuff yourselves until you are sick with food and chocolates, give eachother ever increasingly expensive presents, get drunk and call yourselves Christian? Is THAT healthy? No. So why are you so concerned that people are fasting? Does it affect you?
I gave up arguing about religion some time ago - what is the point? People naturally become very emotive and you will not change someone´s faith by arguing, you will merely alienate yourselves from them and deeply hurt their feelings. If you have no religion or have opposing views that is a personal choice or decision. This kind of talk only increases hate, xenophobia and fundamentalism. On a more local level, you offend some really great TC members.
You might like to rush to be the first to call me a hypocrite - no problem, I´ve never pretended that I have tunnel vision and like to think that the older I get, the wiser I get 
|
|
157. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 01:35 am |
Well, we wont go far, search TLC and tell me about it, who is respecting others religion more than who ?!
And Please, dont start talking about physical violence
Remember, our souls are dear to us same as yours to you...so they are counted too !
You very well know I´m not talking exclusively about Muslims on TLC when mentioning respect but you stated that ´it was a Muslim thing´. Maybe you should ask some guys in Indonesia, Sudan or Nigeria why they kill people only, yes only!!, because they´re not a Muslim. That´s what I meant with violence but you seem to enjoy turning my words.
|
|
158. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 01:37 am |
It seems to me that ´there´ you consider everything rude. If you don´t like mixing with us rude Brits/Americans/Europeans, nobody is forcing you. Perhaps we should opt for 2-tier membership here - one for ´high-level´ people and one for the rest.
Post of the year!!! Absolutely brilliant!!! 
But I have to say, I do enjoy the intermingling of low-brow imbeciles and high-level intellectuals!
I get some of my best laughs from the TC brain trust!! I mean, where else can you find people so pretentious and pompous? And where else can you find people who throw insults with every word but THINK they are so clever that mere nit-wits won´t understand!?!?
Gosh, I dunno, I think I would REALLY miss that!! 
|
|
159. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 01:41 am |
You very well know I´m not talking exclusively about Muslims on TLC when mentioning respect but you stated that ´it was a Muslim thing´. Maybe you should ask some guys in Indonesia, Sudan or Nigeria why they kill people only, yes only!!, because they´re not a Muslim. That´s what I meant with violence but you seem to enjoy turning my words.
Perhaps you should read your history books. The Brits and the Dutch (among other "Christian" countries) were doing that LONG before....
|
|
160. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 01:44 am |
Perhaps you should read your history books. The Brits and the Dutch (among other "Christian" countries) were doing that LONG before....
and they don`t do it anymore? 
|
|
161. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 01:52 am |
You very well know I´m not talking exclusively about Muslims on TLC when mentioning respect but you stated that ´it was a Muslim thing´. Maybe you should ask some guys in Indonesia, Sudan or Nigeria why they kill people only, yes only!!, because they´re not a Muslim. That´s what I meant with violence but you seem to enjoy turning my words.
Noo, noo, noo, you got that wrong, muslims were killed in Nigeria by christians where the majority there are muslims but the Christian countries are supporting the ruling Christians there where they are almost %20 of the population, and you can check that out !
And you also Forgot China, didnt you, there were Muslims there not others
How about Ãraq and Afghanistan...?!
We dont draw offensive cartoons or make offensive movies about other´s religions
We dont talk without respect about others prophets...etc
Anyway, iLoVetHaTx3 asked respect from TLC members not from the whole world, so did Queent and so do i.
That respect wont neither decrease nor increase my belief.
Actually it wont effect my own belief nor Ãslam over all
The point is, it will make us able to share one place and communicate.
Mutual respect its called.
Respecting what the other belif is respecting his/her choice, it donest mean you believe or accept what they believe !
So ÃT ÃS exclusively at TLC not about the whole world
Ãn fact i dont give a d**n about the whole world and what do they think or feel about us Muslims, i have my beliefe and thats enough for me
They think we are wrong, we also think they are wrong, if they dont like us...so what, we also wont like them
à dont really care !
Ãts about TLC and members here, because we share same place, and to be even able to communicate and talk with each others, where you refused what s/he asked and said..´´when i feel like it ´´ !
Edited (8/25/2009) by CANLI
|
|
162. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 02:04 am |
Nobody is going to win this argument. This goes round and round every time these discussion start up. Accusations are thrown from both sides, everybody gets all riled up and pissed off and twisted up (which is another thing I really don´t understand but I guess I will save that commentary for another time)!
If a muslim person chooses to fast....why should anyone else get their panties all knotted over it? You don´t have to participate so eat up!!!
And on the other side....if someone doesn´t respect your choice....who cares!!! What difference does it make what anyone thinks as long as you are ok with your reasons for doing it and it is a choice for you.
This back and forth solves nothing and only stirs up tension. Everyone wants the final word!!!
You all just need to get over yourselves.
|
|
163. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 02:15 am |
Respecting the religion? You´re funny. Tell that to all Muslims who are calling names to non-Muslims (not to talk about physical violence).
what are those names? raghead? diaperhead?
|
|
164. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 03:07 am |
I must absolutely nothing, not from anyone, not even the law. It is ALWAYS my own choice to obey a law or to pay respect to people I think who deserve it (and that´s NOT automatically). Demanding my respect makes me only more critical.
I´m not demanding anything. I´m just letting you know that when you criticize someone else´s belief it´s disrespectful. So, if you want to go on to be a judgemental, disrespectful, ignorant person then go ahead, it´s your life. You will be the one judged at the end of the day by the Highest Power. It´s wrong to criticize someone else´s belief. It´d be different if their belief was to kill every non-Islam or something of that nature, but what they´re doing isn´t harming anyone. So therefore, don´t disrespect others beliefs. You wouldn´t want someone to disrespect your ways or your beliefs, it would offend you, so there for , sus. Like they say, if you don´t have anything nice to say, then don´t say anything. 
|
|
165. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 03:10 am |
iLoVeHatx3 didn´t ask for respect, she said you must respect and that is what Trudy was objecting to.
It´s not what I meant. I should´ve been more clear. You must respect others beliefs, if you want to be a good , open - minded, respectful indivual. Also, if I was demanding respect, I would´ve said way more than that. 
|
|
166. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 06:04 am |
Nobody is going to win this argument. This goes round and round every time these discussion start up. Accusations are thrown from both sides, everybody gets all riled up and pissed off and twisted up (which is another thing I really don´t understand but I guess I will save that commentary for another time)!
If a muslim person chooses to fast....why should anyone else get their panties all knotted over it? You don´t have to participate so eat up!!!
And on the other side....if someone doesn´t respect your choice....who cares!!! What difference does it make what anyone thinks as long as you are ok with your reasons for doing it and it is a choice for you.
This back and forth solves nothing and only stirs up tension. Everyone wants the final word!!!
You all just need to get over yourselves.
True, but we don´t necessarily should see and treat this as an argument to win. I think it´s good to share ideas and see what different people think. Occasionally that leads to someone learning something. 
|
|
167. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 07:39 am |
True, but we don´t necessarily should see and treat this as an argument to win. I think it´s good to share ideas and see what different people think. Occasionally that leads to someone learning something. 
True enough but learning can only happen when people are actually open to hearing other points of view...not just in defending their own. 
|
|
168. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 10:14 am |
Yes its weak and faulty full of errors religion that about 1,525,532,460 - 1,559,728,143 person believe in, but sure you know better !
We have something called ´´respecting the religion´ its a muslim thing, thats why you dont find us make fun of our religion or other´s religions or prophets.
Quantity doesnt make impressions on me, but quality. You see there are over 6 billion of us. All 6 billions are idiots, only a few are genius.
|
|
169. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 10:33 am |
Herkese merhaba
Actually Quran and Koran are both right. Please check .
Selamlar and happy Ramadan.
Hana
|
|
170. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 10:52 am |
Nobody is going to win this argument. This goes round and round every time these discussion start up. Accusations are thrown from both sides, everybody gets all riled up and pissed off and twisted up (which is another thing I really don´t understand but I guess I will save that commentary for another time)!
If a muslim person chooses to fast....why should anyone else get their panties all knotted over it? You don´t have to participate so eat up!!!
And on the other side....if someone doesn´t respect your choice....who cares!!! What difference does it make what anyone thinks as long as you are ok with your reasons for doing it and it is a choice for you.
This back and forth solves nothing and only stirs up tension. Everyone wants the final word!!!
You all just need to get over yourselves.
+10000000000000000 
|
|
171. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 10:55 am |
It must really be hard to impress you. Many eminent scientists, philosophers and statesmen dedicated their work to society. The Renaissance was a manifestation of the acknowledgement of the value of human. Even God is reported to have created the entire universe for humans.
Thoughts of young people are like trains* , they easily get derailed.
(It does make sense in Turkey)
Quantity doesnt make impressions on me, but quality. You see there are over 6 billion of us. All 6 billions are idiots, only a few are genius.
|
|
172. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 10:55 am |
True, but we don´t necessarily should see and treat this as an argument to win. I think it´s good to share ideas and see what different people think. Occasionally that leads to someone learning something. 
Absolutely agree!!
People are learning..
+100000000
|
|
173. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 10:59 am |
Absolutely agree!!
People are learning..
+100000000
Yeah SOME people learn - when will you? 
|
|
174. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 11:57 am |
Yeah SOME people learn - when will you? 
May be you are right..
May be I should learn from Canli and Queent..
Let me think..ermm.
Do you want me to start fasting then?
Shall I join the group threapy?
will you join me?
|
|
175. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 11:59 am |
Here we go again 
|
|
176. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:05 pm |
during days still and still same....people come on!!!!! its bored 
|
|
177. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:08 pm |
Here we go again 

|
|
178. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:10 pm |
during days still and still same....people come on!!!!! its bored 
Somebody stop me! (The Mask)
Biri beni durdursun! (Maske)
Edited (8/25/2009) by seyit
[English version]
|
|
179. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:15 pm |
Nobody is going to win this argument. This goes round and round every time these discussion start up. Accusations are thrown from both sides, everybody gets all riled up and pissed off and twisted up (which is another thing I really don´t understand but I guess I will save that commentary for another time)!
