Welcome
Login:   Pass:     Register - Forgot Password - Resend Activation

Turkish Class Forums / General/Off-topic

General/Off-topic

Thread locked by a moderator or admin.
Religion....
(216 Messages in 22 pages - View all)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ...  >>
1.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 08 Dec 2007 Sat 05:22 pm

As an agnostic, I am genuinely curious as to why you believe in God/Allah.

Have you made any theological investigations into your faith, or is it just because your parents/culture taught you to believe and you have never felt it necessary to question it?

If you believe in God/Allah (without requiring proof) and have absolute faith, why are you insulted when people (like myself) question the validity of your religion?

Have any of you ever changed religion (for reasons OTHER than because you married someone of another faith - which, frankly, is absurd!)?


ADMIN'S NOTE: This thread is only allowed if you speak of your personal thoughts and don't try to persuade or argue with each other or make universal statements about religion and/or who/what is right or wrong.

2.       lovebug
280 posts
 08 Dec 2007 Sat 05:55 pm

I guess mostly it is what you were brought up with. I, as a Roman Catholic, grew up going to Catholic school and going to church every Sunday. Of course, in Religion class, I would always question the priests by asking "if God is everywhere, why do you say you can not get married outside of a church, like on a beach or in a field." I also don't believe in confession. I don't feel I need to go through a "middle man" to tell God I am sorry or how I feel.

As I have gotten older, I still believe in God. I love him and thank him for all my blessings. This is what makes ME happy. Having said that, I no longer go to church on Sundays. I just believe in trying to be kind to one another (and of course, being human I falter on that one). I certainly don't judge people on what they think or believe. I feel it is a very personal matter. I work with someone that is still a "christian", but of a different sect then catholic. He is very judgemental and believes his way is the only way. This is such a contradiction. I have also experienced this with my father's side of the family, they are Baptist and look down on Catholics. I never understood how someone can say they believe in God and love him and treat someone else like this.

I think because of some of these experiences, I make my religion a personal matter between me and God. I don't believe in "organized" religion. I think sometimes this is where problems arise. I certainly am not speaking for anyone else. Like I said this is a personal thing for me and I finally feel happy and at peace.

3.       christine_usa
284 posts
 08 Dec 2007 Sat 06:02 pm

Hi Wendy!

I'm in your boat too! I'm quite spiritual- but not religious. I think Allah, Jesus, Buddha, Brahma.... they're all part of this huge universal godforce both outside and inside every organism!

How else can one explain the profound mysteries of life, love, joy and fate?

4.       KeithL
1455 posts
 08 Dec 2007 Sat 06:12 pm

I have truly seen miracles in my life. I do believe in God and its not only because my parents raised me that way.
I think having a good spiritual relationship with God is like a marraige. Its not easy. There are good times and bad. Its hard work at times and maybe too easy to give up. But if you have faith and work hard, your reward will come.

5.       lovebug
280 posts
 08 Dec 2007 Sat 06:36 pm

I agree with you both, Christine and Keith. One just has to look at nature or what they have to be thankful for in their lives.

Don't get me wrong. I believe in God, I just don't believe you have to go to church every Sunday to show your love for Him.

6.       teaschip
3870 posts
 09 Dec 2007 Sun 02:22 am

Quoting KeithL:

I have truly seen miracles in my life. I do believe in God and its not only because my parents raised me that way.
I think having a good spiritual relationship with God is like a marraige. Its not easy. There are good times and bad. Its hard work at times and maybe too easy to give up. But if you have faith and work hard, your reward will come.



Wow, I'm actually agreeing with Keith remember this moment...very well said and believe it or not I have missed your posts here.

7.       excalibur89
13 posts
 09 Dec 2007 Sun 08:16 am

Quoting christine_usa:

Hi Wendy!

I'm in your boat too! I'm quite spiritual- but not religious. I think Allah, Jesus, Buddha, Brahma.... they're all part of this huge universal godforce both outside and inside every organism!

How else can one explain the profound mysteries of life, love, joy and fate?



An excellent statement! I agree.....A good Muslilm,a good hindu,a good christian, a good buddhist,a good jew....etc.are not very defferent. Some may pray standing up,some may pray kneeling in a pew, some make pray kneeling on a carpet.Each religion has it's own great traditions. does it really matter?If you go about your life being a good person ( you dont even have to be a VERY good person)just be a productive part of your society.Whether it be a student,son, daughter, mother or father. Living in the U.S. I have had the opportunity to know MANY muslims,christians,Jews,hindus buddhist's etc. We all eat different foods,listen to different music,like different things. Being raised a christian (catholic) i dont believe my religion is superior to others, We mutually respect each other. the one thing that stands out that tells me people are not all that much different is the way we all raise our children.People that i know with different religious beliefs raise their children to be respectful,productive members of their society.
Gandhi made a statement which contributed to his being killed by his own people.He said "I am both Muslim and Hindu"
Thank god the extremists of the world are very few in numbers.

8.       teaschip
3870 posts
 09 Dec 2007 Sun 09:03 am

I was brought up Catholic and went to private Catholic schools all of my life. I will admit that religion has been a huge part of my life. However, I believe you lead by example and my parents whom I believe are very fortunate to live a very healthy spirtual life, drove the path for me as an adult.

I'm very open minded to other religions, I may not agree with some of their teachings or beliefs, however I never have had the thought that my religion was any better than the next.

For me giving up an hour a week on Sundays, to praise God is the least I can do to respect the person I believe who died for us. What I get out of church the most is an hour of reflection of how my week went, how my upcoming week will go. Anyone who goes to church may take something different away from it.

I don't have the fear that if I don't believe or go to church that I will be condemed to hell. For me it's more of a spirtual uplifting that I need at times to keep me in check.

Scientifically speaking, it can be hard to comprehend for some who need proof. For me the proof is all around me, my family, friends, love, life itself. Sometimes even though people who have deep spirtual beliefs even struggle at the most difficult times. Why disease, why pain, why death...it's so unfair..if there was a God why would he allow this to happen.

These are the most difficult times when your faith is challenged and put to the test. Some people turn to God and some blame him.

For me if there is the remote possibility that their is a God, I would rather take the chance and embrace him. The question for me is, What do I have to loose? An hour a week. What do I have to gain? Peace of mind, which to me is a sense of spirtual fullfillment.

9.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 09 Dec 2007 Sun 11:26 am

Quoting AEnigma III:

ADMIN'S NOTE: This thread is only allowed if you speak of your personal thoughts and don't try to persuade or argue with each other



Yuck! I created a monster then.
Will leave this thread well alone

10.       hanan
197 posts
 09 Dec 2007 Sun 12:20 pm

[post edited by admin]


when i was young i was believing in allah only coz i found myself as a muslim and i had never feel the faith or the excestance of allah, but day after day when i had bad days "actually so bad days" i relized the difference between having and not having faith ,
and now i know that when i have faith it is much easier to lay all your hard moments and share them with allah and believe me he had been,is,and will be helpful always.
and now for me it is do different to read holy quran and to feel it.

11.       Elisabeth
5732 posts
 10 Dec 2007 Mon 05:32 pm

Faith is not something you can explain or articulate. You either have it or you don't. Religion is an expression of your faith. I believe you can be an extremely ethically person without being religious.

I have seen too much in my life to ever say there is no God. I have no idea whose religion is right (I have a feeling we are all wrong in some ways and right in others) but for me personally, I have studied, questioned, agonized, prayed ect...But every Sunday, I find myself in Church, saying the same prayers my ancestors have said for centuries and feeling a profound sense of belonging and fellowship. I don't know how to put that into words. I don't know why the thought of Jesus's life, work and death can move me to tears...but they do. Maybe that makes me unsophisticated....so be it. AMEN!

12.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 10 Dec 2007 Mon 07:15 pm

This is what I believe and in no way is meant to offend anyone else's faith (note for Admin )

"An Agnostic [noun] embraces a worldview in which the existence of deity is unknown or unknowable."

Although raised as a Christian, I had doubts at an early age that my "religion" had anything to do with what the bible was telling us to do. Everything about the "church" goes against what Jesus was trying to teach people - i.e. you should not pray publically, you should not worship icons, you can talk directly to God not via a preacher or pope. Even then I could see that the church was sitting on millions of pounds while people in the world were suffering.

Since then I have looked at all other religions and found them only to be human's interuptations of how you should believe in God and all seem to me to be equally hypocritical as my own culture's religion.

I believe that if God went to enormous effort to communicate and pass on "religion" to either Jesus or Mohammad, then why was there no significant improvements after these "new" religions? Is the world free of war, suffering, cruelty? Are the prison's less full? Is there less crime? Religion has actually caused more bloodshed. Did God make a mistake then?

In my opinion religion is merely geographical culture. If the most devout muslim had been born in a western country, they would merely be a devout Christian, and vice versa.

I am a good person, I have compassion and I take action when I see suffering, I have never stolen, murdered or hurt any living thing and I respect this planet. I don't need a prophet to tell me what is right or wrong, and I dont believe any human does, unless they are mentally ill. And yet, most religions will tell me that I will burn in eternal hellfire for not having faith, while representatives of their religions kill eachother in their god's name and go to paradise/heaven!

I believe that, if there is a God, he will be quite happy with the way I lived my life, thank you. I will take my chances

13.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 10 Dec 2007 Mon 08:38 pm

Anyway, I am too busy biting my tongue...I should follow Femme's example and stay well away from this MONSTER thread I created! lol

14.       alameda
3499 posts
 10 Dec 2007 Mon 08:47 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Anyway, I am too busy biting my tongue...I should follow Femme's example and stay well away from this MONSTER thread I created! lol



Me too....

look for it if you are so disposed...don't if you are not. It can, and should not be imposed.

15.       MrX67
2540 posts
 11 Dec 2007 Tue 02:44 pm

i think religions or beliefs the latest things for discussion and thats to same blaming someone to be believer or unbeliever.Sure thats good to explain or discover everything with the guide of scienece and mind.But i believe theres never benefit on discuising about the main human rights...

16.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 11 Dec 2007 Tue 02:48 pm

Quoting MrX67:

But i believe theres never benefit on discuising about the main human rights...



:-S

17.       Cacık
296 posts
 11 Dec 2007 Tue 03:20 pm

In a sense AEnigma, it was quite good to open up this thread, at least we can share knowing what we are getting into, not hidden agenda in your topic !

I was brought up aethiest and remained that way until after living in Turkey for 5 years (I've been her longer than that now). After 5 years, I became a Christian. When I first arrived my whole in-law family were Muslims and pretty devout, I attended all the bayrams and everything. I reasearched so much into Islam and Christianity, prayed a lot, read the Bible and Quran and no matter what I did, prayed, said, felt, something very spiritually was right with Jesus Christ, son of God. His whole life, words, examples, teachings added to answered prayers made me become a Christian.

My answer is thus. Hope this helps answer your question AEnigma.

Have a nice day y'all Ya hear !!

18.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 11 Dec 2007 Tue 07:07 pm

Quoting Cacık:

In a sense AEnigma, it was quite good to open up this thread, at least we can share knowing what we are getting into, not hidden agenda in your topic !

I was brought up aethiest and remained that way until after living in Turkey for 5 years (I've been her longer than that now). After 5 years, I became a Christian. When I first arrived my whole in-law family were Muslims and pretty devout, I attended all the bayrams and everything. I reasearched so much into Islam and Christianity, prayed a lot, read the Bible and Quran and no matter what I did, prayed, said, felt, something very spiritually was right with Jesus Christ, son of God. His whole life, words, examples, teachings added to answered prayers made me become a Christian.

My answer is thus. Hope this helps answer your question AEnigma.

Have a nice day y'all Ya hear !!



That's really intresting Cacik - in your case your religion is definitely not a cultural thing and it has been a personal decision on your part after research. I think it is a very rare situation and adds sincerity to your faith Certainly more so than the "insurance religion" - i.e. "I go to church every Sunday just in case there is a God" brigade lol lol lol

19.       Cacık
296 posts
 12 Dec 2007 Wed 10:43 am

Quoting AEnigma III:

That's really intresting Cacik - in your case your religion is definitely not a cultural thing and it has been a personal decision on your part after research. I think it is a very rare situation and adds sincerity to your faith Certainly more so than the "insurance religion" - i.e. "I go to church every Sunday just in case there is a God" brigade lol lol lol



Thanks AEnigma. I think it important to see that not everyone who is a Christian or a Muslim or a Hindu ot Jew or or or.... is culturally bound into their faith. I wanted to share this because I feel it so important to understand that people really must study about faiths very very deeply and pray about it too, if that is what they want. I feel there are so many people who had a "faith" but they really know almost nothing about their "religion" and that goes for all world religions.

I do go to Church when I can, and it is uplifting and warm, like a family. Everybody knows each others names, every body feels safe and calm with each other, we can all share our difficulties and joys, sadness and celebrations, no-one criticizes when we make a mistake, you usually get a hug and a prayer if something goes wrong. There is no fear. Anyway, I may be rambling a wee bit but thanks again AEnigma for being so open.

Have a super wonderful day.

20.       Roswitha
4132 posts
 02 Feb 2008 Sat 03:09 pm

spirtual uplifting

21.       libralady
5152 posts
 02 Feb 2008 Sat 03:27 pm

I remember doubting God from a very young age. What proof was there? Was there some strange old man sitting in the clouds, showering good upon those that deserved it? Over the years my doubt grew and I questioned even more. There are more questions remain unexplained about God than ever answered.

I am also quite synical about those who profess to be religious or regularly attend church but by their actions and words they are some of the most hypocritical people known. For instance, take the priests who abuse young boys placed in their trust. What about those who profess to be Christian but would walk past an injured or sick person in the street?

Then you have the major disasters, how could a God let this happen, why did he not protect the innocent victims? Why did so many people lose not just one relative but many? How can a person who has lost 22 members of his family believe in God?

As for how the earth was created, if you believe in God, then it was He who created it, even though science proves that the world has been here for billions of years. For example, Jehovah Witnesses only believe in (AD) after Christ and don't believe in dinnosaurs when clearly they existed. Adam and Eve, impossible!

My mother is very religious and so was my Grandmother, regularly going to Church, my grandmother played the church organ. I was forced to go to church, but I was not happy and soon stopped, preferring to go fishing. I used to look around the church and wonder if God was sitting in the roof, watching me. I used to think, if there is a God make me fall of my bike on the way home. I never did!

These are just my opinions and my reasons for not believing in a God.

22.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 02 Feb 2008 Sat 03:43 pm

I guess that is why it is called "faith". Once you start to question it, much like Father Christmas, you get disappointed

23.       MrX67
2540 posts
 02 Feb 2008 Sat 10:33 pm

is brain,mind and logic enough to explain everything??

24.       catwoman
8933 posts
 02 Feb 2008 Sat 10:34 pm

Quoting MrX67:

is brain,mind and logic enough to explain everything??


Isn't it your brain, mind and logic that tells you to believe in god?

25.       MrX67
2540 posts
 02 Feb 2008 Sat 10:36 pm

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting MrX67:

is brain,mind and logic enough to explain everything??


Isn't it your brain, mind and logic that tells you to believe in god?

hehe,if only my brain could be enough for explain everything,hope urs enough for expend all question marks?

26.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 02 Feb 2008 Sat 10:39 pm

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting MrX67:

is brain,mind and logic enough to explain everything??


Isn't it your brain, mind and logic that tells you to believe in god?


I think it is not true catwoman..
Because most religious people will accept that they dont believe in religion with their brains, they believe in it with their hearths.

27.       MrX67
2540 posts
 02 Feb 2008 Sat 10:43 pm

Quoting thehandsom:

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting MrX67:

is brain,mind and logic enough to explain everything??


Isn't it your brain, mind and logic that tells you to believe in god?


I think it is not true catwoman..
Because most religious people will accept that they dont believe in religion with their brains, they believe in it with their hearths.

+1

28.       catwoman
8933 posts
 02 Feb 2008 Sat 10:47 pm

Quoting MrX67:

hehe,if only my brain could be enough for explain everything,hope urs enough for expend all question marks?


I'm not Einstein to understand everything. Some things ARE too complicated to know all the answers, and it's ok to leave it that way. But my mind tells me that God doesn't solve anything.

29.       catwoman
8933 posts
 02 Feb 2008 Sat 10:48 pm

Quoting thehandsom:

I think it is not true catwoman..
Because most religious people will accept that they dont believe in religion with their brains, they believe in it with their hearths.


Then I'd like to teach them some anatomy and physiology. lol You can't THINK with your heart!!!

30.       MrX67
2540 posts
 02 Feb 2008 Sat 10:48 pm

Universe full with so unanswered questions still,sure noone of us never deny power of mind or science,but after some line not possible to find answers of many unknowns,so religions or believe in God good way for to be aware of that we r only very lil drops in an endless universeand religions different paths for unknowns with the same self

31.       catwoman
8933 posts
 02 Feb 2008 Sat 10:52 pm

Quoting MrX67:

Universe full with so unanswered questions still,sure noone of us never deny power of mind or science,but after some line not possible to find answers of many unknowns,so religions or believe in God good way for to be aware of that we r only very lil drops in an endless universeand religions different paths for unknowns with the same self


Ok, MrX. I can see your point, although I disagree.

32.       MrX67
2540 posts
 02 Feb 2008 Sat 10:56 pm

anyway thats possible to be good person without believe in God to,so to believe or to don't believe just a personal prefer and one of the most main human right which has to keepen unless don't give harm for to others

33.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 02 Feb 2008 Sat 11:02 pm

Quoting MrX67:

Universe full with so unanswered questions still,sure noone of us never deny power of mind or science,but after some line not possible to find answers of many unknowns,so religions or believe in God good way for to be aware of that we r only very lil drops in an endless universeand religions different paths for unknowns with the same self


But, you cant deny that thousand years ago there were more unanswered questions than 500 years ago, and today we have less unanswered questions than 500 years ago.
Of course there will be always some ununswered questions.
The unanswered questions which make you believe in a religion today, will/might be answered in the future.
And believing into something because it is unknown is not very healthy thing to do.

