What did you bring that book that I didn´t want to be read to out of up from out of in under for?

Who can translate this to Turkish for me correctly? Or explain it to me in English if they have the same trouble?

I can only decode the last one  (what ... for?)

This sort of rambling is sort of common in less privileged neighbourhood in England, Middle England. And that person must be really upset to be bothered by a book or the person coming with the book. Though maybe the person misspoke ´what´ for ´why´.

Then rambles on.....

We´re now writing under the Turkish Class Forums / Practice Turkish and what an English expression means in Turkish isn´t meant to be discussed here, but it was interesting to learn that point. Thank you for the clear explanation.

yes but wasn´t it meant to be translated into turkish? read the first post, too maybe that´s the point of reading forums - starting from reading the first post?

i also agree - the sentence to start with WHY - not WHAT - because i think it should be a question. 

Many thanks.

why = what for

I think the point in choosing "what for" over "why" is to add another preposition to this long cluster

to out of up from out of in under for

 I am not sure that anyone could translate this to Turkish without it first making sense in English.

I am not sure why you have written the words at the end of the sentance in red and what are they supposed to mean?  Are they different endings to the sentance?

-----------------------------------------------------

"What did you bring the book that I didn´t want to read for?"   (using "what" at the beginning of the sentance and "for" at the end, gives the sentance a bit of a sarcastic tone).

"What did you bring that book for?  I didn´t want to read it"

or it could read

"Why did you bring the book that I didn´t want to read?"  (A slightly softer tone)

 At first I didn´t understand the sentence too but it had to be :

to, out, of, up, from, out, of, in, under, for

It isn´t a sentence but words (prepositions)

Part of that - but not all of it - makes a sensible sentence.

What did you bring that book that I didn´t want to be read to out of, up from (somewhere) for. 

That would mean ´why did you bring that book, that I didn´t want to listen to you read from, up here (from somewhere else)?´

(I´m not sure what answer you´re looking for but does that explain anything at all?)

 Yes I know, that is what I wrote!  It would be better if he could say which of these he wanted to use, or does he want to use them all (in there turn).  Most of them would not make any sense, so hopefully between myself and LIR we have given him some options for translation.

Thanks guys. My trouble was with those prepositions. Having seen that you native speakers have some problem with it I excuse myself, but those prepositions are supposed to be something meaningful.

What did you bring that book that I didn´t want to be read to out of up from out of in under for?

After some thinking now I am able to analyze them as follows:

for is related to what at the beginning so what is left is something like

to x from y (to out of up from out of in under)

and both x and y can further be broken down as

out of z (out of up & out of in under)

as such...

Now it is not that meaningless to me anymore but still it´s hard to translate. Anyway.

...... to out of up from out of in under for?

This is a convoluted sentence!

If the book was in a box under a table, you could say: You got it up from out of (a box) in under (the table).

If the book was also downstairs (maybe in a basement) and you brought it outside, you could say: You got the book out of (the house) up from (the basement) out of (a box) in under (a table), but to not use nouns with the positional prepositions is just fooling around. 

Thanks Henry but you missed the "to" in your sentence.

You mean my "to x from y" parsing is wrong?

The ´to´ goes with ´read´ - the verb is ´to read to´.  (Sorry - I don´t think I made that very clear in my above post).   That part is ´the book that I didn´t want to be read to out of ´(out of =from) (that takes care of the first 3)´ 

Like Henry, I think the rest is probably - up from´ (from a place below) out of (removing it from somewhere) in under.

It makes a kind of sense and you can get away with up from out of  butl the last part ´in under´ does seem to need a noun!

(Probably even more muddling - sorry!)

 that sentence can be corrected as ´´what did you bring that book for that i did not want to read?´´

and it means ;

´´okumak istemediðim kitabý neden getirdin?´´

Gulbil - the sentence contains much more than that - native English speakers are having problems understanding it!!!   Si++ is not after a correction to the sentence - he is after an explanation of its construction.

 Well...for more there is an extra charge 

I understand what si++ ´s friend is probably trying to tell him. It´s the likes of Lauren Cooper way of speaking. My friends from England speaks atrocious English and they are supposedly ´English´.

From my experience that I had with my friends, the sentences probably meant in standard English.

si++ was right about the sentence being a statement asking "What for are you doing this?" People shouldn´t really be too riled up about this. It´s only a case of "AM I BOVVERED?!" and a failed chav attitude. Brits might get what I´m trying to say.

Well - none of the native-speakers who have commented on this thread speaks atrocious English so maybe our opinions have more credence.  Just for interest, I googled the words and it seems that the first part of the sentence is actually an exercise in illustrating that, in English, a sentence can end on a preposition - although most of us were taught it shouldn´t.

There´s something about it here and some comments on this language forum

Oh and btw - referring to your other post  the term ´Middle England´ doesn´t exactly refer to Chavland.  

(Just thought - you must mean E***x )

Many thanks to All who contributed to this thread. It´s been very informative for me.

Have you heard how some people in Loughborough speaks, lady in red? London East End is the official homeland for the ´chavs´ but what do you call them ´wannabes´ that are not exactly from London. If it was up to the likes of my former tutor Mr W Calvert, he would´ve exterminated everyone in Hathern and Shepshed to expand his aspiration for the ´Greater Loughborough´ along with fox hunting and laying off Belgium as the Euro-Landfill and saying all Belgians are degenerates. He confessed that he didn´t really mean it but his occasional claims of alien-abduction, who would take him seriously. Even Belgians that came as exchange students enjoyed his sense of humour.

Thanks LIR for your research.

Just for your information si++ ´From out of Down Under´ means something ´coming from Australia´ (I think a reference to under the equator, but there are probably other theories!)

Henry,

Yes I know it since I heard in the following lyrics:

Is it true then Henry that you Aussies like getting drunk on Fosters and chunders a lot. Just like the Brits huh? 

It´s as true as the saying that ´all Brits are whingers´. 

Actually Fosters is not drunk very much in Australia, but ´chundering´ still occurs!!