If a muslim person chooses to fast....why should anyone else get their panties all knotted over it? You don´t have to participate so eat up!!!
And on the other side....if someone doesn´t respect your choice....who cares!!! What difference does it make what anyone thinks as long as you are ok with your reasons for doing it and it is a choice for you.
This back and forth solves nothing and only stirs up tension. Everyone wants the final word!!!
You all just need to get over yourselves.
+1
|
|
180. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:15 pm |
sorry guys I got bored, but why oh why is it that when someone praises another for doing something that requires total commitment and pure strength ,others jump straight on the band wagon with negativities.As it has been said everyone has choices ,and I chose to fast,OH and by the way while I was out enjoying the simple pleasure of eating a meal ,there was a young boy who i see everyday ,so I took my plate of food and sat on the wall and shared it with him.Im not looking for praise ,I am just trying to experience a NEW experience .OH and by the way I am TRYING! to fast again today. so up your bum
|
|
181. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:21 pm |
I just cannot see how anyone is learning anything from this debate/argument. Its just getting everyones backs up the wrong way. By saying that people are learning from it just seems to me like an excuse not to end this ..neverending discussion. People are getting offended on both sides and im sure that is not the aim of TC.
|
|
182. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:25 pm |
I just cannot see how anyone is learning anything from this debate/argument. Its just getting everyones backs up the wrong way. By saying that people are learning from it just seems to me like an excuse not to end this ..neverending discussion. People are getting offended on both sides and im sure that is not the aim of TC.
i think the problem is people of TLC just love arguing soooooooo much it could be about ramadan or any other thing. there will always be reasons to fight. summer is gone, TLC season has begun. it will be much worse in winter 
|
|
183. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:27 pm |
I completely agree! I do wish the arguments didnt have to get so personal all the time. Rules constantly get broken...and if the rules are broken by the right people ...then the rules get changed to accomodate them its a nightmare. I can understand why lots of people get paranoid about voicing their opinion. It usually results in a full scale.....ambush
|
|
184. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:28 pm |
I just cannot see how anyone is learning anything from this debate/argument. Its just getting everyones backs up the wrong way. By saying that people are learning from it just seems to me like an excuse not to end this ..neverending discussion. People are getting offended on both sides and im sure that is not the aim of TC.
So could we say "please, stop!"
|
|
185. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:30 pm |
ok STOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP lol and lets all be friends and start a new conversation about something nice ..
|
|
186. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:32 pm |
ok STOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP lol and lets all be friends and start a new conversation about something nice ..
How beautiful is beautiful and bad is bad 
Edited (8/25/2009) by seyit
[beatifull :)]
|
|
187. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:35 pm |
Somebody stop me! (The Mask)
Biri beni durdursun! (Maske)
Jim Carry! 
|
|
188. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:40 pm |
May be you are right..
May be I should learn from Canli and Queent..
Let me think..ermm.
Do you want me to start fasting then?
Shall I join the group threapy?
will you join me?
As usual you completely miss the point. Learn to live and let live when such things completely unaffect you.
Group therapy with you? Stop trying to get me to be with you canim 
Edited (8/25/2009) by _AE_
|
|
189. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:43 pm |
Lets start a group therapy ! 
|
|
190. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:44 pm |
Lets start a group therapy ! 
Is alcohol the therapy? 
|
|
191. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:45 pm |
Jim Carry! 
I try to smooth the subject over.
Jim Carrey and Ramadan.
I searched on internet and found this:
http://www.fikirbaz.com/arsiv/000654.html

Edited (8/25/2009) by seyit
[could you see the Jim Carrey´s film "Aman Tanrım" on the internet page:)]
Edited (8/25/2009) by seyit
[could you see Jim Carrey´s film "Aman Tanrım" on the internet page (edit for edit) :D]
|
|
192. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:48 pm |
Good point!
|
|
193. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 12:51 pm |
The most funny banner (for me) was RAMAZANDA CEZAEVÃNDEYÃZ means ´ on Ramazan we are in jail´ ?????
|
|
194. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 01:02 pm |
Sultanahmet mosque?
Lest change the subject a bit then..
Did you know that that mosque was the only mosque in islamic world in its time as a mosque with 6 minarets only...
Later on, they discovered that there was another mosque with 6 minarets in saudi Arabia and then they added another minaret into that mosque in order to keep the uniqness of Sultanahment mosque.
And one more info, that mosque was the first mosque built by an Ottoman sultan with money from tresury.. (Earlier , all the mosques were built with the booty)
That was the reason people of Istanbul protested that and did not go to the mosque appr.. for 100 years..

|
|
196. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 01:07 pm |

|
|
197. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 08:02 pm |
Fasting exists in all religions,and in all populations around the globe and for different reasons.I believe it started as a soul purificaton from the daily cravings as a way to give the soul the upper hand over the body,to show that the mind is superior.I personally used to fast on and off,(I suffer from hypoglycemia),I considered it as a disciplin,but no matter how religious I am I cannot believe that not eating during a few hours,no matter how hard it is,makes me a better muslim.I can fast if I live my days in slow motion in order not to consume energy............but I felt stupid doing that.I changed my fasting ,so instead of not eating i try to be honest(not always easy as small lies are sometimes necsssary if you do not want to hurt the feelings of others),to be there for whoever needs help,and so on.
I would like here to add that I can´t understand that a pillar of a religion is conditionnal.The Koran explicitely talks about fasting only for those who can.................and those who are incapacitated go to hell ?................sorry,but this is not my Islam.
My guess is that we haven´t studied the Book hard enough,I read it at least 20 times and although it mentions fasting as a must,it never says it is a pillar.it is a must as much as being loving,caring,fair,honest are..............but not a pillar.
No offend ment here,please try to be openminded,make an effort to understand yourself instead of believing what you are told.Make your own decisions,well now that IS A MUST explicitely mentionned in the Book.
For
those who do fast I wish them easy fasting,Hana
|
|
198. |
25 Aug 2009 Tue 09:07 pm |
Good post, Hana, this I can agree with. 
|
|
199. |
27 Aug 2009 Thu 11:12 pm |
That was the reason people of Istanbul protested that and did not go to the mosque appr.. for 100 years..

it is because it was built only ar XVIII century, much later than it is claimed to be.
|
|
200. |
28 Aug 2009 Fri 12:41 am |
it is because it was built only ar XVIII century, much later than it is claimed to be.
I am really interested to hear about this more Raindrops..
I have checked the dates again. It was built by Architect Mehmet (a student from Sinan school) with the order from sultan Ahmed I who was the ruler between 1603 and 1617.
The mosque was built between 1610 and 1616 (which is also the year when shakspeare died). And a year later Ahmed I died without praying that much in the mosque itself..
Anyway, that is what I know from the sources..
Can you show any sources or tell us regarding the post above?
|
|
201. |
28 Aug 2009 Fri 02:29 pm |
I am really interested to hear about this more Raindrops..
I have checked the dates again. It was built by Architect Mehmet (a student from Sinan school) with the order from sultan Ahmed I who was the ruler between 1603 and 1617.
The mosque was built between 1610 and 1616 (which is also the year when shakspeare died). And a year later Ahmed I died without praying that much in the mosque itself..
Anyway, that is what I know from the sources..
Can you show any sources or tell us regarding the post above?
i will write more with pleasure. just not earlier then on monday. can you wait?
in fact it is not short story ))
|
|
202. |
28 Aug 2009 Fri 09:53 pm |
i will write more with pleasure. just not earlier then on monday. can you wait?
in fact it is not short story ))
I will be waiting impatiently Raindrops..
|
|
203. |
28 Aug 2009 Fri 10:08 pm |
I will be waiting impatiently Raindrops..
OMG Raindrops! 
I CAN´T BELIEVE you are doubting thehandsom? You are a brave girl to take on the mighty wise one, the all knowing all seeing one 
He is waiting.....

Edited (8/28/2009) by _AE_
|
|
204. |
28 Aug 2009 Fri 10:12 pm |
OMG Raindrops! 
I CAN´T BELIEVE you are doubting thehandsom? You are a brave girl to take on the mighty wise one, the all knowing all seeing one 
He is waiting.....

Wow...he´s lost so much hair since the harem left him!!
|
|
205. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 08:36 am |
Wow...he´s lost so much hair since the harem left him!!
thanks for support )))
in fact i m not doubting, i just know what he doesnt 
is he already legend of the TC ? demonic one?
though, having good opponent is exciting )
|
|
206. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 11:47 am |
thanks for support )))
in fact i m not doubting, i just know what he doesnt 
is he already legend of the TC ? demonic one?
though, having good opponent is exciting )
Haha! You are one astute person 
|
|
207. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 12:01 pm |
thanks for support )))
in fact i m not doubting, i just know what he doesnt 
is he already legend of the TC ? demonic one?
though, having good opponent is exciting )
.....and clearly what no one else does either. Every article, guidebook or reference to the Sultan Ahmet Mosque I have ever seen, including those written by Turks in Turkish, states that it was built in the 17th Century. So it must be a big secret when it was really built and I can´t wait to hear it!
(Just out of interest do any Turkish members agree that the mosque wasn´t built when everyone thinks it was?)
Edited (8/29/2009) by lady in red
[added a bit]
|
|
208. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 12:41 pm |
why is it that islam keeps on treating menstruating women as if they were sick? can you update your books and learn that menstruation is a NORMAL physiological process? kind of similar to urinating when your bladder is full.. maybe some muslims need a bit of enlightement this ramadan.
It is unfortunate that you reply to a post that seems to classify mensturating women as sick.