34.       MrX67
2540 posts
 02 Feb 2008 Sat 11:08 pm

Quoting thehandsom:

Quoting MrX67:

Universe full with so unanswered questions still,sure noone of us never deny power of mind or science,but after some line not possible to find answers of many unknowns,so religions or believe in God good way for to be aware of that we r only very lil drops in an endless universeand religions different paths for unknowns with the same self


But, you cant deny that thousand years ago there were more unanswered questions than 500 years ago, and today we have less unanswered questions than 500 years ago.
Of course there will be always some ununswered questions.
The unanswered questions which make you believe in a religion today, will/might be answered in the future.
And believing into something because it is unknown is not very healthy thing to do.

and trusting more then enough to power of mind not a healthy way for keep our hearts peacfull to

35.       catwoman
8933 posts
 02 Feb 2008 Sat 11:20 pm

Quoting MrX67:

anyway thats possible to be good person without believe in God to,so to believe or to don't believe just a personal prefer and one of the most main human right which has to keepen unless don't give harm for to others


+100000000000

36.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 11:47 am

How to create your own religion!

1. You need a story
The Romans created the story of Romulus and Remus. The christians have Jesus. The muslims have Mohammad. You need a reason for the beginning of the religion.

2. Put roots in other, existing religions or philosophies. Play on what people already believe. Scientology has its roots in psychology. Christianity roots itself in judeaism. Satanism seems to root itself in greek religion and philosophy (as the satan figure has been referred to as promethean on a few accounts)

3. Form some sort of enemy or comparative opposition
Judaism seemed anti-gentile. Satanism mocks he 'pipedreams' of christianity.

4. Promise to make them happy..eventually.
Satanism is the only to promise immediate gratification. Scientology says it will come at some point, Hinduism and native americans think it may come some time in the next few lives, and christianity says it comes after judgement day.

5. Find a means of covertly isolating your people from other religions (if you want)
"though shalt not suffer a witch to live"--christian bible. Exodus, I believe. Scientology says you should not be around those who 'hinder your spiritual growth'
of course, hindus say we are all on the same path, and wiccans are taught to accept everyone, so who knows where to go with this.

6. Create rules for behavior.
Look at any religious text for this.

7. Create symbols of your religion.
Or use someone else's, like Lavayan satanism did.

8. Tell them why they are better then everyone else.
Lavay's satanic bible is like a handjob for your ego. The old testament refers to the hebrews as the chosen people, and scientology anounces certain members 'clear' (though they continue to beat there wives and emotionally abuse others)

9. A charasmatic leader

10. A set of beliefs.

11. A firm group of people to congregate and spread the word. it it not neccessary for this group of people to believe it, but helpful if the ones below them do. the ones who speak most about the religion just believe it.

(source unknown - sorry Alameda, it was sent in an email )

37.       qdemir
813 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 01:29 pm

The above post says Hz Mohammed wrote the Koran himself, or with his companions 1400 years ago. This is not a bright new claim. Quite a large number of people have put forward such a claim since the beginning of Islam. However, none of them managed to write such a book when they were asked to do (God says a similar thing in the Koran to those people; Come and try!). Considering advances in computer technology in the 21st century why don't those who make such a claim write a book similar to the Koran, and prove their claim?

38.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 01:32 pm

Quoting qdemir:

The above post says Hz Mohammed wrote the Koran himself, or with his companions 1400 years ago.



Perhaps you should read it again, it does NOT say that. It talks only of the story of Mohammad

39.       vineyards
1954 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 04:12 pm

Where English speakers say: "It takes a thief to deal with a thief", we say : "Dinsizin hakkindan imansiz gelir." meaning : "It takes a faithless person to deal with an agnostic one." The only time I found this phrase particularly meaningful was when Turkish National Soccer Team beat a tough opponent with a goal scored by Ilhan Mansiz. At that time one of the newspaper headlines read:
"Dinsizin Hakkindan I. Mansiz gelir."

It seems most faithfull people have a problem with those who don't believe. We experience the usual problems associated with being in minority. We cannot get our message through. Our choices about belief are not properly taught in schools and presented as viable options to school children. It is obvious that we non-believers are subjected to a large scale silencing campaign.



40.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 04:27 pm

Quoting vineyards:

It seems most faithfull people have a problem with those who don't believe. We experience the usual problems associated with being in minority. We cannot get our message through. Our choices about belief are not properly taught in schools and presented as viable options to school children. It is obvious that we non-believers are subjected to a large scale silencing campaign.



Its not something I experience (except on this website!). I think most people believe in God, but in the culture I live in faith is a very personal thing which is rarely discussed and does not play a obvious part in day to day lives, or interfere with it (with the exception of Jehovah's Witnesses who bang on our doors to persuade everyone to join their "faith" lol).

41.       qdemir
813 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 05:28 pm

Sometimes, people confuse the non-acceptance of something's existence with the acceptance of its non-existence. While the former is only a negation or a rejection, and it is simply a choice. No one could have anything to say or interfere, on the other hand, the latter is a judgment needing proof.

42.       Deli_kizin
6376 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 05:39 pm

Quoting qdemir:

Sometimes, people confuse the non-acceptance of something's existence with the acceptance of its non-existence. While the former is only a negation or a rejection, and it is simply a choice. No one could have anything to say or interfere, on the other hand, the latter is a judgment needing proof.




Isnt this (nearly) a quote from Fethulla Gulen?

43.       qdemir
813 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 05:47 pm

Quoting Deli_kizin:

Quoting qdemir:

Sometimes, people confuse the non-acceptance of something's existence with the acceptance of its non-existence. While the former is only a negation or a rejection, and it is simply a choice. No one could have anything to say or interfere, on the other hand, the latter is a judgment needing proof.




Isnt this (nearly) a quote from Fethulla Gulen?



Do you know him? I do read and share his views.

44.       Deli_kizin
6376 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 05:53 pm

Quote:

Quoting qdemir:

Isnt this (nearly) a quote from Fethulla Gulen?



Do you know him? I do read and share his views.



I am reading his book, I dont remembe the title, but I think I read what you just said nearly the same way about 2 weeks ago I will look it up when I get home from work.


Unfortunately I dont share his views at all and his reasons why he thinks God exists, seem very simplistic and childish to me. To be honest, the book is boring me. However, since I work at an organization who have close connection with Zaman Gazetesi, I thoght I should learn a bit about his points of view

45.       Deli_kizin
6376 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 05:55 pm

I should add that the part you quoted from him, is something I feel close to, though.

46.       qdemir
813 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 06:07 pm

Quoting Deli_kizin:



Unfortunately I dont share his views at all and his reasons why he thinks God exists, seem very simplistic and childish to me.



Does it mean you don't accept God's existince, or you have better reasoning?

I have read the same article of him. Yes it is in a plain language, but it is scientific and logical. Also I think the way he reasons God existence in a simple style makes it easy for anyone from different educational background to understand.

47.       peacetrain
1905 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 06:14 pm

Quoting qdemir:

Quoting Deli_kizin:

Quoting qdemir:

Sometimes, people confuse the non-acceptance of something's existence with the acceptance of its non-existence. While the former is only a negation or a rejection, and it is simply a choice. No one could have anything to say or interfere, on the other hand, the latter is a judgment needing proof.




Isnt this (nearly) a quote from Fethulla Gulen?



Do you know him? I do read and share his views.



Not often his name is mentioned on this site. He is someone who interests me simply because there are such opposing opinions of him.

48.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 06:16 pm

Quoting qdemir:

but it is scientific and logical.


which part is scientific?

49.       Deli_kizin
6376 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 06:16 pm

Quoting qdemir:

Does it mean you don't accept God's existince, or you have better reasoning?

I have read the same article of him. Yes it is in a plain language, but it is scientific and logical. Also I think the way he reasons God existence in a simple style makes it easy for anyone from different educational background to understand.



Yes, that is also why the book was written, to reach people who believe and people who dont believe. Its more that I expected more from it, maybe thats why it seemed such a simplistic book!

I accept the existence of a power, but I dont accept the existence of an "omni potent God-power" as described in any of the holy books. I dont have any scientific reasoning for it, but I also dont feel like I need to.

50.       qdemir
813 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 06:19 pm

Quoting femme_fatal:

Quoting qdemir:

but it is scientific and logical.


which part is scientific?



Don't you think you have got to read the article first?

51.       Deli_kizin
6376 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 06:19 pm

Quoting peace train:

Not often his name is mentioned on this site. He is someone who interests me simply because there are such opposing opinions of him.



Yes me too. That is why I started reading one of his books, where he explains (his ideas on) the basics of islamic beliefs. So that I can get my own opinion on him.

52.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 06:26 pm

Quoting qdemir:

Also I think the way he reasons God existence in a simple style makes it easy for anyone from different educational background to understand.



Maybe... or maybe it is because you can only talk about it in simplistic terms and it does not stand up to scientific scrutiny

53.       peacetrain
1905 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 06:26 pm

I bought a couple of his books when I was in Istanbul in October but I left the at my friend's home. Good reason to return soon! He has a website too and the Fountain publication is also online. I'm sure you already know though.

54.       qdemir
813 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 06:33 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting qdemir:

Also I think the way he reasons God existence in a simple style makes it easy for anyone from different educational background to understand.



Maybe... or maybe it is because you can only talk about it in simplistic terms and it does not stand up to scientific scrutiny



Honey, you had better read the article first before you make such a conclusive statement.

Here is the article:Does God exist?

The law of entropy is suffice itself to reason God's existence.

55.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 06:36 pm

Be very careful Qdemir - I would not want you to break the rules of this thread:-

"ADMIN'S NOTE: This thread is only allowed if you speak of your personal thoughts and don't try to persuade or argue with each other or make universal statements about religion and/or who/what is right or wrong. "

I am refraining from giving links to very convincing sites which deny the existance of God

56.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 06:38 pm

May I just add, that if you ARE religious, that you pray for your God(s) to make a few changes - he has not done such a very good job with his religions or world, has he?

57.       qdemir
813 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 06:43 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Be very careful Qdemir - I would not want you to break the rules of this thread:-

"ADMIN'S NOTE: This thread is only allowed if you speak of your personal thoughts and don't try to persuade or argue with each other or make universal statements about religion and/or who/what is right or wrong. "

I am refraining from giving links to very convincing sites which deny the existance of God



You think you have always complied with the above rule, and have never ever broken it.

You have just made a universal statement above; very convincing site; for whom? It might be very convincing for you. Also, I don't judge what you believe or you don't believe, or am trying to convince you of anything.

58.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 06:45 pm

Quoting qdemir:

You think you have always complied with the above rule, and have never ever broken it.

You have just made a universal statement above; very convincing site; for whom? It might be very convincing for you. Also, I don't judge what you believe or you don't believe, or am trying to convince you of anything.



I am talking about this thread - it would be a shame to see it locked because you were posting links to sites in an attempt to prove your religion as the "true" one ... Honey

59.       qdemir
813 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 06:51 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting qdemir:

You think you have always complied with the above rule, and have never ever broken it.

You have just made a universal statement above; very convincing site; for whom? It might be very convincing for you. Also, I don't judge what you believe or you don't believe, or am trying to convince you of anything.



I am talking about this thread - it would be a shame to see it locked because you were posting links to sites in an attempt to prove your religion as the "true" one ... Honey



My religion? We believe there is only one God, and believers of each religion pray for the same God.

Haven't you ever posted in an attempt to reason your agnostic belief? Has anyone judge you, or blame you for being an agnostic.

60.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 06:54 pm

Quoting qdemir:

My religion? We believe there is only one God, and believers of each religion pray for the same God.



You may well believe that they pray to the same God, but they will go to hell for not following Islam eh?

What about religions where they pray to more than one god? You don't believe such religions exist, or you just do not recognise them?

Quoting qdemir:

Has anyone judge you, or blame you for being an agnostic.



Frequently! lol lol lol

61.       qdemir
813 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 07:02 pm


Quoting qdemir:

Haven't you ever posted in an attempt to reason your agnostic belief?



Have you forgotten to quate and answer the above question?

Quoting AEnigma III:

You may well believe that they pray to the same God, but they will go to hell for not following Islam eh?



Could you let me know your source in Islam to substantiate the above statement? That's not true.

62.       qdemir
813 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 07:07 pm

Quote:


Quoting qdemir:

Has anyone judge you, or blame you for being an agnostic.



Frequently! lol lol lol



Also, could you quote a few of such posts judging or blaming you for that. You may not quote the posters's user names.

63.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 07:12 pm

Quoting qdemir:


Quoting AEnigma III:

You may well believe that they pray to the same God, but they will go to hell for not following Islam eh?



Could you let me know your source in Islam to substantiate the above statement? That's not true.


Sorry to butt in, but am i right to think that kaffirs will never go to heaven?

64.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 07:13 pm

There is no place in the Quran where Muhammad commands Muslims to love people of other religions. By contrast there are at least three dozen verses that tell Muslims to fight against non-Muslims and about 500 that speak of their place in hell. They are from each period in Muhammad's life, scattered across 87 of the Quran's 114 chapters.

To put this in perspective, nearly one out of twelve verses in the Quran says that Allah hates non-Muslims to the extent that he will torment them for eternity in horrible ways. The Suras that make reference to this comprise about 95% of the Quran's total volume. If Allah creates infidels merely to fuel the fires of Hell, then there is little reason for Muslims to believe that such lives are of any worth in this world either.

Do you want me to quote them?

65.       qdemir
813 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 07:16 pm

Quoting thehandsom:

Quoting qdemir:


Quoting AEnigma III:

You may well believe that they pray to the same God, but they will go to hell for not following Islam eh?



Could you let me know your source in Islam to substantiate the above statement? That's not true.


Sorry to butt in, but am i right to think that kaffirs will never go to heaven?



A kaffir is a person who doesn't accept God's existence. S/he has, of course, no place in God's heaven.

66.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 07:26 pm

Quoting qdemir:


Could you let me know your source in Islam to substantiate the above statement?



The Quran

Sura (9:30 ) - And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah, and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah... Allah (Himself) fighteth against them. How perverse are they!

Sura (4:52) - Those (Christians) are they whom Allah hath cursed...

Sura (4:47) - O you (Jews) who have been given the Book! believe that which We have revealed, verifying what you have, before We alter faces then turn them on their backs, or curse them as We cursed the violaters of the Sabbath, and the command of Allah shall be executed.

There are many more

67.       qdemir
813 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 07:34 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

There is no place in the Quran where Muhammad commands Muslims to love people of other religions. By contrast there are at least three dozen verses that tell Muslims to fight against non-Muslims and about 500 that speak of their place in hell. They are from each period in Muhammad's life, scattered across 87 of the Quran's 114 chapters.

To put this in perspective, nearly one out of twelve verses in the Quran says that Allah hates non-Muslims to the extent that he will torment them for eternity in horrible ways. The Suras that make reference to this comprise about 95% of the Quran's total volume. If Allah creates infidels merely to fuel the fires of Hell, then there is little reason for Muslims to believe that such lives are of any worth in this world either.

Do you want me to quote them?



You are in the wrong in the first place. Hz Mohammed doesn't command in Koran, but God. Hz Mohammed is a messenger.

I don't know where you have got the above post, but it is quite obvious that it has been written by what kind of people. I have asked for a source in Islam.

Just quote verses, if there are any, to substantiate the claim you have put forward.

Let me correct just a thing which is directly related to your claim:


'Allah hates non-Muslims to the extent that he will torment them for eternity in horrible ways':

not non-Muslims, but those who reject God's existence.




68.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 07:36 pm

Quoting qdemir:

Just quote verses, if there are any, to substantiate the claim you have put forward.



I did
You want MORE?

69.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 07:39 pm

Quoting qdemir:

You are in the wrong in the first place. Hz Mohammed doesn't command in Koran, but God. Hz Mohammed is a messenger.



That is only YOUR belief Qdemir

70.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 07:45 pm

Quoting qdemir:

Quoting thehandsom:

Quoting qdemir:


Quoting AEnigma III:

You may well believe that they pray to the same God, but they will go to hell for not following Islam eh?



Could you let me know your source in Islam to substantiate the above statement? That's not true.


Sorry to butt in, but am i right to think that kaffirs will never go to heaven?



A kaffir is a person who doesn't accept God's existence. S/he has, of course, no place in God's heaven.


You might have a point there but wiki describes kaffir as:

Kafir (Arabic: كافر kāfir; plural كفّار kuffār) is an Arabic word meaning "unbeliever". In the Islamic doctrinal sense the term refers to a person who does not recognize Allah or the prophethood of Muhammad (i.e., any non-Muslim) or who hides, denies, or covers the truth. In cultural terms, it is seen as a derogatory term[1] used to describe an unbeliever, non-Muslims, apostate from Islam and even between Muslims of different sects.


and since all non-muslims dont recognize Muhammed, then they wont go to heaven.

Quote:

'Allah hates non-Muslims to the extent that he will torment them for eternity in horrible ways':


And this means non-muslims will never go to heaven?


71.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 07:45 pm

Choice quotes from the hadeth :-

Bukhari (2:28) - Women comprise the majority of Hell's occupants. (A weak Hadith, Kanz al-`ummal, 22:10, even suggests that 99% of women go to Hell).

Muslim (40:6831) - Non-Muslims in Hell will be given thick skin so as to prolong their agony (before they are given fresh skin for a new round of torture - Sura 4:56).

Bukhari (59:727) - Allah's Apostle [said]... "Allah's curse be on the Jews and the Christians" This was spoken on Muhammad's death bed, and was one of the last things that he ever said.

Ishaq 240 - "The Jews are a nation of liars.... The Jews are a treacherous, lying, and evil people"

72.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 07:47 pm

Quoting thehandsom:

and since all non-muslims dont recognize Muhammed, then they wont go to heaven.



Hope they have raki in hell

73.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 07:51 pm

Quoting thehandsom:

and since all non-muslims dont recognize Muhammed, then they wont go to heaven.

Quote:

'Allah hates non-Muslims to the extent that he will torment them for eternity in horrible ways':


And this means non-muslims will never go to heaven?



Apparently he hates hyprocrites the most!
So all raki drinking muslims will join us "down there" lol

74.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 07:54 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting thehandsom:

and since all non-muslims dont recognize Muhammed, then they wont go to heaven.

Quote:

'Allah hates non-Muslims to the extent that he will torment them for eternity in horrible ways':


And this means non-muslims will never go to heaven?



