General/Off-topic |
|
|
|
Revised NATIONALIST MANIFESTO
|
1. |
25 Jan 2008 Fri 02:05 pm |
Revised to include a special item on dudus....
For us, fiercely moustached Turkish Nationalists (not to be confused with racists), life is simple...
1. Anyone who is telling Turks that Ataturk's time is over, his pictures should be removed from display and he should be forgotten,
2. Anyone who says Ataturk's revolutions were works of a dictator, not necessarily according to public wishes,
3. Anyone who advocates that Turks should go back to their Ottoman roots, ie. use Ottoman language, adopt Ottoman dress code etc.
4. Anyone who says being the free citizen of a republic and the follower of a religious belief are two concepts in competition, and Turks should obviously prefer the latter,
5. Anyone who preaches that the people in Turkia are from different ethnic groups, and that they should be allowed to separate themselves from the unity...like small pebbles from a mozaic. PKK supportes.
6. Any coward (ablebodied, male citizen) who flees the country, when it is his turn to serve in the Army,
7. Anyone who suggests that Turkia should stop being a nation-state and becomes a part of the merry Global crowd,
8. Anyone who preaches EU is the only life saving option open to Turkia and strives for membership - even at the cost of national soveregnity and pride,
9. Anyone trying to sell a different religion to Turkish citizens; missionaries of all kinds, operating under veils,
10. Anyone who supports those who intend to replace the current democratic and secular republic with an Islamic mode of government (whether of fundamentalist, or soft kind),
11. Anyone who fancies himself to be ethnically of pure Turkish blood, hence imagines that he is superior to all other etnic citizen groups in Turkia, or that he is a better patriot,
12. Anyone who likes to sing false songs about Armenian misfortunes, but demands a down payment of 14 billion dollars to start discussing realities in historical terms,
13. Any creep who approaches love stricken Western Ladies with intentions to cheat them out of their money, telephones, laptops or gold ear rings, whatever (dudu),
is not our friend....
|
|
2. |
25 Jan 2008 Fri 02:11 pm |
14-who looking at life with ''blinkers'' is not our friend 15-who says ''there are not others only me and my realities'' is not our friend......
|
|
3. |
25 Jan 2008 Fri 02:20 pm |
Which item(s) of the Manifesto disturbs you?
|
|
4. |
25 Jan 2008 Fri 02:38 pm |
Alpha seeing you is like looking at a piece of history, "politicAL (edit, ehem) views of the previous century, protecting the homeland?".
Are you denying that we live in a globalized world?
|
|
5. |
25 Jan 2008 Fri 02:44 pm |
Quoting azade: Alpha seeing you is like looking at a piece of history, "politic views of the previous century, protecting the homeland?". |
+100000000000
|
|
6. |
25 Jan 2008 Fri 04:23 pm |
Quoting AlphaF: Which item(s) of the Manifesto disturbs you? |
its not easy to fix problems with strong nationalist ideas,and we have to look at events a bit more objective criterions (away from ideological dogmas) for set a real world peace...
|
|
7. |
25 Jan 2008 Fri 09:53 pm |
Global world, yes.
But not as led by neocons.
Stop talking in vague sentences...I would appreciate if I knew which items of my manifesto is disturbing to Turks of different opinions.......
|
|
8. |
25 Jan 2008 Fri 11:39 pm |
Quoting AlphaF: Global world, yes.
But not as led by neocons.
Stop talking in vague sentences...I would appreciate if I knew which items of my manifesto is disturbing to Turks of different opinions....... |
first why did you need this manifesto ?and second this manifesto full with oppositeness? nationalism or globalism,localness or universalism not clear on this manifesto??So i believe a ''Humanist Manifesto'' would be better then a nationalist manifesto,isn't it?
|
|
9. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 01:00 am |
My manifesto, though seems light hearted and though may be objectionable to some, clearly adresses most major issues in Turkia today...without any uncertain statements and leaving no doubt to my philosopy.
Do not bother writing insincere remarks, asking peanut questions - unless you have the heart for it.
What do you want? A full doctorate course?
Are you ashamed or scared to say what you think?...You probably are!..
|
|
10. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 01:04 am |
Quoting AlphaF: 1. Anyone who is telling Turks that Ataturk's time is over, his pictures should be removed from display and he should be forgotten |
OK I am a bit short of time, but, dear partner, I would like to take issue with Number 1 in your list for now
Few deny what a great man Ataturk was, but I hate to break the news to you but Ataturk's time IS over, by the simple fact that he has been DEAD for decades!!!!!
Instead of worshiping this man like a God, why don't you encourage a political culture where a similar man could continue with his achievements?
Iyi geceler - I have a nice bottle of wine and good friends waiting
|
|
11. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 01:06 am |
Point 2 - Turkish nationalists should seriously re-think the size of their moustaches
|
|
12. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 01:34 am |
You have a heart, dear partner...
You are wrong however that I worship the man...I simply think that his principles are still valid. I may have a point there, considering others want to follow people who died 1400 years ago...
|
|
13. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 01:43 am |
Quoting AEnigma III: Point 2 - Turkish nationalists should seriously re-think the size of their moustaches  |
Notice MOUSTACHE is in preface, hence not open to discussion.
Serefe !
|
|
14. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 02:44 am |
What a Topic... Welcome to Turkish Class...students! A good lesson about Turkish Nationalism here...? This thread should be wiped. Seems to be exclusively filled with hate, or is it politics?
|
|
15. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 03:06 am |
ha ha..
Pls ya..dont take it seriously.
the entire writing (manifesto) looks like a composition work of a 12 years old 'cow' student.
|
|
16. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 03:07 am |
Quoting Waseem_UK: What a Topic... Welcome to Turkish Class...students! A good lesson about Turkish Nationalism here...? This thread should be wiped. Seems to be exclusively filled with hate, or is it politics? |
Well said but . . . be careful (this is the emblem of the Brownie Guides and their motto is "Who bakes wins")
|
|
17. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 03:13 am |
Quoting Waseem_UK: What a Topic... Welcome to Turkish Class...students! A good lesson about Turkish Nationalism here...? This thread should be wiped. Seems to be exclusively filled with hate, or is it politics? |
Don't you think it's better to leave this thread intact? It is good to see people's true colours (or insanity) - you know the saying "give someone enough rope and they will hang themselves"??
|
|
18. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 09:44 am |
Exactly dear partner.
That is how you got to be my partner, though we disagree on almost everything. What is common between us are honesty and self respect.
Why do you think all this crap flows in and nobody dare offer a counterview, a different opinion on any of the points there, except my dear partner.. You, yourself, offered an honest objection in no uncertain terms; did my reply hurt?
What some people here want is to be able to mutter somethings in the dark, without giving away their true colors. No honesty, no self respect......
|
|
19. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 02:02 pm |
Quoting AlphaF: My manifesto, though seems light hearted and though may be objectionable to some, clearly adresses most major issues in Turkia today...without any uncertain statements and leaving no doubt to my philosopy.
Do not bother writing insincere remarks, asking peanut questions - unless you have the heart for it.
What do you want? A full doctorate course?
Are you ashamed or scared to say what you think?...You probably are!..
|
seems you forcing politeness rules ,first i advice you to be more gentleman and next i advice you to look at events from poles,not from center of ur own realities
|
|
20. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 02:37 pm |
Quoting AlphaF: Why do you think all this crap flows in and nobody dare offer a counterview, a different opinion on any of the points there, except my dear partner.. You, yourself, offered an honest objection in no uncertain terms; did my reply hurt? |
People just don't give a crap about you and the things you mumble...
Quoting AlphaF: What some people here want is to be able to mutter somethings in the dark, without giving away their true colors. No honesty, no self respect...... |
You lost it man... (my honest opinion)
|
|
22. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 08:25 pm |
Quoting MrX67: Quoting AlphaF: My manifesto, though seems light hearted and though may be objectionable to some, clearly adresses most major issues in Turkia today...without any uncertain statements and leaving no doubt to my philosopy.
Do not bother writing insincere remarks, asking peanut questions - unless you have the heart for it.
What do you want? A full doctorate course?
