Welcome
Login:   Pass:     Register - Forgot Password - Resend Activation

Turkish Class Forums / General/Off-topic

General/Off-topic

Thread locked by a moderator or admin.
informal thoughts on Turkish Class
(112 Messages in 12 pages - View all)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ...  >>
1.       pagliaccio
770 posts
 23 Sep 2007 Sun 11:40 am

TC is the site that its all users say they miss its old days and that misses none of its old users!

2.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 23 Sep 2007 Sun 12:06 pm

I disagree!! TC is a site where people FREQUENTLY talk of missing old users, mourn them as if they were dead and fail to see the huge contribution of new users.

3.       lady in red
6947 posts
 23 Sep 2007 Sun 06:10 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

I disagree!! TC is a site where people FREQUENTLY talk of missing old users, mourn them as if they were dead and fail to see the huge contribution of new users.



Ah! - Robyn, Kai - where are you now???

4.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 23 Sep 2007 Sun 06:15 pm

Quoting lady in red:

Quoting AEnigma III:

I disagree!! TC is a site where people FREQUENTLY talk of missing old users, mourn them as if they were dead and fail to see the huge contribution of new users.



Ah! - Robyn, Kai - where are you now???



lol

5.       catwoman
8933 posts
 23 Sep 2007 Sun 06:22 pm

Quoting pagliaccio:

TC is the site that its all users say they miss its old days and that misses none of its old users!


Bravo pagliaccio! lol lol lol lol
For example, would Mujde miss Erdinc?

6.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 23 Sep 2007 Sun 06:24 pm

Quoting catwoman:

Erdinc



Nooooooooooooooo!
That word is kryptonite to my superhuman powers!

7.       Trudy
7887 posts
 23 Sep 2007 Sun 06:26 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting catwoman:

Erdinc



Nooooooooooooooo!
That word is kryptonite to my superhuman powers!



I never had the pleasure of meeting Erdinc on this forum or feel the consequences of his posts/acts as a mod. I get the strong feeling I missed something.

8.       catwoman
8933 posts
 23 Sep 2007 Sun 07:29 pm

Quoting Trudy:

I never had the pleasure of meeting Erdinc on this forum or feel the consequences of his posts/acts as a mod. I get the strong feeling I missed something.


You can go to his profile and see.

9.       Chantal
587 posts
 23 Sep 2007 Sun 09:02 pm

He was a great translator and was very well able to explain things!!

10.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 23 Sep 2007 Sun 09:16 pm

Quoting Chantal:

He was a great translator and was very well able to explain things!!


he was a hero to me
the only turkish male with balls to speak of the dark sides of turkey
i just cant understand the patriotism of all of them. :S

11.       vineyards
1954 posts
 24 Sep 2007 Mon 03:35 am

Quoting femme_fatal:

Quoting Chantal:

He was a great translator and was very well able to explain things!!


he was a hero to me
the only turkish male with balls to speak of the dark sides of turkey
i just cant understand the patriotism of all of them. :S



It is not that you can't understand Turks' patriotism, you have actually turned that matter into an obsession; you are pretty much stuck with it. This subject obviously starts you up because you seem to like tug-of-war games and you reckon you are always on the stronger side. After all how wrong can you be when you are so sure you have the right culture and the right values.

That's probably why every now and then you judge them, mock them and call them cowards using slang and provocative expressions.

You will probably continue having problems understanding Turks, Greeks, Bulgarians or all the others whom you have a chance to know. On your abacus, Bush and all the excellent things he has done to the humanity are nothing but a bead drawn to the left or right. For us to be even, we need to sacrifice Ataturk or some other Turkish leader. This way the abacus will look just and right.

As a matter of fact, much of your problem stems from that very same primitive abacus you are using. You should obviously neither judge nor appreciate a culture in such simple terms.

A culture, its language, its values and traditions form a perfect entity. It takes even college professors years to understand their mysteries. When you ridicule people's thoughts like that, you are actually ridiculing yourself. Guess why?

12.       Badiabdancer74
382 posts
 24 Sep 2007 Mon 06:13 am

You go vineyards! I felt patriotic in Turkey and I'm not even living there! In 'old' cultures there is a homogeniety that the U.S. can't touch (except the Native Americans) and groups that have clung to their country of origins culture. Turkish people have a lot to be proud of. I think it would be great to feel good about being where you are from, I certainly don't. As for this threads topic...Turkish class is a very helpful site. There do seem to be little cliques here. Overall the people here are very friendly and helpful, which is also my impression of Turkish people in general. My translation T-E skills have gotten much better by practicing on the posts. Unfortunately the other way E-T...COK ZOR!