Mensturating women are excused from fasting not because they are sick, but because fasting may be too demanding on ladies at such periods.
|
|
209. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 01:23 pm |
It is unfortunate that you reply to a post that seems to classify mensturating women as sick.
Mensturating women are excused from fasting not because they are sick, but because fasting may be too demanding on ladies at such periods.
But if women don´t have any trouble with their menstruation, they are not feeling weaker or sick and they want to fast, these days don´t count!
|
|
210. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 01:40 pm |
But if women don´t have any trouble with their menstruation, they are not feeling weaker or sick and they want to fast, these days don´t count!
It is not as simple and logical as you think.
Mensutaring women were seen as not clean in judaism and Islam followed the tradition..
In many books this situation is considered as ´cünüb´(cenabet in Turkish) which practically means ´not clean from the religious point of view´
Apart from everything, of course all these were written by men who have never experienced (and will never will) these kind of thing
|
|
211. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 01:54 pm |
It is not as simple and logical as you think.
Mensutaring women were seen as not clean in judaism and Islam followed the tradition..
In many books this situation is considered as ´cünüb´(cenabet in Turkish) which practically means ´not clean from the religious point of view´
Apart from everything, of course all these were written by men who have never experienced (and will never will) these kind of thing
Why do you keep repeating these ideas...mensutaring women ....mensutaring women....it´s very clear...they do not have to fast and after the month of ramadan is over they have to fast those days
Who told you "mensurating women" are considered "not clean" in Islam???give me an evidence
|
|
212. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 02:23 pm |
Why do you keep repeating these ideas...mensutaring women ....mensutaring women....it´s very clear...they do not have to fast and after the month of ramadan is over they have to fast those days
Who told you "mensurating women" are considered "not clean" in Islam???give me an evidence
Bakara 2/222 for example?
Quuent? 
|
|
213. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 02:40 pm |
If you know "albakara" so you surely know that this "aya" says that wives and husbands must not have sexual intercouse during this period because it is harmful NOT that women are dirty (not clean)
Quuent?????
|
|
214. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 03:09 pm |
If you know "albakara" so you surely know that this "aya" says that wives and husbands must not have sexual intercouse during this period because it is harmful NOT that women are dirty (not clean)
Quuent?????
Harmful? That´s the most outdated thing I´ve heard in ages. But ok, enlighten me please, maybe you know things better than all doctors. Are you afraid a man will lose his potency?
|
|
215. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 03:13 pm |
Harmful? That´s the most outdated thing I´ve heard in ages. But ok, enlighten me please, maybe you know things better than all doctors. Are you afraid a man will lose his potency?
This is the same for pretty much all main religions - including roman catholics. As you are not religious I guess you can shag whenever and however you want but why does it bother you that others have these rules? Is it affecting you badly? 
|
|
216. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 03:17 pm |
Harmful? That´s the most outdated thing I´ve heard in ages. But ok, enlighten me please, maybe you know things better than all doctors. Are you afraid a man will lose his potency?
Well,you seem playing that role of doctors
Needless to explain or participate in such conversations since you´re all the time trying to proove WE (muslims) are wrong
|
|
217. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 03:18 pm |
.. enlighten me please, maybe you know things better than all doctors. Are you afraid a man will lose his potency?
There is recent research which suggests that having sex during your period can increase the risk of endometriosis because it may push menstrual fluid back into your uterus. There is also evidence that you are more likely to develop STDs and AIDs during this time, but this is still under debate.
|
|
218. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 03:29 pm |
This is the same for pretty much all main religions - including roman catholics. As you are not religious I guess you can shag whenever and however you want but why does it bother you that others have these rules? Is it affecting you badly? 
As a former Roman Catholic I know sex was not forbidden during a womens period. Maybe to shag is your hobby, it´s not mine. One doesn´t have to be religious to have certain morality, though that is obviously a bridge too far to understand for you.
|
|
219. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 03:33 pm |
As a former Roman Catholic I know sex was not forbidden during a womens period. Maybe to shag is your hobby, it´s not mine. One doesn´t have to be religious to have certain morality, though that is obviously a bridge too far to understand for you.
This doesn´t really answer my question - why are you so bothered by it? Why does it affect YOU and your sex life? 
|
|
220. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 03:36 pm |
One doesn´t have to be religious to have certain morality, though that is obviously a bridge too far to understand for you.
Another question. What did I write that was so upsetting to you that you felt you had to question MY morality? 
|
|
221. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 03:38 pm |
This doesn´t really answer my question - why are you so bothered by it? Why does it affect YOU and your sex life? 
Anything - wrongly told - about women does effect my life. It effects ideas how people - all over the world - look at women, see them as second class people, treat them as second class people, treat them as if they are not mature enough to make decisions by themselves. But probably you are too self-centred to see things in a broader view.
|
|
222. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 03:43 pm |
Another question. What did I write that was so upsetting to you that you felt you had to question MY morality? 
Dear, you are not important enough to upset me, at most you annoy me (to death). However the fact that you combine being non-religieus automatically with loose morality (quote: ´you can shag whenever and however as you want´ unquote) means for me you´re not able to discuss something in an adult way. Have it your way, I can pretend you are mature.
|
|
223. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 03:44 pm |
Anything - wrongly told - about women does effect my life. It effects ideas how people - all over the world - look at women, see them as second class people, treat them as second class people, treat them as if they are not mature enough to make decisions by themselves. But probably you are too self-centred to see things in a broader view.
Again you are name calling to make your point? This is the best you can do?
I agree with your comments to a certain extent, in general. However, firstly prove that this is "wrongly told". Secondly, whilst there are extremes in any religion, if women CHOOSE to follow a certain religion then respect that choice, don´t mock it. Instead of embracing women of all cultures, ages and race, you are merely holding yourself up as the perfect example and ridiculing others who are not like and do not think, like you. I see this as a negative rather than positive towards women. If you think that you are "educating" women with your attitude you are wrong. You are alienating them. You won´t change anything by mocking people.
Lastly, does your "freedom" make you happier than other women? You don´t seem to be a very happy person to me. Is this the price you pay?
Edited (8/29/2009) by _AE_
|
|
224. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 03:46 pm |
Again you are name calling to make your point? This is the best you can do?
Learned it from the master herself.
|
|
225. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 03:48 pm |
The Koran seems open to different interpretations and having read the several english explanations of al-baqarah 2/222 bissane seems to have got it right.
Welcome to TLC bissane by the way and prepare yourself for some flak. 
Don´t worry about Trudy...she had a bad experience at a mosque once.
|
|
226. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 03:55 pm |
Posted three times by mistake :S
Edited (8/29/2009) by _AE_
|
|
227. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 03:55 pm |
OMG what happened!!!
Edited (8/29/2009) by _AE_
|
|
228. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 03:55 pm |
Sorry - weird connection problem! Posted three times.
Edited (8/29/2009) by _AE_
|
|
229. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 03:57 pm |
Dear, you are not important enough to upset me, at most you annoy me (to death). However the fact that you combine being non-religieus automatically with loose morality (quote: ´you can shag whenever and however as you want´ unquote) means for me you´re not able to discuss something in an adult way. Have it your way, I can pretend you are mature.
Where did you imagine you saw me equating loose morality with non-religious people? You were saying that it is quite ok to have sex during menstration and I replied that if you do not have this as a religious rule you are free to have sex whenever and however you want. Where does this say that if you do this you have no morals, or multiple partners? 
The only immature poster I see in this discussion is YOU 
Edited (8/29/2009) by _AE_
|
|
230. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 04:12 pm |
You don´t seem to be a very happy person to me.
And I´m oh so happy you don´t know me.
|
|
231. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 04:13 pm |
And I´m oh so happy you don´t know me.
I can see that I will have to wait for Catwoman to come here and give a convincing and considered reply to my questions. You don´t seem able to be able to actually debate this issue with anything substantial but prefer to throw jibes....sad for you 
Edited (8/29/2009) by _AE_
|
|
232. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 04:14 pm |
Exactly what I´m thinking for 163 posts long.
|
|
233. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 04:15 pm |
Exactly what I´m thinking for 163 posts long.
Great contribution to an important discussion 
|
|
234. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 04:55 pm |
There is recent research which suggests that having sex during your period can increase the risk of endometriosis because it may push menstrual fluid back into your uterus. There is also evidence that you are more likely to develop STDs and AIDs during this time, but this is still under debate.
Not to mention how disgusting it is! What man (don´t say!) would want to have sex while a woman is menstruating or what woman would want to have sex while she is menstruating ............. I put this in the same category and other bodily functions performed during sex. 
Edited (8/29/2009) by libralady
[Thought I better add another sentance.......... ]
|
|
235. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 05:04 pm |
Not to mention how disgusting it is! What man (don´t say!) would want to have sex while a woman is menstruating or what woman would want to have sex while she is menstruating ............. I put this in the same category and other bodily functions performed during sex. 
The other factor to this is that historically women WERE unclean during this time!!! Sorry to write such a shocking thing but it is true! Even now, unless you are lucky enough to be born in a rich country where you can purchase decent sanitaryware, you ARE "unclean". I watched a great series on TV recently where western women had to live with African tribal women for one month. In one particular episode she went to sit on a stool that a tribal woman had been sitting on and noticed it was covered with blood - the woman was menstruating and they had nothing to use, so the culture was to just "let it flow" ....!!!
These women were completely unaffected by any other culture, were amazingly independent and strong and yet CHOSE to keep away from men during this time.
Edited (8/29/2009) by _AE_
Edited (8/29/2009) by _AE_
|
|
236. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 05:07 pm |
The other factor to this is that historically women WERE unclean during this time!!! Sorry to write such a shocking thing but it is true! Even now, unless you are lucky enough to be born in a rich country where you can purchase decent sanitaryware, you ARE "unclean". I watched a great series on TV recently where western women had to live with African tribal women for one month. In one particular episode she went to sit on a stool that a tribal woman had been sitting on and noticed it was covered with blood - the woman was menstrating and they had nothing to use, so the culture was to just "let it flow" ....!!!