Are you ashamed or scared to say what you think?...You probably are!..
|
seems you forcing politeness rules ,first i advice you to be more gentleman and next i advice you to look at events from poles,not from center of ur own realities |
CAN YOU NOT TELL WHAT IT IS THAT DISTURBS YOU?
|
|
23. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 08:28 pm |
Quoting AlphaF: CAN YOU NOT TELL WHAT IT IS THAT DISTURBS YOU? |
You know very well that what disturbs people is that you are speaking your mind!! You are supposed to hide your real thoughts behind a mask of political correctness
|
|
24. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 08:32 pm |
Quoting azade: Alpha seeing you is like looking at a piece of history, "politicAL (edit, ehem) views of the previous century, protecting the homeland?".
Are you denying that we live in a globalized world? |
I am historical, an antique
|
|
25. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 08:34 pm |
Quoting AlphaF: 2. Anyone who says Ataturk's revolutions were works of a dictator, not necessarily according to public wishes |
Ok lets move to (2)
Hmmmmm well, "in my humble opinion" (copyright Alameda) there was something of a dictator in his methods - reinforced by the army! Are you seriously suggesting that he had the Turkish people 100% behind his ideals?
|
|
26. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 08:35 pm |
Quoting AEnigma III: Quoting AlphaF: CAN YOU NOT TELL WHAT IT IS THAT DISTURBS YOU? |
You know very well that what disturbs people is that you are speaking your mind!! You are supposed to hide your real thoughts behind a mask of political correctness  |
You are smart and honest....and voice your opinions clearly...
That definitely gives you the right to disagree with me on any subject, at you own will and pleasure.
|
|
27. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 08:36 pm |
Quoting AlphaF: That definitely gives you the right to disagree with me on any subject, at you own will and pleasure. |
Thank you - it is all I live for
|
|
28. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 08:42 pm |
Now this is not so much fun, because of course I agree with your manifesto item numbers 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13
Which makes me a bit curious about the "hate" people are talking about here
|
|
29. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 08:49 pm |
Quoting AEnigma III: Quoting AlphaF: 2. Anyone who says Ataturk's revolutions were works of a dictator, not necessarily according to public wishes |
Ok lets move to (2)
Hmmmmm well, "in my humble opinion" (copyright Alameda) there was something of a dictator in his methods - reinforced by the army! Are you seriously suggesting that he had the Turkish people 100% behind his ideals?
|
There was no "Turkish people" right after the War of Independence. All Ataturk had was the very poor, largely ignorant mix of perhaps more than 20 ethnic groups, all used to being subjects of a Sultan and very ill at ease with the idea of being free citizens of a young republic: just piece meal remnants of an old Empire. A nation had to be built.
Ataturk had no time to lose with niceties. He had started a revolution, and wanted it to succeed and survive. It may be said that he allowed compromises on democracy, in favor of the republic. He was no dictator in the sense Mussolini, Hitler or Stalin were. Every decision he took had the backing of the National Assembly. He always had his way to persuade the Assembly.
|
|
30. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 09:02 pm |
Well of course, your answer is very reasonable and true, but please note that I used the words "something of a dictator in his methods" and was in no way comparing him to the likes of Stalin or Hitler!
However, I think you should amend your manifesto because, of course, many of Ataturk's revolutionary laws WERE against public opinion, and you should not deny it (or make enemies of people who speak the facts). It is irrevelent whether or not they were in the wrong.
As you are a supporter of honesty and truth I know you will agree with this
|
|
31. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 09:11 pm |
I must confess it is rather strange to have opposing views with someone on Turkish Class without them resorting to insulting me
|
|
32. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 09:14 pm |
When he died, he left everything he owned in life to Turkish Nation, except for a minor sum he allocated to some kids he was personally taking care of, at the time.
For lack of further funds, he actually had a request (in his will) from people of Turkia, that Turks should care for the family of Mr. Ismet Inonu (one of his friends, prime ministers and a close comrade-in-arms), should they ever be in need of such support.
|
|
33. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 09:16 pm |
Quoting AlphaF: When he died, he left everything he owned in life to Turkish Nation, excep for a minor sum he allocated to some kids he was taking care of.
For lack of further funds, he actually had a request (in his will) from people of Turkia, that Turks should care for the family Mr. Ismet Inonu (one of his friends, prime ministers and close comrade-in-arms), should they ever be in need of such support. |
That is very commendable - he was a great man. Ama.... what is it's relevance here?
|
|
34. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 09:18 pm |
How do you think Mussolini and Stalin were finacially rating, as dictators of his time?
|
|
35. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 09:21 pm |
Quoting AEnigma III: I must confess it is rather strange to have opposing views with someone on Turkish Class without them resorting to insulting me
|
For that, you should give the merit to yourself...
|
|
36. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 09:28 pm |
Quoting AlphaF: For that, you should give the merit to yourself... |
Hahah I think people (esp. Catwoman) will start to feel a bit sick soon
Let us argue about the EU next
|
|
37. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 09:39 pm |
One question!
If we do not have that moustache, cant we agree/support on these lines?
Though i have problems with liking Ismet Inonu...
|
|
38. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 09:40 pm |
How is that, to shake them off the track?
|
|
39. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 09:41 pm |
Quoting SuiGeneris: One question!
If we do not have that moustache, cant we agree/support on these lines? |
I believe it is compulsory Sui. As we speak, I am fashioning one out of some spare Handsom hair!
|
|
40. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 09:43 pm |
Quoting SuiGeneris: One question!
If we do not have that moustache, cant we agree/support on these lines?
Though i have problems with liking Ismet Inonu... |
He was a patriot, he served the country with best of intentions......But he was not as bright as Ataturk and he made some serious mistakes.
|
|
41. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 09:44 pm |
Quoting AlphaF: but he was not as bright as Ataturk and he made some serious mistakes. |
For a moment I thought you were talking about Bush
|
|
42. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 09:49 pm |
Yeap...
I appriciate his fighting shoulder to shoulder for defending this country...
But then...
I see myself that Turkey didnt developed from those times... In the history classes of university, i had a great professor with great knowlegde his color might the way too nationalistic but he was great historician... and the things he was telling us with the proves... made me had cold shudders each time...
So i have problems with the politicians after Ataturk...
I think that in his death these had role aswell... I think it was harder to fight alone in cold war for him than fighting to enemies directly...
|
|
43. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 09:57 pm |
Sui,
The revolution that Ataturk started died out, immediately after he was murdered...
From that point on, we have a counter revolution. Inonu was not a party to the counter revolution, but he failed to recognize and fight it...
A look from this perspective may help you put many pieces of the puzzle together.
|
|
44. |
26 Jan 2008 Sat 11:10 pm |
Quoting AlphaF: Quoting MrX67: Quoting AlphaF: My manifesto, though seems light hearted and though may be objectionable to some, clearly adresses most major issues in Turkia today...without any uncertain statements and leaving no doubt to my philosopy.
Do not bother writing insincere remarks, asking peanut questions - unless you have the heart for it.
What do you want? A full doctorate course?
Are you ashamed or scared to say what you think?...You probably are!..
|
seems you forcing politeness rules ,first i advice you to be more gentleman and next i advice you to look at events from poles,not from center of ur own realities |
CAN YOU NOT TELL WHAT IT IS THAT DISTURBS YOU? |
if you trying a manifesto that's origin or self must be humanity or human,coz each national,religional or regional manifestos creats opposites of it,so that can make bigger problems or unfixed.But if theres only all humanity on base of ur manifesto thats good way or effort for a real peace.İ hope i could tell my meaning with my poor English?
|
|
45. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 03:13 am |
Quoting AlphaF: Revised to include a special item on dudus....
For us, fiercely moustached Turkish Nationalists (not to be confused with racists), life is simple...
1. Anyone who is telling Turks that Ataturk's time is over, his pictures should be removed from display and he should be forgotten,
his time is over, in a way to say that he passed away.
he should never be forgotten. the contributions he made were essential for Turkia. And worth to be continued in a way that to develop the country. his ideas and achievements need to be taken as a foundation in further openings.
2. Anyone who says Ataturk's revolutions were works of a dictator, not necessarily according to public wishes,
from the very little i know, his works were - taken in generally benefic. might he had oposing public wishes... a country must be very difficult to lead. ))) sometimes sacrifices have to be done.
here is a review i found interesting. i know few of Ataturk's life, deeds and the whole political and historical conjuncture.