13.       catwoman
8933 posts
 24 Sep 2007 Mon 06:48 am

Vineyards has the right to defend patriotism and femme has the right to criticize it. I don't understand though why vineyards feels the need to bash her personally in his post. Would that mean something about himself as a person?

14.       libralady
5152 posts
 24 Sep 2007 Mon 03:14 pm

Quoting catwoman:

Vineyards has the right to defend patriotism and femme has the right to criticize it. I don't understand though why vineyards feels the need to bash her personally in his post. Would that mean something about himself as a person?




Don't see why Vineyards post amounts to a "bashing". I have seen many much worse.

On many ocassions TC members have been "bashed" quite viciously at times but not a word to the "basher".
One of my informal thoughts on TC "it is OK for some but not for others"!

15.       vineyards
1954 posts
 24 Sep 2007 Mon 03:55 pm

Quoting catwoman:

Vineyards has the right to defend patriotism and femme has the right to criticize it. I don't understand though why vineyards feels the need to bash her personally in his post. Would that mean something about himself as a person?



Catwoman, although I am not a believer I like this Islamic notion probably derived from the Quran itself: "If you are rich or mighty you are in a greater peril of sinning since you are capable of more malice than others. In the end, God only knows who is really right or who is really wrong."

As a moderator, you made a number of mistakes in the past. Those mistakes violated the freedoms of speech of a number of people. You knowingly deleted some of their messages and also your replies to those messages. You didn't have a right to do that. This site maybe yours and you may close it down any second you wish but you have no right to start a public forum and turn it into your own playhouse. If that is your intenetion, you should put a disclaimer notice and notify people that their messages can be deleted or modified arbitrarily. Who would post messages in your forums under those circumstances?

I expected you to apoligize on realizing your mistakes. You didn't do that and turned a deaf ear to people's complaints completely disregarding their protests against certain other members who openly bashed them. You don't have a right to complain about the current situation anymore.

Do you realize now how grave your mistake was?
Do you realize that we would not have to go through all these flaming circles if only you could act the way a moderator should.

16.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 24 Sep 2007 Mon 04:23 pm

Quoting vineyards:

You didn't do that and turned a deaf ear to people's complaints completely disregarding their/my protests against certain other members who openly bashed me/them. You don't have a right to complain about so called bashings people do to one another now.



Can this sanctimonious, pompous post be coming from the same man who called me a "bitch" and a "slut" when I disagreed with him once?

17.       vineyards
1954 posts
 24 Sep 2007 Mon 04:32 pm

So, The Empire Strikes Back!
Let's put the record straight. You insulted me in a private message and when I complained, you said it was a private message. Then I sent you a private message and asked whether it would be OK if I called you "a bitch" or "a slut" because it was just a PM.

You also publicly accused me of sending you vile PM's in which I insulted you. Being in suspicion I found and posted the originals of those messages to prove that they did not contain any insulting words. Then you accused me of violating your privacy by posting messages sent to you in the public forum.

Now are we facing yet another lie Ms. Aenigma?

18.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 24 Sep 2007 Mon 04:42 pm

Quoting vineyards:

So, The Empire Strikes Back!



Hahahaha!
Always thought I was Jedi....

19.       Elisabeth
5732 posts
 24 Sep 2007 Mon 06:31 pm

My informal thought.....does anyone (myself included) actually pay any attention to the "language" portion of the site?

20.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 24 Sep 2007 Mon 11:09 pm

i think patriotism is a thing with the help of which the wide mass is manipulated.

21.       pagliaccio
770 posts
 24 Sep 2007 Mon 11:09 pm

TC, with its true type font bigger than 15, is well suited to especially the hypermetropic!

22.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 24 Sep 2007 Mon 11:18 pm

Quoting pagliaccio:

TC, with its true type font bigger than 15, is well suited to especially the hypermetropic!


so?

23.       vineyards
1954 posts
 25 Sep 2007 Tue 12:09 am

Everyone has a different view of certain concepts. For example, what is regarded as a religious requirement by some can be seen as an act of barbarism by others. There used to be people who sacrificed their lives with all the best intentions in sake of communism but to some others they were just a bunch of bastards whose heads had to be crushed.

If your understanding of patriotism is more in the lines of chauvenism then you probably see no difference at all between patriotism and nationalism either. This kind of a misconception is very much like my regarding a dentist as a torturer no matter how useful in reality a dentist is.

24.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 25 Sep 2007 Tue 12:24 am

Quoting vineyards:

Everyone has a different view of certain concepts. For example, what is regarded as a religious requirement to some can be seen as an act of barbarism to others. There used to be people who sacrificed their lives with all the best intentions in sake of communism but to some others they were just a bunch of bastards whose heads had to be crushed.