These women were completely unaffected by any other culture, were amazingly independent and strong and yet CHOSE to keep away from men during this time.
I saw that too. And I think it is Nepal where women live in a special hut during their periods away from the rest of the family because of the problem of sanitation and cleanliness during that time.
|
|
237. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 05:12 pm |
If you know "albakara" so you surely know that this "aya" says that wives and husbands must not have sexual intercouse during this period because it is harmful NOT that women are dirty (not clean)
Quuent?????
I do not think you know what you are talking about here.
In my country, some women still call themselves ´ben kirliyim´ -I am dirty- when they have their period.
You sound suspiciously like Queent !!
|
|
238. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 05:16 pm |
The Koran seems open to different interpretations and having read the several english explanations of al-baqarah 2/222 bissane seems to have got it right.
Welcome to TLC bissane by the way and prepare yourself for some flak. 
Don´t worry about Trudy...she had a bad experience at a mosque once.
You got it completely WRONG again 
So in scotland your version of interpretation is different than many muslim countries.. Eh? 
|
|
239. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 05:21 pm |
I do not think you know what you are talking about here.In my country, some women still call themselves ´ben kirliyim´ -I am dirty- when they have their period.
You sound suspiciously like Queent !!
Good job you do, you are such a mine of information when it comes to anything to do with women
Perhaps you should realise that women in the UK would also think of themselves as "dirty" and probably still do to some extent depending on their mothers views and it was /is a very taboo / embarrassing subject for many people. It was often and probably still is the brunt of many a school boy playground joke, with many derogatory terms denoting a girl having a period.
|
|
240. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 05:22 pm |
I really don´t see the point to your reasoning about certain people being excluded from fasting. At the time the Quran was written, menstruating was a messy and dirty thing - like it or not! You might find it offensive that it is still considered to be so in modern times, but the fact is it really doesn´t affect you personally, or me. If you have even just a cold you are excluded from fasting - is that discrimination too?
Edited (8/29/2009) by _AE_
|
|
241. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 05:30 pm |
....finally MANY women have terrible pains during their period, feel sick and lightheaded. It is a fact that every month many women even have to take time off work because of it. I am quite certain that if they were FORCED to fast during this time, you would be complaining that they were being treated unfairly!!! 
|
|
242. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 05:34 pm |
....finally MANY women have terrible pains during their period, feel sick and lightheaded. It is a fact that every month many women even have to take time off work because of it. I am quite certain that if they were FORCED to fast during this time, you would be complaining that they were being treated unfairly!!! 
And MANY women do NOT have terrible pains, do not feel sick or lightheaded, they do NOT take time off each month. Still, a menstruating woman who WANTS to fast herself is not allowed, or, she is allowed but her days don´t count as she is seen as dirty!
|
|
243. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 05:37 pm |
And MANY women do NOT have terrible pains, do not feel sick or lightheaded, they do NOT take time off each month. Still, a menstruating woman who WANTS to fast herself is not allowed, or, she is allowed but her days don´t count as she is seen as dirty!
Perhaps it would be good to get the views of other Muslim women.
|
|
244. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 05:39 pm |
Anything - wrongly told - about women does effect my life. It effects ideas how people - all over the world - look at women, see them as second class people, treat them as second class people, treat them as if they are not mature enough to make decisions by themselves. But probably you are too self-centred to see things in a broader view.
+10000
I would second to that..
Obviously, once you look at everything from shagging point of view, a woman who pretends that she respects the backwardness might increase the chance getting of laid as there are many backwards men around. (And of course same thing applies to Turkish nationalism)
It would make the chance much broader as it were..
But of course if you look at the events from that angle..
|
|
245. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 05:41 pm |
I really don´t see the point to your reasoning about certain people being excluded from fasting. At the time the Quran was written, menstruating was a messy and dirty thing - like it or not! You might find it offensive that it is still considered to be so in modern times, but the fact is it really doesn´t affect you personally, or me. If you have even just a cold you are excluded from fasting - is that discrimination too?
The problem is that because of what they thought they new in the 7th century about how babies are born and teh whole menstruation process is the basis of the situation of women in islam today. They use these ridiculous things like PMS to rationalize that women are weak, should be excluded from the center of decision making (the mosque) because they are "not clean" (as if they never heard of tampons and can´t take care of themselves! ), this also justifies in their minds that the man should be the decision maker in the family... etc... This is the real problem with the big deal they make about menstruation.
Edited (8/29/2009) by catwoman
[quickly correcting my spelling before I´m asked what "the" means!!! hahahah]
|
|
246. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 05:41 pm |
And MANY women do NOT have terrible pains, do not feel sick or lightheaded, they do NOT take time off each month. Still, a menstruating woman who WANTS to fast herself is not allowed, or, she is allowed but her days don´t count as she is seen as dirty!
As I said previously, the Quran was written in a time where women WERE dirty during this time. If people follow the words in the Quran exactly then that is why they are excluded. I understand it is more about the health and wellbeing of those fasting rather than any kind of exclusion. However, again I have to question why you are so concerned. You are one one hand saying that you disagree with fasting and now you are complaining that certain people are excluded from fasting. The muslim women who have posted here are not complaining, and it is THEY who are affected.
If your problem is with Islam as a whole then that is a different issue. I have problems with ALL religions for many different reasons and have made that quite clear in the past, but as long as people CHOOSE to follow that religion then it´s their own concern, not ours. If people are quite happy in their lives then that is all that matters. When people become oppressed or victimised because of their religion it becomes a problem. This works BOTH ways - all I see from you is victimisation.
|
|
247. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 05:43 pm |
The problem is that because of what they thought they new in the 7th century about how babies are born and teh whole menstruation process is the basis of the situation of women in islam today. They use these ridiculous things like PMS to rationalize that women are weak, should be excluded from the center of decision making (the mosque) because they are "not clean" (as if they never heard of tampons and can´t take care of themselves! ), this also justifies in their minds that the man should be the decision maker in the family... etc... This is the real problem with the big deal they make about menstruation.
It is a bit "rich westerner" to assume that every woman in the world has access to tampons or the spare cash to purchase them!!!
Edited (8/29/2009) by _AE_
|
|
248. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 05:46 pm |
It is a bit "rich westerner" to assume that every woman in the world has access to tampons or the spare cash to purchase them!!!
that was not the point AE!! tampons are only one way to stay clean, as women managed to take care of themselves all along. it does however challenge the whole basis of "women are dirty" thinking!!
|
|
249. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 05:47 pm |
And MANY women do NOT have terrible pains, do not feel sick or lightheaded, they do NOT take time off each month. Still, a menstruating woman who WANTS to fast herself is not allowed, or, she is allowed but her days don´t count as she is seen as dirty!
Well
As I said, it is nothing to do with god or anything..
Mensturating women are seen as dirty in judaism and islam did not hesitate to copy it..
It is what it is..
Say that it is religion or not religion or say that it is people applying quran in a wrong way..
The fact is that "mensturating women are seen as dirty"..
It is unbelievable that any balanced women who would say that ´ah.. dont interfere..if they want to see themselves as dirty, let them see themselves as dirty´ !!!
Sad really..
|
|
250. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 05:49 pm |
+10000
I would second to that..
Obviously, once you look at everything from shagging point of view, a woman who pretends that she respects the backwardness might increase the chance getting of laid as there are many backwards men around. (And of course same thing applies to Turkish nationalism)
It would make the chance much broader as it were..
But of course if you look at the events from that angle..
As the discussion WAS about "shagging" then I fail to see your point. The discussion about having sex during your period has led you to this assumption about me? If you wish to start some more name calling, then I think you are so obsessed with the "chance of getting laid" that you taint everything you read which (as a married man with children) is so typically backward and chauvanistic that you may count yourself amongst those men you mention.
Edited (8/29/2009) by _AE_
|
|
251. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 05:53 pm |
Ruffling feathers!!!  
|
|
252. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 05:53 pm |
The muslim women who have posted here are not complaining, and it is THEY who are affected.
If your problem is with Islam as a whole then that is a different issue. I have problems with ALL religions for many different reasons and have made that quite clear in the past, but as long as people CHOOSE to follow that religion then it´s their own concern, not ours. If people are quite happy in their lives then that is all that matters. When people become oppressed or victimised because of their religion it becomes a problem. This works BOTH ways - all I see from you is victimisation.
Most women in islamic cultures (and not only islamic, but especially the ´tightly controlled communities´ , do not have the same freedom of choice that you do. They are not presented with many options and allowed to make an informed decision about which they choose!!
The "choice" usually looks like this "either you conform or you will have the whole family/community... etc reject you, and practically you will have no chance of making it on your own... etc" That is the reality of most of these "choices".
Anyway... as long as this kind of system does not lead to human rights violations, you´re right -- it´s their problem, not mine. But if you see that there are some terrible outcomes of this, you have to question the foundations of their beliefs... and yes, it IS your responsibility to do this, because most of THOSE women CAN´T! YOU will be their voice, even if at this point it is unthinkable for them to criticize or object their traditions and families.
|
|
253. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 05:54 pm |
As I said previously, the Quran was written in a time where women WERE dirty during this time. If people follow the words in the Quran exactly then that is why they are excluded. I understand it is more about the health and wellbeing of those fasting rather than any kind of exclusion. However, again I have to question why you are so concerned. You are one one hand saying that you disagree with fasting and now you are complaining that certain people are excluded from fasting. The muslim women who have posted here are not complaining, and it is THEY who are affected.
If your problem is with Islam as a whole then that is a different issue. I have problems with ALL religions for many different reasons and have made that quite clear in the past, but as long as people CHOOSE to follow that religion then it´s their own concern, not ours. If people are quite happy in their lives then that is all that matters. When people become oppressed or victimised because of their religion it becomes a problem. This works BOTH ways - all I see from you is victimisation.