ATATURK
by Andrew Mango
Woodstock, N.Y.: Overlook, 2000. 666 pp. $40
Middle East Quarterly
March 2000
Reviewed by Daniel Pipes
Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (1881-1938), one of the great political figures of the twentieth century, has not been the subject of a full-scale biography in English since one published by Lord Kinross in 1964. The author, Istanbul-born and a writer on things Turkish, has produced far and away the best biography of Atatürk in English, one boasting solid research, fine presentation, and sensible judgments. The result is a more textured and complex picture than hitherto available.
Mango skillfully captures the themes of his tale. "Atatürk was a competent commander, a shrewd politician, a statesman of supreme realism. But above all he was a man of the Enlightenment. And the Enlightenment was not made by saints." "Atatürk was often described as a dictator - a description he hated above all others. It was, in fact, inappropriate, for he behaved not like a modern dictator, but like a latter-day king, who had delegated government to his chief minister, and then sought to amuse himself as best he could." Atatürk emerges from this biography as resolute yet contradictory. He forwarded women's rights but in his private life "could not accept women as equals." He was a devoted rationalist but invented "fantastic historical and linguistic theories."
Mango concludes with an assessment of the Atatürk experiment that bears quoting for its succinct insight and enduring message: "Atatürk's message is that East and West can meet on the ground of universal secular values and mutual respect, that nationalism is compatible with peace, that human reason is the only true guide in life. It is an optimistic message and its validity will always be in doubt. But it is an ideal that commands respect."
3. Anyone who advocates that Turks should go back to their Ottoman roots, ie. use Ottoman language, adopt Ottoman dress code etc.
why should Turkia go back?
4. Anyone who says being the free citizen of a republic and the follower of a religious belief are two concepts in competition, and Turks should obviously prefer the latter,
the concepts are not in competition.
5. Anyone who preaches that the people in Turkia are from different ethnic groups, and that they should be allowed to separate themselves from the unity...like small pebbles from a mozaic. PKK supportes.
different ethnicities are different ethnicities. they are smole pieces of a mosaic. that is diversity. in unity, as it is called. mosaics are beautiful... i am not aware of what the PKK supporters do and say. (under developement)
6. Any coward (ablebodied, male citizen) who flees the country, when it is his turn to serve in the Army,
if the army is no other way, but an education for those who does not have means to that, it is beneficial. some people learn to wash their clothes there( sorry, it is what a high employee told me... officer?), have discipline... as i was told. now, army might not offer proper conditions, either. i do not think that neither sticking in a place 1.5 years necessary improves a person(in Romania, for ex, some came home with ulcer...), nor that the way armies are equipped nowadays compulsory service would mean a major contribution to the safety of the country. responsibility can be assumed in many ways. the best should be a non-compulsory military service. why not serving civil duties? planting trees, helping disabled? in my opinion, this is also a worthy contribution. this should be compulsory. i think if someone flees responsibilities of life, or being human and just in the meantime, that is condemnable. Armies should introduce civil services, in my opinion. There will always be men fleeing away from army.
7. Anyone who suggests that Turkia should stop being a nation-state and becomes a part of the merry Global crowd,
isn't Turkia part of the global merry crowd? ))) merry crowd. either way, it is a state part of a global "crowd" of states. extend what you have said about the pieces of mosaic. and here we are. what makes the difference? the way you take part in that crowd... what influence do you have, how far it goes, what do you offer to the citizens of your country, how you coop in resolving internal and external conflicts, balancing your own welfare with the global one.
something puzzles me in this. i think the nation state term. nation means that is a group sharing common cultural heritage, common values. a multicultural nation? for example, lutherans are good citizens, but they will not whirl three times round the table the way catholics do(rituals). this is also part of a heritage. if hungarians, they will have different motives on pottery than romanians. yet, they are the members of the same country, co-nationals.
8. Anyone who preaches EU is the only life saving option open to Turkia and strives for membership - even at the cost of national soveregnity and pride,
(chapter under development and reading. at a first glance i would say that, due to it's position adherence to EU is not the only solution for Turkey.).
9. Anyone trying to sell a different religion to Turkish citizens; missionaries of all kinds, operating under veils,
in Romania sects have extended. in what ways? between other things, they went even in isolated mountain village and preached the people. more then that, they helped the poor. they encourage collectivity, common interests and mutual help. Orthodox priests did not much thing in their mandate (as they are, in a way to say "invested"). many times they just accepted gifts, respect without doing much of a thing to their religious community. this created a pre-condition to desert religion. the second was they offered money. people need better financial state and to learn how to make their lives better. then again, if religion is a matter of choice... i think this should relate very much on the personal belief. a good believer had belief in the heart. religion always mixed political and social interests and comes to define identity. still does. hence the reprobation at missionaries. missionaries existed and will exist. and probably there exist methods in avoiding this. one of them should be tie the belief to the heart.(my idealist view here) religions should not be sold... yet they are.
10. Anyone who supports those who intend to replace the current democratic and secular republic with an Islamic mode of government (whether of fundamentalist, or soft kind),
taking number four, this is not a good choice. it looks like a trap. religions have not been reformed. hence, there are some dangers. spiritual should reflect in conducts in everyday life. fundamentalism, in my opinion, is also not a good choice.
11. Anyone who fancies himself to be ethnically of pure Turkish blood, hence imagines that he is superior to all other etnic citizen groups in Turkia, or that he is a better patriot,
so there are ethnicities. all this terminology((... Citizenship gives you rights and restrictions. one of the restrictions should be (and legally is) the referring to a so called superiority in blood. this reminds me many jews bought noble titles... counts i think (these were "buyable" titles)
12. Anyone who likes to sing false songs about Armenian misfortunes, but demands a down payment of 14 billion dollars to start discussing realities in historical terms,
(not aware of the whole situation of the Armenian killing, but there are also always good ways to ask for some money)
13. Any creep who approaches love stricken Western Ladies with intentions to cheat them out of their money, telephones, laptops or gold ear rings, whatever (dudu),
i like point 13. it is a personal statement of integrity which tells that the first 12 are a mixture of beliefs, values, terminologies, facts that belong to political philosophy, and are of big importance in developing national strategies, social conducts and applying terminologies to these. if you ask me, this post is a bubby trap.))) what i like is the way ideas were switched and connected here. a beautiful mind.
not any inloved lady or gentlemen should be approached with the mere intention of cheating. cheating is morally and legally condemnable. love has several levels. treat it like a pleasure of life, like a miracle, like a long term investment, like a shrine yet/but/and love always deserves the best. and energy, and time, devotion, raising mutual interests, learning, effort.
is not our friend....
|
Turkia is a state founded by Ataturk, who put the basis for reform, change and evolution of the country, separated state from religion (to say that citizenship is not the same with the follower of a religion) in a state which citizens originate from several ethnical groups. Turkia is one state from the states of the world. Turkia has compulsory military service, some of the candidates flee away. Turkia has given a deep thought to the adherence to EU and probably is at a point where anti-secularism (pro islamic state) tendencies strengthen and nationalism (inacceptance of different ethnicities) has registered slightly increased values. (There are people trying to convert muslims at different religion offering them material benefits?) Turkia was asked for a large sum of money for the Armenian genocide. It sounds like a deal offer interconnected to the country's political situation among the merry fellow states on this planet, development, acceptance/adherance to EU.
respect to love.
|
|
46. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 04:02 am |
Quoting AlphaF:
The revolution that Ataturk started died out, immediately after he was murdered... |
And when exactly was it that Atatürk was murdered..?
|
|
47. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 04:05 am |
Quoting portokal: Quoting AlphaF: Revised to include a special item on dudus....
For us, fiercely moustached Turkish Nationalists (not to be confused with racists), life is simple...
1. Anyone who is telling Turks that Ataturk's time is over, his pictures should be removed from display and he should be forgotten,
his time is over, in a way to say that he passed away.
he should never be forgotten. the contributions he made were essential for Turkia. And worth to be continued in a way that to develop the country. his ideas and achievements need to be taken as a foundation in further openings.