If your understanding of patriotism is more in the lines of chauvenism then you probably see no difference at all between patriotism and nationalism either. This kind of a misconception is very much like my regarding a dentist as a torturer no matter how useful in reality a dentist is.


25.       erdinc
2151 posts
 25 Sep 2007 Tue 01:22 am

Hello Folks.

I'm back and I look forward to have some nice discussions with our fellow members. But be careful. You might get banned if you are using a language that is too argumentative or slang or implies a religious perspective. I'm sure we will be able to find a forum rule you are violating.

Just kidding. It's nice to be remembered. Cheers.

26.       catwoman
8933 posts
 25 Sep 2007 Tue 01:22 am

Quoting vineyards:

Everyone has a different view of certain concepts. For example, what is regarded as a religious requirement to some can be seen as an act of barbarism to others. There used to be people who sacrificed their lives with all the best intentions in sake of communism but to some others they were just a bunch of bastards whose heads had to be crushed.

If your understanding of patriotism is more in the lines of chauvenism then you probably see no difference at all between patriotism and nationalism either. This kind of a misconception is very much like my regarding a dentist as a torturer no matter how useful in reality a dentist is.


I think this is well said . I just would like to add that a certain level of brainwashing by media and government does influence a person's ideas, wouldn't you agree?

27.       vineyards
1954 posts
 25 Sep 2007 Tue 06:34 am

It is impossible to establish a complete control over all the aspects of life. It is in man's nature to have a desire to use opportunities. If you find an abandoned newspaper on the bus, you would like to read it. If you are a very rich person, you'd spend a poor worker's annual income on a dinner party and that would be perfectly normal to you.

No matter how much you complain of the way governments and media use the coercion they have; they will always be in place and running on their own natural paths.

When you study society in a wider context, you will notice how archaic it actually is. Just like myriad layers of sediments forming in a lake, the traces of bygone years are perpetually recorded in the muddy waters of society. If we could drill through all these sediment layers and reach the end of it, we would probably find a caveman there who is responsible for all that mud and blur.
Generation after generation people did their best to destroy the caveman by constantly improving all the aspects of society. Yet the caveman is still with us. We took the axe in his hand and gave him a-bombs to nuke tens of thousands of people in one go.

As a matter of fact, patriotism is very much like the love you have for your family. You love your country, and your identity. If there is love in your family chances are that there is love in you too. You open up your eyes to the beauties of this world then. Because you are a love child and you know what love is. Your parents loved each other and you learned from them. Similarly, if you love your country and feel that you can do whatever sacrifice to save it just like you would if your family were in danger, that will not do any harm to anyone. It will indeed make love prevail.

Here is the magic formula: love yourself, love your family and friends, love your country and love this world that we all live in.

I am in love with this world. I thank million times to the unknown creator for the oxygen it gave us, for the sun that heats and energizes us, for the abundant foods and all the other riches we are given.

28.       teaschip
3870 posts
 25 Sep 2007 Tue 02:40 pm

Quoting erdinc:

Hello Folks.

I'm back and I look forward to have some nice discussions with our fellow members. But be careful. You might get banned if you are using a language that is too argumentative or slang or implies a religious perspective. I'm sure we will be able to find a forum rule you are violating.

Just kidding. It's nice to be remembered. Cheers.



Is that really you? Violating a forum rule? Never..
Welcome back!

29.       teaschip
3870 posts
 25 Sep 2007 Tue 02:47 pm

Quoting teaschip1:

Quoting erdinc:

Hello Folks.

I'm back and I look forward to have some nice discussions with our fellow members. But be careful. You might get banned if you are using a language that is too argumentative or slang or implies a religious perspective. I'm sure we will be able to find a forum rule you are violating.

Just kidding. It's nice to be remembered. Cheers.



Is that really you? Violating a forum rule, I'm not sure what you mean. No never, not me..
Welcome back!



I wonder if you are still in London...

30.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 25 Sep 2007 Tue 07:51 pm

Quoting erdinc:

Hello Folks.

I'm back and I look forward to have some nice discussions with our fellow members. But be careful. You might get banned if you are using a language that is too argumentative or slang or implies a religious perspective. I'm sure we will be able to find a forum rule you are violating.

Just kidding. It's nice to be remembered. Cheers.


31.       Müjde
posts
 25 Sep 2007 Tue 08:22 pm

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting pagliaccio:

TC is the site that its all users say they miss its old days and that misses none of its old users!