I indeed disagree with fasting as a compulsory thing because I think it is not healthy but if someone wants to fast herself AND is not allowed just because she is a woman menstruating, I find that discrimination yes.
The way religious people look at society does affect me. You, on your secluded island with two Turks - like you said yesterday or so (however I remember many, many postings by you complaining about immigrants not adapting to British society), might not feel the influence of immigrants. I, living in a multicultural city (there are 162 nationalities in my town and 52% is not from Dutch origin!), do feel these impacts. And thát´s what I´m opposing at. Not the religion itself, if people want to live by rules from the 7th century, be my guest, but do not expect me to accept that these century old rules take over. I will not accept that from Muslims, not from Christians living by a Bible from 16th century (and yes, we have those too, and yes, I oppose to them too), not from Hindus, Buddhist or whoever.
|
|
254. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 05:54 pm |
It is unbelievable that any balanced women who would say that ´ah.. dont interfere..if they want to see themselves as dirty, let them see themselves as dirty´ !!!
Sad really..
+1000000000000000
|
|
255. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 05:55 pm |
Most women in islamic cultures (and not only islamic, but especially the ´tightly controlled communities´ , do not have the same freedom of choice that you do. They are not presented with many options and allowed to make an informed decision about which they choose!!
The "choice" usually looks like this "either you conform or you will have the whole family/community... etc reject you, and practically you will have no chance of making it on your own... etc" That is the reality of most of these "choices".
Anyway... as long as this kind of system does not lead to human rights violations, you´re right -- it´s their problem, not mine. But if you see that there are some terrible outcomes of this, you have to question the foundations of their beliefs... and yes, it IS your responsibility to do this, because most of THOSE women CAN´T! YOU will be their voice, even if at this point it is unthinkable for them to criticize or object their traditions and families.
Brilliant post!!! Finally! I had given up on Trudy as she could not come up with a decent debate on this. Yes I completely agree with you - HOWEVER I also do not think that ridiculing muslims on this site or face to face, is the way to make change.
Edited (8/29/2009) by _AE_
|
|
256. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 05:57 pm |
Brilliant post!!! Finally! I had given up on Trudy as she could not come up with a decent debate on this. Yes I completely agree with you - HOWEVER I also do not think that ridiculing muslims on this site or face to face, is the way to make change.
Yes.. I agree with you on this as well... that is why I don´t like femme´s way of ´debating´ this subject..
|
|
257. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 06:01 pm |
You got it completely WRONG again 
So in scotland your version of interpretation is different than many muslim countries.. Eh? 
No handsom I think that is you that has got it wrong again. These interpretations were done by Islamic scholars. I will do another google and get a Scottish translation and get back too you. 
|
|
258. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 06:01 pm |
I indeed disagree with fasting as a compulsory thing because I think it is not healthy but if someone wants to fast herself AND is not allowed just because she is a woman menstruating, I find that discrimination yes.
The way religious people look at society does affect me. You, on your secluded island with two Turks - like you said yesterday or so (however I remember many, many postings by you complaining about immigrants not adapting to British society), might not feel the influence of immigrants. I, living in a multicultural city (there are 162 nationalities in my town and 52% is not from Dutch origin!), do feel these impacts. And thát´s what I´m opposing at. Not the religion itself, if people want to live by rules from the 7th century, be my guest, but do not expect me to accept that these century old rules take over. I will not accept that from Muslims, not from Christians living by a Bible from 16th century (and yes, we have those too, and yes, I oppose to them too), not from Hindus, Buddhist or whoever.
+9999999999
|
|
259. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 06:02 pm |
You, on your secluded island with two Turks - like you said yesterday
I am getting very tired of you judging me on such slight information Trudy. You know nothing about my experiences of such things or the fact that most of my working life has involved travelling abroad many of the major cities of the world. If you prefer to see me as insular then please do so, but don´t try to use that in an argument against me in a post 
You, on your secluded island with two Turks - like you said yesterday or so (however I remember many, many postings by you complaining about immigrants not adapting to British society), might not feel the influence of immigrants. I, living in a multicultural city (there are 162 nationalities in my town and 52% is not from Dutch origin!), do feel these impacts.
I still fail to see what the above has to do with your objection to fasting.
And thát´s what I´m opposing at. Not the religion itself, if people want to live by rules from the 7th century, be my guest, but do not expect me to accept that these century old rules take over.
How are those rules affecting YOU? How are they taking over your life?
|
|
260. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 06:05 pm |
No handsom I think that is you that has got it wrong again. These interpretations were done by Islamic scholars. I will do another google and get a Scottish translation and get back too you. 
Well
I am telling you you are wrong. Those islamic scholars would spend their times trying paing a rosy picture about Islam.
But the reality, the way it is interpreted and applied are different..
I have already told you that women in my country call themselves "dirty" during their mensturation !!!
|
|
261. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 06:08 pm |
I am telling you you are wrong. Those islamic scholars would spend their times trying paing a rosy picture about Islam.
Based on what evidence? I have read some very interesting thoughts by Islamic scholars recently who are trying to effect change, including incorporating Darwin´s theory and modern living into their religion.
|
|
262. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 06:11 pm |
Well
I am telling you you are wrong. Those islamic scholars would spend their times trying paing a rosy picture about Islam.
But the reality, the way it is interpreted and applied are different..
I have already told you that women in my country call themselves "dirty" during their mensturation !!!
Okay handsom I bow to your greater wisdom. 
Edited (8/29/2009) by bydand
|
|
263. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 06:26 pm |
Based on what evidence? I have read some very interesting thoughts by Islamic scholars recently who are trying to effect change, including incorporating Darwin´s theory and modern living into their religion.
Read Ibn Maskawayh, who lived 800 years before Darwin. See where Darwin got his theory from.
|
|
264. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 06:30 pm |
Read Ibn Maskawayh, who lived 800 years before Darwin. See where Darwin got his theory from.
Ahh dear Alpha - I dont want to get involved in an argument about Darwinism or who was first or who plagarised who, I just wrote that the article mentioned that Islamic scholars were hoping to include Darwinism within the Quran - it is not an opinion 
|
|
265. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 06:37 pm |
Okay handsom I bow to your greater wisdom. 
Do not mention it..
You were trying to defend a primitive, backward idea or ideas which are not compatible in todays way of living. So no surpise really..
|
|
266. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 06:42 pm |
Do not mention it..
You were trying to defend a primitive, backward idea or ideas which are not compatible in todays way of living. So no surpise really..
Maybe you should have said "not compatible in today´s western way of living". Rich talk from someone who is primitive and backward in so many other ways...
|
|
267. |
29 Aug 2009 Sat 06:47 pm |
Maybe you should have said "not compatible in today´s western way of living". Rich talk from someone who is primitive and backward in so many other ways...
Lets do not get up close and personal please..OK?
|
|
268. |
30 Aug 2009 Sun 12:17 am |
Ahh dear Alpha - I dont want to get involved in an argument about Darwinism or who was first or who plagarised who, I just wrote that the article mentioned that Islamic scholars were hoping to include Darwinism within the Quran - it is not an opinion 
Islam´s holy book is not one that scholars can add to or delete from.
On the other hand, if you see an Islamic scholar who is trying to reconcile Darwin´s theories with Islam, you can safely tell him he is about 900 years too late. Ibn Maskawayh was there 900 years ago.
|
|
269. |
30 Aug 2009 Sun 12:30 am |
Islam´s holy book is not one that scholars can add to or delete from.
On the other hand, if you see an Islamic scholar who is trying to reconcile Darwin´s theories with Islam, you can safely tell him he is about 900 years too late. Ibn Maskawayh was there 900 years ago.
Let me repeat - I was writing something I had READ in an article, it was not my personal opinion. However, as you are seeking my personal opinion then firstly I would say that Ibn Maskawayh may have been first, but he certainly was not very successful in convincing anybody! Secondly, it is not about adding anything or deleting it from the Quran, it is about understanding it. This is very important, as for centuries you have all been thinking you were going to spend paradise with 70 virgins when in fact you will receive grapes! 
I believe this shows the importance of translating CORRECTLY from original texts for better understanding - dont you? 
Edited (8/30/2009) by _AE_
|
|
270. |
30 Aug 2009 Sun 12:39 am |
However...not wanting to dampen your spirit, "modern apologists of Islam try to downplay the evident materialism and sexual implications of such descriptions, but, as the Encyclopaedia of Islam says, even orthodox Muslim theologians such as al Ghazali (died 1111 CE) and Al-Ash´ari (died 935 CE) have "admitted sensual pleasures into paradise". The sensual pleasures are graphically elaborated by Al-Suyuti (died 1505 ), Koranic commentator and polymath. He wrote: "Each time we sleep with a houri we find her virgin. Besides, the penis of the Elected never softens. The erection is eternal; the sensation that you feel each time you make love is utterly delicious and out of this world and were you to experience it in this world you would faint. Each chosen one [ie Muslim] will marry seventy [sic] houris, besides the women he married on earth, and all will have appetising vaginas."
A kind of spiritual Viagra?   
Edited (8/30/2009) by _AE_
|
|
271. |
30 Aug 2009 Sun 12:47 am |
However...not wanting to dampen your spirit, "modern apologists of Islam try to downplay the evident materialism and sexual implications of such descriptions, but, as the Encyclopaedia of Islam says, even orthodox Muslim theologians such as al Ghazali (died 1111 CE) and Al-Ash´ari (died 935 CE) have "admitted sensual pleasures into paradise". The sensual pleasures are graphically elaborated by Al-Suyuti (died 1505 ), Koranic commentator and polymath. He wrote: "Each time we sleep with a houri we find her virgin. Besides, the penis of the Elected never softens. The erection is eternal; the sensation that you feel each time you make love is utterly delicious and out of this world and were you to experience it in this world you would faint. Each chosen one [ie Muslim] will marry seventy [sic] houris, besides the women he married on earth, and all will have appetising vaginas."