2. Anyone who says Ataturk's revolutions were works of a dictator, not necessarily according to public wishes,
from the very little i know, his works were - taken in generally benefic. might he had oposing public wishes... a country must be very difficult to lead. ))) sometimes sacrifices have to be done.
here is a review i found interesting. i know few of Ataturk's life, deeds and the whole political and historical conjuncture.
ATATURK
by Andrew Mango
Woodstock, N.Y.: Overlook, 2000. 666 pp. $40
Middle East Quarterly
March 2000
Reviewed by Daniel Pipes
Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (1881-1938), one of the great political figures of the twentieth century, has not been the subject of a full-scale biography in English since one published by Lord Kinross in 1964. The author, Istanbul-born and a writer on things Turkish, has produced far and away the best biography of Atatürk in English, one boasting solid research, fine presentation, and sensible judgments. The result is a more textured and complex picture than hitherto available.
Mango skillfully captures the themes of his tale. "Atatürk was a competent commander, a shrewd politician, a statesman of supreme realism. But above all he was a man of the Enlightenment. And the Enlightenment was not made by saints." "Atatürk was often described as a dictator - a description he hated above all others. It was, in fact, inappropriate, for he behaved not like a modern dictator, but like a latter-day king, who had delegated government to his chief minister, and then sought to amuse himself as best he could." Atatürk emerges from this biography as resolute yet contradictory. He forwarded women's rights but in his private life "could not accept women as equals." He was a devoted rationalist but invented "fantastic historical and linguistic theories."
Mango concludes with an assessment of the Atatürk experiment that bears quoting for its succinct insight and enduring message: "Atatürk's message is that East and West can meet on the ground of universal secular values and mutual respect, that nationalism is compatible with peace, that human reason is the only true guide in life. It is an optimistic message and its validity will always be in doubt. But it is an ideal that commands respect."
3. Anyone who advocates that Turks should go back to their Ottoman roots, ie. use Ottoman language, adopt Ottoman dress code etc.
why should Turkia go back?
4. Anyone who says being the free citizen of a republic and the follower of a religious belief are two concepts in competition, and Turks should obviously prefer the latter,
the concepts are not in competition.
5. Anyone who preaches that the people in Turkia are from different ethnic groups, and that they should be allowed to separate themselves from the unity...like small pebbles from a mozaic. PKK supportes.
different ethnicities are different ethnicities. they are smole pieces of a mosaic. that is diversity. in unity, as it is called. mosaics are beautiful... i am not aware of what the PKK supporters do and say. (under developement)
6. Any coward (ablebodied, male citizen) who flees the country, when it is his turn to serve in the Army,
if the army is no other way, but an education for those who does not have means to that, it is beneficial. some people learn to wash their clothes there( sorry, it is what a high employee told me... officer?), have discipline... as i was told. now, army might not offer proper conditions, either. i do not think that neither sticking in a place 1.5 years necessary improves a person(in Romania, for ex, some came home with ulcer...), nor that the way armies are equipped nowadays compulsory service would mean a major contribution to the safety of the country. responsibility can be assumed in many ways. the best should be a non-compulsory military service. why not serving civil duties? planting trees, helping disabled? in my opinion, this is also a worthy contribution. this should be compulsory. i think if someone flees responsibilities of life, or being human and just in the meantime, that is condemnable. Armies should introduce civil services, in my opinion. There will always be men fleeing away from army.
7. Anyone who suggests that Turkia should stop being a nation-state and becomes a part of the merry Global crowd,
isn't Turkia part of the global merry crowd? ))) merry crowd. either way, it is a state part of a global "crowd" of states. extend what you have said about the pieces of mosaic. and here we are. what makes the difference? the way you take part in that crowd... what influence do you have, how far it goes, what do you offer to the citizens of your country, how you coop in resolving internal and external conflicts, balancing your own welfare with the global one.
something puzzles me in this. i think the nation state term. nation means that is a group sharing common cultural heritage, common values. a multicultural nation? for example, lutherans are good citizens, but they will not whirl three times round the table the way catholics do(rituals). this is also part of a heritage. if hungarians, they will have different motives on pottery than romanians. yet, they are the members of the same country, co-nationals.
8. Anyone who preaches EU is the only life saving option open to Turkia and strives for membership - even at the cost of national soveregnity and pride,
(chapter under development and reading. at a first glance i would say that, due to it's position adherence to EU is not the only solution for Turkey.).
9. Anyone trying to sell a different religion to Turkish citizens; missionaries of all kinds, operating under veils,
in Romania sects have extended. in what ways? between other things, they went even in isolated mountain village and preached the people. more then that, they helped the poor. they encourage collectivity, common interests and mutual help. Orthodox priests did not much thing in their mandate (as they are, in a way to say "invested"). many times they just accepted gifts, respect without doing much of a thing to their religious community. this created a pre-condition to desert religion. the second was they offered money. people need better financial state and to learn how to make their lives better. then again, if religion is a matter of choice... i think this should relate very much on the personal belief. a good believer had belief in the heart. religion always mixed political and social interests and comes to define identity. still does. hence the reprobation at missionaries. missionaries existed and will exist. and probably there exist methods in avoiding this. one of them should be tie the belief to the heart.(my idealist view here) religions should not be sold... yet they are.
10. Anyone who supports those who intend to replace the current democratic and secular republic with an Islamic mode of government (whether of fundamentalist, or soft kind),
taking number four, this is not a good choice. it looks like a trap. religions have not been reformed. hence, there are some dangers. spiritual should reflect in conducts in everyday life. fundamentalism, in my opinion, is also not a good choice.
11. Anyone who fancies himself to be ethnically of pure Turkish blood, hence imagines that he is superior to all other etnic citizen groups in Turkia, or that he is a better patriot,
so there are ethnicities. all this terminology((... Citizenship gives you rights and restrictions. one of the restrictions should be (and legally is) the referring to a so called superiority in blood. this reminds me many jews bought noble titles... counts i think (these were "buyable" titles)
12. Anyone who likes to sing false songs about Armenian misfortunes, but demands a down payment of 14 billion dollars to start discussing realities in historical terms,
(not aware of the whole situation of the Armenian killing, but there are also always good ways to ask for some money)
13. Any creep who approaches love stricken Western Ladies with intentions to cheat them out of their money, telephones, laptops or gold ear rings, whatever (dudu),
i like point 13. it is a personal statement of integrity which tells that the first 12 are a mixture of beliefs, values, terminologies, facts that belong to political philosophy, and are of big importance in developing national strategies, social conducts and applying terminologies to these. if you ask me, this post is a bubby trap.))) what i like is the way ideas were switched and connected here. a beautiful mind.
not any inloved lady or gentlemen should be approached with the mere intention of cheating. cheating is morally and legally condemnable. love has several levels. treat it like a pleasure of life, like a miracle, like a long term investment, like a shrine yet/but/and love always deserves the best. and energy, and time, devotion, raising mutual interests, learning, effort.
is not our friend....
|
Turkia is a state founded by Ataturk, who put the basis for reform, change and evolution of the country, separated state from religion (to say that citizenship is not the same with the follower of a religion) in a state which citizens originate from several ethnical groups. Turkia is one state from the states of the world. Turkia has compulsory military service, some of the candidates flee away. Turkia has given a deep thought to the adherence to EU and probably is at a point where anti-secularism (pro islamic state) tendencies strengthen and nationalism (inacceptance of different ethnicities) has registered slightly increased values. (There are people trying to convert muslims at different religion offering them material benefits?) Turkia was asked for a large sum of money for the Armenian genocide. It sounds like a deal offer interconnected to the country's political situation among the merry fellow states on this planet, development, acceptance/adherance to EU.
respect to love. |
Portokal,
Are these your own words? I only aske because your command of English has come on in leaps and bounds all in one day.
|
|
48. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 04:05 am |
Quoting azade: Quoting AlphaF:
The revolution that Ataturk started died out, immediately after he was murdered... |
And when exactly was it that Atatürk was murdered..?  |
I deliberately avoided that question! You know how Turks love a conspiracy theory...
|
|
49. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 04:11 am |
Quoting AEnigma III: Quoting azade: Quoting AlphaF:
The revolution that Ataturk started died out, immediately after he was murdered... |
And when exactly was it that Atatürk was murdered..?  |
I deliberately avoided that question! You know how Turks love a conspiracy theory... |
This is a theory that I would love to hear though!
