I have a follow up question about that.

I thought that if you use 2 verbs that should have the same tense ending, you would put -ip on the first one, like this:

Gelip seni bürodan alýrým.

Would this not apply/be correct in this case? How do you know when to omit -ip?

Thanks

 "Tam üstüne bastýn, Melek."

You hit the nail on the head, Melek.

"Onlar ayný anlama geliyor."

They have same meaning:  

"Gelir, seni bürodan alýrým." and "Gelip, seni bürodan  alýrým."

That´s very helpful to me, as I was wondering the other day about that very thing after seeing this:

"Amaçlar

Bu üniteyi çalýþtýktan sonra;

• Türkiye´nin iklim özellikleri hakkýnda geniþ bilgi sahibi olacak,

• Türkiye´deki iklim tiplerinin neler olduðunu kavrayacak, bu

tipler hakkýnda bilgilenecek,

• Bu iklim tiplerinin hangi coðrafi bölgelerimizde görüldüklerini

öðreneceksiniz."

I wasn´t sure why it wasn´t olup and bilgilenip, but it seems that it could have been and it would also be correct.

So, just to make sure I understand, it is correct, when you list more than one verb with the same tense ending to use:

- verb+ip, verb+tense marker+personal ending (olup, bilgilenip, öðreneceksiniz)

or

- verb+tense marker, verb+tense marker+ personal ending (olacak, bilgilenecek, öðreneceksiniz)

Right?

Thanks again.

 It sounds well when you use it only once. If there is a direct relevance we can use it easily. You will study and then you will pass your exams. Ders çalýþýp derslerini geçeceksin. I have not enough time to explain more. If I can I will help you. see you.

 I agree that they both mean almost the same, but when you use -ip it is kind of a condition for the following statement.

For example:

Oyun oynar gelirsiniz. - You can play games and come -

Here there is an option,you can play games, or just sit over there..

Gelip seni alýrým - I will come and pick you up.

In this example, he has to come so that he can pick her up.