A kind of spiritual Viagra?   
I am just back from a vacation in Southern Turkey. If you see all those foreign chicks looking for it on the beaches, you will know that old Gazali was not far off.
Edited (8/30/2009) by AlphaF
|
|
272. |
30 Aug 2009 Sun 05:45 pm |
Well
I am telling you you are wrong. Those islamic scholars would spend their times trying paing a rosy picture about Islam.
But the reality, the way it is interpreted and applied are different..
I have already told you that women in my country call themselves "dirty" during their mensturation !!!
not only in your country. christian women during periods are "dirty" either.
maybe it is already not articulated nowadays bec of being politically incorrect, but still
|
|
273. |
30 Aug 2009 Sun 06:49 pm |
not only in your country. christian women during periods are "dirty" either.
maybe it is already not articulated nowadays bec of being politically incorrect, but still
That´s why I´m happy I´m not religious. Nobody is going to make me feel inferior for being a woman and having a natural, healthy, life-giving cycle. The misogyny of religions is just breathtaking.
|
|
274. |
30 Aug 2009 Sun 07:38 pm |
not only in your country. christian women during periods are "dirty" either.
maybe it is already not articulated nowadays bec of being politically incorrect, but still
I don´t know which country you are from raindrops,but in my country nobody treats a woman during menstruation time as a "dirty"one.Although most of population are Christians and Catholics.
It is the wisdom of Dabrowskis population to treat such things as a normal process, nobody here makes a big fuss about it.Neither religious or non.
|
|
275. |
30 Aug 2009 Sun 07:47 pm |
That´s why I´m happy I´m not religious. Nobody is going to make me feel inferior for being a woman and having a natural, healthy, life-giving cycle. The misogyny of religions is just breathtaking.
What ever you want to say regarding the naturalness of menses....it is waste matter being expelled. It does not smell fresh...in fact it´s pretty stinky. What is being eliminated is the endometrium and blood. If it were to stay inside you, it would kill you as it rotts internaly in your body.
Many women are incapacitated by menstral cramps. In fact most women are not in their top physical cndition during their menses.
I wouldn´t say this makes females inferior. In fact, I´ve heard there are benefits to this monthly renewal...but still a menstrating woman can be stinky. I don´t know about you, but I can very often know who is in their menses by their odor.
|
|
276. |
30 Aug 2009 Sun 07:57 pm |
Too much information!
|
|
277. |
30 Aug 2009 Sun 08:05 pm |
Anything - wrongly told - about women does effect my life. It effects ideas how people - all over the world - look at women, see them as second class people, treat them as second class people, treat them as if they are not mature enough to make decisions by themselves. But probably you are too self-centred to see things in a broader view.
Trudy,
Can´t you just learn to accept others´ beliefs´? If it´s not harming someone or others to do so, then why should you care what other people choose to do and practice in the privacy of their own homes? Why are you making a fuss? That´s the rule of Islam and just because you think it´s wrong doesn´t mean it going to change anything. It´s not wrong - I don´t see a problem with that, I´m a woman myself. I don´t have sex during my period because to be quite honest it makes a mess and it´s gross. It´s not harming you so don´t continue to argue because this argument will never end.
|
|
278. |
30 Aug 2009 Sun 08:06 pm |
What ever you want to say regarding the naturalness of menses....it is waste matter being expelled. It does not smell fresh...in fact it´s pretty stinky. What is being eliminated is the endometrium and blood. If it were to stay inside you, it would kill you as it rotts internaly in your body.
Many women are incapacitated by menstral cramps. In fact most women are not in their top physical cndition during their menses.
I wouldn´t say this makes females inferior. In fact, I´ve heard there are benefits to this monthly renewal...but still a menstrating woman can be stinky. I don´t know about you, but I can very often know who is in their menses by their odor.
I would recommend improving personal hygine. It´ll help with the smell, I promise.
Whether or not the issue is related to physical uncleanliness or just general ignorance of people in Biblical times (and in current times as well), women in the Bible are treated as social pariahs (as is anybody who touches a menstruating woman). But worry not all one needs to do is sacrifice a pigeon so she can atone for her condition. As if that was something a woman needed to apologize for! I don´t know how the issue is treated in Islam, but my guess would be none the better.
Edited (8/30/2009) by Melek1974
[Addition]
|
|
279. |
30 Aug 2009 Sun 09:27 pm |
I would recommend improving personal hygine. It´ll help with the smell, I promise.
That was exactly what I was thinking!!!
|
|
280. |
30 Aug 2009 Sun 09:59 pm |
...... in my country nobody treats a woman during menstruation time as a "dirty"one.Although most of population are Christians and Catholics.
It is the wisdom of Dabrowskis population to treat such things as a normal process, nobody here makes a big fuss about it.Neither religious or non.
VIVA POLONYA!!!!
|
|
281. |
30 Aug 2009 Sun 11:23 pm |
Not all turkish are religious.
|
|
282. |
31 Aug 2009 Mon 12:44 am |
Deleted
Edited (8/31/2009) by AlphaF
|
|
283. |
31 Aug 2009 Mon 12:45 am |
" I would recommend improving personal hygine. It´ll help with the smell, I promise"
Lets get a few things straight regarding fasting of ladies in mensturation periods. I will not be surprised if what I have to say does not make full sense to the uninitiated, but it is the best I can do.
1. The term "dirty" used in association with ladies in such periods is not simply related to insuffiency or total lack of personal hygene. It is more related to staus of that person´s spritual cleanliness or spiritual fitness to qualify for worship.
2. In other words, a person can be in perfect hygenically clean physical conditions (men or women), yet may not qualify to face his creator in worship. He or she has to fulfill a certain ritual to elevate (cleanse) his spirit before he is elligible to worship.
3. Examples of such conditions that may get a person into this "unfit to worship" status include sexual intercourse or ladies mensturation periods. The situations however are not considered derogatory or humiliating in any respect. All one has to do is to go through a very simple religious ritual to restore his/her spiritual elligibility to worship.
4. I will spare you the details of the required ritual. It will suffice to say that it involves only a considered declaration of "intention" to achieve spiritual cleanliness and a few simple ritualistic steps.
5. To summerize,
- Fasting is form of worshipping,
- One needs to attain a certain level of spiritual purity to qualify for any kind of worship, which necessary level of purity may be impaired after certain specified actions.
- Such actions that may impair one´s elligibility to worship may be of natural causes hence are not necessarily humiliating for such persons (ex: having sexual intercourse, mensturation, masturbation etc.). The only requirement is that one´s impaired spiritual purity level has to be restored back to required levels - thru a simple religious ritual- as soon as such conditions or acts are over.
6. By a religious definition, ( it does not matter if she takes 16 baths a day or uses 12 diiferent parfumes all at the same time) MENSTURATION PERIOD is a stretch of time during which no religious ritual can restore a lady´s spiritual cleanliness to quallify her as fit for worshiping. She is not considered abnormal, unnatural or looked down upon during such periods, but simply excused from all obligations to worship. Say, if the period comes in the middle of Ramadan, (a) considered as unfit to worship, she will simply stop fasting (or any other form of worship) for that many days, (b) once the period is over, restore her elligibility to worship by going thru the required ritual and continue fasting for the remainder of the month.
She will however, be expected to fast for an equal number of days to make up for the missed days, after the month of Ramadan. No hard feelings anywhere....
That is just about it, folks !
|
|
284. |
31 Aug 2009 Mon 01:10 am |
During menstruation i feel..great i can say...even if hurts bad. Ã never feel as much woman as in menstruation time. Ãts a blessing. A woman can have sexual intercourse from 10-11 years old ( we often hear on tv) since 70 or more...but cannot procreate all her life! So on menstuation time i need to feel more close to God and thank him for this gift : to be able to procreate .
Edited (8/31/2009) by ReyhanL
[add]
Edited (8/31/2009) by ReyhanL
[.]
|
|
285. |
31 Aug 2009 Mon 02:42 am |
I`m wondering how this topic got from ramadan to menstruation. I suspect gg hijacked the thread. 
|
|
286. |
31 Aug 2009 Mon 03:02 am |
I can´t help posting this:
I don´t trust women. I mean, how can you trust something that bleeds for a few days every month and doesn´t die?

That´s about the only thing that came to my mind reading the above posts. So...men-created religions treat menstruating women as dirty? Surprise, surprise. And believe the dead endometrium cells influence spiritual impurity? Geez, that must mean soul is located at the entrance to the uterus 
I come from a very religious country but Dobrowskis treat religion as tradition of christening, communion and white weddings. I know some of my friends have sex during their or their partners´ period while some don´t. And it´s not religion influencing that but personal preference. Actually everybody treat menstruation as a normal thing. We don´t inform people that we´re menstruating but we´re not ashamed of it either. I´ve never met anyone considering women impure just because it was that part of the cycle...
|
|
287. |
31 Aug 2009 Mon 03:04 am |
I can´t help posting this:
I don´t trust women. I mean, how can you trust something that bleeds for a few days every month and doesn´t die?
ahahahah wasn`t it Al Bundy who said that? but it`s so true 
|
|
288. |
31 Aug 2009 Mon 10:52 am |
I don´t know which country you are from raindrops,but in my country nobody treats a woman during menstruation time as a "dirty"one.Although most of population are Christians and Catholics.
It is the wisdom of Dabrowskis population to treat such things as a normal process, nobody here makes a big fuss about it.Neither religious or non.
look, we think by categories of time we live in. it was just different when these rules were created.
did women have pads and so on 300-500 years ago? in my country you won´t be let to enter the church during the periods (if anybody knows, of course , but it does not change the ancient rule). and it is understandable. can you imagine the small room with many people in (sweat (of course we all got used to be washed before going to church, but antiperspirants are too modern to be considered), candles, incense, unique smells of different people) and odor of periods of women ... blood is hard to wash out, plus smell etc... many people would faint of such bouquet of aromas.