|
|
50. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 04:36 am |
Quoting AlphaF: Quoting AEnigma III: I must confess it is rather strange to have opposing views with someone on Turkish Class without them resorting to insulting me
|
For that, you should give the merit to yourself... |
You do make a beautiful couple AlphaF & AEnigmaIII... both start with an A and end with capitals, Aenigma a bit fatter, Alpha a "bit" older. Wisdom and beauty finally meets, like in "beauty and the beast"?
|
|
51. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 04:43 am |
Quoting peace train:
Portokal,
Are these your own words? I only aske because your command of English has come on in leaps and bounds all in one day.  |
Peace Train,
these are my words.
my english command... it is developing
and these are my opinions on the matter.
should i be asked, i give them. with biggest care. trying to be responsible to bring a good answer.
i prefer music. and living life.
|
|
52. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 04:44 am |
Quoting AEnigma III: You know very well that what disturbs people is that you are speaking your mind!! You are supposed to hide your real thoughts behind a mask of political correctness  |
Those radicals in your country Aenigma, also speak their minds, are they also on your A-list?
|
|
53. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 05:20 am |
Quoting portokal: Quoting peace train:
Portokal,
Are these your own words? I only aske because your command of English has come on in leaps and bounds all in one day.  |
Peace Train,
these are my words.
my english command... it is developing
and these are my opinions on the matter.
should i be asked, i give them. with biggest care. trying to be responsible to bring a good answer.
i prefer music. and living life.
|
I wasn't referring to your opinion Portokal. I was referring to your writing style in that particular post. It is very different to your usual style, and indeed different to you reply to me, and the grammar is almost perfect. I thought perhaps you were quoting somebody and had forgotten to give the source. Actually the style seems familiar. Oh well perhaps you simply got help from a friend, no harm in that.
take care
|
|
54. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 06:10 am |
Quoting peace train:
I wasn't referring to your opinion Portokal. I was referring to your writing style in that particular post. It is very different to your usual style, and indeed different to you reply to me, and the grammar is almost perfect. I thought perhaps you were quoting somebody and had forgotten to give the source. Actually the style seems familiar. Oh well perhaps you simply got help from a friend, no harm in that.
take care |
Here we have it...a perfect example of peace train's sanctimonious attitude! Portokal said it was her writing and opinion. PERHAPS you should just take the lady for her word.
I guess “the light†you said you said you saw recently regarding commenting on others in your posts went burned out quickly.
|
|
55. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 06:35 am |
Quoting girleegirl: Quoting peace train:
I wasn't referring to your opinion Portokal. I was referring to your writing style in that particular post. It is very different to your usual style, and indeed different to you reply to me, and the grammar is almost perfect. I thought perhaps you were quoting somebody and had forgotten to give the source. Actually the style seems familiar. Oh well perhaps you simply got help from a friend, no harm in that.
take care |
Here we have it...a perfect example of peace train's sanctimonious attitude! Portokal said it was her writing and opinion. PERHAPS you should just take the lady for her word.
I guess “the light†you said you said you saw recently regarding commenting on others in your posts went burned out quickly.
|
Maybe that was over-interpreting, but a perfect example of peace train being sanctimonious? :-S I think that you and Aenigma are just not as good mind readers as you think you are.
|
|
56. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 07:18 am |
it is no harm in getting help from a friend.
i got a lot of help from a friend. if my friend would have thought it is harm in giving help, my friend would have not given it to me.
and trying to find the right solutions is always good.
my style is... improving, i think. nevertheless, there is always room for more. i compare this with drawing circles. it is an exercise used to improve hand's abilities for precise drawing. takes everyday practice. when the potatoes one draws become rounder, that is an improvement. when you got the circles, that is better. you can start/continue in drawing letters. if so, effort is valuable, lessons priceless.
coming back to my opinions i sometimes tend to be radical in mind and strongly humanist in heart.
the grammar i use is better since the posting window has word and spelling corrector.
|
|
57. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 08:30 am |
Quoting MrX67: Quoting AlphaF: Quoting MrX67: Quoting AlphaF: My manifesto, though seems light hearted and though may be objectionable to some, clearly adresses most major issues in Turkia today...without any uncertain statements and leaving no doubt to my philosopy.
Do not bother writing insincere remarks, asking peanut questions - unless you have the heart for it.
What do you want? A full doctorate course?
Are you ashamed or scared to say what you think?...You probably are!..
|
seems you forcing politeness rules ,first i advice you to be more gentleman and next i advice you to look at events from poles,not from center of ur own realities |
CAN YOU NOT TELL WHAT IT IS THAT DISTURBS YOU? |
if you trying a manifesto that's origin or self must be humanity or human,coz each national,religional or regional manifestos creats opposites of it,so that can make bigger problems or unfixed.But if theres only all humanity on base of ur manifesto thats good way or effort for a real peace.İ hope i could tell my meaning with my poor English? |
I can understand why you can not talk straight.
Mine is a Nationalist Manifesto...
Try and write down your own Humanist Manifesto, if you can. If you cover similar issues in parallel order with mine, we shall all have a chance to compare the two manifestos.
|
|
58. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 09:26 am |
Quoting catwoman:
Maybe that was over-interpreting, but a perfect example of peace train being sanctimonious? :-S I think that you and Aenigma are just not as good mind readers as you think you are.  |
I never claimed to be a mind reader dear kitty and I stand behind my statement.
|
|
59. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 11:53 am |
Quoting catwoman: Those radicals in your country Aenigma, also speak their minds, are they also on your A-list?
|
Yes of course
|
|
60. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 11:55 am |
Quoting catwoman: Quoting AlphaF: Quoting AEnigma III: I must confess it is rather strange to have opposing views with someone on Turkish Class without them resorting to insulting me
|
For that, you should give the merit to yourself... |
You do make a beautiful couple AlphaF & AEnigmaIII... both start with an A and end with capitals, Aenigma a bit fatter, Alpha a "bit" older. Wisdom and beauty finally meets, like in "beauty and the beast"?  |
FATTER?!?!?!
Anyway, it is nice to see you proved my original point 
|
|
62. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 01:43 pm |
Quoting AEnigma III: Quoting catwoman: Maybe that was over-interpreting, but a perfect example of peace train being sanctimonious? :-S I think that you and Aenigma are just not as good mind readers as you think you are.  |
Are you peace train's lawyer? You seem to do a better job defending her than I ever did for Femme (to your obvious disgust!!!!)
Maybe only stealth mode members are allowed to defend others?  |
I don't have a lawyer, I plead insanity. I don't think there are any "lawyers" on this site, only a few puppeteers. I feel a new thread coming on . . . "Who is working who?"
|
|
63. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 01:44 pm |
Quoting peace train: I plead insanity. I don't think there are any "lawyers" on this site, only a few puppeteers. I feel a new thread coming on . . . "Who is working who?" |
You are displaying symptoms of paranoia and an unhealthy obsession with me! I agree - I think you need therapy
|
|
64. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 02:08 pm |
Quoting peace train: Quoting AEnigma III: Quoting catwoman: Maybe that was over-interpreting, but a perfect example of peace train being sanctimonious? :-S I think that you and Aenigma are just not as good mind readers as you think you are.  |
Are you peace train's lawyer? You seem to do a better job defending her than I ever did for Femme (to your obvious disgust!!!!)
Maybe only stealth mode members are allowed to defend others?  |
I don't have a lawyer, I plead insanity. I don't think there are any "lawyers" on this site, only a few puppeteers. I feel a new thread coming on . . . "Who is working who?" |
Where were you trained peace-train?
|
|
65. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 02:12 pm |
Quoting AEnigma III: Quoting catwoman: Quoting AlphaF: Quoting AEnigma III: I must confess it is rather strange to have opposing views with someone on Turkish Class without them resorting to insulting me
|
For that, you should give the merit to yourself... |
You do make a beautiful couple AlphaF & AEnigmaIII... both start with an A and end with capitals, Aenigma a bit fatter, Alpha a "bit" older. Wisdom and beauty finally meets, like in "beauty and the beast"?  |
FATTER?!?!?!
Anyway, it is nice to see you proved my original point 
|
She definitely has a soft spot for me partner !
