of course that´s how it should be.. 

Nice logic, Lemoncim

I don´t care whose name is kept. A few friends of mine decided to combine their surnames with their husbands and their husbands did the same, so they´re now called, say, Broun-Smythe. Now, if their child marries another double-barrelled person, say, Winston-Churchil, are they going to change their surnames into Broun-Smythe-Winston-Churchil? And what about the next generations?

You know, I think the best idea is to pick a new surname for both people who get married Preferably ones that include the date of the marriage so that men don´t forget it!

then you will not be able to track down your ancestors.

carrying mothers surname is simple and ideal. i mean you can have any father, but only one woman gives you a birth. and its only mothers who really take care of children.

everything comes from mother: genetic material, developing material, love, care, support.

to be continued

 interesting point of view ,in that case sperm is nothing but mother´s daily or night cream?

I´m looking for a guy with an internationally easy name. I would take my husband´s name if it was easier then the one I have now

Why do we need last names anyway?  I like the way Native Americans name their children...Soaring Bird, Dancing Bull, Swift River....Its very generic!

sperm can do a better cream than a genetic material.

soaring bird needs a last name. i need to know whose soaring bird that is. a bird of texas or of smith?

we need identities, we need history, my dear precious egg.

 I wish I had had my biology classes with you,you sound more interesting

oj, kurna, nie wymadrzaj sie, nie psuj mojej pieknej idei.

a pozatym czy naprawde uwazasz mnie za debila, czy co?

 uważam cię za super inteligentną kobietę....

Nie miałam zamiaru się wymadrzać,tylko trochę poprzekomarzaćNie masz chyba dzisiaj złego dnia??????