Apparently he hates hyprocrites the most!
So all raki drinking muslims will join us "down there" lol


lol
raki and 99% of women..It sounds like heaven

75.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 07:56 pm

Quoting thehandsom:

lol
raki and 99% of women..It sounds like heaven



Hahahahaha made me laugh so loud! lol lol

76.       catwoman
8933 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 07:57 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Hope they have raki in hell


Yes, they do. I've seen a couple times.

77.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 07:58 pm

i suggest to take freezers with yourselves

78.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 07:59 pm

Quoting femme_fatal:

i suggest to take freezers with yourselves



Good thinking! I will need ice with my drinks in case it gets a little warm!

79.       catwoman
8933 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 08:08 pm

I actually hate raki. I prefer vodka with red bull... I might have to choose a different section of hell.. :-S

80.       qdemir
813 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 08:26 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting qdemir:

Just quote verses, if there are any, to substantiate the claim you have put forward.



I did
You want MORE?



The original verses of Sura 9:30 is as below:

'9.30': And the Jews say: Uzair is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!


To understand the above verse we need to read the verse immediately following the verse '9:30', which clarifies it.

The verse '9:30' is about such Christians and Jews defined in the following verse '9:31'.

It doesn't include all Christians or Jews as not all Christians or Jews believe in the same way as defined in the following verse. We are talking about believers of each religion praying the same God, otherwise we can't talk about the same God.



'9.31': They have taken their doctors of law and their monks for lords besides Allah, and (also) the Messiah son of Marium and they were enjoined that they should serve one God only, there is no god but He; far from His glory be what they set up (with Him).



Some day, a non-believer claims that people are ordered to stay away from praying God (five times a day), and he substantiates his claim with a verse in the Koran.

What he says is actually true, and is stated in the Koran just as he said. However, that verse also says something in the following, which is: (women) (stay away from praying ) when you are on your menstruation periods

In Islam women don't pray during the periods of their menstruation.


There is no need to talk about the other verses that AEnigma stated.





81.       catwoman
8933 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 08:29 pm

Quoting qdemir:

In Islam women don't pray during the periods of their menstruation.


They don't pray because male chauvinist pigs convinced them (under the threat of death) that it's "dirty".

82.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 08:50 pm

Dear Qdemir,
Thank you for your clarification. It seems that it is yet another "translation problem". The same "translation problem" that causes thousands of extremists to behave in the way they do.

May I suggest someone make a CORRECT translation one day? I wonder though....why do arabic countries misunderstand it too?

Yours sincerely,
AEnigma

83.       qdemir
813 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 09:00 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Dear Qdemir,
Thank you for your clarification. It seems that it is yet another "translation problem". The same "translation problem" that causes thousands of extremists to behave in the way they do.

May I suggest someone make a CORRECT translation one day? I wonder though....why do arabic countries misunderstand it too?

Yours sincerely,
AEnigma



We could get rid of such misunderstanding (for both sides) through mutual dialogue.

Yours sincerely

84.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 09:02 pm

Quoting qdemir:

We could get rid of such misunderstanding (for both sides) through mutual dialogue.



Unfortunately our only education and dialogue comes from the hatred banners and the wild screams of our British muslim population, quoting those parts of the Quran that I posted, which you tell me are incorrect!

Have you ever witnessed "mutual dialogue" with these people?

Yours faithfully

85.       peacetrain
1905 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 09:12 pm

quoting AEnigma

Unfortunately our only education and dialogue comes from the hatred banners and the wild screams of our British muslim population,

end of quote.


You are so predictable and that statement above is inflammatory, as if you didn't know. You mentioned thread locking earlier, perhaps now is the time.

86.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 09:13 pm

Quoting peace train:

You are so predictable.



And so are you dear

87.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 09:21 pm

Quoting peace train:

You are so predictable and that statement above is inflammatory, as if you didn't know. You mentioned thread locking earlier, perhaps now is the time.



It is no secret peace train - there is nothing inflammatory about those words - it is fact

(Wow you really change your posts after the initial posting ! lol )

88.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 09:28 pm

Quoting peace train:

quoting AEnigma

Unfortunately our only education and dialogue comes from the hatred banners and the wild screams of our British muslim population,

end of quote.


You are so predictable and that statement above is inflammatory, as if you didn't know. You mentioned thread locking earlier, perhaps now is the time.



peace train
there must be somethnig you are afraid of since you wish the thread was locked. how hypocritic!
isnt it aenigma unveiling something here? she seems to know more on islam than you or qdemir?

89.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 09:28 pm

It makes me laugh how Brits are so "politically correct" and always attack anyone who complains. Yet they remain silent when people come to live in our country and fail to integrate at all into our society or learn the language, and do nothing but talk about the "evil west" and promote extremist and fundamentalist views and actions.

You are their biggest allies! lol

90.       peacetrain
1905 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 09:42 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting peace train:

You are so predictable and that statement above is inflammatory, as if you didn't know. You mentioned thread locking earlier, perhaps now is the time.



It is no secret peace train - there is nothing inflammatory about those words - it is fact



I know you like to quote fact.

Your statement:

"Unfortunately our only education and dialogue comes from the hatred banners and the wild screams of our British muslim population,"

This implies all Muslims do what you state. You say it is "our only education and dialogue", "our"? I live in the same country as you and I don't wish you to speak for me.

There are alternative sources of education about Islam too, if you look and I am sure an intelligent person like yourself does read.

I remember you once said you had Muslim friends, surely they don't wave hatred banners and scream wildly do they? You said that was your only education.

Although there are some unsavoury elements at work here, your statement was at worst worded deliberately to sensationalise and at best, badly worded.

Here endeth my last lesson for today.

Nice to know you're watching my every movement. I didn't know you cared.

91.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 09:45 pm

Peacetrain you look at everything with rose-tinted glasses, because you have a few nice friends who are muslims!! Of course, so do I

But do you never look around you and see what is happening? Do you deny that we have more radical extremist muslims in the UK than in Turkey? Do you deny that we are in more danger from terrorism from our own citizens than from anywhere else in the world?

There is nothing sensationalist in my words. There are MORE non-integrated muslims in the UK, than integrated ones. There are whole parts of our biggest cities taken over by them, they use their OWN doctors, taxis, businesses and have their own social lives. In fact, they live completely separate lives to the rest of the UK, because they see us as evil. Do you deny this?

92.       peacetrain
1905 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 09:46 pm

Quoting femme_fatal:

Quoting peace train:

quoting AEnigma

Unfortunately our only education and dialogue comes from the hatred banners and the wild screams of our British muslim population,

end of quote.


You are so predictable and that statement above is inflammatory, as if you didn't know. You mentioned thread locking earlier, perhaps now is the time.



peace train
there must be somethnig you are afraid of since you wish the thread was locked. how hypocritic!
isnt it aenigma unveiling something here? she seems to know more on islam than you or qdemir?



I'm so pleased for her. You must take great comfort in that. Well done.

93.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 09:46 pm

Quoting peace train:

Here endeth my last lesson for today.



If only that were true

94.       peacetrain
1905 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 09:47 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

It makes me laugh how Brits are so "politically correct" and always attack anyone who complains. Yet they remain silent when people come to live in our country and fail to integrate at all into our society or learn the language, and do nothing but talk about the "evil west" and promote extremist and fundamentalist views and actions.

You are their biggest allies! lol



That needle . . . that groove . . . stuck again!

95.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 09:50 pm

Quoting peace train:

That needle . . . that groove . . . stuck again!



Yes, you keep saying the same things over and over...

96.       Deli_kizin
6376 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 10:07 pm

Qdemir, I dont want to get in any discussion bashing religions or anything. But dont you think the Quran is full of contradictions? I have read several sources upon it, (as a study Islamology at university), and read quoted verses there in Quran. At one point, it asks the Muslims to kill all Christians, but somewhere it writes that Muhammad says that EVERYBODY who says that there is only ONE god (no matter whether you clal it ALlah and believe in his prophet),will go to heaven. It ıs very unclear which things are really meant. No wonder there are a million different groups among Muslims. How is one to know what is true? There are very few people in Turkey who can read Arabic, and if they can, they can only read the ltters and not understand the words. How are they to read the Quran, since its forbidden to read its translation? I am just struggling to get a picture of this complex religion, whose believers are strong defenders of things that I just cant understand.


I am really trying to get an idea of what Islam is. But the more I learn, the more disappointed I get. And it is not because I am anti-religious, I am actually really spiritual. But all that I read, doesnt make me think of a Good Power.

97.       peacetrain
1905 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 10:20 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Peacetrain you look at everything with rose-tinted glasses, because you have a few nice friends who are muslims!! Of course, so do I

But do you never look around you and see what is happening? Do you deny that we have more radical extremist muslims in the UK than in Turkey? Do you deny that we are in more danger from terrorism from our own citizens than from anywhere else in the world?

There is nothing sensationalist in my words. There are MORE non-integrated muslims in the UK, than integrated ones. There are whole parts of our biggest cities taken over by them, they use their OWN doctors, taxis, businesses and have their own social lives. In fact, they live completely separate lives to the rest of the UK, because they see us as evil. Do you deny this?



If it suits you to psychoanalyse (I know you like this word) me then do so. Create a view of me for what I do say. Create a view of me for what I don't say. I'm quite happy for you to do that because I'm happy with my views. Because I don't share them doesn't mean they are drastically different to yours or absolutely in line with yours. And also, all members are at liberty to have a view of any other member, based on how they conduct themselves. We all agree to that when we post a comment and I don't think there's any sense in whinging about it.

I'm reminded of your "defeatist" (your word) comments, about the people trafficking petition, this morning. I could say a similar thing about putting views forward here.

Cut, paste, analyse - not a problem for me.

98.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 03 Feb 2008 Sun 10:22 pm

Will give you the last word peace train, because arguing with you is not as much fun as arguing with Qdemir and I am getting sleepy at the thought of more posts...

Zzzzzzzzzzz

99.       qdemir
813 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 12:39 am

Deli_kizin, just sent you a pm concerning your above post.

100.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 01:09 am

Quoting peace train:

Not often his name is mentioned on this site. He is someone who interests me simply because there are such opposing opinions of him.



To be honest peace train, there is nothing interesting about him. he just happens to be one of those preachers with strong determination to bring sheria into Turkey.

He is well known with his languishing eyes with an innocent look on his face. Of course, everybody realises in Turkey that he is just faking it..

He is very well supported by the USA, I think, in terms of creating a light version of islam in turkey as an example to other muslim countries. Of course, they dont realise the fact that he is just faking everything with them too . He is merely trying to reach his destination!!

There are many rumors about his sayings(of course he always denies them ). Some of them are all related how 'secretly they should be organised in order to reach the ultimate goal'. And they are very secretive and very well organised indeed.
Their secrecy is coming from the days when they were hiding. And they very well know that they cant find any supporters if they said 'they want sheria'

But I have to admit, the way they are organised is impressive:
When they want to pass a message, or prepare the public on a topic, you would see in all turkish forums, suddenly these well mannered users coming in and opening a subject about what he says, what the idea is etc..

101.       vineyards
1954 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 01:36 am

Pointing out to translation problems Aenigma asks why Quran can't be properly translated and why even Arabs misunderstand it: Arabic is full of equivocal words which produce immensely different meanings in different contexts.
This aspect of the Arabic language is somewhat in line with how Arabs generally are.

To make things more complicated, The Quran was written in Phasih Arabic, almost a separate language not spoken by the masses but vaguely understood. Add to that the fact that, The Qoran was first memorized by certain individuals the credibility of whom was said to be determined by a board of scholars. Some of the verses were eliminated and some were included, the wording depended on how well those people memorized the verses and it did not happen in prophet's life time nor did it happen before some 40-50 years. The Quran was first hand written on gazelle hide and sealed.

In addition to all this, there is a principle in the Islamic Faith called Taqiyye which means if your life is at stake, or if you think you are serving a good purpose such as the spreading of your faith then you are free to tell lies.

No one knows, what is true from an Islamic point of view (turban included) whether it is a taquiyye, translation problem or lack of IQ to properly understand it.

102.       peacetrain
1905 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 01:46 am

Thanks for the straight forward post Handsom. It's much appreciated. I've learned quite a lot about the strength of feeling that prevails in Turkey regarding various issues. A good discussion about Gulen would be enlightening to read. I wonder if anyone will oblige . . .

On a lighter note, me thinks you are jealous of his looks and his ability to fake. But there is hope for you, you have more hair

103.       alameda
3499 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 01:56 am

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting qdemir:

In Islam women don't pray during the periods of their menstruation.


They don't pray because male chauvinist pigs convinced them (under the threat of death) that it's "dirty".



Could it not be that the state they are in is like a prayer? If one misses a prayer, they are obliged to make it up. In the case of a menstruation woman, no make up is required.

104.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:14 am

Quoting peace train:

Thanks for the straight forward post Handsom. It's much appreciated. I've learned quite a lot about the strength of feeling that prevails in Turkey regarding various issues. A good discussion about Gulen would be enlightening to read. I wonder if anyone will oblige . . .
On a lighter note, me thinks you are jealous of his looks and his ability to fake. But there is hope for you, you have more hair


F gulen preaching
I know it is in Turkish, but just listen to his vioce and look at his face.. He is a greate ACTOR.
And yesss..I AM SO JEALOUS..lol

105.       kaddersokak
130 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:45 am

Quoting peace train:

Thanks for the straight forward post Handsom. It's much appreciated. I've learned quite a lot about the strength of feeling that prevails in Turkey regarding various issues. A good discussion about Gulen would be enlightening to read. I wonder if anyone will oblige . . .

On a lighter note, me thinks you are jealous of his looks and his ability to fake. But there is hope for you, you have more hair




well, there are some people who see him as a cult and there are others who hate him. you can see the examples of both in this webpage. I think the best way to understand Gulen and his movement is to read the academic works on him and his movement. One of them is written by Dr. Yavuz from the University of Utah. Here is an interview with Yavuz on the Gulen movement. I know this will not change anything for those who hate him and for those who love him


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
The Gülen Movement: a modern expression of Turkish Islam - Interview with Hakan Yavuz

Religioscope
21 Jul 2004

On first looking at the volume edited by M. Hakan Yavuz and John L. Esposito entitled "Turkish Islam and the Secular State: The Gülen Movement" (Syracuse University Press, 2003), many people are likely to wonder who the man is pictured on the cover of the book. They will discover that he is Fetullah Gülen (b. 1938), an important figure in contemporary Turkish Islam. The book is a well-informed introduction by Western and Turkish experts to the Gülen movement – a movement that, as we shall see, sometimes looks more like a network.


This movement is one of the eight major groups derived from the work of the reformer Said Nursi (1873–196, author of several volumes of Qur'anic exegesis known as Risale-I Nur. Nursi made an attempt to respond to the debates of his time (emergence of the new republic and Kemalist secularization efforts): he became the source of a powerful movement active in Turkey. Hakan Yasvuz explains:

"The Nur movement (also known as Nurculuk) differs from other Islamic movements in terms of its understanding of Islam and is strategy of transforming society by raising individual consciousness. As a resistance movement to the the ongoing statist modernization process in Turkey, it is forward looking and proactive."

Regarding the Gülen community, its impact is not limited to Turkey: putting into practice Nursi's educational ideals, the community has created more than 300 modern, high-quality schools (including high schools), not only in Turkey, but also in several other parts of the world (primarily in Central Asia and the Balkans, but also in more exotic places, such as Mongolia or Bangladesh as well as in some Western cities). The curriculums of these schools do not have any explicitly Islamic content. Gülen aspires to create an educated elite and does not see any conflict between reason and revelation. His schools also contribute to the development of Turkish influence abroad.

At the end of two introductory chapters, which put the movement into context, co-editor Hakan Yavuz (associate professor in political science at the University of Utah) claims that "this movement opens new venues for the radical reimagination of tradition". Gülen's community combines Islam and Turkish nationalism. Moreover, it is "secularization-friendly" – and also American-friendly, which is not very common today in the Muslim world, but apparently derives from an assessment of what is best for Turkish interests.

In order to find out more about the Gülen movement, Religioscope put several questions on the subject to Hakan Yavuz, considered to be one of the best academic experts on the movement. He agreed to share his insights with us.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Said Nursi (Source: http://www.bediuzzaman.org)
Religioscope - Fetullah Gülen has emerged as one of the manifestations of Said Nursi's legacy in Turkey. Could you please first summarize some of the key features of Said Nursi's teachings?

Hakan Yavuz - As far I know, Said Nursi attempted to empower Turkey's Muslims by updating Islamic terminology and language. He tried to provide them with a new vocabulary in order to allow them to participate in modern discussions and debates on issues like constitutionalism, science, freedom and democracy. So one of his primary goals was to empower Muslims with a new cognitive map.

Secondly, he tried to provide a new, flexible Muslim identity.

Thirdly, he stressed the idea that religion and science are not in tension: they are not mutually exclusive, but can work together. In a way, he tried to vernacularize science and modern discourses in an Islamic idiom, to facilitate the dissemination of scientific knowledge in Muslim countries.

These, essentially, were the three goals of the writings of Said Nursi.

Religioscope - Fetullah Gülen never met Said Nursi personally. How does his own teaching fit into Said Nursi’s legacy? And what are the relations between the group around Fetullah Gülen and the other parts of the Nur movement?

Hakan Yavuz - The Nur movement went through a number of processes of fragmentation or pluralization: firstly, as a result of political debates; secondly, as a result of class distinctions; thirdly, as a result of ethnic divisions between Kurds and Turkish Nurcus; and fourthly, in terms of the differences between highly-educated and less-educated Turks. This has led to different understandings and different groupings within the Nur movement.

The Gülen movement emerged very much out of the Nur movement. Yet there are certain characteristics that Gülen brought to it. This is why I call it a neo-Nur movement. In terms of nationalism, Gülen is more Turkish nationalist in his thinking. Also, he is somewhat more state-oriented, and is more concerned with market economics and neo-liberal economic policies. These, in my opinion, are the three major characteristics of the neo-Nur movement.