Bravo pagliaccio! lol lol lol lol
For example, would Mujde miss Erdinc?



people or events are not important than systems

32.       girleegirl
5065 posts
 26 Sep 2007 Wed 01:43 am

Quoting Müjde:

people or events are not important than systems



:-S

33.       Laila01
0 posts
 26 Sep 2007 Wed 03:16 am

I think this Turkish Class is great because it allows us to find out other peoples views on culture, news, media, nationalities, general feelings etc and not just on the language being learned.

34.       erdinc
2151 posts
 26 Sep 2007 Wed 04:50 am

Hi teaschip1,
I'm not actually 'back', just passing by. Yes, I'm still in London. I will return back to Turkia when my job finishes. Bye.

35.       catwoman
8933 posts
 26 Sep 2007 Wed 05:24 am

Quoting girleegirl:

Quoting Müjde:

people or events are not important than systems



:-S


+1 :-S

36.       catwoman
8933 posts
 26 Sep 2007 Wed 05:43 am

Quoting erdinc:

Hi teaschip1,
I'm not actually 'back', just passing by. Yes, I'm still in London. I will return back to Turkia when my job finishes. Bye.


Erdinc, why don't you stop by more often? How are things going for you?

37.       erdinc
2151 posts
 26 Sep 2007 Wed 10:08 pm

Hello Catwoman,

Everything is fine. Thanks for asking. Cheers.

38.       catwoman
8933 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 12:00 am

Quoting erdinc:

Hello Catwoman,

Everything is fine. Thanks for asking. Cheers.


I hope you stop by more often, it's nice to see you. Good luck.

39.       Deli_kizin
6376 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 01:01 am

Quoting erdinc:

Hello Folks.

I'm back and I look forward to have some nice discussions with our fellow members. But be careful. You might get banned if you are using a language that is too argumentative or slang or implies a religious perspective. I'm sure we will be able to find a forum rule you are violating.

Just kidding. It's nice to be remembered. Cheers.



Classic!

40.       alameda
3499 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 02:08 am

Hmmm...you mean....like when communications is censored by those in charge? :-S

Quoting catwoman:

I think this is well said . I just would like to add that a certain level of brainwashing by media and government does influence a person's ideas, wouldn't you agree?

41.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 08:40 am

I think through out history, there has always been a very thin line between patritoism and nationalism. Someone has to be quite careful about where that line is.
I was looking at the wiki for patriotism link
Patriotism is often portrayed as a more positive alternative to nationalism
patriotism is distinguished from nationalism by its lack of aggression or hatred for others, its defensiveness, and positive community building

As far as patriotism in Turkey is concerned, well, most of our patriots are nationalists with racist elements. I find it quite disturbing actually.
And that type of patriotism should be bashed and smashed into pieces.
In the end, all nationalists call themselves patriots as well. Hitler was a patriot, so as Stalin, so is Bush.

42.       catwoman
8933 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 08:49 am

Quoting thehandsom:

I think through out history, there has always been a very thin line between patritoism and nationalism. Someone has to be quite careful about where that line is.
I was looking at the wiki for patriotism link
Patriotism is often portrayed as a more positive alternative to nationalism
patriotism is distinguished from nationalism by its lack of aggression or hatred for others, its defensiveness, and positive community building

As far as patriotism in Turkey is concerned, well, most of our patriots are nationalists with racist elements. I find it quite disturbing actually.
And that type of patriotism should be bashed and smashed into pieces.
In the end, all nationalists call themselves patriots as well. Hitler was a patriot, so as Stalin, so is Bush.


Couldn't agree more!

43.       vineyards
1954 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 07:39 pm

thehandsom, you are contradicting with your own statement when you say most patriots in Turkey are nationalists. Well if someone is a nationalist then he is not exactly a patriot by definition. Maybe you would like to say something like this: of those who can be broadly (and unnecessarily) categorized as patriots, nationalists, right-wing chauvenists etc. the majority is held by nationalists. Even so, patriots are patriots and nationalists are nationalists. You shouldn't refer to one of them and describe the other.

As I wrote earlier, definitions of those concepts vary dramatically depending on the culture or subculture you belong to. Just because you consider yourself thehandsome not every girl is supposed to be crazy for you.

44.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 07:39 pm

Quoting thehandsom:

I think through out history, there has always been a very thin line between patritoism and nationalism. Someone has to be quite careful about where that line is.
I was looking at the wiki for patriotism link
Patriotism is often portrayed as a more positive alternative to nationalism
patriotism is distinguished from nationalism by its lack of aggression or hatred for others, its defensiveness, and positive community building

As far as patriotism in Turkey is concerned, well, most of our patriots are nationalists with racist elements. I find it quite disturbing actually.
And that type of patriotism should be bashed and smashed into pieces.
In the end, all nationalists call themselves patriots as well. Hitler was a patriot, so as Stalin, so is Bush.


