I´m shocked that you think a mother who has a "mongol"  which I haven´t heard this term in years.....A mother with a down syndrom baby can´t have a career.  So women can´t have a career who have kids?  Is it so awful to have daycare?  Do you find this palming it off on someone else?  Unbelievable!

As far as everyone´s comments here about abortion..your entitled to your views.  This doesn´t change my views one bit about pro-life, in fact it just reaffirms why I believe this way in the first place. 

Interesting that Hilliary also called out Obama on the fact he voted "present" which means "no" on seven bills introduced.   Two bills outlawed the late-term procedure that opponents call partial-birth abortion. Two bills required parental notification for minors seeking abortions. Three bills were for so-called "born alive" legislation, which require doctors to administer medical care to aborted fetuses that survive the abortion process in hopes that the fetuses can survive.  Just many of the hundreds of reasons why I don´t want him representing me.

 My opinion is "unbelieveable" that a women should bring us her own children! Shock horror!!!!

 So in other words, a woman can´t have a career if she has children.  Yes that is shock and horror!

This has nothing to do with the goverment but MY moral belief that abortion is WRONG..

 Actually it is possible to have children, bring them up yourself, and have a career!  I somehow managed it  I did not miss out on any crucial parts of my children growing up nor have I missed out on the career ladder either - shock horror!

As long as you, Palin and others have that believe as a private believe, I think it is very much ok. But when, by law, women are forbidden to choose what THEY want because your/her/other persons private believes are suddenly compulsary for all, is it indeed WRONG!

 The issue is that McCain has publicly and repeatly said that if elected he would seek to have Roe V Wade overturned. (you can see that in this 02/07 and this 09/08 article) That would mean the government would have legal control over women´s bodies. That would eliminate a woman´s ability to have a choice.

If people like teaschip and elisabeth feel strongly about bringing a fetus to term in their own bodies, that´s fine with me. It´s when the right to choice is removed I have a very serious problem.

 The issue, in my eyes is not about the legal right for a woman to choose.  The issue is the legal right for a fetus to exist.     

 Sorry Elisabeth, a woman is carrying that fetus in her body, not otherwise. I´m not pro-abortion, I´m pro choice. But let´s agree to diagree...

 Of course, Trudy, I will agree to disagree with you.  I will respectfully do so.  However, I don´t like the insinuation that I am not a thinking woman or that I am thin brained because I don´t feel the same.  (I do realize that it was not you who said this...but it makes me angry!!  )

 The issue is that McCain has publicly and repeatly said that if elected he would seek to have Roe V Wade overturned. (you can see that in this 02/07 and this 09/08 article) That would mean the government would have legal control over women´s bodies. That would eliminate a woman´s ability to have a choice.

If people like teaschip and elisabeth feel strongly about bringing a fetus to term in their own bodies, that´s fine with me. It´s when the right to choice is removed I have a very serious problem.