Language |
|
|
|
|
|
Instruction signs
|
| 10. |
11 Sep 2006 Mon 12:33 am |
|
Anladığına sevindim.
|
|
| 11. |
11 Sep 2006 Mon 01:31 am |
|
Quoting qdemir: Anladığına sevindim. |
Anladığına
Anlamak + suffix participle (dIk) + then ???
In is kişi eki ???!
And what is the (a ) do we add any cases to the verbs too as in nouns ??
Like causative case ,or state case ?? :-S
İsn't anladık is a participle verb ?
|
|
| 12. |
11 Sep 2006 Mon 01:02 pm |
|
qdemir,
Can you explain this pls?
|
|
| 13. |
11 Sep 2006 Mon 01:48 pm |
|
Quote: Anladığına
Anlamak + suffix participle (dIk) + then ???
In is kişi eki ???!
And what is the (a ) do we add any cases to the verbs too as in nouns ??
|
The -dik past participle is the object of the verb.
"Anladığına sevindim."
In this role the -dik participle takes the case endings appropriate to the verb.
As you have said above.
-dik > past particple suffix
-in > kişi eki
-a > case ending
|
|
| 14. |
11 Sep 2006 Mon 02:28 pm |
|
What do you mean the case ending appropriate to the verb ?
Doesn't anlamak take the causative case ?or this is something different ? :-S
|
|
| 15. |
11 Sep 2006 Mon 04:02 pm |
|
Quoting qdemir: -a > case ending |
But the dictionary shows sevinmek as taking the nomative state - in other words no suffix. Is this an ommission in the dictionary???
|
|
| 16. |
11 Sep 2006 Mon 06:35 pm |
|
Quoting bod: Quoting qdemir: -a > case ending |
But the dictionary shows sevinmek as taking the nomative state - in other words no suffix. Is this an ommission in the dictionary??? |
Mine does indicate the dative case..
|
|
| 17. |
11 Sep 2006 Mon 07:05 pm |
|
Quoting Elisa: Quoting bod: Quoting qdemir: -a > case ending |
But the dictionary shows sevinmek as taking the nomative state - in other words no suffix. Is this an ommission in the dictionary??? |
Mine does indicate the dative case.. |
So it is an ommission in the dictionary!
|
|
| 18. |
11 Sep 2006 Mon 07:18 pm |
|
guys ??
How can a verb take any case,nones only take cases
and short infinitive take cases,
For example, we can say
Gitmeye....but we can never gidiyorumA ..
Right ?? or what ??!
Then how does anladığınA take a case, any case dative or causative or whatever
İt is still verb ...right ? :-S
|
|
| 19. |
11 Sep 2006 Mon 07:58 pm |
|
But the -dik suffix forms a noun out of a verbal stem......so it needs a case suffix to suit the verb that is being applied to it.
|
|
| 20. |
12 Sep 2006 Tue 01:14 am |
|
you mean 'Anladığına' is a noun now, a participle noun,not a verb anymore ?
|
|
|