+1000
there you go, finally, time to time i see reasonable posts!
i shall celebrate it!

45.       vineyards
1954 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 07:44 pm

Reason your reason.

46.       catwoman
8933 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 07:44 pm

Quoting vineyards:

thehandsom, you are contradicting with your own statement when you say most patriots in Turkey are nationalists. Well if someone is a nationalist then he is not exactly a patriot by definition. Maybe you would like to say something like this: of those who can be broadly (and unnecessarily) be collectively categorized as patriots, nationalists, right-wing chauvenists etc. the majority is held by nationalists. Even so, patriots are patriots and nationalists are nationalists. You shouldn't refer to one of them and describe the other.


I think that the point he made was very clear and conversely, YOU are blurring the differences and playing demagogue.

Quoting vineyards:

As I wrote earlier, definitions of those concepts vary dramatically depending on the culture or subculture you belong to. It is very much like you may consider yourself thehandsome but not every girl is supposed feel crazy for you.


No it's not! Some things don't change based on location, although - the goal is to make people not see them the way they really are.

47.       Trudy
7887 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 07:45 pm

Quoting thehandsom:

I think through out history, there has always been a very thin line between patritoism and nationalism. Someone has to be quite careful about where that line is.
I was looking at the wiki for patriotism link
Patriotism is often portrayed as a more positive alternative to nationalism
patriotism is distinguished from nationalism by its lack of aggression or hatred for others, its defensiveness, and positive community building

As far as patriotism in Turkey is concerned, well, most of our patriots are nationalists with racist elements. I find it quite disturbing actually.
And that type of patriotism should be bashed and smashed into pieces.
In the end, all nationalists call themselves patriots as well. Hitler was a patriot, so as Stalin, so is Bush.



Applause!!!

48.       teaschip
3870 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 07:47 pm

Quoting thehandsom:

I think through out history, there has always been a very thin line between patritoism and nationalism. Someone has to be quite careful about where that line is.
I was looking at the wiki for patriotism link
Patriotism is often portrayed as a more positive alternative to nationalism
patriotism is distinguished from nationalism by its lack of aggression or hatred for others, its defensiveness, and positive community building

As far as patriotism in Turkey is concerned, well, most of our patriots are nationalists with racist elements. I find it quite disturbing actually.
And that type of patriotism should be bashed and smashed into pieces.
In the end, all nationalists call themselves patriots as well. Hitler was a patriot, so as Stalin, so is Bush.



My only comment of course is to reference Bush in the same context as Hitler and Stalin. Just thought it was a little extreme. Bye the way, I'm also not an advocate of Bush...

49.       catwoman
8933 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 07:49 pm

Quoting teaschip1:

My only comment of course is to reference Bush in the same context as Hitler and Stalin. Just thought it was a little extreme.


Yes, I agree. If you're adding milder nationalists you should definitely add Ataturk before Bush.

50.       vineyards
1954 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 07:49 pm

Catwoman take your time and write a few more paragraphs to explain your opinion. All you are saying is yes it is true; no it's not right.
Here is my answer: no, you are wrong...

51.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 07:50 pm

Quoting teaschip1:



My only comment of course is to reference Bush in the same context as Hitler and Stalin. Just thought it was a little extreme. Bye the way, I'm also not an advocate of Bush...


its very fashionable today to talk rubbish on bush most of people think if they dont criticise bushes they fall out of societies. the more you throw up on bush the more applauses you gain. very simple.

52.       catwoman
8933 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 07:54 pm

Quoting vineyards:

Catwoman take your time and write a few more paragraphs to explain your opinion. All you are saying is yes it is true; no it's not right.
Here is my answer: no, you are wrong...


You are contradicting yourself now though because you said earlier that it's a matter of personal opinions, so how can you tell me that I'm wrong????
And I was thinking that we are here to have a reason-based dialogue not to decide who's wrong..

53.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 07:55 pm

Quoting femme_fatal:

Quoting teaschip1:



My only comment of course is to reference Bush in the same context as Hitler and Stalin. Just thought it was a little extreme. Bye the way, I'm also not an advocate of Bush...


its very fashionable today to talk rubbish on bush most of people think if they dont criticise bushes they fall out of societies. the more you throw up on bush the more applauses you gain. very simple.


btw, you dont dare compare ataturk to those! im pretty sure you know the consequences
they can speak whatever on the subject of western leaders, and if you try to defend them, you are f...ing stupid dumbass american or westerner

54.       vineyards
1954 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 07:58 pm

Quote:

Quote:


Yes, I agree. If you're adding milder nationalists you should definitely add Ataturk before Bush.