Notice, I am only just "a bit" older? Should I be alarmed?
|
|
66. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 02:14 pm |
Quoting AlphaF: She definitely has a soft spot for me partner !
Notice, I am only just "a bit" older? |
Yes it had not escaped my notice! Maybe you are right
I think it is important also to note that, if you take her comments in order, I am the wisdom and you are the beauty!
|
|
67. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 03:06 pm |
Quoting AlphaF: Quoting peace train: Quoting AEnigma III: Quoting catwoman: Maybe that was over-interpreting, but a perfect example of peace train being sanctimonious? :-S I think that you and Aenigma are just not as good mind readers as you think you are.  |
Are you peace train's lawyer? You seem to do a better job defending her than I ever did for Femme (to your obvious disgust!!!!)
Maybe only stealth mode members are allowed to defend others?  |
I don't have a lawyer, I plead insanity. I don't think there are any "lawyers" on this site, only a few puppeteers. I feel a new thread coming on . . . "Who is working who?" |
Where were you trained peace-train? |
Dear Alfalfa
Where was I trained? A play on words? ok that deserves a similar style in my answer. So, firstly , think about my question "Who trained Who?" Next remove the ? and it becomes a statement. Translate the repeated word into Turkish. My answer is "I have no strings."
So . .. who are your students? No, don't tell me, I found your promotional video. You look great in red btw .
(Dear moderators . . . there is no political or religious content in this video link)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=hWraRx9Mwvo
Regards
Kim
|
|
68. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 04:57 pm |
Quoting AlphaF:
She definitely has a soft spot for me partner !
Notice, I am only just "a bit" older? Should I be alarmed? |
not a single moment. as long as you are ready to give what she has and take what she gives.
i cannot help in heaving an old mind and a young body.
nor would i wish to change any of these. one is a result of work, the other one of birth (do these rime a little?))). the latter will change anyway.
|
|
69. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 05:00 pm |
Quoting AlphaF:
Where were you trained peace-train? |
as for me, my humour i think has tibetan origins.
|
|
70. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 06:43 pm |
Quoting portokal: Quoting AlphaF:
Where were you trained peace-train? |
as for me, my humour i think has tibetan origins. |
me thinks at least one conspiracy theory on this site is true
|
|
71. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 08:57 pm |
Quoting AEnigma III: You are displaying symptoms of paranoia and an unhealthy obsession with me! I agree - I think you need therapy
 |
Canim, it's more like you displaying an unhealthy obsession with yourself. On top of that, you see things...
|
|
72. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 09:02 pm |
Quoting catwoman: Canim, it's more like you displaying an unhealthy obsession with yourself. On top of that, you see things...  |
I look foward to your nightly activity of passing comment on 60% of my posts, but decline to reply anymore
|
|
73. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 09:06 pm |
Quoting AEnigma III: Are you peace train's lawyer? You seem to do a better job defending her than I ever did for Femme (to your obvious disgust!!!!)
Maybe only stealth mode members are allowed to defend others?  |
Oh, don't underestimate yourself canim , I hope the stealth mode defense is not the cause of your obvious disgust though!!!!
|
|
74. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 09:08 pm |
Quoting AEnigma III:
I look foward to your nightly activity of passing comment on 60% of my posts, but decline to reply anymore 
|
You really look forward to it?
|
|
75. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 09:10 pm |
Quoting AEnigma III: Anyway, it is nice to see you proved my original point 
|
At the bottom of things, I do actually agree with you! As would anybody who finally opens their eyes, stop lying to themselves, admit the truth and see the light...
|
|
76. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 09:18 pm |
MANIFESTO
Hereby I put into writing my fundamentals and strategic directions to be followed in a nation state, in accordance to policies and legislation.
1. Ataturk’s time is not over, his pictures are on the display, deeds remembered.
2. Ataturk is not a dictator, revolutions were in accordance with public wishes.
3. there is no returning to Ottoman cultural habits and no advocacy towards that.
4. a home is the secular state where religion melts with policy perfectly yet being separate. love penetrates in everyday, everyday penetrates love through duties.
5. no separatism is acceptable
6. Army services are of highest duty to citizens.
7. There is the Nation State and there is the Global merry crowd. Citizens find joy in the State.
8.national sovereignty and pride are coming above all.
9. citizens of the national state will not buy from missionaries.
10 no to fundamentalism or soft dictatorship tendencies.
11. no to individualism and self-praising tendencies.
12. there were no Armenian misfortunes; leasing methods are preferred.
13. beauty and wisdom are shared, mutual and reciprocal.
|
|
77. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 09:21 pm |
Quoting portokal: MANIFESTO
Hereby I put into writing my fundamentals and strategic directions to be followed in a nation state, in accordance to policies and legislation.
1. Ataturk’s time is not over, his pictures are on the display, deeds remembered.
2. Ataturk is not a dictator, revolutions were in accordance with public wishes.
3. there is no returning to Ottoman cultural habits and no advocacy towards that.
4. a home is the secular state where religion melts with policy perfectly yet being separate. love penetrates in everyday, everyday penetrates love through duties.
5. no separatism is acceptable
6. Army services are of highest duty to citizens.
7. There is the Nation State and there is the Global merry crowd. Citizens find joy in the State.
8.national sovereignty and pride are coming above all.
9. citizens of the national state will not buy from missionaries.
10 no to fundamentalism or soft dictatorship tendencies.
11. no to individualism and self-praising tendencies.
12. there were no Armenian misfortunes; leasing methods are preferred.
13. beauty and wisdom are shared, mutual and reciprocal.
|
Portokal, is the extent of your politics only that which your friend Alpha has taught you?
|
|
78. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 09:28 pm |
Quoting AEnigma III: Quoting portokal: MANIFESTO
Hereby I put into writing my fundamentals and strategic directions to be followed in a nation state, in accordance to policies and legislation.
1. Ataturk’s time is not over, his pictures are on the display, deeds remembered.
2. Ataturk is not a dictator, revolutions were in accordance with public wishes.
3. there is no returning to Ottoman cultural habits and no advocacy towards that.
4. a home is the secular state where religion melts with policy perfectly yet being separate. love penetrates in everyday, everyday penetrates love through duties.
5. no separatism is acceptable
6. Army services are of highest duty to citizens.
7. There is the Nation State and there is the Global merry crowd. Citizens find joy in the State.
8.national sovereignty and pride are coming above all.
9. citizens of the national state will not buy from missionaries.
10 no to fundamentalism or soft dictatorship tendencies.
11. no to individualism and self-praising tendencies.
12. there were no Armenian misfortunes; leasing methods are preferred.
13. beauty and wisdom are shared, mutual and reciprocal.
|
Portokal, is the extent of your politics only that which your friend Alpha has taught you?  |
no...
|
|
79. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 09:32 pm |
Quote: Quoting portokal: Portokal, is the extent of your politics only that which your friend Alpha has taught you?  |
no...  |
It is strange you became a Turkish Nationalist without even being Turkish
|
|
80. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 09:38 pm |
Quote: Quoting AEnigma III: Quoting portokal: Portokal, is the extent of your politics only that which your friend Alpha has taught you?  |
no...  |
It is strange you became a Turkish Nationalist without even being Turkish  |
She is not the only one, I think..
|
|
81. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 09:39 pm |
Quote: Quoting AEnigma III: Quoting portokal: Portokal, is the extent of your politics only that which your friend Alpha has taught you?  |
no...  |
It is strange you became a Turkish Nationalist without even being Turkish  |
i guess... part of it was in my blood and part of it learned. it is the way i am. quite strict in rules. give me a manifesto... and the nationalist jumps out with respect to turkishness. Turkish Nationalist.
|
|
82. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 09:46 pm |
Quoting portokal: 9. citizens of the national state will not buy from missionaries.
10 no to fundamentalism or soft dictatorship tendencies.
11. no to individualism and self-praising tendencies. |
Portokal, do you not think that your points 9 and 11 conflict with your point 10?
(You have time to PM Alpha before answering )
|
|
83. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 09:49 pm |
Anaaaamm! Manyak misin sen, deli misin neyisin sen?
