Social polls and statistics give very rough answers, going to abstract conclusions with some specific questions can be very misleading.
With different polls, I´m sure I can get two very opposite conclusions of a same society:
I can get "Turkish people are the most secular people" and by another poll I can get the conclusion: "The majority of turkish people are for Sharia"
Again with different polls, I bet I can have a conclusion that "Turks are the most hospitable people", while with different poll questions, I can conclude that "Turks are xenophobes"
If we want, we can make every single country xenophobe by simply a few polls asking a few questions. I can make France racist, Germany racist, United States racist, Japan racist, every single country.
Polls are the most generalist, simplist and unrealiable way to make abstract conclusions such as xenophobe, racist, happy, sad, hostile, paranoic, hospitable, lovely about a society.
Apperantly you have no idea about "survey methods". do you think they go to a nationalist village in anatolia and ask people what they think about foreigners? do you think they dont choose samples from every class of societyd every ideology? be sure they must have gone to either Niþantaþý or Yozgat for this poll. do you remember that Konda conducted a poll before 2007 election and its results were the closest to the election´s results.