We tend to consider "dirty" figurative, but if we take it directly it will have more sense. Sex during periods was also NO bec smegma can cause erosion during the normal days, and more likely to do so during periods. when you have wound on your arm you cover it, protect from dirt.
now circumstances changed and reasons for ancient rules are forgotten. thus, women are fighting for their rights and for being equal. with time rules will be changed either it will be very natural. just minds are slower to be changed.
from other hand being women makes hard to accept that you are less than men. though from the position of agriculture it is perfectly expedient: periods 12 times a year or pregnancy each year, less powered muscles etc. Thus, absurdity and ineptitude of certain rules today does not mean their vainness in the past.
|
|
289. |
31 Aug 2009 Mon 06:57 pm |
thanks for support )))
in fact i m not doubting, i just know what he doesnt 
is he already legend of the TC ? demonic one?
though, having good opponent is exciting )
Raindrops..We are still waiting 
|
|
290. |
31 Aug 2009 Mon 10:32 pm |
Raindrops..We are still waiting 
i m writing. it takes time. i also need some sources not to be unfounded.
greatly appreciate your patience in advance!
|
|
291. |
01 Sep 2009 Tue 01:56 am |
i m writing. it takes time. i also need some sources not to be unfounded.
greatly appreciate your patience in advance!
(on behalf of thehandsom) - ´oh goodee but you did say Monday!)
|
|
292. |
01 Sep 2009 Tue 01:57 am |
(on behalf of thehandsom)

|
|
293. |
01 Sep 2009 Tue 07:29 pm |
Raindrops..We are still waiting 
I would start with one note: info below needs thinking and open mind. Do not reject for the reason of being ridiculous. Think more, search more. This info is really very interesting (and I cannot write here everything), but hard to believe at first. Thus, I talked to historians and they said that most probably it is true. Because information they have now is not system. Facts contradict each other. Nevertheless, unless it is officially accepted none can use it in science (at last millions of dissertations were made and proved based on usual information). SO, try to wide your consciousness first and then read.
We know history that never existed. Why so? Till about XVI century there was great empire from Western Europe to America, including Turkey, Persia, part of India, China, North of Africa – all territories we are aware of many local empires on. Of course, local “managers” at last wanted to became local kings and started the process of dividing. We know it as Reformation in Germany (for example there are some manuscripts telling that Germans were deadly afraid of Russians who would come and punish). There were two centres: in modern Russia and in Istanbul. After empire collapsed (mainly in Western Europe) to prevent other parts to restore former system history was changed. Old manuscripts were burnt and new written. New with new dates, some facts left away etc. Thus, history we know today was written by Miller and Scaliger. Empire was ruled from Russian territory, at that time new dynasty of Romanoff came.
Jerusalem means just Holly place for certain nation, people. As well as Mekka. So there were many jerusalems in the past, it modern Jerusalem is not one mentioned in the Bible as at that time it was not proper noun. There are several sources of description of Jerusalem and there is only one city that corresponds with them. It is Istanbul. Scaliger’s version says that Magomet II (sorry for spelling) conquered Istanbul and adds well known fact how boats were moved on land to Golden Horn. Russians have the same fact about their King Oleg who conquered Istanbul in the same way, but in X century. Though, this story is unique… there is painting in National library of Paris made by contemporary of conquer. Historians today agree with everything, but: clothes and arms of ottomans-atamans (in Russian): no turbans but Me helmets, no crescent but dragons and two-headed eagle…
Bible tells us measures of Solomon temple. They are measures of Ayasofia, which was built by Suleyman (king Solomon). Sofia did not go deeper into ground as it is seen with really old buildings and churches (s temple of st.Irina or small sofia). There are no signs of windows too close to the ground. It means that there is good basement and it is mentioned by Djelal Essad, Turkish historian, who also wrote about 25 foots of concrete (!) in the basement. Ayasofia was first experience. Huge dome was too heavy, thus temple today has many “additions”. Suleyman built Sofia in 1550-1557 years (temple was absent on maps of earlier periods). Sofia was covered by gold from inside as it is mentioned about temple of Solomon in Bible. Being first try of megalith construction it was the last as well due to Scaliger, bec nothing like that was built next to Sofia. Though if we look around we will see many Huge temples=mosques in Istanbul.
Solomon’s temple was built out of bricks (die to Bible) and we see it in Sofia. Bricks were invented ar XV-XVI century. Muslims do not recognize drawings of animals or people, as Christians do in their churches. Though frescos of Sofia were plastered in the middle of XVIII century. Before that Sofia was main temple of the city and burial-vault sultans. It became burial-vault at XVI century, right after it was built as it was usual practice. It was natural for that time because at that time two religions were together, as well Russian and Arabian languages were official languages of empire, nevertheless, people used Turkic for everyday life. They prayed mixing prayers to Allah and Jesus, from Kuran and Bible, on Russian then Persian then Turkic …
Sultan prayed in Sofia, why would they if Suleyman built Blue Mosque? He and his progeny gifted Sofia candles, jars for water to be consecrated. Khans of Crimea went to orthodox temples to ask the Blessed Virgin for a victory. After getting Crimea turks made Uspenski temple the residence of metropolitan in 1475.
And so on. There are many more facts: in the history of Western Europe, Russia, China, Egypt and all old world we have known from school age. Though we learnt faked history.
post is chaotic, but hope you get a clue.
|
|
294. |
01 Sep 2009 Tue 08:25 pm |
We know history that never existed. ... After empire collapsed (mainly in Western Europe) to prevent other parts to restore former system history was changed. Old manuscripts were burnt and new written. New with new dates, some facts left away etc. Thus, history we know today was written by Miller and Scaliger. ...
Wow, that reads like a George Orwell´s novel. A huge conspiracy and all the historians are in on it (except the ones that you talked to). To say this is far fetched is a huge and polite understatement.
|
|
295. |
01 Sep 2009 Tue 08:47 pm |
Wow, Im about to burn my books on history after reading this comment.
I would start with one note: info below needs thinking and open mind. Do not reject for the reason of being ridiculous. Think more, search more. This info is really very interesting (and I cannot write here everything), but hard to believe at first. Thus, I talked to historians and they said that most probably it is true. Because information they have now is not system. Facts contradict each other. Nevertheless, unless it is officially accepted none can use it in science (at last millions of dissertations were made and proved based on usual information). SO, try to wide your consciousness first and then read.
We know history that never existed. Why so? Till about XVI century there was great empire from Western Europe to America, including Turkey, Persia, part of India, China, North of Africa – all territories we are aware of many local empires on. Of course, local “managers” at last wanted to became local kings and started the process of dividing. We know it as Reformation in Germany (for example there are some manuscripts telling that Germans were deadly afraid of Russians who would come and punish). There were two centres: in modern Russia and in Istanbul. After empire collapsed (mainly in Western Europe) to prevent other parts to restore former system history was changed. Old manuscripts were burnt and new written. New with new dates, some facts left away etc. Thus, history we know today was written by Miller and Scaliger. Empire was ruled from Russian territory, at that time new dynasty of Romanoff came.
Jerusalem means just Holly place for certain nation, people. As well as Mekka. So there were many jerusalems in the past, it modern Jerusalem is not one mentioned in the Bible as at that time it was not proper noun. There are several sources of description of Jerusalem and there is only one city that corresponds with them. It is Istanbul. Scaliger’s version says that Magomet II (sorry for spelling) conquered Istanbul and adds well known fact how boats were moved on land to Golden Horn. Russians have the same fact about their King Oleg who conquered Istanbul in the same way, but in X century. Though, this story is unique… there is painting in National library of Paris made by contemporary of conquer. Historians today agree with everything, but: clothes and arms of ottomans-atamans (in Russian): no turbans but Me helmets, no crescent but dragons and two-headed eagle…
Bible tells us measures of Solomon temple. They are measures of Ayasofia, which was built by Suleyman (king Solomon). Sofia did not go deeper into ground as it is seen with really old buildings and churches (s temple of st.Irina or small sofia). There are no signs of windows too close to the ground. It means that there is good basement and it is mentioned by Djelal Essad, Turkish historian, who also wrote about 25 foots of concrete (!) in the basement. Ayasofia was first experience. Huge dome was too heavy, thus temple today has many “additions”. Suleyman built Sofia in 1550-1557 years (temple was absent on maps of earlier periods). Sofia was covered by gold from inside as it is mentioned about temple of Solomon in Bible. Being first try of megalith construction it was the last as well due to Scaliger, bec nothing like that was built next to Sofia. Though if we look around we will see many Huge temples=mosques in Istanbul.
Solomon’s temple was built out of bricks (die to Bible) and we see it in Sofia. Bricks were invented ar XV-XVI century. Muslims do not recognize drawings of animals or people, as Christians do in their churches. Though frescos of Sofia were plastered in the middle of XVIII century. Before that Sofia was main temple of the city and burial-vault sultans. It became burial-vault at XVI century, right after it was built as it was usual practice. It was natural for that time because at that time two religions were together, as well Russian and Arabian languages were official languages of empire, nevertheless, people used Turkic for everyday life. They prayed mixing prayers to Allah and Jesus, from Kuran and Bible, on Russian then Persian then Turkic …
Sultan prayed in Sofia, why would they if Suleyman built Blue Mosque? He and his progeny gifted Sofia candles, jars for water to be consecrated. Khans of Crimea went to orthodox temples to ask the Blessed Virgin for a victory. After getting Crimea turks made Uspenski temple the residence of metropolitan in 1475.