You're probably a lost case, otherwise I would google around to document that you are wrong.
|
|
84. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 09:57 pm |
Also, could you explain Point 7 to me. It is a little unclear. What exactly do you mean?
"Citizens find joy in the state" meaning what?
You mean they want to cut themselves off from the "global merry crowd" completely? Do they not need US money anymore?
|
|
85. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 10:01 pm |
Portokal?
|
|
86. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 10:11 pm |
Quoting AEnigma III: It is strange you became a Turkish Nationalist without even being Turkish  |
Actually, I thought you were aware that we are ALL Turkish.
|
|
87. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 10:27 pm |
Quoting AEnigma III: Also, could you explain Point 7 to me. It is a little unclear. What exactly do you mean?
"Citizens find joy in the state" meaning what?
You mean they want to cut themselves off from the "global merry crowd" completely? Do they not need US money anymore?  |
thank you for your observations above, i just PMd Alpha.
i think it is important to maintain trading activities so the State can have a life.
|
|
88. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 10:35 pm |
Quoting catwoman: Quoting AEnigma III: It is strange you became a Turkish Nationalist without even being Turkish  |
Actually, I thought you were aware that we are ALL Turkish. |
the turkilinial society.))
thank you. i tend to omit this when it comes to myself. just having many ethnics in me.. and i had a time when my accent an my national identity represented a problem. i was working at the restauration of a church (painting and putting gold) and this was the main reason in having to quit the job after a time.
i AM Turkish.
|
|
90. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 10:43 pm |
Quoting azade: Anaaaamm! Manyak misin sen, deli misin neyisin sen?
You're probably a lost case, otherwise I would google around to document that you are wrong. |
i am not familiar with political terminologies.
manyak... maybe
if you do not have principles to respect, what do you have besides appartenance and heart affiliation?
i do not think that doing things that have to be done, or having a walk, or a night in Kumkapi is stepping over principles.
what is basic is the need to keep clean, to agree, to decide democratic. and with wisdom.
|
|
91. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 11:12 pm |
Quoting portokal:
if you do not have principles to respect, what do you have besides appartenance and heart affiliation?
i do not think that doing things that have to be done, or having a walk, or a night in Kumkapi is stepping over principles.
what is basic is the need to keep clean, to agree, to decide democratic. and with wisdom.
|
Of course everyone should have principles. But tell me this, how are points 3, (4), 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, (10 ) and 11 democratic?
Turkish sentence was a popular line by the way
|
|
92. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 11:15 pm |
Quote: Quoting thehandsom: Quoting AEnigma III: Quoting portokal: Portokal, is the extent of your politics only that which your friend Alpha has taught you?  |
no...  |
It is strange you became a Turkish Nationalist without even being Turkish  |
She is not the only one, I think.. |
There's a long queue of ladies lining up to surrender their TC passwords... it's quicker than signing up for training. I said he looked good in red.
|
|
93. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 11:52 pm |
Quoting azade: Quoting portokal:
if you do not have principles to respect, what do you have besides appartenance and heart affiliation?
i do not think that doing things that have to be done, or having a walk, or a night in Kumkapi is stepping over principles.
what is basic is the need to keep clean, to agree, to decide democratic. and with wisdom.
|
Of course everyone should have principles. But tell me this, how are points 3, (4), 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, (10 ) and 11 democratic?
Turkish sentence was a popular line by the way  |
3. no to bringing back historical terms and habits.
well... Ottomans have some habits are not practised nowadays. Like several wifes also. or the habit of being alone. or being screamy, scary, talking about past. old dresses...
4. a home is the secular state where religion melts with policy perfectly yet being separate. love penetrates in everyday, everyday penetrates love through duties.
5. no separatism is acceptable
i feel like having a long nap this afternoon. what do you feel like to do?
or
i will have xxxx today evening.
6. Army services are of highest duty to citizens.
if one is on duty, would the other slice the apple thick?
should ever something happen, who you count on?
7. There is the Nation State and there is the Global crowd. Citizens find joy in the State.
would one do a massage to one's feet? shall one ask the neighbor for this joy?
8.national sovereignty and pride come above all.
one is the best friend and home is the best place. that, again does not mean locking or that the merry crowd cannot be visited.
9. missionaries will not find buyers in the citizens of the national state.
see point 9 details and add to this the fact of choosing and joy and will, will you?
10 no to fundamentalism or soft dictatorship tendencies.
11. no to individualism and self-praising tendencies.
"if i would not have done"... "i am the..." "leave me alone!" "do not nag me!" in different languages.
|
|
94. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 11:54 pm |
Your rules are quite specific and limiting the individual so my question is still, how is that democratic?
|
|
95. |
28 Jan 2008 Mon 12:02 am |
Quoting azade: Your rules are quite specific and limiting the individual so my question is still, how is that democratic? |
i don't know azade.
if you know what is democracy, tell me.
|
|
96. |
28 Jan 2008 Mon 12:03 am |
actually, why am i in this thread of revised manifesto?
|
|
97. |
28 Jan 2008 Mon 01:12 am |
Quote: Quoting peace train: Quoting thehandsom: Quoting AEnigma III: Quoting portokal: Portokal, is the extent of your politics only that which your friend Alpha has taught you?  |
no...  |
It is strange you became a Turkish Nationalist without even being Turkish  |
She is not the only one, I think.. |
There's a long queue of ladies lining up to surrender their TC passwords... it's quicker than signing up for training. I said he looked good in red. |
i am not gealous. they are the ladies without TURKISH MANIFESTO
|
|
98. |
28 Jan 2008 Mon 01:14 am |
Quoting peace train: There's a long queue of ladies lining up to surrender their TC passwords... it's quicker than signing up for training. I said he looked good in red. |
There is? From what information do you base this? Another conspiracy theory?
|
|
99. |
28 Jan 2008 Mon 02:06 am |
REVISED MANIFESTO
There are rules.
there are things that has to be done.
And there is the way we feel about doing some things.
What is important and we love has priorities.
And nothing is comparable with being happy and making happy.
Many things need to be learned about the one we love.
In the same time, we discover ourselves, too.
In a way, principles come from the heart. Yet they are related to societal and cohabitation. We can dig up as much as we want. It will also depend on the angle of the digger. An answer depends on putting the no before yes, too. And there can always be the danger of facing a not good choice.
Sometimes we have the tendencies of accumulating bad experiences. One comes and wipes them away. No matter how. The will of getting somewhere, to do something is what matters. To share. To have a project. To be together.
Do not ask me what democracy is. Equal rights. What is equal? In this democracy, someone punches your nose elegantly.
Nietzsche converted before death. What is faith for Nietzsche?(just at the level of wandering)
Partners in a relationship fight to get each other. They do a lot of things together. They try to give the "best". They build a language. They get familiar with each other. They get to have a common world.
The basis may be or not material.
Should one only stick to that, life would be rather dull.
It is about building and developing.
And you can discover so much things in your friend, that you can build a world. Actually, -and this is basic- complete your world. but what you got seems like it has nothing to do with what you had. And you like it. You love it. Your life becomes colourful. It can be kept colourful alone, also. We are not self-sufficient. This world has to be kept. These could be rules. There has to be an equilibrium. And an input. But these melt in a way that becomes natural.
Having these is wonderful.
And necessary. Sine qua non condition.
Ruin the world you built, give up pillars from it in favor of foreign "advices", not melting wat you have into it, you will destroy it.
A horrible thought, but only ment to acknowledge of the treasure a world is.
What are the pillars? Trust, faith, respect, openness, honesty, understanding and freedom.
Trust in the common world, faith in building a shrine to love, respect towards the world, yourself and your friend, honesty in being correct and open towards what you bring in and what is brought in, openness to give and receive, to have and to cherish what you have. understanding of what is good to be done, what can be built in, what needs to be cleared and taken care of. and freedom to understand and question. (birds love freedom))))
and humor. salt and spice of life.