The Gülen movement tries to move from practice to ideas. Practice is important: action is very significant. In its view, Islam is not only about praying five times a day and reading the books of Said Nursi, but acting, doing and creating institutions. In that sense, the Gülen movement is more worldly: it wants to create heaven in this world – education system, hospitals, institutions, and so forth. So whereas Said Nursi stressed cognitive understanding, Gülen is more action-oriented.


Hakan Yavuz during the interview with Religioscope.
Religioscope - If we consider the context of contemporary Turkey, there is one key element: the harsh forms of secularism that Kemalist Turkey developed. This kind of secularism came to be a kind of state ideology. How do the Nur movement in general and Gülen specifically deal with this reality of secular Turkey?

Hakan Yavuz - In Turkey, there are two competing conceptions of modernity. One is top-down modernity, also known as Kemalism, the ideology of Mustafa Kemal, the founder of the Turkish Republic. This ideology has two pillars: nationalism and secularism. Secularism is very much equated with modernization and Westernization in Turkey. It eventually became the legitimizing ideology of the governing elite. Secularism does not necessarily mean separation of religion and politics. But as it increasingly came to define the identity of the ruling elite, it generated a major reaction from the Anatolian masses and the periphery. This reaction articulated itself against secularism.

The second conception of modernity in Turkey is a bottom-up modernity: here modernity is not an alien and negative thing. The Turks should enjoy it, but it should be negotiated and redefined. It should also be internalized by the masses rather than imposed by the state.

With those two different conceptions of modernity, you have also two different conceptions of secularism in Turkey. One is the top-down modernization-project conception of secularism: it is very much a laïcisme in the French sense. This approach means that there is no room at all for religion in the public sphere, resulting in the cleansing of religion from the public domain. Science becomes the guide, while religion is something negative: something to get rid of.

The second form of modernity – i.e. bottom-up modernity – allows room for religion in the public sphere. Its conception of secularism is in line with the Anglo-Saxon notion of this concept. Religion is seen as a source of morality and ethics. It also does not see religion and politics as being necessarily in conflict. However, it does not want religion to become a tool of politics, because if something then goes wrong in politics, people will blame religion.

The Nur movement always wanted religion to remain above politics, because it was concerned that politics would corrupt religion.

Today, in Turkey, the balance of power is shifting toward a bottom-up conception of modernity and a new vision of secularism. Gülen very much represents this approach, and he is an agent of this transformation. He has played a key role in transforming people’s minds and has led them to a new understanding of a bottom-up modernity.

Religioscope - You have described the Nur movement as a movement to cultivate faith without entering into a confrontation with modernity. What are its methods for achieving this in contemporary Turkey?

Hakan Yavuz - I understand modernity in terms of a market economy, human rights and creating new spaces for individual differences. The Nur movement is a modernizing system of faith and a modernizing activism generated and supported by Islam. Islam and modernity are not necessarily in conflict: they can work together.

In order to preserve their uniqueness and respect the uniqueness of others as well, Muslims need to share a new legal code, and to have a free-market economy, private education and free thinking. All these aspects of modernity have been internalized, but also disseminated and legitimized, by the Nur movement, which has stressed the idea of becoming and being a Muslim in the modern world by supporting and consolidating modern institutions of democracy, the rule of law, a free-market economy, and so forth.


Religioscope - From an organizational viewpoint, how does the Gülen movement express itself? As one speaks with followers of Fetullah Gülen, there is an obvious reluctance to acknowledge the group as an organization. Since the title of your book mentions the Gülen movement, do you consider this word as the most appropriate description? Or would you rather speak about a network? Sometimes, followers describe themselves as a cemaat (community).

Hakan Yavuz - This is an excellent question. Is this a movement, a community or a network? How should it be seen?

I use the term movement, because a movement has a collective goal that it intends to achieve through a collective engagement. In order to achieve it, you need networks. The Gülen movement consists of a number of networks, organized horizontally. In this loose network system, the traditional values and idioms of the community play an important role.

As a movement, it incorporates the network and community, or communal ethos. I would consider it as a movement based on the re-imagining of Islam and consisting of loose networks under the guidance and leadership of Fetullah Gülen.

These networks are not necessarily organized in hierarchical terms. But we see three circles. The first is the core circle around Gülen. The second circle consists of those who give their time and labour in order to achieve the collective goals of the movement. The third circle consists of those who are sympathizers: sometimes they support the movement by writing an article in the media, or they give money, or they support the movement in other ways.

So you have a number of circles, but each circle includes a number of networks. When we examine these networks, there is a sense of solidarity and of the Islamic ethos of brotherhood. This is the glue that joins these networks together.

Religioscope - The most important factor that holds these networks together seems to be Fetullah Gülen himself. Could the movement exist without him?

Hakan Yavuz - You are right that Gülen is in a way the integrating personality of these networks and circles. If Gülen dies, we will see a fragmentation. However, it could be just like the Nur movement: Said Nursi died, but the Nur movement survived and expanded.

After Gülen’s death, I expect a number of new groups to emerge and networks to be revised. I do not think that the movement is going to disappear. It could restructure itself under different names and with different leaders.

Religioscope - You have described the movement as an education-oriented movement. Could we say that an educational project is at the very core of the Gülen movement?

Hakan Yavuz - Gülen believes that the main problem in the world is lack of knowledge, which involves related problems concerning the production and control of knowledge. How do you create knowledge, maintain it and disseminate it? He thinks it can only be done through education. Education is very important if one wants to become a better Muslim.

Education is key. Not religious education: we are talking about secular education, science and the humanities – and of course religion as well. Gülen believes that those three forms of education should enhance and complement each other rather than compete with each other.

Religioscope - What most people know about the Gülen movement has been the creation of a network of schools. Interestingly, the movement did not only create schools in Turkey, but in a number of other countries as well. Does this education-oriented project go along with the movement’s strategic thinking? Is it a way of spreading values that go beyond the confines of the educational project?

Hakan Yavuz - Yes. The Gülen movement believes that we are living in a global world. Muslims are not isolated. Muslim communities are found in many non-Muslim countries. They have to interact and to create a shared understanding, a shared experience and a shared code of ethics.

The movement tries to achieve this through the educational system. By establishing schools in China, in Russia or in Africa, it aspires to educate other people about Islam and to educate Muslims about other cultures as well. It sees education as the only way to create a shared language and shared ethics – and also to create sympathizers around the world, which is the third circle I mentioned earlier.

Religioscope - Sympathizers for the Gülen movement, for Islam, for Turkey?...

Hakan Yavuz - That is correct: sympathizers for Gülen, sympathizers for Islam and sympathizers for Turkey.

The national aspect is very important for Gülen. He believes in something called Turkish Islam, shaped by Sufism, Turkey's positive experience with the West and Turkey's transformation. This is an understanding of Islam shaped by the history and contemporary experiences of Turkey.

Religioscope - Does this explain why the Gülen movement is not really active in the Arabic world? Or are there other circumstances that explain this fact?

Hakan Yavuz - You are right, the Gülen movement in not active in the Arab world. One of the key reasons is that some Arab countries do not allow the movement to operate and treat it as an agent of the United States (or even an agent of the CIA, since Gülen lives in the United States). It is also viewed as an agent of globalization. The Arab world is not at all sympathetic to this movement.

Also, Gülen and people around him do not necessarily want to get involved in the Arab world, because they believe that it does not understand Islam properly. In fact, they want to distance themselves from the Arab world. Here you have the nationalist aspect of the movement coming to the fore.

Religioscope - But are there some movements in the Arab world with which the Gülen movement maintains privileged relations?

Hakan Yavuz - As far as I know, no. I do not know any movement that – at the moment – is in interaction or in sympathy with the Gülen movement. In the movement’s newspaper, Zaman, and on its TV station, Samanyolu, I have yet to see an article that praises any Islamic movement in the Arab world as democratic or modern. They are either critical or silent on the subject.

The movement believes that the best Islam is the Islam of Turkey, the Islam that is defended and promoted by Gülen, who is in favour of dialogue and moderation. He has met with Pope John Paul II and several prominent religion scholars. He believes that Islam should not take on an identity of confrontation and conflict, but rather one of co-operation and coexistence.

Religioscope - Beside education, what is Fetullah Gülen's aim? In the recently published book, you stress that his aim is not to create an Islamic state.

Hakan Yavuz - According to Gülen and the Nur movement, it is anti-Islamic to talk about an Islamic state. But you can create a conscious Muslim. You can create Muslim networks. You can create Muslim ethics and good models of coexistence by utilizing Islam. But when Islam becomes a model for the state, Gülen believes it is not Islam anymore.

His goal is to raise Muslim consciousness and to get involved in modernity, democracy and a free-market economy, so as to get Muslims to enter into those global processes. His goal is also to turn Turkey into a regional power. Turkey means a lot to Fetullah Gülen.

Religioscope - In light of your explanations, it may seem quite surprising that, in recent years, some hardline secularists in Turkey have become extremely hostile to Fetullah Gülen – even though the movement seeks to avoid confrontation with the state and has sometimes even proved to be subservient to it; for instance, in the early 1980s, when Gülen supported the military coup. How do you explain why the movement has experienced such reactions to its work and teachings? Fetullah Gülen has been living abroad for several years in order to avoid unpleasant experiences.


Hakan Yavuz - In my book Islamic Political Identity in Turkey (Oxford University Press, 2003), I have attempted to explain that, when Turkey started to go through a process of neo-liberal economic reform in the early 1980s, it created a space for new opportunities. This allowed variousidentities to become more public, particularly communal processes. For instance, Kurdish and Alevi identities became more assertive. The Kemalist military state wanted to exploit the Gülen form of political Islam and they did, using it against Erbakan (the ex-Prime Minister and leader of political Islam in Turkey for many years).

After the military and their allies got rid of Erbakan, they turned against Gülen. Gülen represents a major threat for these people, because they want to see a backward, radical Islam, in order to justify repression – whereas with Gülen, you do not get that. This angers them even more!

Also, Gülen tries to educate the periphery by teaching them foreign languages and providing scholarships for study in foreign countries. This angers the establishment as well, because they want to control the country and not to share the resources with the rest of the population. There is also a conflict over resources. Gülen was on the side of the poor, while the establishment did not want to see his movement opening up educational opportunities for the marginal sectors of Turkish society. This frustrated militant secularists in Turkey.

Religioscope - What do the Gülen movement and the Nur movement in general represent in contemporary Turkey in terms of influence, intellectual impact, numbers, and so on?

Hakan Yavuz - The movement is very active, and is responsible for newspapers, financial institutions, the best hospitals and private high schools in Turkey, and so forth. It is part of every aspect of Turkish life. It tries to set a good example and to improve standards. I think it is well integrated into Turkish society.

The movement wants to provide a good image of Islam, not so much through indoctrination, but to teach Islam through its members setting a good example by becoming good doctors, good mathematicians, good politicians, good cooks, and so forth. Such people want to teach Islam by doing their duty properly.

In a way, they represent a new model of Islam in Turkey, at peace with democracy and modernity. This also reflects the Anatolian understanding of Islam, i.e. the Sufi conception of morality is at the centre of the movement.

It also stresses the "greater jihad" (jihad al akbar), i.e. the control of one's nafs (lower desires).

I think it has played a very positive role in developing closer ties with European countries.

Religioscope - Could we describe such a movement as an expression of post-Sufi trends?

Hakan Yavuz - Yes, one could see it as post-Sufism, or as a new Sufism – a religion structuring social interactions by reutilizing and reinterpreting religious values without imposing religion on society. It has to do with action informed by religion.

Religioscope - People involved in the Gülen movement are not involved in Sufi brotherhoods, are they?

Hakan Yavuz - No, they are not. Members of the Nur movement are not members of any Sufi group, because they believe that the age of Sufi tarikat [Sufi brotherhood] is past. Yet they believe that the ideas of morality, religion and God could be remodelled and utilized in the modern age.

Religioscope - And what is the interaction between the followers of Fetullah Gülen and the current leading party in Turkey, the Justice and Development Party (AKP)? Do they tend to belong to this party or do they vote primarily for parties without a Muslim background.

Hakan Yavuz - In previous elections, members of the movement voted for Bülent Ecevit (Democratic Left). In recent elections, I think their votes were divided between the AKP and Ecevit. Members of the movement do not necessarily vote for Muslim parties. They actually try to stay away from any party that describes itself as "Islamic" or "Muslim". But they have very good ties and relations with the AKP government.

M. Hakan Yavuz and John L. Esposito (eds.), Turkish Islam and the Secular State: The Gülen Movement, Syracuse (New York): Syracuse University Press, 2003, XXXIV+280 pp.

The interview was conducted by Jean-François Mayer.




106.       kaddersokak
130 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:46 am

Quoting peace train:

Thanks for the straight forward post Handsom. It's much appreciated. I've learned quite a lot about the strength of feeling that prevails in Turkey regarding various issues. A good discussion about Gulen would be enlightening to read. I wonder if anyone will oblige . . .

On a lighter note, me thinks you are jealous of his looks and his ability to fake. But there is hope for you, you have more hair




well, there are some people who see him as a cult and there are others who hate him. you can see the examples of both in this webpage. I think the best way to understand Gulen and his movement is to read the academic works on him and his movement. One of them is written by Dr. Yavuz from the University of Utah. Here is an interview with Yavuz on the Gulen movement. I know this will not change anything for those who hate him and for those who love him


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
The Gülen Movement: a modern expression of Turkish Islam - Interview with Hakan Yavuz

Religioscope
21 Jul 2004

On first looking at the volume edited by M. Hakan Yavuz and John L. Esposito entitled "Turkish Islam and the Secular State: The Gülen Movement" (Syracuse University Press, 2003), many people are likely to wonder who the man is pictured on the cover of the book. They will discover that he is Fetullah Gülen (b. 1938), an important figure in contemporary Turkish Islam. The book is a well-informed introduction by Western and Turkish experts to the Gülen movement – a movement that, as we shall see, sometimes looks more like a network.


This movement is one of the eight major groups derived from the work of the reformer Said Nursi (1873–196, author of several volumes of Qur'anic exegesis known as Risale-I Nur. Nursi made an attempt to respond to the debates of his time (emergence of the new republic and Kemalist secularization efforts): he became the source of a powerful movement active in Turkey. Hakan Yasvuz explains:

"The Nur movement (also known as Nurculuk) differs from other Islamic movements in terms of its understanding of Islam and is strategy of transforming society by raising individual consciousness. As a resistance movement to the the ongoing statist modernization process in Turkey, it is forward looking and proactive."

Regarding the Gülen community, its impact is not limited to Turkey: putting into practice Nursi's educational ideals, the community has created more than 300 modern, high-quality schools (including high schools), not only in Turkey, but also in several other parts of the world (primarily in Central Asia and the Balkans, but also in more exotic places, such as Mongolia or Bangladesh as well as in some Western cities). The curriculums of these schools do not have any explicitly Islamic content. Gülen aspires to create an educated elite and does not see any conflict between reason and revelation. His schools also contribute to the development of Turkish influence abroad.

At the end of two introductory chapters, which put the movement into context, co-editor Hakan Yavuz (associate professor in political science at the University of Utah) claims that "this movement opens new venues for the radical reimagination of tradition". Gülen's community combines Islam and Turkish nationalism. Moreover, it is "secularization-friendly" – and also American-friendly, which is not very common today in the Muslim world, but apparently derives from an assessment of what is best for Turkish interests.

In order to find out more about the Gülen movement, Religioscope put several questions on the subject to Hakan Yavuz, considered to be one of the best academic experts on the movement. He agreed to share his insights with us.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Said Nursi (Source: http://www.bediuzzaman.org)
Religioscope - Fetullah Gülen has emerged as one of the manifestations of Said Nursi's legacy in Turkey. Could you please first summarize some of the key features of Said Nursi's teachings?

Hakan Yavuz - As far I know, Said Nursi attempted to empower Turkey's Muslims by updating Islamic terminology and language. He tried to provide them with a new vocabulary in order to allow them to participate in modern discussions and debates on issues like constitutionalism, science, freedom and democracy. So one of his primary goals was to empower Muslims with a new cognitive map.

Secondly, he tried to provide a new, flexible Muslim identity.

Thirdly, he stressed the idea that religion and science are not in tension: they are not mutually exclusive, but can work together. In a way, he tried to vernacularize science and modern discourses in an Islamic idiom, to facilitate the dissemination of scientific knowledge in Muslim countries.

These, essentially, were the three goals of the writings of Said Nursi.

Religioscope - Fetullah Gülen never met Said Nursi personally. How does his own teaching fit into Said Nursi’s legacy? And what are the relations between the group around Fetullah Gülen and the other parts of the Nur movement?

Hakan Yavuz - The Nur movement went through a number of processes of fragmentation or pluralization: firstly, as a result of political debates; secondly, as a result of class distinctions; thirdly, as a result of ethnic divisions between Kurds and Turkish Nurcus; and fourthly, in terms of the differences between highly-educated and less-educated Turks. This has led to different understandings and different groupings within the Nur movement.

The Gülen movement emerged very much out of the Nur movement. Yet there are certain characteristics that Gülen brought to it. This is why I call it a neo-Nur movement. In terms of nationalism, Gülen is more Turkish nationalist in his thinking. Also, he is somewhat more state-oriented, and is more concerned with market economics and neo-liberal economic policies. These, in my opinion, are the three major characteristics of the neo-Nur movement.

The Gülen movement tries to move from practice to ideas. Practice is important: action is very significant. In its view, Islam is not only about praying five times a day and reading the books of Said Nursi, but acting, doing and creating institutions. In that sense, the Gülen movement is more worldly: it wants to create heaven in this world – education system, hospitals, institutions, and so forth. So whereas Said Nursi stressed cognitive understanding, Gülen is more action-oriented.


Hakan Yavuz during the interview with Religioscope.
Religioscope - If we consider the context of contemporary Turkey, there is one key element: the harsh forms of secularism that Kemalist Turkey developed. This kind of secularism came to be a kind of state ideology. How do the Nur movement in general and Gülen specifically deal with this reality of secular Turkey?

Hakan Yavuz - In Turkey, there are two competing conceptions of modernity. One is top-down modernity, also known as Kemalism, the ideology of Mustafa Kemal, the founder of the Turkish Republic. This ideology has two pillars: nationalism and secularism. Secularism is very much equated with modernization and Westernization in Turkey. It eventually became the legitimizing ideology of the governing elite. Secularism does not necessarily mean separation of religion and politics. But as it increasingly came to define the identity of the ruling elite, it generated a major reaction from the Anatolian masses and the periphery. This reaction articulated itself against secularism.