Yes, after reading this I should be mad at you and flame you because I consider Ataturk as a national hero and you are adding it on the same list with Stalin, Hitler and Bush.

Sorry, I thought and decided I am not that cheap.

I made a number of very serious accusations to you. You did not want to answer them and now looking to have a chance to get even.

55.       catwoman
8933 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 08:04 pm

Quoting vineyards:

Yes, after reading this I should be mad at you and flame you because I consider Ataturk as a national hero and you are adding it on the same list with Stalin, Hitler and Bush.

Sorry, I thought and decided I am not that cheap.

I made a number of very serious accusations to you. You did not want to answer them and now looking to have a chance to get even.


Vineyards, as opposed to you, I'm not here to fight with you. I also consider Ataturk a national hero as well as one of the greatest leaders that ever existed. That doesn't mean that he wasn't a nationalist. I understand why he began the nationalism in Turkey, but I think that Turkish people didn't carry on with Ataturk's ideas and are stagnated in a way. I'm sure that if Ataturk was alive now, he'd curb the nationalism and begin a more open-minded movement.
And by the way, Bush should NOT be compared to Hitler or Stalin either!!!

56.       vineyards
1954 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 08:06 pm

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting vineyards:

Catwoman take your time and write a few more paragraphs to explain your opinion. All you are saying is yes it is true; no it's not right.
Here is my answer: no, you are wrong...


You are contradicting yourself now though because you said earlier that it's a matter of personal opinions, so how can you tell me that I'm wrong????
And I was thinking that we are here to have a reason-based dialogue not to decide who's wrong..




If we are not here to find out who is right or wrong don't say you are wrong twice in your previous message. When I said you are wrong I wanted to accentuate this point. We shouldn't say you are wrong or right we should take the time and explain our own points instead. Your contradictions are plenty.

57.       catwoman
8933 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 08:10 pm

Quoting vineyards:

If we are not here to find out who is right or wrong don't say you are wrong twice in your previous message. When I said you are wrong I wanted to accentuate this point. We shouldn't say you are wrong or right we should take the time and explain our own points instead. Your contradictions are plenty.


I actually did explain my points, long-essays are not necessary for that.
I never said that "you are wrong", unlike you, even though I totally don't agree with you.
Vineyards, can we start using the same logic?

58.       vineyards
1954 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 08:17 pm

Quoting femme_fatal:

Quoting femme_fatal:

Quoting teaschip1:



My only comment of course is to reference Bush in the same context as Hitler and Stalin. Just thought it was a little extreme. Bye the way, I'm also not an advocate of Bush...


its very fashionable today to talk rubbish on bush most of people think if they dont criticise bushes they fall out of societies. the more you throw up on bush the more applauses you gain. very simple.


btw, you dont dare compare ataturk to those! im pretty sure you know the consequences
they can speak whatever on the subject of western leaders, and if you try to defend them, you are f...ing stupid dumbass american or westerner



Femme_fatal, you know so many slang words I am sure. I suggest that you shouldn't put them on display here. After all, the only way for us to learn about you is through your own words. I have a few Kazakh friends here who are Muslims, who are much more oriental than I am. None of them are as western as you are. Did you just drop your Kazakh identity dear and now are you ridiculing the ways of Turks. You should remember the situation in your country. They are fighting for the bread money. Your workers are fighting with foreign workers because in your country Kazakh workers are underpaid and mistreated. You are free to just not to care all that much about the Kazakh feelings about the West but if you want to deal with patriotism then there is always your own country going through graver problems. What is your problem with Turkey?

59.       catwoman
8933 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 08:22 pm

Quoting vineyards:

You are free to just not to care all that much about the Kazakh feelings about the West but if you want to deal with patriotism then there is always your own country going through graver problems. What is your problem with Turkey?


Vineyards, sorry to jump in to your conversation with femme, but I think you grossly misunderstood something about her. She's not specifically critical of Turkey, but of certain mentality of all eastern AND western (!) nations, so don't take it personally!

60.       vineyards
1954 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 08:29 pm

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting vineyards:

If we are not here to find out who is right or wrong don't say you are wrong twice in your previous message. When I said you are wrong I wanted to accentuate this point. We shouldn't say you are wrong or right we should take the time and explain our own points instead. Your contradictions are plenty.


