According to the Un Child Rights Convention signed by almost all countries in the world the interest of the child is the main point on which country policies must be focused.Some countries don´t have sufficient laws and structures to provide children with their basic needs -care,love and education.And if this ability of the country fails an international adoption seems to be rightful to be considered.In case an abandoned child cannot be brought up by relatives,or community members acting as foster parents or any other family willing to provide all basic needs for this child and all other options better than orphanages,to which I strongly oppose ,are exhausted international adoption with agreement to national and international laws is the best option .
Another problem is the age and health condition of adopted to be children.Most of future foster families are interested in babies and toddlers with excellent health conditions.
Infertility and childlesness are the main reasons in many cases for foster parents to look for a child preferably small enough,who will fill emptiness in their life and help them create happy family.And if this happens both - a child and parents can benefit.
But on the other hand not all kids that can be adopted are under age of 3 years old and in excellent health.My admiration goes to any parent who decides on adopting such a kid in order to help him/her enjoy happy,careless childhood and provide medical care,no matter if single or married parents are.
Just adding to my original post,I am not against adoption even by foreigners but I do think
that the more attention should be given to the needs of the child by first trying adoption or foster care locally in child´s homeland and my thought refers to pretty well functioning countries with decent per capita not to the countries affected by wars,conflicts,etc...
|