The second conception of modernity in Turkey is a bottom-up modernity: here modernity is not an alien and negative thing. The Turks should enjoy it, but it should be negotiated and redefined. It should also be internalized by the masses rather than imposed by the state.

With those two different conceptions of modernity, you have also two different conceptions of secularism in Turkey. One is the top-down modernization-project conception of secularism: it is very much a laïcisme in the French sense. This approach means that there is no room at all for religion in the public sphere, resulting in the cleansing of religion from the public domain. Science becomes the guide, while religion is something negative: something to get rid of.

The second form of modernity – i.e. bottom-up modernity – allows room for religion in the public sphere. Its conception of secularism is in line with the Anglo-Saxon notion of this concept. Religion is seen as a source of morality and ethics. It also does not see religion and politics as being necessarily in conflict. However, it does not want religion to become a tool of politics, because if something then goes wrong in politics, people will blame religion.

The Nur movement always wanted religion to remain above politics, because it was concerned that politics would corrupt religion.

Today, in Turkey, the balance of power is shifting toward a bottom-up conception of modernity and a new vision of secularism. Gülen very much represents this approach, and he is an agent of this transformation. He has played a key role in transforming people’s minds and has led them to a new understanding of a bottom-up modernity.

Religioscope - You have described the Nur movement as a movement to cultivate faith without entering into a confrontation with modernity. What are its methods for achieving this in contemporary Turkey?

Hakan Yavuz - I understand modernity in terms of a market economy, human rights and creating new spaces for individual differences. The Nur movement is a modernizing system of faith and a modernizing activism generated and supported by Islam. Islam and modernity are not necessarily in conflict: they can work together.

In order to preserve their uniqueness and respect the uniqueness of others as well, Muslims need to share a new legal code, and to have a free-market economy, private education and free thinking. All these aspects of modernity have been internalized, but also disseminated and legitimized, by the Nur movement, which has stressed the idea of becoming and being a Muslim in the modern world by supporting and consolidating modern institutions of democracy, the rule of law, a free-market economy, and so forth.


Religioscope - From an organizational viewpoint, how does the Gülen movement express itself? As one speaks with followers of Fetullah Gülen, there is an obvious reluctance to acknowledge the group as an organization. Since the title of your book mentions the Gülen movement, do you consider this word as the most appropriate description? Or would you rather speak about a network? Sometimes, followers describe themselves as a cemaat (community).

Hakan Yavuz - This is an excellent question. Is this a movement, a community or a network? How should it be seen?

I use the term movement, because a movement has a collective goal that it intends to achieve through a collective engagement. In order to achieve it, you need networks. The Gülen movement consists of a number of networks, organized horizontally. In this loose network system, the traditional values and idioms of the community play an important role.

As a movement, it incorporates the network and community, or communal ethos. I would consider it as a movement based on the re-imagining of Islam and consisting of loose networks under the guidance and leadership of Fetullah Gülen.

These networks are not necessarily organized in hierarchical terms. But we see three circles. The first is the core circle around Gülen. The second circle consists of those who give their time and labour in order to achieve the collective goals of the movement. The third circle consists of those who are sympathizers: sometimes they support the movement by writing an article in the media, or they give money, or they support the movement in other ways.

So you have a number of circles, but each circle includes a number of networks. When we examine these networks, there is a sense of solidarity and of the Islamic ethos of brotherhood. This is the glue that joins these networks together.

Religioscope - The most important factor that holds these networks together seems to be Fetullah Gülen himself. Could the movement exist without him?

Hakan Yavuz - You are right that Gülen is in a way the integrating personality of these networks and circles. If Gülen dies, we will see a fragmentation. However, it could be just like the Nur movement: Said Nursi died, but the Nur movement survived and expanded.

After Gülen’s death, I expect a number of new groups to emerge and networks to be revised. I do not think that the movement is going to disappear. It could restructure itself under different names and with different leaders.

Religioscope - You have described the movement as an education-oriented movement. Could we say that an educational project is at the very core of the Gülen movement?

Hakan Yavuz - Gülen believes that the main problem in the world is lack of knowledge, which involves related problems concerning the production and control of knowledge. How do you create knowledge, maintain it and disseminate it? He thinks it can only be done through education. Education is very important if one wants to become a better Muslim.

Education is key. Not religious education: we are talking about secular education, science and the humanities – and of course religion as well. Gülen believes that those three forms of education should enhance and complement each other rather than compete with each other.

Religioscope - What most people know about the Gülen movement has been the creation of a network of schools. Interestingly, the movement did not only create schools in Turkey, but in a number of other countries as well. Does this education-oriented project go along with the movement’s strategic thinking? Is it a way of spreading values that go beyond the confines of the educational project?

Hakan Yavuz - Yes. The Gülen movement believes that we are living in a global world. Muslims are not isolated. Muslim communities are found in many non-Muslim countries. They have to interact and to create a shared understanding, a shared experience and a shared code of ethics.

The movement tries to achieve this through the educational system. By establishing schools in China, in Russia or in Africa, it aspires to educate other people about Islam and to educate Muslims about other cultures as well. It sees education as the only way to create a shared language and shared ethics – and also to create sympathizers around the world, which is the third circle I mentioned earlier.

Religioscope - Sympathizers for the Gülen movement, for Islam, for Turkey?...

Hakan Yavuz - That is correct: sympathizers for Gülen, sympathizers for Islam and sympathizers for Turkey.

The national aspect is very important for Gülen. He believes in something called Turkish Islam, shaped by Sufism, Turkey's positive experience with the West and Turkey's transformation. This is an understanding of Islam shaped by the history and contemporary experiences of Turkey.

Religioscope - Does this explain why the Gülen movement is not really active in the Arabic world? Or are there other circumstances that explain this fact?

Hakan Yavuz - You are right, the Gülen movement in not active in the Arab world. One of the key reasons is that some Arab countries do not allow the movement to operate and treat it as an agent of the United States (or even an agent of the CIA, since Gülen lives in the United States). It is also viewed as an agent of globalization. The Arab world is not at all sympathetic to this movement.

Also, Gülen and people around him do not necessarily want to get involved in the Arab world, because they believe that it does not understand Islam properly. In fact, they want to distance themselves from the Arab world. Here you have the nationalist aspect of the movement coming to the fore.

Religioscope - But are there some movements in the Arab world with which the Gülen movement maintains privileged relations?

Hakan Yavuz - As far as I know, no. I do not know any movement that – at the moment – is in interaction or in sympathy with the Gülen movement. In the movement’s newspaper, Zaman, and on its TV station, Samanyolu, I have yet to see an article that praises any Islamic movement in the Arab world as democratic or modern. They are either critical or silent on the subject.

The movement believes that the best Islam is the Islam of Turkey, the Islam that is defended and promoted by Gülen, who is in favour of dialogue and moderation. He has met with Pope John Paul II and several prominent religion scholars. He believes that Islam should not take on an identity of confrontation and conflict, but rather one of co-operation and coexistence.

Religioscope - Beside education, what is Fetullah Gülen's aim? In the recently published book, you stress that his aim is not to create an Islamic state.

Hakan Yavuz - According to Gülen and the Nur movement, it is anti-Islamic to talk about an Islamic state. But you can create a conscious Muslim. You can create Muslim networks. You can create Muslim ethics and good models of coexistence by utilizing Islam. But when Islam becomes a model for the state, Gülen believes it is not Islam anymore.

His goal is to raise Muslim consciousness and to get involved in modernity, democracy and a free-market economy, so as to get Muslims to enter into those global processes. His goal is also to turn Turkey into a regional power. Turkey means a lot to Fetullah Gülen.

Religioscope - In light of your explanations, it may seem quite surprising that, in recent years, some hardline secularists in Turkey have become extremely hostile to Fetullah Gülen – even though the movement seeks to avoid confrontation with the state and has sometimes even proved to be subservient to it; for instance, in the early 1980s, when Gülen supported the military coup. How do you explain why the movement has experienced such reactions to its work and teachings? Fetullah Gülen has been living abroad for several years in order to avoid unpleasant experiences.


Hakan Yavuz - In my book Islamic Political Identity in Turkey (Oxford University Press, 2003), I have attempted to explain that, when Turkey started to go through a process of neo-liberal economic reform in the early 1980s, it created a space for new opportunities. This allowed variousidentities to become more public, particularly communal processes. For instance, Kurdish and Alevi identities became more assertive. The Kemalist military state wanted to exploit the Gülen form of political Islam and they did, using it against Erbakan (the ex-Prime Minister and leader of political Islam in Turkey for many years).

After the military and their allies got rid of Erbakan, they turned against Gülen. Gülen represents a major threat for these people, because they want to see a backward, radical Islam, in order to justify repression – whereas with Gülen, you do not get that. This angers them even more!

Also, Gülen tries to educate the periphery by teaching them foreign languages and providing scholarships for study in foreign countries. This angers the establishment as well, because they want to control the country and not to share the resources with the rest of the population. There is also a conflict over resources. Gülen was on the side of the poor, while the establishment did not want to see his movement opening up educational opportunities for the marginal sectors of Turkish society. This frustrated militant secularists in Turkey.

Religioscope - What do the Gülen movement and the Nur movement in general represent in contemporary Turkey in terms of influence, intellectual impact, numbers, and so on?

Hakan Yavuz - The movement is very active, and is responsible for newspapers, financial institutions, the best hospitals and private high schools in Turkey, and so forth. It is part of every aspect of Turkish life. It tries to set a good example and to improve standards. I think it is well integrated into Turkish society.

The movement wants to provide a good image of Islam, not so much through indoctrination, but to teach Islam through its members setting a good example by becoming good doctors, good mathematicians, good politicians, good cooks, and so forth. Such people want to teach Islam by doing their duty properly.

In a way, they represent a new model of Islam in Turkey, at peace with democracy and modernity. This also reflects the Anatolian understanding of Islam, i.e. the Sufi conception of morality is at the centre of the movement.

It also stresses the "greater jihad" (jihad al akbar), i.e. the control of one's nafs (lower desires).

I think it has played a very positive role in developing closer ties with European countries.

Religioscope - Could we describe such a movement as an expression of post-Sufi trends?

Hakan Yavuz - Yes, one could see it as post-Sufism, or as a new Sufism – a religion structuring social interactions by reutilizing and reinterpreting religious values without imposing religion on society. It has to do with action informed by religion.

Religioscope - People involved in the Gülen movement are not involved in Sufi brotherhoods, are they?

Hakan Yavuz - No, they are not. Members of the Nur movement are not members of any Sufi group, because they believe that the age of Sufi tarikat [Sufi brotherhood] is past. Yet they believe that the ideas of morality, religion and God could be remodelled and utilized in the modern age.

Religioscope - And what is the interaction between the followers of Fetullah Gülen and the current leading party in Turkey, the Justice and Development Party (AKP)? Do they tend to belong to this party or do they vote primarily for parties without a Muslim background.

Hakan Yavuz - In previous elections, members of the movement voted for Bülent Ecevit (Democratic Left). In recent elections, I think their votes were divided between the AKP and Ecevit. Members of the movement do not necessarily vote for Muslim parties. They actually try to stay away from any party that describes itself as "Islamic" or "Muslim". But they have very good ties and relations with the AKP government.

M. Hakan Yavuz and John L. Esposito (eds.), Turkish Islam and the Secular State: The Gülen Movement, Syracuse (New York): Syracuse University Press, 2003, XXXIV+280 pp.

The interview was conducted by Jean-François Mayer.




107.       catwoman
8933 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 05:01 am

Quoting vineyards:

Pointing out to translation problems Aenigma asks why Quran can't be properly translated and why even Arabs misunderstand it: Arabic is full of equivocal words which produce immensely different meanings in different contexts.
This aspect of the Arabic language is somewhat in line with how Arabs generally are.

To make things more complicated, The Quran was written in Phasih Arabic, almost a separate language not spoken by the masses but vaguely understood. Add to that the fact that, The Qoran was first memorized by certain individuals the credibility of whom was said to be determined by a board of scholars. Some of the verses were eliminated and some were included, the wording depended on how well those people memorized the verses and it did not happen in prophet's life time nor did it happen before some 40-50 years. The Quran was first hand written on gazelle hide and sealed.

In addition to all this, there is a principle in the Islamic Faith called Taqiyye which means if your life is at stake, or if you think you are serving a good purpose such as the spreading of your faith then you are free to tell lies.

No one knows, what is true from an Islamic point of view (turban included) whether it is a taquiyye, translation problem or lack of IQ to properly understand it.


Thank you for this very interesting post Vineyards. I love the idea of telling lies in order to spread the faith! It's absolutely brilliant and smells so much like 7th century backwardness to me.

108.       catwoman
8933 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 05:07 am

Quoting alameda:

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting qdemir:

In Islam women don't pray during the periods of their menstruation.


They don't pray because male chauvinist pigs convinced them (under the threat of death) that it's "dirty".



Could it not be that the state they are in is like a prayer? If one misses a prayer, they are obliged to make it up. In the case of a menstruation woman, no make up is required.


That's a very interesting twist, much like the "burka liberates women" bs. Too bad Mohammed didn't think of that one and simply put it that "they are dirty".
So if menstruation is actually a "higher state", then I guess it's even better when they do pray at taht time, don't you think?
The real reason I suspect had to do with the fact that arabs were dirty people at that time and Islam was supposed to enforce some hygiene. The problem is that it's not 7th century any more and such obsolete behaviors are backwards and simply ridiculous.

109.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 11:47 am

Quoting vineyards:

Pointing out to translation problems Aenigma asks why Quran can't be properly translated and why even Arabs misunderstand it: Arabic is full of equivocal words which produce immensely different meanings in different contexts.
This aspect of the Arabic language is somewhat in line with how Arabs generally are.

To make things more complicated, The Quran was written in Phasih Arabic, almost a separate language not spoken by the masses but vaguely understood. Add to that the fact that, The Qoran was first memorized by certain individuals the credibility of whom was said to be determined by a board of scholars. Some of the verses were eliminated and some were included, the wording depended on how well those people memorized the verses and it did not happen in prophet's life time nor did it happen before some 40-50 years. The Quran was first hand written on gazelle hide and sealed.

In addition to all this, there is a principle in the Islamic Faith called Taqiyye which means if your life is at stake, or if you think you are serving a good purpose such as the spreading of your faith then you are free to tell lies.

No one knows, what is true from an Islamic point of view (turban included) whether it is a taquiyye, translation problem or lack of IQ to properly understand it.



Thanks for your interesting post Vineyards.
It certainly explains A LOT to me, and makes me wonder how every muslim I ever knew speaks with such expert authority on the Quran!!!

110.       qdemir
813 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 01:44 pm

If your life or life of a member of your family is under threat just because of your faith, you are allowed to hide your faith, or you are allowed to say as opposed to whay you actually believe.
This is called 'takiyye' in Islam.

One of the companions of Hz Mohammed, Ammar and his parents were tortured by non-believers as he became a Muslim. He was forced to denial of his belief by torturing his father and mother heavily. His father and mother died of severe torture. As he was exposed to excruciating torture he said what he was asked for by non-believers. However, it was just a denial in words, but not one from the heart. Hz Mohammed told him if he was exposed to such a torture again he would say in the same way.

If your properties or money are under threat you are allowed to tell lies.
This is also called 'takiyye'

Nobody tells the truth when they are threatened by robbers. It wouldn't be wise just for sake of telling the truth.

Takiyye doesn't mean you are allowed to tell lies about issues related to Islam in order to spread your belief.

Every thing is distinctly stated in the Koran. Nobody is allowed, or licensed to state otherwise.

Takiyye isn't one of the principles or prays in Islam, but just a permission to tell such lies to save your life, properties, money, etc. in such cases.


111.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:06 pm

kadersokak,
its not that innocent with cheating as you describe above. it is allowed at any time under any circumstnces.
and one of the names of allah is a great deceiver. just wonderful!
while other two religions dont allow such behaviour.

i guess islam is the only religion that obsessively defends itself even using lies.

112.       qdemir
813 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:07 pm

In Islam women don't perform their daily prayers when they are on menstruation period because a woman who is menstruating can't keep ablution as blood keeps flowing from her body on her period. Ablution is a prerequisite for a prayer. And they aren't obliged to make up those prayers they missed during their periods.

113.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:12 pm

Quoting qdemir:

In Islam women don't perform their daily prayers when they are on menstruation period because a woman who is menstruating can't keep ablution as blood keeps flowing from her body on her period. Ablution is a prerequisite for a prayer. And they aren't obliged to make up those prayers they missed during their periods.


its so funny that body is more important than soul in islam. everything is very earthly in islam, not spiritual at all.
why blood is considered to be impure?
its not important what you have on your body, but on your heart.

114.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:20 pm

Quoting qdemir:

Every thing is distinctly stated in the Koran.



But according to Vineyards, it is not! Nobody seems to be able to agree on what EXACTLY or DISTINCTLY it does say!

115.       qdemir
813 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:24 pm

That's not because menstruation is considered dirty or blood is impure. Ablution is not only getting clean physically but also getting ready spiritually for a prayer.
And there are some principles to keep an ablution. One of them is; you mustn't bleed in any way.

116.       qdemir
813 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:27 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting qdemir:

Every thing is distinctly stated in the Koran.



But according to Vineyards, it is not! Nobody seems to be able to agree on what EXACTLY or DISTINCTLY it does say!



It doesn't matter who says what, others or me. Just get a Koran in English, read and find out yourself. If you would like, I can recommend you one.

117.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:30 pm

Quoting qdemir:

It doesn't matter who says what, others or me. Just get a Koran in English, read and find out yourself. If you would like, I can recommend you one.



Actually it matters A LOT who says what!!!!

I have read it - but it appears that all translations are wrong eh?

118.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:31 pm

Quoting qdemir:

That's not because menstruation is considered dirty or blood is impure. Ablution is not only getting clean physically but also getting ready spiritually for a prayer.
And there are some principles to keep an ablution. One of them is; you mustn't bleed in any way.



qdemir, mohammed said that the period is a sickness/illness
and now you are telling a different story. are you applying taqqye to infidels?