I actually did explain my points, long-essays are not necessary for that.
I never said that "you are wrong", unlike you, even though I totally don't agree with you.
Vineyards, can we start using the same logic?



Catwoman, being an electronic device designer and a professional programmer I feel, I am both very logical and quite good at different kinds of logic. Otherwise I would be bankrupt by now.



61.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 08:30 pm

Quoting vineyards:


Femme_fatal, you know so many slang words I am sure. I suggest that you shouldn't put them on display here. After all, the only way for us to learn about you is through your own words. I have a few Kazakh friends here who are Muslims, who are much more oriental than I am. None of them are as western as you are. Did you just drop your Kazakh identity dear and now are you ridiculing the ways of Turks. You should remember the situation in your country. They are fighting for the bread money. Your workers are fighting with foreign workers because in your country Kazakh workers are underpaid and mistreated. You are free to just not to care all that much about the Kazakh feelings about the West but if you want to deal with patriotism then there is always your own country going through graver problems. What is your problem with Turkey?


as for words i use in posts i just quoted some easterners or some turks.
i think theres smth wrong with you, definitely.
not long ago you tried to hurt me with borat. it didnt work.
today you come up with kazakhs and kazakhstan to defend your sick imagination about me. it also doesnt work.
i speak up my mind wether you like it or not.
i dont care for patriotic national blah-blah things.
all i care is my viewpoints.
i really dont care for what you think about me. so, dont try hard criticising me. it doesnt work!

62.       vineyards
1954 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 08:33 pm

You did not answer my question.

63.       catwoman
8933 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 08:34 pm

Quoting vineyards:

Catwoman, being an electronic device designer and a professional programmer I feel, I am both very logical and quite good at different kinds of logic.


Then you're not completely objective . Professional skills however don't exclude illogical ideas or lack of objectivity in other areas of life.

Quoting vineyards:

Otherwise I would be bankrupt by now.


I'm glad you're doing good!

64.       catwoman
8933 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 08:36 pm

Quoting vineyards:

You did not answer my question.


Vineyards, you are really using attack as a form of defense here. What does Kazakhstan have ANYTHING to do with femme's criticism of Turkey?
What question did you ask - why is she criticizing Turkey and not Kazakhstan???

65.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 08:37 pm

vineyards
all you turkish boys including all other easterners (kazakhs too) speak the same like machines, you all are brought up by one unfailable system. and the worst thing you dont see it.

greeks are bad, very bad, its absolutely okey for turks to speak bad of greeks, but when greeks talk bad of turks its unacceptable!

66.       SuiGeneris
3922 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 08:40 pm

Quoting femme_fatal:

vineyards
all you turkish boys including all other easterners (kazakhs too) speak the same like machines, you all are brought up by one unfailable system. and the worst thing you dont see it.

greeks are bad, very bad, its absolutely okey for turks to speak bad of greeks, but when greeks talk bad of turks its unacceptable!



thats for sure that... you didnt see lots of turks dancing with greeks in istanbul...

67.       vineyards
1954 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 08:41 pm

Catwoman, what is the relation of Ataturk with Stalin and Hitler? Is he more akin to them than femme is to Kazakhstan?

68.       catwoman
8933 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 08:42 pm

Quoting vineyards:

Catwoman, what is the relation of Ataturk with Stalin and Hitler? Is he more akin to them than femme is to Kazakhstan?


Vineyards, can you STOP taking my words out of context!!!!

69.       vineyards
1954 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 08:44 pm

Quoting femme_fatal:

vineyards
all you turkish boys including all other easterners (kazakhs too) speak the same like machines, you all are brought up by one unfailable system. and the worst thing you dont see it.

greeks are bad, very bad, its absolutely okey for turks to speak bad of greeks, but when greeks talk bad of turks its unacceptable!



Femme you should really reset your prejudices. You are insulting all the Easterners including your own Kazakhs collectively now. Do you have a spine? Or are you a jelly fish?

70.       catwoman
8933 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 08:49 pm

Quoting vineyards:

Femme you should really reset your prejudices. You are insulting all the Easterners including your own Kazakhs collectively now. Do you have a spine? Or are you a jelly fish?


So she's also not allowed to criticize Kazakhs now either? I thought she'd have the right to do that since she's from there...
Yes, I agree that she generalized all Turks and Greeks unfairly, but the point is that there are many Turks who still think the way she described - would you agree with that? (and I remember that you were often in conflict with some Turkish people because you were against such behavior).
I think that it's those who are so easily insulted that they can't even hold a conversation who should grow a spine as well.

71.       catwoman
8933 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 08:52 pm

Quoting SuiGeneris:

thats for sure that... you didnt see lots of turks dancing with greeks in istanbul...