And so on. There are many more facts: in the history of Western Europe, Russia, China, Egypt and all old world we have known from school age. Though we learnt faked history.
post is chaotic, but hope you get a clue.
|
|
296. |
01 Sep 2009 Tue 08:50 pm |
Wow, that reads like a George Orwell´s novel. A huge conspiracy and all the historians are in on it (except the ones that you talked to). To say this is far fetched is a huge and polite understatement.
if you are not historian you are unaware of news that certain manuscripts are faked. you dont know that chronicle of Evsevia is base for 3/4 dates we operate, and it was recognized as faked. that ancient manuscripts were in fact issued by monasteries by 400 volumes. they are "based" on some documents that never were seen since that. that certain monasteries in different part of europe were responsible for certain themes to be published - what a coherency! we mainly use their volumes, arabian and eastern historians were almost forgotten bec west could not collaborate with east with the same efficiency.
in XVI Fridrih Prussian torn pictures of Luther and went to bed fully armed as was scared of russians and turks coming to punish him for reformation. that russian metropolitan wore mitre decorated with many gems, one of which, right above the cross, had Arabic character, as well as russian swords and other arm. That some sayings in catholic temples and churches in wester europe could be read if you knwo Glagolitic alphabet, later transformed into Cyrillic (personnel call such inscription - unreadable). you were not shown pictures of russian tsars wearing turbans. that chronology of china is based on list of comets seen, which never existed as nowadays scientists proved...
Edited (9/1/2009) by raindrops
|
|
297. |
01 Sep 2009 Tue 09:09 pm |
if you are not historian you are unaware of news that certain manuscripts are faked. you dont know that chronicle of Evsevia is base for 3/4 dates we operate, and it was recognized as faked. that ancient manuscripts were in fact issued by monasteries by 400 volumes. they are "based" on some documents that never were seen since that. that certain monasteries in different part of europe were responsible for certain themes to be published - what a coherency! we mainly use their volumes, arabian and eastern historians were almost forgotten bec west could not collaborate with east with the same efficiency.
in XVI Fridrih Prussian torn pictures of Luther and went to bed fully armed as was scared of russians and turks coming to punish him for reformation. that russian metropolitan wore mitre decorated with many gems, one of which, right above the cross, had Arabic character, as well as russian swords and other arm. That some sayings in catholic temples and churches in wester europe could be read if you knwo Glagolitic alphabet, later transformed into Cyrillic (personnel call such inscription - unreadable). you were not shown pictures of russian tsars wearing turbans. that chronology of china is based on list of comets seen, which never existed as nowadays scientists proved...
It might be helpful for us "not historians" to be pointed to some credible, preferably peer-reviewed sources, which would help us to update our knowledge. I´m not a fundementalist when it comes to history or science, I´ll be more than happy to change my perception of historical facts when faced with intellectually satisfying evidence. 
|
|
298. |
01 Sep 2009 Tue 09:13 pm |
history is always subjective. Even if things are written in stone, it was a bunch of people who put it there.
|
|
299. |
01 Sep 2009 Tue 09:23 pm |
It might be helpful for us "not historians" to be pointed to some credible, preferably peer-reviewed sources, which would help us to update our knowledge. I´m not a fundementalist when it comes to history or science, I´ll be more than happy to change my perception of historical facts when faced with intellectually satisfying evidence. 
read Uve Topper for example
|
|
300. |
01 Sep 2009 Tue 09:46 pm |
read Uve Topper for example
Yeah, well, that´s going to be a problem. I just checked in my library and the only books by him I could get (as an interlibrary loan) would be in Bulgarian or Russian. And there´s absolutely ZERO journal articles authored by him in any scientific journals. 
There´s some stuff about him online, but how reliable is it really? I mean do I trust Wikipedia or historians? Tough choice.
P.S. I apologize if I´m coming across as making fun. I´m just being very sceptical about the theory as it seems outlandish. I´m sure it´s an interesting theory though and might be worth exploring further. I just don´t think a global conspiracy about historical facts is even remotly possible.
Edited (9/1/2009) by Melek74
|
|
301. |
01 Sep 2009 Tue 09:53 pm |
read Uve Topper for example
Uwe Topper (born 194 is a German amateur researcher and author of books about historic, ethnographic and anthropological subjects.
Topper published in 1977 Das Erbe der Giganten (The Legacy of the Giants), a book about the prehistory of Spain and the Western Mediterranean basin. The main thesis interpretes the remnant of very early high cultures there as the basis for Plato´s Atlantis.
|
|
302. |
03 Sep 2009 Thu 01:59 pm |
I would start with one note: info below needs thinking and open mind. Do not reject for the reason of being ridiculous. Think more, search more. This info is really very interesting (and I cannot write here everything), but hard to believe at first. Thus, I talked to historians and they said that most probably it is true. Because information they have now is not system. Facts contradict each other. Nevertheless, unless it is officially accepted none can use it in science (at last millions of dissertations were made and proved based on usual information). SO, try to wide your consciousness first and then read.
We know history that never existed. Why so? Till about XVI century there was great empire from Western Europe to America, including Turkey, Persia, part of India, China, North of Africa – all territories we are aware of many local empires on. Of course, local “managers” at last wanted to became local kings and started the process of dividing. We know it as Reformation in Germany (for example there are some manuscripts telling that Germans were deadly afraid of Russians who would come and punish). There were two centres: in modern Russia and in Istanbul. After empire collapsed (mainly in Western Europe) to prevent other parts to restore former system history was changed. Old manuscripts were burnt and new written. New with new dates, some facts left away etc. Thus, history we know today was written by Miller and Scaliger. Empire was ruled from Russian territory, at that time new dynasty of Romanoff came.
Jerusalem means just Holly place for certain nation, people. As well as Mekka. So there were many jerusalems in the past, it modern Jerusalem is not one mentioned in the Bible as at that time it was not proper noun. There are several sources of description of Jerusalem and there is only one city that corresponds with them. It is Istanbul. Scaliger’s version says that Magomet II (sorry for spelling) conquered Istanbul and adds well known fact how boats were moved on land to Golden Horn. Russians have the same fact about their King Oleg who conquered Istanbul in the same way, but in X century. Though, this story is unique… there is painting in National library of Paris made by contemporary of conquer. Historians today agree with everything, but: clothes and arms of ottomans-atamans (in Russian): no turbans but Me helmets, no crescent but dragons and two-headed eagle…
Bible tells us measures of Solomon temple. They are measures of Ayasofia, which was built by Suleyman (king Solomon). Sofia did not go deeper into ground as it is seen with really old buildings and churches (s temple of st.Irina or small sofia). There are no signs of windows too close to the ground. It means that there is good basement and it is mentioned by Djelal Essad, Turkish historian, who also wrote about 25 foots of concrete (!) in the basement. Ayasofia was first experience. Huge dome was too heavy, thus temple today has many “additions”. Suleyman built Sofia in 1550-1557 years (temple was absent on maps of earlier periods). Sofia was covered by gold from inside as it is mentioned about temple of Solomon in Bible. Being first try of megalith construction it was the last as well due to Scaliger, bec nothing like that was built next to Sofia. Though if we look around we will see many Huge temples=mosques in Istanbul.
Solomon’s temple was built out of bricks (die to Bible) and we see it in Sofia. Bricks were invented ar XV-XVI century. Muslims do not recognize drawings of animals or people, as Christians do in their churches. Though frescos of Sofia were plastered in the middle of XVIII century. Before that Sofia was main temple of the city and burial-vault sultans. It became burial-vault at XVI century, right after it was built as it was usual practice. It was natural for that time because at that time two religions were together, as well Russian and Arabian languages were official languages of empire, nevertheless, people used Turkic for everyday life. They prayed mixing prayers to Allah and Jesus, from Kuran and Bible, on Russian then Persian then Turkic …
Sultan prayed in Sofia, why would they if Suleyman built Blue Mosque? He and his progeny gifted Sofia candles, jars for water to be consecrated. Khans of Crimea went to orthodox temples to ask the Blessed Virgin for a victory. After getting Crimea turks made Uspenski temple the residence of metropolitan in 1475.
And so on. There are many more facts: in the history of Western Europe, Russia, China, Egypt and all old world we have known from school age. Though we learnt faked history.
post is chaotic, but hope you get a clue.
First of all thank you for your lengthy reply..
It was very interesting to read..
But I dont think I will ever believe what you are saying up there..
I dont know which empire you are stating there, which was collapsed and when...
Do you mean Romans?
And also as far as the dates are concerned in nowadays there are many scientific approaches to determine the dates of the object with pretty good accuracy..
I dont think there will be anything wrong with the dates..And do not forget , we are talking about the some objects and buildings related to Ottomans and they were very very meticulous about keeping the records!!
Suleyman/Sinan ´repaired´ Hagia Sophia and they always used it since they captured Istanbul because it is a fantastic building..Blue mosque (which was built by Sultan Ahmed) does not come close to Hagia Sophia in my view (thinking of that, in my view, it is only only Sinan´s mosque in Edirne can match to Hagia Sophia)..
But thanks
|
|
303. |
03 Sep 2009 Thu 07:34 pm |
Who can give me a statistic of car accidents on..lets say Ãstanbul during Ramazan and on a normal month ?
One has to be an idiot if he/she drives while fasting, aware that fasting lowers his driving capability....There are not many such idiots in Istanbul.
|
|
304. |
03 Sep 2009 Thu 07:42 pm |
One has to be an idiot if he/she drives while fasting, aware that fasting lowers his driving capability....There are not many such idiots in Istanbul.
Maalesef there are. At beginning of Ramazan i saw a small lorry just 500 meters after crossing the giþe on highway. Lost control got of and rolled itself 3 or 4 times. The driver had just few scratches. When people who stopped to see what happend ofered him watter he refused. So he was fasting. My convert-to-islam friend said to me ´ see he is fasting thats why Allah protected him´ . à thing because of fasting he had the accident!
Was around 3 p.m. and very hot outside.
Edited (9/3/2009) by ReyhanL
[add]
|
|
|