119.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:33 pm

Quoting qdemir:

If you would like, I can recommend you one.



I have an idea that your recommended one would be the preferred translation of Fethulla Gulen - maybe a nice "soft" version for converting westerners!!

120.       qdemir
813 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:34 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting qdemir:

It doesn't matter who says what, others or me. Just get a Koran in English, read and find out yourself. If you would like, I can recommend you one.



Actually it matters A LOT who says what!!!!

I have read it - but it appears that all translations are wrong eh?



No, they aren't. If you really would like to read one translated successfully in Enlish, Just pm me.

121.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:36 pm

Quoting femme_fatal:

qdemir, mohammed said that the period is a sickness/illness



NO NO Femme!

It must have been a bad translation you read - it is not to be trusted.

The ACTUAL words were probably something like:-
"All women are wonderful and the period is a wonderful thing too"

122.       ciko
784 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:38 pm

what is the aim of this thread? to determine how good or bad islam is?

123.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:39 pm

It is specifically to annoy you Ciko

124.       qdemir
813 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:40 pm

Quoting qdemir:

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting qdemir:

It doesn't matter who says what, others or me. Just get a Koran in English, read and find out yourself. If you would like, I can recommend you one.



Actually it matters A LOT who says what!!!!

I have read it - but it appears that all translations are wrong eh?



No, they aren't. If you really would like to read one translated successfully in Enlish, Just pm me.



I got you, AEnigma.

125.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:42 pm

You got me Qdemir? Perhaps you missed my response to your kind offer

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting qdemir:

If you would like, I can recommend you one.



I have an idea that your recommended one would be the preferred translation of Fethulla Gulen - maybe a nice "soft" version for converting westerners!!

126.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:43 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting femme_fatal:

qdemir, mohammed said that the period is a sickness/illness



NO NO Femme!

It must have been a bad translation you read - it is not to be trusted.

The ACTUAL words were probably something like:-
"All women are wonderful and the period is a wonderful thing too"


thats what vineyards wrote about.
when you read koran and speak good things on it, then you apparently understood it.
but if you speak negative, then it must be a bed translation or you simply lack IQ to understand the people of science-arabs!

127.       qdemir
813 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:43 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

You got me Qdemir? Perhaps you missed my response to your kind offer

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting qdemir:

If you would like, I can recommend you one.



I have an idea that your recommended one would be the preferred translation of Fethulla Gulen - maybe a nice "soft" version for converting westerners!!



I got you. Just keep going on your way.

128.       ciko
784 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:43 pm

Quoting qdemir:

Quoting qdemir:

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting qdemir:

It doesn't matter who says what, others or me. Just get a Koran in English, read and find out yourself. If you would like, I can recommend you one.



Actually it matters A LOT who says what!!!!

I have read it - but it appears that all translations are wrong eh?



No, they aren't. If you really would like to read one translated successfully in Enlish, Just pm me.



I got you, AEnigma.



qdemir..what are you trying to do? cant you see people who you are trying to argue with apperantly dont like religions and their rules..why then!!! let people believe whatever they want please.

129.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:45 pm

Quoting qdemir:

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting qdemir:

It doesn't matter who says what, others or me. Just get a Koran in English, read and find out yourself. If you would like, I can recommend you one.



Actually it matters A LOT who says what!!!!

I have read it - but it appears that all translations are wrong eh?



No, they aren't. If you really would like to read one translated successfully in Enlish, Just pm me.


I wish there will be less secrecy..We would like to be enlightened too.
Why are you not giving the links so we can all have a look and learn the truth?
ps..I think same secret enlightenment has been applied to DK as well, if i my memory is not failing me.

130.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:47 pm

Quoting thehandsom:


I wish there will be less secrecy..We would like to be enlightened too.
Why are you not giving the links so we can all have a look and learn the truth?



shhhhhhhhhhh!
hes secretly teaching deli kizin and aenigma

131.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:48 pm

Quoting femme_fatal:

shhhhhhhhhhh!
hes secretly teaching deli kizin and aenigma



NEVER!

132.       qdemir
813 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:48 pm

Quoting ciko:

Quoting qdemir:

Quoting qdemir:

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting qdemir:

It doesn't matter who says what, others or me. Just get a Koran in English, read and find out yourself. If you would like, I can recommend you one.



Actually it matters A LOT who says what!!!!

I have read it - but it appears that all translations are wrong eh?



No, they aren't. If you really would like to read one translated successfully in Enlish, Just pm me.



I got you, AEnigma.




qdemir..what are you trying to do? cant you see people who you are trying to argue with apperantly dont like religions and their rules..why then!!! let people believe whatever they want please.



I am not in a position to let anybody do anything, or to prevent anybody from doing anything. I am just talking about me and my belief. Let me talk, PLEASE, will you?

133.       ciko
784 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:50 pm

Quoting qdemir:

Quoting ciko:

Quoting qdemir:

Quoting qdemir:

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting qdemir:

It doesn't matter who says what, others or me. Just get a Koran in English, read and find out yourself. If you would like, I can recommend you one.



Actually it matters A LOT who says what!!!!

I have read it - but it appears that all translations are wrong eh?



No, they aren't. If you really would like to read one translated successfully in Enlish, Just pm me.



I got you, AEnigma.




qdemir..what are you trying to do? cant you see people who you are trying to argue with apperantly dont like religions and their rules..why then!!! let people believe whatever they want please.



I am not in a position to let anybody do anything, or to prevent anybody from doing anything. I am just talking about me and my belief. Let me talk, PLEASE, will you?



of course you can talk but the more you talk the more they tease your religion..i just dont want them to make fun of my religion ..cos it hurts me..thats all.

134.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:51 pm

Quoting qdemir:

I am not in a position to let anybody do anything, or to prevent anybody from doing anything. I am just talking about me and my belief. Let me talk, PLEASE, will you?



Excuse me, but recommending people to read the Quran and explaining things by PM only, sounds a bit like trying to convince others to join Islam, rather than talking about your own private faith...

135.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:52 pm

Quoting qdemir:


I am not in a position to let anybody do anything, or to prevent anybody from doing anything. I am just talking about me and my belief. Let me talk, PLEASE, will you?



well, while ago you were one of those who tried to silence others who tried to speak different views than others.

well, as democracy lovers we let you speak, please, do, but dont get offended or complain if we speak negative about your religion

136.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:54 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting femme_fatal:

shhhhhhhhhhh!
hes secretly teaching deli kizin and aenigma



NEVER!


lol
I already mentioned about their impressive secrecy and skills to persuade people..
I am not going to be surprised you and dk start talking about in favor of turban in a month.haha lol lol lol

137.       qdemir
813 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:54 pm

Quoting ciko:

Quoting qdemir:

Quoting ciko:

Quoting qdemir:

Quoting qdemir:

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting qdemir:

It doesn't matter who says what, others or me. Just get a Koran in English, read and find out yourself. If you would like, I can recommend you one.



Actually it matters A LOT who says what!!!!

I have read it - but it appears that all translations are wrong eh?



No, they aren't. If you really would like to read one translated successfully in Enlish, Just pm me.



I got you, AEnigma.




qdemir..what are you trying to do? cant you see people who you are trying to argue with apperantly dont like religions and their rules..why then!!! let people believe whatever they want please.



I am not in a position to let anybody do anything, or to prevent anybody from doing anything. I am just talking about me and my belief. Let me talk, PLEASE, will you?



of course you can talk but the more you talk the more they tease your religion..i just dont want them to make fun of my religion ..cos it hurts me..thats all.



If it's the case just as you have stated, that's their problem, isn't it? It doesn't hurt me as I have self-confidence with myself as a person and with my belief.

138.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:55 pm

Quoting thehandsom:

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting femme_fatal:

shhhhhhhhhhh!
hes secretly teaching deli kizin and aenigma



NEVER!


lol
I already mentioned about their impressive secrecy and skills to persuade people..
I am not going to be surprised you and dk start talking about in favor of turban in a month.haha lol lol lol



139.       ciko
784 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:57 pm

Quoting qdemir:

Quoting ciko:

Quoting qdemir:

Quoting ciko:

Quoting qdemir:

Quoting qdemir:

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting qdemir:

It doesn't matter who says what, others or me. Just get a Koran in English, read and find out yourself. If you would like, I can recommend you one.



Actually it matters A LOT who says what!!!!

I have read it - but it appears that all translations are wrong eh?



No, they aren't. If you really would like to read one translated successfully in Enlish, Just pm me.



I got you, AEnigma.




qdemir..what are you trying to do? cant you see people who you are trying to argue with apperantly dont like religions and their rules..why then!!! let people believe whatever they want please.



I am not in a position to let anybody do anything, or to prevent anybody from doing anything. I am just talking about me and my belief. Let me talk, PLEASE, will you?



of course you can talk but the more you talk the more they tease your religion..i just dont want them to make fun of my religion ..cos it hurts me..thats all.



If it's the case just as you have stated, that's their problem, isn't it? It doesn't hurt me as I have self-confidence with myself as a person and with my belief.



you are not speaking your own thoughts you are speaking on behalf of muslims...it requires some responsibility. i am not sure that you are qualified enough to argue about such things.

140.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 02:59 pm

Quoting ciko:



of course you can talk but the more you talk the more they tease your religion..i just dont want them to make fun of my religion ..cos it hurts me..thats all.



well, dear boy, try to learn that there are people with diverse opinions about your religion. you ve got to learn to receive criticisms.
otherwise you are immature just as those who react with anger and murder anyone met in foreign embassies, churches or synagogues

141.       qdemir
813 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 03:01 pm

Quoting ciko:


you are not speaking your own thoughts you are speaking on behalf of muslims...it requires some responsibility. i am not sure that you are qualified enough to argue about such things.



If you have better explanations related to such issues, I would love to hear, or if I am in the wrong with anything I have posted, I would love you to correct me, too.

If it's your point.

142.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 03:04 pm

Quoting ciko:


of course you can talk but the more you talk the more they tease your religion..i just dont want them to make fun of my religion ..cos it hurts me..thats all.



theres an interesting document about danish cartoons.
how muslims are unable to take criticisms.

btw, theres a moment about a turk who without a wink lies

enjoy!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03OhSgLlETY

143.       ciko
784 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 03:15 pm

i really really wonder didnt you islam proffesors read anything beautiful in qoran i would like to hear something nice about islam from you for only once

144.       si++
3785 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 03:29 pm

Quoting a Turkish hater:


theres an interesting document about danish cartoons.
how muslims are unable to take criticisms.

btw, theres a moment about a turk who without a wink lies

enjoy!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03OhSgLlETY




what makes you feel like putting a comment like that?

are you implying that you should expect lies from a Turk anytime anywhere?

you had said you don't hate Turks. Hadn't you? Why do I find it hard to believe? (Not a question for you, I am just talking to myself)

145.       si++
3785 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 03:37 pm

Quoting kaddersokak:


Long article snipped


Kadder,

You've done it again. You always do that.



Instead of copy-pasting a long article, can you just a give a link?

Or put them into a box like this, so that we wouldn't have to scroll down too much in case we want to skip your thing.

146.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 03:38 pm

Quoting ciko:

i just dont want them to make fun of my religion ..cos it hurts me..thats all.



Ciko, I apologise.
You rarely "bite back" and usually take things in very good humour, so I am sorry if my posts offended you

147.       si++
3785 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 03:47 pm

Quoting Deli_kizin:

......... But dont you think the Quran is full of contradictions? I have read several sources upon it, (as a study Islamology at university), and read quoted verses there in Quran. At one point, it asks the Muslims to kill all Christians, but somewhere it writes that .........


I am really trying to get an idea of what Islam is. But the more I learn, the more disappointed I get. And it is not because I am anti-religious, I am actually really spiritual. But all that I read, doesnt make me think of a Good Power.



Is it all Christians or all non-Muslims? I mean it's not something against Christians in particular. If you are not a Muslim or anti-Muslim actually, you are a target.

148.       Daydreamer
3743 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 05:08 pm

Quoting qdemir:

If your life or life of a member of your family is under threat just because of your faith, you are allowed to hide your faith, or you are allowed to say as opposed to whay you actually believe.
This is called 'takiyye' in Islam.



That's really interesting. If I remember correctly, in Catholicism, whatever the threat, you are being rewarded for abiding by your faith. Rejecting your faith - even if you're lying to save yourself - is considered a sin. Islam seems quite an opportunistic religion, judging by what you're saying. On the one hand, like extremists blowing up innocent people, you should fight for your faith, even die; on the other, if it's inconvenient, or you might lose your money, feel free to reject Islam, Allah won't hold a grudge against you as you're lying. Lying a virtue? Or, at least something a God can tolerate? Weird...

You know, I'm not God, but if I were, I'd hate my supporters to be free to reject me if only that's convenient for them.

149.       Daydreamer
3743 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 05:11 pm

Oh, by the way, I'm not defending or promoting Catholicism, I'm an atheist so I'm gonna burn in hell anyway...

150.       qdemir
813 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 05:54 pm

Quoting Daydreamer:

Quoting qdemir:

If your life or life of a member of your family is under threat just because of your faith, you are allowed to hide your faith, or you are allowed to say as opposed to whay you actually believe.
This is called 'takiyye' in Islam.



That's really interesting. If I remember correctly, in Catholicism, whatever the threat, you are being rewarded for abiding by your faith. Rejecting your faith - even if you're lying to save yourself - is considered a sin. Islam seems quite an opportunistic religion, judging by what you're saying. On the one hand, like extremists blowing up innocent people, you should fight for your faith, even die; on the other, if it's inconvenient, or you might lose your money, feel free to reject Islam, Allah won't hold a grudge against you as you're lying. Lying a virtue? Or, at least something a God can tolerate? Weird...

You know, I'm not God, but if I were, I'd hate my supporters to be free to reject me if only that's convenient for them.



You should have quoted the following instance, too:

One of the companions of Hz Mohammed, Ammar and his parents were tortured by non-believers as he became a Muslim. He was forced to denial of his belief by torturing his father and mother heavily. His father and mother died of severe torture. As he was exposed to excruciating torture he said what he was asked for by non-believers. However, it was just a denial in words, but not one from the heart. Hz Mohammed told him if he was exposed to such a torture again he would say in the same way.

Quoting qdemir:

If your properties or money are under threat you are allowed to tell lies.
This is also called 'takiyye'

Nobody tells the truth when they are threatened by robbers. It wouldn't be wise just for sake of telling the truth.



Does it mean you can reject Islam to save your money!?



Sampanya liked this message
151.       ciko
784 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 06:17 pm

Quoting femme_fatal:

Quoting ciko:



of course you can talk but the more you talk the more they tease your religion..i just dont want them to make fun of my religion ..cos it hurts me..thats all.



well, dear boy, try to learn that there are people with diverse opinions about your religion. you ve got to learn to receive criticisms.
otherwise you are immature just as those who react with anger and murder anyone met in foreign embassies, churches or synagogues



well dear girl, i know there are people with diverse opinions about my religion and i have some unusual opinions about my religion and i am able to question my own religion but sometimes you judge whole the religion according to only what you see in your countries...i mean extremists.. Islam is not as bad as you think. there are some beautiful things in islam femme. i dont expect you to be nice to muslims....and i dont care about it but i just expect you to consider that believers could be sensitive sometimes when you are so harsh to their religions..and i think it is understandable ( if you ever believed in anything in your life..you can understand what i mean)

152.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 06:24 pm

Now I am a bit confused qdemir.
previously you wrote that :
"Every thing is distinctly stated in the Koran. Nobody is allowed, or licensed to state otherwise."
I assumed that takkiye is in Koran itself.
The event you are mentioning, thinking about the time scale, happened after Islam's creation. I mean Kuran was already there and Mohammad was the prophet. (Because his friend was a believer-believing in Islam- had been tortured by non-believers etc)

If takkiye is in Kuran, are you suggesting that 'that incident' had happened and God sent that a new verse because of that event?
Or takkiye is not in Kuran itself?

ps..I am really trying to understand the timescale of it..I am not trying insinuate anything.

153.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 06:59 pm

Quoting Daydreamer:

Oh, by the way, I'm not defending or promoting Catholicism, I'm an atheist so I'm gonna burn in hell anyway...



Hehehe you can join me, thehandsom, and 99.9% of women then (plus raki) ....

I think thehandsom will be too busy to talk to US though lol lol lol

154.       teaschip
3870 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 07:41 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting Daydreamer:

Oh, by the way, I'm not defending or promoting Catholicism, I'm an atheist so I'm gonna burn in hell anyway...



Hehehe you can join me, thehandsom, and 99.9% of women then (plus raki) ....

I think thehandsom will be too busy to talk to US though lol lol lol



Yet, there is still hope for all of you.

155.       Elisabeth
5732 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 07:44 pm

Quoting teaschip1:


Yet, there is still hope for all of you.



I'm not sure that "Hail Mary's" can save this bunch...but we can try teas! Go Go Dynamic Catholic Duo Powers!!

156.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 08:01 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting Daydreamer:

Oh, by the way, I'm not defending or promoting Catholicism, I'm an atheist so I'm gonna burn in hell anyway...



Hehehe you can join me, thehandsom, and 99.9% of women then (plus raki) ....

I think thehandsom will be too busy to talk to US though lol lol lol



with 99.9% of women?
goodness! are you really gonna enjoy such hell of women? lol

i prefer 99% of men.

157.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 08:02 pm

btw, what allah has prepared for women in the jannah?

158.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 08:02 pm

Quoting femme_fatal:


with 99.9% of women?
goodness! are you really gonna enjoy such hell of women? lol

i prefer 99% of men.



I agree but sadly most of them go to eternal paradise
I will fight you for thehandsom

159.       catwoman
8933 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 08:51 pm

Quoting femme_fatal:

btw, what allah has prepared for women in the jannah?


a more comfortable harem.

160.       Elisabeth
5732 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 09:00 pm

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting femme_fatal:

btw, what allah has prepared for women in the jannah?


a more comfortable harem.


161.       catwoman
8933 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 09:06 pm

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting femme_fatal:

btw, what allah has prepared for women in the jannah?


a more comfortable harem.



