Okay, let us put few basic things on the table directly:

• There is no -te/ta conjunction in Turkish, it can only be suffix, primaly the locative one, hence always attacthed to the previous part of the word and means, as you already wrote above, in/on/at :

Example: Sinifta, (ilk) bakişta, uçuşta

• If -de/da is written separetely, then it is the conjunction there, primaly meaning ´and/as well/either/neither´ but sometimes ´but´, like in the case here. If it is written together, then it is the locative suffix (actually the prior and original version of -te/ta above):

Example:

masada, görevde, firinda -  lokative suffix

ben de, sen de, yarin da - conjuntion, simply ´too, as well´

in negative statements, it means ´neither, either´

Ben de sevmedim. - I didn´t like either.

And finally, and rarely it means ´but, and yet´:

Isteyip de elde edememek

Gidip de donmemek

Gorüp de soylememek

Bilip de bilmemezlikten gelmek

Here, -de/da signals that the following part is negative, opposite, etc. of the first part, hence roughly ´but´.

Okay, let us put few basic things on the table directly:

• There is no -te/ta conjunction in Turkish, it can only be suffix, primaly the locative one, hence always attacthed to the previous part of the word and means, as you already wrote above, in/on/at :

Example: Sinifta, (ilk) bakişta, uçuşta

• If -de/da is written separetely, then it is the conjunction there, primaly meaning ´and/as well/either/neither´ but sometimes ´but´, like in the case here. If it is written together, then it is the locative suffix (actually the prior and original version of -te/ta above):

Example:

masada, görevde, firinda -  lokative suffix

ben de, sen de, yarin da - conjuntion, simply ´too, as well´

in negative statements, it means ´neither, either´

Ben de sevmedim. - I didn´t like either.

And finally, and rarely it means ´but, and yet´:

Isteyip de elde edememek

Gidip de donmemek

Gorüp de soylememek

Bilip de bilmemezlikten gelmek

Here, -de/da signals that the following part is negative, opposite, etc. of the first part, hence roughly ´but´.

Thank you for your explanation!

So, my example wasn´t good. Guess this would be better: "Bir araba isteyip de almadı" ?

Edit: guess I concentrated too much on your last examples and not on what you said before.. So my first example was also right

Anyway, thanks!

Another one that I forgot to ask about is ki like:

Her zamankı

A quick reply:

-ki: possesive suffix, giving the meaning of ´belong to, of, in, etc.´:

her zamanki : something that´s belong to ´her zaman´- as usual

benimki/seninki/onunki: mine/yours/hers

o günkü yürüyüş: demonstration of that day

bu yilki gelir: the income of this year

sabahki konuşma/yarinki toplanti: the speech of this morning/meeting in tomorrow

s++ - Get out of my way!

Okay, let us put few basic things on the table directly:

• There is no -te/ta conjunction in Turkish, it can only be suffix, primaly the locative one, hence always attacthed to the previous part of the word and means, as you already wrote above, in/on/at :

Example: Sinifta, (ilk) bakişta, uçuşta

• If -de/da is written separetely, then it is the conjunction there, primaly meaning ´and/as well/either/neither´ but sometimes ´but´, like in the case here. If it is written together, then it is the locative suffix (actually the prior and original version of -te/ta above):

Example:

masada, görevde, firinda -  lokative suffix

ben de, sen de, yarin da - conjuntion, simply ´too, as well´

in negative statements, it means ´neither, either´

Ben de sevmedim. - I didn´t like either.

And finally, and rarely it means ´but, and yet´:

Isteyip de elde edememek

Gidip de donmemek

Gorüp de soylememek

Bilip de bilmemezlikten gelmek

Here, -de/da signals that the following part is negative, opposite, etc. of the first part, hence roughly ´but´.

What is your way?