This is the revised manifesto.
|
|
100. |
28 Jan 2008 Mon 02:09 am |
Werent you the one I pmd with about some sort of goth-like art personal picture, quite some time ago, Portokal?
|
|
101. |
28 Jan 2008 Mon 02:15 am |
Quoting Deli_kizin: Werent you the one I pmd with about some sort of goth-like art personal picture, quite some time ago, Portokal? |
and weren't you the one who did not answer at a pm from a romanian young lady which i told to put her inquiries to you regarding university in turkey?
yup, it was me. pick was genuine, no photoshop, nothing. turned black and white only.
her personal Xmas tree at her personal home. everything was all clean.
i still like the pic and the idea.
the best part was my interpretation.
|
|
102. |
28 Jan 2008 Mon 02:16 am |
Portokal.... are you smoking the same plant as you were the other day?
|
|
103. |
28 Jan 2008 Mon 02:18 am |
Quoting portokal: and weren't you the one who did not answer at a pm from a romanian young lady which i told to put her inquiries to you regarding university in turkey?
|
Sorry who are we talking about here? So far I have answered ALL pms that were not spam, especially considering entering uni in Turkey because it was a pain in the ... for me.
I was just surprised that you were the same person as I understand from this forum now... but now that Catwoman brought up the use of plants.. why dont you come to the Netherlands Lots of choice here and aaaaaalll legal.
|
|
104. |
28 Jan 2008 Mon 02:20 am |
Quoting Deli_kizin: why dont you come to the Netherlands Lots of choice here and aaaaaalll legal. |
oh..... those were the days....
|
|
105. |
28 Jan 2008 Mon 02:21 am |
Quoting catwoman: Portokal.... are you smoking the same plant as you were the other day?  |
no. i change them according to hours and desired colours.
all based on the stages of the m n.
|
|
106. |
28 Jan 2008 Mon 02:22 am |
Quoting catwoman: oh..... those were the days....
|
We thought theyd never end.. lalalalalalalalalalalalaaaaa.
|
|
107. |
28 Jan 2008 Mon 02:25 am |
Quoting Deli_kizin: Quoting portokal: and weren't you the one who did not answer at a pm from a romanian young lady which i told to put her inquiries to you regarding university in turkey?
|
Sorry who are we talking about here? So far I have answered ALL pms that were not spam, especially considering entering uni in Turkey because it was a pain in the ... for me.
I was just surprised that you were the same person as I understand from this forum now... but now that Catwoman brought up the use of plants.. why dont you come to the Netherlands Lots of choice here and aaaaaalll legal. |
right now i am having a rubeddenciopis gulinata.
you have this one also? and is legal?
|
|
108. |
28 Jan 2008 Mon 02:27 am |
Quoting portokal:
right now i am having a rubeddenciopis gulinata.
you have this one also? and is legal?
|
Somethıng wıth such a name cant taste good
|
|
109. |
28 Jan 2008 Mon 03:10 am |
Quoting Deli_kizin: Quoting portokal:
right now i am having a rubeddenciopis gulinata.
you have this one also? and is legal?
|
Somethıng wıth such a name cant taste good  |
|
|
110. |
28 Jan 2008 Mon 04:24 am |
Quoting girleegirl: Quoting peace train:
I wasn't referring to your opinion Portokal. I was referring to your writing style in that particular post. It is very different to your usual style, and indeed different to you reply to me, and the grammar is almost perfect. I thought perhaps you were quoting somebody and had forgotten to give the source. Actually the style seems familiar. Oh well perhaps you simply got help from a friend, no harm in that.
take care |
I guess “the light†you said you said you saw recently regarding commenting on others in your posts went burned out quickly.
|
nah it was sarcasm, pure and simple.
oh and I was being condescending and patronizing, not sanctimonious .
oops I'm doing it again, I'll go and sit on the naughty step.
Feel free to reply. It will fall on deaf ears.
|
|
112. |
28 Jan 2008 Mon 04:37 am |
Quoting catwoman: Quoting peace train: nah it was sarcasm, pure and simple.
oh and I was being condescending and patronizing, not sanctimonious .
oops I'm doing it again, I'll go and sit on the naughty step.
Feel free to reply. It will fall on deaf ears.
|
It's ok to be patronizing, condescending, arrogant, mysogynist, demeaning, racist, but don't you dare being sanctimonious!!!!!  |
I will do my best Catwoman but I warn you, I have promised to renew my Brownie Girl Guide vows. This is why I am up so late, I daren'y go to bed because I know when I wake I will be sanctimonious again. Perhaps the Mods will allow me dual membership, then I can have two personalities.
|
|
115. |
28 Jan 2008 Mon 05:20 am |
Quoting thehandsom:
I must say that i am a bit surprised about this thread.
Because, the first post of this thread was so arrogant, racist, example of little knowledge of politics (and turkish politics), turkish cofee house (kahvehane) politics, a great example of mixing racism with nationalism.
I still dont get it. Why do you go item by item for that post? do you really have that much time?
well..anyway..it is just me stating my opinion really..
But I am a bit dissapointed with it generally..
|
That's exactly what I mean....
|
|
116. |
28 Jan 2008 Mon 06:45 am |
Quoting peace train:
nah it was sarcasm, pure and simple.
oh and I was being condescending and patronizing, not sanctimonious .
oops I'm doing it again, I'll go and sit on the naughty step.
Feel free to reply. It will fall on deaf ears.
|
Oh how kind of you to allow me to reply. My goodness, I wouldn't have known what to do had you not told me!!!
Ya know, your one-note tune has grown incredibly tiring and bored me to tears........hhhmmmm I have to wonder if that one-note tune is what has caused your deafness...you may want to go get that checked!!
And I won't be so arrogant as to tell you to feel free to reply...I could care less if you do or not.
And cat...I'm surprised by your consistent defense of peace train. The only difference between her and femme is that femme was direct and to the point in her comments whereas peace train just hides behind this 'oh-gosh-it's-just-poor-little-ol-me' persona.
Give me 'in-your-face' anyday.
|
|
117. |
28 Jan 2008 Mon 06:58 am |
Quoting girleegirl: And cat...I'm surprised by your consistent defense of peace train. The only difference between her and femme is that femme was direct and to the point in her comments whereas peace train just hides behind this 'oh-gosh-it's-just-poor-little-ol-me' persona.
Give me 'in-your-face' anyday. |
You are confusing something here GG. I'm not defending Peace Train, I'm stating my opinions about what I read! You can post your opinions and I can post mine, why is it so surprising that we happen to disagree??? Apparently I haven't noticed the PT's 'oh-gosh-it's-just-poor-little-ol-me' persona.
|
|
118. |
28 Jan 2008 Mon 08:57 am |
Quoting catwoman:
You are confusing something here GG. I'm not defending Peace Train, I'm stating my opinions about what I read! You can post your opinions and I can post mine, why is it so surprising that we happen to disagree??? Apparently I haven't noticed the PT's 'oh-gosh-it's-just-poor-little-ol-me' persona. |
Of course you can post your opinions (which, I think you know, many times I agree with)!!!! My point here is that it seems that you have been jumping in on any post in which peace train's arrogance is called in to question. So it would appear...in my opinion....that you are consistently defending her. I guess it surprises me because I just find the 'oh gosh' persona so blatant.
Can we agree to disagree?
|
|
119. |
28 Jan 2008 Mon 09:12 am |
Quoting girleegirl: Of course you can post your opinions (which, I think you know, many times I agree with)!!!! My point here is that it seems that you have been jumping in on any post in which peace train's arrogance is called in to question. So it would appear...in my opinion....that you are consistently defending her. I guess it surprises me because I just find the 'oh gosh' persona so blatant.
Can we agree to disagree?
|
I can see your point GG, but I honestly don't see it the same way. I would never defend someone just for the sake of defending her/him, it is just the same issue we keep coming back to, so I keep responding the same thing.. . In my last post, I was being sarcastic that there's so much fuss about someone being sanctimonious, while other racist posts are taken with humor. I don't want to argue about it, I just made an observation. Of course you don't have to agree with me and I still like you GG.
|
|
120. |
28 Jan 2008 Mon 09:27 am |
Quoting catwoman:
I don't want to argue about it, |
You are no fun tonight!!
Quoting catwoman:
I still like you GG.
|
Ohhhh ok you are still fun.
|
|
121. |
28 Jan 2008 Mon 09:31 am |
Quoting girleegirl: Quoting catwoman:
I don't want to argue about it, |
You are no fun tonight!!
Quoting catwoman:
I still like you GG.
|
Ohhhh ok you are still fun. |
|
|
|