Also, only one dude for 72 of them... that means less work... and that means they can strangle and kill the guy easier...

162.       vineyards
1954 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 09:56 pm

Back in the 80's, I was representing an American publication and had a guest from Saudi Arabia. I took him to a nice bar in the center of Taksim (Etap Marmara), and we began discussing Turkey, Islam. He said Turkey was going through all these economic problems because Turks had betrayed Islam. The guy was holding a glass of whiskey on the rocks and cursing Ataturk and his reforms. Of course, he wanted me to help him arrange a woman for that night. Now, if this is not takiyye or whatever it is a tell tale sign of how immature these medieval people are.

163.       Elisabeth
5732 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 09:58 pm

Quoting vineyards:

Back in the 80's, I was representing an American publication and had a guest from Saudi Arabia. I took him to a nice bar in the center of Taksim (Etap Marmara), and we began discussing Turkey, Islam. He said Turkey was going through all these economic problems becuase Turks betrayed Islam. The guy was holding a glass of whiskey on the rocks and cursing Ataturk and his reforms. Of course, he wanted me to help him arrange a woman for that night. Now, this is not takiyye or whatever it is but a tell tale sign of how immature these medieval people are.



You're so right.

164.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 10:29 pm

Quoting vineyards:

Back in the 80's, I was representing an American publication and had a guest from Saudi Arabia. I took him to a nice bar in the center of Taksim (Etap Marmara), and we began discussing Turkey, Islam. He said Turkey was going through all these economic problems because Turks had betrayed Islam. The guy was holding a glass of whiskey on the rocks and cursing Ataturk and his reforms. Of course, he wanted me to help him arrange a woman for that night. Now, if this is not takiyye or whatever it is a tell tale sign of how immature these medieval people are.


lol lol

165.       catwoman
8933 posts
 04 Feb 2008 Mon 10:33 pm

Quoting vineyards:

Back in the 80's, I was representing an American publication and had a guest from Saudi Arabia. I took him to a nice bar in the center of Taksim (Etap Marmara), and we began discussing Turkey, Islam. He said Turkey was going through all these economic problems because Turks had betrayed Islam. The guy was holding a glass of whiskey on the rocks and cursing Ataturk and his reforms. Of course, he wanted me to help him arrange a woman for that night. Now, if this is not takiyye or whatever it is a tell tale sign of how immature these medieval people are.


Yep! Completely agree with you! It must be the third time now!

166.       CANLI
5084 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 02:04 am

Quoting vineyards:

Pointing out to translation problems Aenigma asks why Quran can't be properly translated and why even Arabs misunderstand it: Arabic is full of equivocal words which produce immensely different meanings in different contexts.
This aspect of the Arabic language is somewhat in line with how Arabs generally are.

To make things more complicated, The Quran was written in Phasih Arabic, almost a separate language not spoken by the masses but vaguely understood.


İ some how agree with that part,there would be some phrases need better explaination from İmam 'who is like a teacher of İslam whom studied arabic language as well'
But Fos'ha or formal arabic was the language spoken nowadays,so it was well understood by them,and it should be the language which we speak too as arabic speakers countries,but unfortunately we dont use in in our daily life thats why sometimes we 'as arabic speakers' need explanation for some words.
But as you see,there is Kur'an with explanation,signed from El-Azhar and as you know it is the ,oldest,biggest and largest İslamic Uni,and there is a committee of big,trusted,and well educated İmamlar to accept those explanations before authorise publishing to puplic ,so actually we dont trust any book,or anything related to religion without having good refrences.
As anyone can write anything and say it is in İslam,as it happen,and cause lots of problems and misunderstanding
so actually only people who cant read,or who are lazy to read tend to ask imamlar in persons about Kur'an meanings,but even tho İmamlar are there and will answer them,so nothing would cause misunderstanding if they seek the right source,and for that,its their own responsibility.

Quoting vineyards:


Add to that the fact that, The Qoran was first memorized by certain individuals the credibility of whom was said to be determined by a board of scholars. Some of the verses were eliminated and some were included, the wording depended on how well those people memorized the verses and it did not happen in prophet's life time nor did it happen before some 40-50 years. The Quran was first hand written on gazelle hide and sealed.


Yes it hasnt been collected as it is now in Muhamed SAV time,but it's been written on his time ,as he ordered it from people arround him to write it down as they heared it from him
it has been collected from them after he SAV died ,and that is a big difference
So,im afraid what you are stating above is out of the question!

Quoting vineyards:


In addition to all this, there is a principle in the Islamic Faith called Taqiyye which means if your life is at stake, or if you think you are serving a good purpose such as the spreading of your faith then you are free to tell lies.

No one knows, what is true from an Islamic point of view (turban included) whether it is a taquiyye, translation problem or lack of IQ to properly understand it.



İ dont know about that princible,but actually telling lies is HARAM forbidden in İslam by all means,except in some cases
Like when Muslim has been captured by his enemy in a war or something and they want information from him,and his life in danger if not telling so he can lie about it,or if he is threatened for being a muslim by people 'as happened in history' he is allowed to hide his faith and lie about it,if telling a thief lies to protect himself and family
Or,when a wife for example asks her husband if she looks wonderful,and he thinks she is away beyond it,he is allowed to lie about it

And as you see,that is logic,and if not doing so,that would be beyond it
BUT...to spread our faith by telling lies ?!
No ,never been allowed ,its still lies,and its forbbiden,actually,and its silly to do so too,because people who will become Muslims will discover the truth,so how come would such thing be allowed?
The other way arround,we MUST seek accuracy when talking about our religion,so we wont bear the burden of someone understood something wrong from something we've said.

So actually everything is clear in İslam 'even Turban' for people who want to know about it,and for those who doesnt want to know,they hide beyond such excuses.

167.       CANLI
5084 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 02:17 am

Quoting thehandsom:

Now I am a bit confused qdemir.
previously you wrote that :
"Every thing is distinctly stated in the Koran. Nobody is allowed, or licensed to state otherwise."
I assumed that takkiye is in Koran itself.
The event you are mentioning, thinking about the time scale, happened after Islam's creation. I mean Kuran was already there and Mohammad was the prophet. (Because his friend was a believer-believing in Islam- had been tortured by non-believers etc)

If takkiye is in Kuran, are you suggesting that 'that incident' had happened and God sent that a new verse because of that event?
Or takkiye is not in Kuran itself?

ps..I am really trying to understand the timescale of it..I am not trying insinuate anything.



İ dont know what do you mean exactly with ''takkiye''
İs it when people lie to protect their lives when being threatened for their religions?
when i understand the meaning 'maybe we call it something else',i can answer if i know

İ thought you were Muslim handsom...
Anyway,Kur'an has been sent from ALLAH during the time Rasul SAV were inviting people to İslam,
İt was interfeering with people's lives on that time
So,when you read when the Ayat has been sent,you will find many Ayat had stories of people who done this or that,and they didnt know the right thing so ALLAH answered them
So,as qdemir said,AMMAR had to say he is Kafir so they stop tourturing him 'they used to beary Muslims in sand,and only their head is visible,or tie each one of their hands in a robe,and pulling it different ways by horses till they become apart,...ect'so we are talking about really none human things
So,when he said that,he was crying sad,he is Muslim in his heart,but his tongue said he is not,so ALLAH sent that ayat on that time to calm his heart and people like him,not to worry they still muslims,and in cases like this they are allowed to lie to protect their lives and they are still Muslims as long as they are really Muslims in their hearts.

168.       CANLI
5084 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 02:20 am

Quoting femme_fatal:

btw, what allah has prepared for women in the jannah?


Whatever we wish for.

169.       CANLI
5084 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 02:21 am

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting femme_fatal:

btw, what allah has prepared for women in the jannah?


a more comfortable harem.



ALLAH told you that ?!

170.       catwoman
8933 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 02:33 am

Quoting CANLI:

Quoting femme_fatal:

btw, what allah has prepared for women in the jannah?


Whatever we wish for.


Allah told you that!?

171.       CANLI
5084 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 02:34 am

Quoting AEnigma III:

As an agnostic, I am genuinely curious as to why you believe in God/Allah.



Till a certian age,teens i believe,i didnt question it,and i was Muslim because my parents,family were Muslims too
But at on my teen stage i've start to question it
İ didnt question if there is a God or not,because i believe there is one
As a ship has its captain,universe must have its creator too.
But i've questioned which one is right,which one to follow
İslam,Christianity,or Judaism
Read some,and investigated,it was much easier for me to investigate Christianity tho we have many Christians living with us,but they couldnt answer lots of my questions,or giving me logical explanation for them can convince me
İslam did...so i knew it was the right one for me.

172.       catwoman
8933 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 02:39 am

I believe it's only Islam that gives people explicit directions about every area of their lives.

173.       CANLI
5084 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 03:17 am

Quoting catwoman:

I believe it's only Islam that gives people explicit directions about every area of their lives.


You mean Christianity doesnt do so too ?!
İ guess it does with different ways or point of views
All religions do so,religions in a whole consist of rules people follow without mentioning the spiritual parts of course
The only difference is which rules do you follow
Even agnostic consist of rules too telling you how to live your life
As not to believe in god,as not to go to church or mosque.
So,i believe WHATEVER you believe in is giving people explicit directions about every area of their lives not just İslam
Or what else BELİEVER would mean if you dont really believe in your own faith?

174.       CANLI
5084 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 03:22 am

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting CANLI:

Quoting femme_fatal:

btw, what allah has prepared for women in the jannah?


Whatever we wish for.


Allah told you that!?


Actually yes.

175.       catwoman
8933 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 03:25 am

Quoting CANLI:

Quoting catwoman:

I believe it's only Islam that gives people explicit directions about every area of their lives.


You mean Christianity doesnt do so too ?!
İ guess it does with different ways or point of views
All religions do so,religions in a whole consist of rules people follow without mentioning the spiritual parts of course
The only difference is which rules do you follow
Even agnostic consist of rules too telling you how to live your life
As not to believe in god,as not to go to church or mosque.
So,i believe WHATEVER you believe in is giving people explicit directions about every area of their lives not just İslam
Or what else BELİEVER would mean if you dont really believe in your own faith?


Uhmm, cnm, I don't want to go into the Christian vs Muslim thing.. What I meant was taht Islam has rules about every single step you make, which way to get out of bed, how to divide inheritance, how to cook, what to eat, how to eat.... it's a system that dictates your every move or at least has rules about your every move. It's very different then christianity.

176.       catwoman
8933 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 03:25 am

Quoting CANLI:

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting CANLI:

Quoting femme_fatal:

btw, what allah has prepared for women in the jannah?


Whatever we wish for.


Allah told you that!?


Actually yes.


Tell me more about it...

177.       CANLI
5084 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 03:42 am

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting CANLI:

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting CANLI:

Quoting femme_fatal:

btw, what allah has prepared for women in the jannah?


Whatever we wish for.


Allah told you that!?


Actually yes.


Tell me more about it...


Me too dont want to get into religious discussions
But yes ALLAH told us when we be in HEAVEN inşallah we will have whatever we ask for.
İsnt it written same way in Christianity ?
What will you have there ?

178.       catwoman
8933 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 03:50 am

Quoting CANLI:


Me too dont want to get into religious discussions
But yes ALLAH told us when we be in HEAVEN inşallah we will have whatever we ask for.
İsnt it written same way in Christianity ?
What will you have there ?


I have no idea what christians will have in heaven. I haven't spoken with anybody who's ever been there, so I honestly think that there's nothing there.

In islam - if men will have 72 virgins in heaven, won't women find themselves in a harem?

179.       CANLI
5084 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 04:02 am

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting CANLI:


Me too dont want to get into religious discussions
But yes ALLAH told us when we be in HEAVEN inşallah we will have whatever we ask for.
İsnt it written same way in Christianity ?
What will you have there ?


I have no idea what christians will have in heaven. I haven't spoken with anybody who's ever been there, so I honestly think that there's nothing there.

In islam - if men will have 72 virgins in heaven, won't women find themselves in a harem?


And who asked them to be with that man ?lol
Beside women will have what they ask for too

Well,and i didnt speak to anyone there too,i didnt see ALLAH,but i believe HE is there
So im curious isnt it written in the Bible ?!

180.       catwoman
8933 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 07:41 am

Quoting CANLI:

And who asked them to be with that man ?lol
Beside women will have what they ask for too

Well,and i didnt speak to anyone there too,i didnt see ALLAH,but i believe HE is there
So im curious isnt it written in the Bible ?!


I actually don't know what's written in the Bible about this, I guess it just says "paradise", you go interpret that. lol

I guess the 72 virgins will probably have to be blow-up dolls, as no woman would actually "wish" to be a prostitute in heaven. :-S lol

There's a joke about that: A guy goes to an imam and asks "will women also have 72 male virgins in heaven?" and the imam says "yes, if they are good muslims, they will". The guy goes home and sees his wife praying... goes to her and says "I know why you're praying, you want to go to heaven to have sex with other men!"

181.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 10:04 am

Quoting CANLI:

Quoting thehandsom:


ps..I am really trying to understand the timescale of it..I am not trying insinuate anything.



İ dont know what do you mean exactly with ''takkiye''
İs it when people lie to protect their lives when being threatened for their religions?
when i understand the meaning 'maybe we call it something else',i can answer if i know

İ thought you were Muslim handsom...
Anyway,Kur'an has been sent from ALLAH during the time Rasul SAV were inviting people to İslam,
İt was interfeering with people's lives on that time
So,when you read when the Ayat has been sent,you will find many Ayat had stories of people who done this or that,and they didnt know the right thing so ALLAH answered them
So,as qdemir said,AMMAR had to say he is Kafir so they stop tourturing him 'they used to beary Muslims in sand,and only their head is visible,or tie each one of their hands in a robe,and pulling it different ways by horses till they become apart,...ect'so we are talking about really none human things
So,when he said that,he was crying sad,he is Muslim in his heart,but his tongue said he is not,so ALLAH sent that ayat on that time to calm his heart and people like him,not to worry they still muslims,and in cases like this they are allowed to lie to protect their lives and they are still Muslims as long as they are really Muslims in their hearts.


Now what you are saying above is quite interesting and it will fuel the speculations about how everything was sent down to the earth in the first place.

Because Allah, who knows the past and the future, decided to send his ayats by looking at particular situations, particular events before sending them.
Then the questions will come into everbody's mind 'why the creater of everything had to wait? did he not know that incident was going to happen? did he need to see those incidents before sending corresponding ayats?'
If you are going to answer above questions Canli, your answer should be NOT 'Allah knows better than us, we cant question why'.

182.       Daydreamer
3743 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 10:45 am

Quoting qdemir:

Quoting Daydreamer:


You know, I'm not God, but if I were, I'd hate my supporters to be free to reject me if only that's convenient for them.



You should have quoted the following instance, too:

One of the companions of Hz Mohammed, Ammar and his parents were tortured by non-believers as he became a Muslim. He was forced to denial of his belief by torturing his father and mother heavily. His father and mother died of severe torture. As he was exposed to excruciating torture he said what he was asked for by non-believers. However, it was just a denial in words, but not one from the heart. Hz Mohammed told him if he was exposed to such a torture again he would say in the same way.



So, what does it really change? You re-stated my point - you may lie about not being Muslim if it's inconvenient for you to be one.

Quoting qdemir:

If your properties or money are under threat you are allowed to tell lies.
This is also called 'takiyye'

Nobody tells the truth when they are threatened by robbers. It wouldn't be wise just for sake of telling the truth.



Actually, for people of great faith worrying about money should be the last reason for lying about their faith. Or is faith just to be exercised when you're perfectly safe?

And how does it correspond with killing infidels?
Thou art allowed to reject thy God should thy welfare be in danger, but thou shalt kill an infidel who lieth not about his faith.???

Sorry, that seems illogical to me...

183.       vineyards
1954 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 10:46 am

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting CANLI:

Quoting catwoman:

I believe it's only Islam that gives people explicit directions about every area of their lives.


You mean Christianity doesnt do so too ?!
İ guess it does with different ways or point of views
All religions do so,religions in a whole consist of rules people follow without mentioning the spiritual parts of course



The evolution of the Christian faith follows a very interesting path. It emerges in Jerusalem, after Jesus was killed by the Romans. Believers flee from Jerusalem due to excessive oppression they were subjected to. They come to Cappadocia to build their "underground" churches. As iconography was banned by the Romans they live as a secresive community. In the process, it is very likely that they lose some of their original identity being forced to live in a foreign land under the rule of the Hittites and then Romans again. They get exposed to the Byzantium later on and at that poin their belief was rationalized in line with the Western norms. There is also a talk about a Frenchman visiting Anatolia some 150 years after the death of Jesus, he then takes this faith to Western Europe.

Summarily;

* Current Christian faith is a Europanized version of Jesus' teachings.
* At the time of the first Christian Council in Nicae (Iznik), Christians had not reached a consensus about whether Jesus was God or not. (Still unsettled). Although meant for uniting churches, the first council was indeed the beginning of the politization of the Christian faith. Hence all current sects were political deviations essentially. The first council was held under the auspices of a King for the first time. As a result those who did not believe Jesus was God formed the Orthodox sect.
* The entire array of Christian images including those of Jesus, Mary, Santa Claus etc are mere Western fantasies. Their real identities are Middle Eastern, their names are mistranslated and converted into European images. That is why when you think of Santa Claus you think about a Scandinavian figure from (say) Norway. In fact, he was a Greek bishop called Niko of Demre. Mother Mary is usually depicted as a Greek goddess.
* Las but not least, it would be very difficult for Christians to question the validity of their belief because indeed, that belief has organically been formed by themselves. The punchline is Christianism is a product of the European culture -period-

184.       Daydreamer
3743 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 10:53 am

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting Daydreamer:

Oh, by the way, I'm not defending or promoting Catholicism, I'm an atheist so I'm gonna burn in hell anyway...



Hehehe you can join me, thehandsom, and 99.9% of women then (plus raki) ....

I think thehandsom will be too busy to talk to US though lol lol lol


Statistically, the life-span of women in Europe is somewhat about 70 so in 40 something years the hell shall rock!!

Quoting femme_fatal:



with 99.9% of women?
goodness! are you really gonna enjoy such hell of women? lol

i prefer 99% of men.


