The monumental Cypriot problem obstructing Turks’ 53 years-old march towards European Union has once again been strongly referred to in the EU Summit that ended yesterday. The basic message is: if you want to continue to open the chapters, you need to sort out the Cyprus problem. But no guarantee of a membership. Nobody knows how long the process will take if it ever ends with accession.
The conclusions of EU foreign ministers that were endorsed by EU leaders yesterday simply point to the fact that the EU was willing to give the Christofias administration what it had asked for. The latest salvos by the Turkish government not only criticizing the EU’s stance on Turkey but also ridiculing the economic situation of Europe has emboldened and strengthened the Greek Cypriot position. Capitalizing on what President Abdullah Gül said during his recent visit to Britain, Greek Cypriots have been successful in convincing their fellow Europeans to toughen the language on Turkey in the conclusions. Gül, apparently angry at how the EU had handled the Cypriot problem, had called the EU “a miserable union,” which echoed very badly not only in Brussels but also in some member countries’ capitals.
EU reiterated her full support for Greek Cypriots in their oil and gas exploration, while at the same time declaring their solidarity with the upcoming Greek Cypriot presidency in the latter part of 2012. Regretting the Turkish declaration that all talks would be suspended during Greek Cypriots’ presidency, the EU stressed that the term presidency was a right and stemmed from the EU constitution. On Turkey’s attitude vis-à-vis oil and gas exploration, EU said: “In line with the Negotiating Framework and previous European Council and Council conclusions, the Council underlines that Turkey needs to commit itself unequivocally to good neighborly relations and to the peaceful settlement of disputes in accordance with the United Nations Charter, having recourse, if necessary, to the International Court of Justice. In this context, the Union urges the avoidance of any kind of threat, source of friction or actions that could damage good neighborly relations and the peaceful settlement of disputes. Furthermore, the EU stresses again all the sovereign rights of EU member states which include, inter alia, entering into bilateral agreements, in accordance with the EU acquis and international law, including the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.”
In what has become a rule now, the EU also referred to the Additional Protocol and the lack of recognition of Greek Cyprus by Turkey. European leaders said: Recalling its conclusions of Dec. 11, 2006, and the declaration of Sept. 21, 2005, the Council notes with deep regret that Turkey, despite repeated calls, continues refusing to fulfill its obligation of full, non-discriminatory implementation of the Additional Protocol to the Association Agreement. In the absence of progress on this issue, the Council will maintain its measures from 2006, which will have a continuous effect on the overall progress of the negotiations. Furthermore, Turkey has still not made progress towards the necessary normalization of its relations with the Republic of Cyprus. The Council invites the Commission to monitor closely and specifically report on all issues covered by the declaration of the European Community and its member states of Sept. 21, 2005, in its forthcoming annual report. On this basis, the Council will continue to closely follow and review progress made, in accordance with its conclusions of Dec. 11, 2006, and Dec. 14, 2010. Progress is now expected without further delay.
It was not only the Greek Cypriots’ who wanted to toughen the language but also the French whose allergy against the word “accession” persisted when it comes to Turkey. France did not want to see the words “accession” and “Turkey” together in the Turkish part of the conclusions. While EU leaders mentioned the word accession 11 times for Croatia, 5 times for Iceland, 2 times for Montenegro, which has not even started accession talks, once for both Serbia and Albania, who are not even declared candidates, the word “accession” was not used for Turkey. The conclusions were not all bad. There were positive notes on constitutional reform, civilian oversight over the military and the economy, but also criticism on deficiencies in fundamental freedoms, first and foremost in freedom of expression and press.
On the increasingly active Turkish foreign policy, the EU was somewhat ambivalent; welcoming the candidate country’s active and positive role on the one hand, but hesitant about the possible fallout on the other; hence, calling for a coordinated foreign policy with Brussels.
“Turkey has continued to be active in its wider neighborhood and remains an important regional player in the Middle East, the Western Balkans, Afghanistan/Pakistan, the Southern Caucasus and the Horn of Africa. In line with the principles set out in the Negotiating Framework, the Council encourages Turkey to develop its foreign policy as a complement to and in coordination with the EU and to progressively align with EU policies and positions. In this regard, the Council remains committed to further reinforcing the EU’s existing political dialogue with Turkey on foreign policy issues of mutual interest.” said the EU statement.
Every indication shows, for the time being, that Turkey’s European Winter will be a long one. Croatia, which started accession talks on Oct. 3, 2005, together with Turkey, will be a member as of July 1, 2013, while Turkey has only been able to close one single chapter out of 35. One chapter in six years means hundreds of years to complete them successfully as long as the current political climate dominates Europe.
Brussells Sunday’s zaman.
Note : All I can say is that I am sick of seeing the EU´s unjust approach to Turkiye.