This way or another we're screwed...we'll either go to heaven where we'll have our hymen grow back and be hookers for the faithful-faith-fighters-who-can-lie-about-it, or go to hell where we'll get 0.1% men and will have to be a harem for them

:-S
That's a great perspective, huh?

185.       Daydreamer
3743 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 10:56 am

Or, perhaps, condemned women will make those prostitutes for good Muslims and that will be those women's hell. Good Muslim women will then...bake, cook and clean as this is women's greatest passion?

186.       MrX67
2540 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 11:51 am

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting CANLI:

And who asked them to be with that man ?lol
Beside women will have what they ask for too

Well,and i didnt speak to anyone there too,i didnt see ALLAH,but i believe HE is there
So im curious isnt it written in the Bible ?!


I actually don't know what's written in the Bible about this, I guess it just says "paradise", you go interpret that. lol

I guess the 72 virgins will probably have to be blow-up dolls, as no woman would actually "wish" to be a prostitute in heaven. :-S lol

There's a joke about that: A guy goes to an imam and asks "will women also have 72 male virgins in heaven?" and the imam says "yes, if they are good muslims, they will". The guy goes home and sees his wife praying... goes to her and says "I know why you're praying, you want to go to heaven to have sex with other men!"

''dervişin fikri neyse zikride odur''

187.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 12:15 pm

Quoting MrX67:

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting CANLI:

And who asked them to be with that man ?lol
Beside women will have what they ask for too

Well,and i didnt speak to anyone there too,i didnt see ALLAH,but i believe HE is there
So im curious isnt it written in the Bible ?!


I actually don't know what's written in the Bible about this, I guess it just says "paradise", you go interpret that. lol

I guess the 72 virgins will probably have to be blow-up dolls, as no woman would actually "wish" to be a prostitute in heaven. :-S lol

There's a joke about that: A guy goes to an imam and asks "will women also have 72 male virgins in heaven?" and the imam says "yes, if they are good muslims, they will". The guy goes home and sees his wife praying... goes to her and says "I know why you're praying, you want to go to heaven to have sex with other men!"

''dervişin fikri neyse zikride odur''


I think catwoman was quite logical mrx67.
Do you really believe virgins are waiting for you in heaven?

188.       MrX67
2540 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 12:22 pm

Quoting thehandsom:

Quoting MrX67:

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting CANLI:

And who asked them to be with that man ?lol
Beside women will have what they ask for too

Well,and i didnt speak to anyone there too,i didnt see ALLAH,but i believe HE is there
So im curious isnt it written in the Bible ?!


I actually don't know what's written in the Bible about this, I guess it just says "paradise", you go interpret that. lol

I guess the 72 virgins will probably have to be blow-up dolls, as no woman would actually "wish" to be a prostitute in heaven. :-S lol

There's a joke about that: A guy goes to an imam and asks "will women also have 72 male virgins in heaven?" and the imam says "yes, if they are good muslims, they will". The guy goes home and sees his wife praying... goes to her and says "I know why you're praying, you want to go to heaven to have sex with other men!"

''dervişin fikri neyse zikride odur''


I think catwoman was quite logical mrx67.
Do you really believe virgins are waiting for you in heaven?

i think noone of innocent religious not to much interested in with sexuality,sure they need to be satisfied as everyone,but i think they r enough logical for fix this problem on this world,not for wait to heaveni'm not to religious,but i'm on side of the respect others's beliefs,and i guess sexuality is one of the last worry for a true religional????But if we talking about extremists or sex addicteds easy to see many believers or unbeliever with very colourfoul fantasies

189.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 12:35 pm

conclusion is mohammed promised everything in his paradise to attract a bunch of wild horny men from deserts.

- virgins
- wine
- water
- fruits

who are those virgins? are they human beings? are they virgins forever?

............

190.       MrX67
2540 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 12:43 pm

to don't believe or interrogate sure a personal prefer and a freedom,but whats benefit to hurt others feelings who believeing em with their all innocence??

191.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 12:48 pm

Quoting MrX67:

to don't believe or interrogate sure a personal prefer and a freedom,but whats benefit to hurt others feelings who believeing em with their all innocence??


Mrx67, if we were all like you, we would have nothing to talk or argue!!

192.       MrX67
2540 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 12:51 pm

Quoting thehandsom:

Quoting MrX67:

to don't believe or interrogate sure a personal prefer and a freedom,but whats benefit to hurt others feelings who believeing em with their all innocence??


Mrx67, if we were all like you, we would have nothing to talk or argue!!

i can hear you brotherand i think you right,thats very easy to find any topic for creat argue,but if show efforts for find more common things for all humanity,wouldn't be more productive??

193.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 12:55 pm

Quoting MrX67:

i can hear you brotherand i think you right,thats very easy to find any topic for creat argue,but if show efforts for find more common things for all humanity,wouldn't be more productive??



Of course we have many common things (if you would only accept that you have things in common with the wicked west!) but where is the fun in talking about that?

194.       MrX67
2540 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 01:08 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting MrX67:

i can hear you brotherand i think you right,thats very easy to find any topic for creat argue,but if show efforts for find more common things for all humanity,wouldn't be more productive??



Of course we have many common things (if you would only accept that you have things in common with the wicked west!) but where is the fun in talking about that?

hmmmmm if aim fun,lets funnnnnnnnbut not on very sensitive topic

195.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 01:45 pm

Quoting MrX67:

hmmmmm if aim fun,lets funnnnnnnnbut not on very sensitive topic



Hmmm I suppose that also rules out talking about thehandsom's hair then?

196.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 01:57 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting MrX67:

hmmmmm if aim fun,lets funnnnnnnnbut not on very sensitive topic



Hmmm I suppose that also rules out talking about thehandsom's hair then?



lol lol lol

at least you can have fun with only turk here, who doesnt mind being fun

but what fun out of mrx?

197.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 01:59 pm

Quoting femme_fatal:

at least you can have fun with only turk here, who doesnt mind being fun



Crikey Femme - that's the biggest compliment you ever paid a man on this site
Are you trying to "butter him up" so you can steal him from us all in raki hell?

198.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 02:09 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting femme_fatal:

at least you can have fun with only turk here, who doesnt mind being fun



Crikey Femme - that's the biggest compliment you ever paid a man on this site
Are you trying to "butter him up" so you can steal him from us all in raki hell?



because im as innocent and good as mrx im gonna join heaven and enjoy the community of peace train, alameda, mrx, qdemir etc, etc.



199.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 02:10 pm

Quoting femme_fatal:

because im as innocent and good as mrx im gonna join heaven and enjoy the community of peace train, alameda, mrx, qdemir etc, etc.





I think that will be God's punishment on such a bed girl as you.....send you to heaven! lol lol

200.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 03:14 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting femme_fatal:

because im as innocent and good as mrx im gonna join heaven and enjoy the community of peace train, alameda, mrx, qdemir etc, etc.





I think that will be God's punishment on such a bed girl as you.....send you to heaven! lol lol


its definetly a punishment!
but i hope God would be merciful on me by creating a new paradise for me: where i will have 72 wide-dark (can be blue too) eyed male virgins who can do the belly dance, countless slaves (can also be young beautiful boys who look like pearls) rivers full of coke, internet, beaches, what else?

i still dont wanna join your women hell

lets pray to a creator for a new paradise.

201.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 03:16 pm

Quoting femme_fatal:

its definetly a punishment!
but i hope God would be merciful on me by creating a new paradise for me: where i will have 72 wide-dark (can be blue too) eyed male virgins who can do the belly dance, countless slaves (can also be young beautiful boys who look like pearls) rivers full of coke, internet, beaches, what else?



Knowing my luck they would be gay
I agree we need new paradise..... so we need to create new religion for it lol

202.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 03:22 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting femme_fatal:

its definetly a punishment!
but i hope God would be merciful on me by creating a new paradise for me: where i will have 72 wide-dark (can be blue too) eyed male virgins who can do the belly dance, countless slaves (can also be young beautiful boys who look like pearls) rivers full of coke, internet, beaches, what else?



Knowing my luck they would be gay
I agree we need new paradise..... so we need to create new religion for it lol


why gays again?
do you think God wouldnt know my preferences to punish me even in paradise?
well, mohammed could make a paradise, why not we?
its very easy, you do some researches on the market and its demands, and there comes a new paradise.

203.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 03:24 pm

Quoting femme_fatal:

its very easy, you do some researches on the market and its demands, and there comes a new paradise.



First we need a new religion. I will start working on the theology, you start deciding it's "dos" and "donts". What do we call it?

204.       Capoeira
575 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 04:48 pm

I haven't read the all of the other posts as I have taken my time to ponder exactly what I wanted to say.

I have to say that I am not a 'religious' person. Religion comes, goes and is swayed by popular culture. I am a person that is interested in finding out 'who' and 'What' God is all about.

My quest has of course been influenced by my upbringing. But my most profound discoveres came from studying Molecular and Cell Biology with a minor in Pure Maths at U.C.Berkeley for three years before becoming a Spanish Lit. major. While studying the sciences I was deeply moved by the leading lecturers and researchers in their field using the terms 'we believe', 'it might point to', 'it suggests' when discussing the lastest finds in biological research regarding the orgins of life. There was no 'FACT' as many so quicly reply when discussing science based on not actually going further than their high school bio class. There are only findings and research that allow one to draw conclusions and most often they are contradicted by other findings and view points or conclusions drawn from others research.

I discovered that even a belief in 'evolution' or 'creation' is merely and purely a belief!

Given these three years that I had very little contact with religion or seeking out God it made me curious to start my own experiments.

I discovered that if I prayed before exams I did better than the exams that I didn't pray before taking. I discovered that my academic GPA improved after taking a day off of studies to observe the Sabbath. I discovered that I physically felt better after abstaining from certain foods and drink. And I was happier and more hopeful about my future after spending time each morning praying and reading the Bible...And I the biggest miracle of all. My father was diagnosed with level 4 cancer. He prayed and trusted God and asked for a longer life. He lived four years with level four cancer!

These are my discoveries. Are they self fulfilled profecies? It is up to others to deliberate over. I can only say that I live in a country that has historical sites that confirm biblical stories. Also there exists a deep sense of strong spiritual guidance and power in my life that I KNOW comes from God.


205.       CANLI
5084 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 05:51 pm

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting CANLI:

And who asked them to be with that man ?lol
Beside women will have what they ask for too

Well,and i didnt speak to anyone there too,i didnt see ALLAH,but i believe HE is there
So im curious isnt it written in the Bible ?!


I actually don't know what's written in the Bible about this, I guess it just says "paradise", you go interpret that. lol

I guess the 72 virgins will probably have to be blow-up dolls, as no woman would actually "wish" to be a prostitute in heaven. :-S lol

There's a joke about that: A guy goes to an imam and asks "will women also have 72 male virgins in heaven?" and the imam says "yes, if they are good muslims, they will". The guy goes home and sees his wife praying... goes to her and says "I know why you're praying, you want to go to heaven to have sex with other men!"


haahaa,that is a good one lol
she should have told him,to go to heaven and get rid of you lol

206.       CANLI
5084 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 06:01 pm

Quoting thehandsom:


Now what you are saying above is quite interesting and it will fuel the speculations about how everything was sent down to the earth in the first place.

Because Allah, who knows the past and the future, decided to send his ayats by looking at particular situations, particular events before sending them.
Then the questions will come into everbody's mind 'why the creater of everything had to wait? did he not know that incident was going to happen? did he need to see those incidents before sending corresponding ayats?'
If you are going to answer above questions Canli, your answer should be NOT 'Allah knows better than us, we cant question why'.


İ didnt understand the last part,but yes of course ALLAH knew it,but human didnt knew it
Human didnt know that was going to happen,so ALLAH didnt sent those ayat BEFORE it happened
You think about it..what would be easier to you,to have a book contain of rules and asked you to know it by heart and do as it says,or
To live it,and feel it and have the rule then ?
Even if you try to educate kids,do you throw all the knowledge in their faces at once,or you do it step by step,and you wait till they have good understanding of the first one before to move to the next ?
İslam and Muslims were like kids,in their first step to learn about İslam.
And i guess to have this kind of interact between ALLAH and people specially when İslam was in the first is great,and supportive too.

Btw,you didnt explain what is takkiye ?

207.       catwoman
8933 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 07:44 pm

Quoting Capoeira:

I haven't read the all of the other posts as I have taken my time to ponder exactly what I wanted to say.

I have to say that I am not a 'religious' person. Religion comes, goes and is swayed by popular culture. I am a person that is interested in finding out 'who' and 'What' God is all about.

My quest has of course been influenced by my upbringing. But my most profound discoveres came from studying Molecular and Cell Biology with a minor in Pure Maths at U.C.Berkeley for three years before becoming a Spanish Lit. major. While studying the sciences I was deeply moved by the leading lecturers and researchers in their field using the terms 'we believe', 'it might point to', 'it suggests' when discussing the lastest finds in biological research regarding the orgins of life. There was no 'FACT' as many so quicly reply when discussing science based on not actually going further than their high school bio class. There are only findings and research that allow one to draw conclusions and most often they are contradicted by other findings and view points or conclusions drawn from others research.

I discovered that even a belief in 'evolution' or 'creation' is merely and purely a belief!

Given these three years that I had very little contact with religion or seeking out God it made me curious to start my own experiments.

I discovered that if I prayed before exams I did better than the exams that I didn't pray before taking. I discovered that my academic GPA improved after taking a day off of studies to observe the Sabbath. I discovered that I physically felt better after abstaining from certain foods and drink. And I was happier and more hopeful about my future after spending time each morning praying and reading the Bible...And I the biggest miracle of all. My father was diagnosed with level 4 cancer. He prayed and trusted God and asked for a longer life. He lived four years with level four cancer!

These are my discoveries. Are they self fulfilled profecies? It is up to others to deliberate over. I can only say that I live in a country that has historical sites that confirm biblical stories. Also there exists a deep sense of strong spiritual guidance and power in my life that I KNOW comes from God.



Thank you for sharing Capo.

208.       catwoman
8933 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 07:46 pm

Quoting CANLI:

she should have told him,to go to heaven and get rid of you lol


lol lol lol

209.       alameda
3499 posts
 05 Feb 2008 Tue 10:58 pm

I wonder if it would be a good idea to define exactly what we mean by religion. What is religion?

To me it is the awareness that there is more to me than my flesh, there is a transcendental soul that is alive and capable of growth and development. It can also wither and die, or become stunted along the way. Some feel there is an interconnection between all of the seen and the unseen. To me religion is the spiritual path to understand my relationship to that whole.

Having faith/belief is like having another sense. It is like the sense of hearing or smell. Some do not have any awareness of it and don't want it. They are content to live in the world of the flesh, gratifying earthly desires. Some have inkling about it and want it and want others to give it to them. Some loose it and strike out in anguish at the emptiness inside. For those who have it, it is a precious gift that they guard. Even Mother Theresa questioned her faith, but she fought on to keep it.

Religion gives the directions on how to nourish and develop the human soul to be the best it can to get to the next level in the best condition possible.

As in our earthly life with different maps and guides, our job is to pick the one that suites us best. This is like an analogy to our spiritual development and growth. To affect that journey for some that is Islam, Christianity, Judaism or some other religion. Some just accept without question the religion of their parents and community. Others question and seek.

I would not want to attempt a desert crossing without a map and a guide. Some do, some survive, but most do not. Those who attempt the journey alone, even if they do survive, would be in better shape if they had a map and guide.




210.       Animal Mother
0 posts
 06 Feb 2008 Wed 02:30 am

Turk's religion was existed before the semitic books announced. Think twice, why those religions appeared only in where semitics live ?

211.       catwoman
8933 posts
 06 Feb 2008 Wed 03:19 am

Quoting Animal Mother:

Turk's religion was existed before the semitic books announced. Think twice, why those religions appeared only in where semitics live ?


Do tell us more..

212.       Animal Mother
0 posts
 06 Feb 2008 Wed 03:47 am

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting Animal Mother:

Turk's religion was existed before the semitic books announced. Think twice, why those religions appeared only in where semitics live ?


Do tell us more..



What do you call a man who got married with a girl only 9 years old and entered the bridal chamber with her?

213.       catwoman
8933 posts
 06 Feb 2008 Wed 03:54 am

Quoting Animal Mother:

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting Animal Mother:

Turk's religion was existed before the semitic books announced. Think twice, why those religions appeared only in where semitics live ?


Do tell us more..



What do you call a man who got married with a girl only 9 years old and entered bridal chamber with her?


Hahahahaha, I knew this was going to be interesting...
I am not sure what you call that... and I think swearing is forbidden..

214.       Animal Mother
0 posts
 06 Feb 2008 Wed 04:08 am

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting Animal Mother:

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting Animal Mother:

Turk's religion was existed before the semitic books announced. Think twice, why those religions appeared only in where semitics live ?


Do tell us more..



What do you call a man who got married with a girl only 9 years old and entered bridal chamber with her?


Hahahahaha, I knew this was going to be interesting...
I am not sure what you call that... and I think swearing is forbidden..



If calling someone as prophet is a swear, then go on

215.       catwoman
8933 posts
 06 Feb 2008 Wed 04:38 am

Quoting Animal Mother:

If to call him as prophet is a swear, then go on


prophet, prophet, prophet!!!!!

216.       admin
758 posts
 06 Feb 2008 Wed 05:08 am

Thread locked because of religious discussion going into bad directions.

(216 Messages in 22 pages - View all)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ...  >>
Thread locked by a moderator or admin.




Turkish Dictionary
Turkish Chat
Open mini chat
New in Forums
Crossword Vocabulary Puzzles for Turkish L...
qdemir: You can view and solve several of the puzzles online at ...
Giriyor vs Geliyor.
lrnlang: Thank you for the ...
Local Ladies Ready to Play in Your City
nifrtity: ... - Discover Women Seeking No-Strings Attached Encounters in Your Ci...
Geçmekte vs. geçiyor?
Hoppi: ... and ... has almost the same meaning. They are both mean "i...
Intermediate (B1) to upper-intermediate (B...
qdemir: View at ...
Why yer gördüm but yeri geziyorum
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much, makes perfect sense!
Random Pictures of Turkey
Most commented