+1

72.       vineyards
1954 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 09:01 pm

Many Polish friends I chatted online curse Turks. With so many Balkan countries cursing Turks (for example when you are playing a computer game) passes for a routine salutation which is solemnly made. They say (including some Kazakhs) Hey ....... Turk .... get the hell out of here. I rarely see any Turks showing this kind of a reaction to them. I believe their brains are washed in their families and in the churches they go. This problem is more evident among teenagers who don't know yet any systematic ways to exercise their hatred.

Nevertheless, there is a full district called Polonezköy in Istanbul. Our sultan opened up the doors to thousands of them in their difficult times. Today, all those Polish settlers enjoy a very good life in their new home. It is unbelievable why an avarage Pole should hate a Turk because our history is full of accounts of our troops helping them out of besieges and attacks. The same is true for the Jews too. We did make a number of outrageous mistakes too. For the time being none has been proven and research continues with all sorts of claims being made.

Today I am chatting with one Kazakh and a Polish girl whose only problem seem to be the anti western sentiment in Turkey. To put the record straight, I do have lots of friends in the Western world and I am a fan of their music, culture and heritage. What I am against is the nationalistic policies the so called falcons in American are following. For example, did any one of the debaters here ever read the National Defense Doctrine of the US government. After reading it you will realize why Bush can be categorized alongside Hitler. Because even Hitler could not dare pass such an aggressive defense doctrine in his hey day.

73.       KeithL
1455 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 09:04 pm

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting teaschip1:

My only comment of course is to reference Bush in the same context as Hitler and Stalin. Just thought it was a little extreme.


Yes, I agree. If you're adding milder nationalists you should definitely add Ataturk before Bush.



even I agree with that...

74.       KeithL
1455 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 09:06 pm

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting vineyards:

Yes, after reading this I should be mad at you and flame you because I consider Ataturk as a national hero and you are adding it on the same list with Stalin, Hitler and Bush.

Sorry, I thought and decided I am not that cheap.

I made a number of very serious accusations to you. You did not want to answer them and now looking to have a chance to get even.


Vineyards, as opposed to you, I'm not here to fight with you. I also consider Ataturk a national hero as well as one of the greatest leaders that ever existed. That doesn't mean that he wasn't a nationalist. I understand why he began the nationalism in Turkey, but I think that Turkish people didn't carry on with Ataturk's ideas and are stagnated in a way. I'm sure that if Ataturk was alive now, he'd curb the nationalism and begin a more open-minded movement.
And by the way, Bush should NOT be compared to Hitler or Stalin either!!!



the words for Hitler and stalin should not be nationalist but fascist. very big difference...

75.       catwoman
8933 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 09:09 pm

Quoting vineyards:

Many Polish friends I chatted online curse Turks. With so many Balkan countries cursing Turks (for example when you are playing a computer game) passes for a routine salutation which is solemnly made. They say (including some Kazakhs) Hey ....... Turk .... get the hell out of here. I rarely see any Turks showing this kind of a reaction to them. I believe their brains are washed in their families and in the churches they go. This problem is more evident among teenagers who don't know yet any systematic ways to exercise their hatred.


Oh, so now YOU are generalizing EVERYBODY! Very interesting - looks like it's allowed to do that when it serves your purposes. I would again question what Poland now has to do with this conversation...

Quoting vineyards:

Nevertheless, there is a full district called Polonezköy in Istanbul. Our sultan opened up the doors to thousands of them in their difficult times. Today, all those Polish settlers enjoy a very good life in their new home. It is unbelievable why an avarage Pole should hate a Turk because our history is full of accounts of our troops helping them out of besieges and attacks. The same is true for the Jews too. We did make a number of outrageous mistakes too. For the time being none has been proven and research continues with all sorts of claims being made.


None of them has been proven...??? Did you hear about the killings of Christians in Malatya by the way?

Quoting vineyards:

Today I am chatting with one Kazakh and a Polish girl whose only problem seem to be the anti western sentiment in Turkey. To put the record straight, I do have lots of friends in the Western world and I am a fan of their music, culture and heritage. What I am against is the nationalistic policies the so called falcons in American are following. For example, did any one of the debaters here ever read the National Defense Doctrine of the US government. After reading it you will realize why Bush can be categorized alongside Hitler. Because even Hitler could not dare pass such a vandalistic defense doctrine in his hey day.


Bush did not set up Holocaust where he's burning people alive!!! Get that straight! You are again not being fair. Nobody is defending Bush's politics, on the contrary - he is severely criticized in his own country. However, when it comes to criticizing the east and Turkey, you seem to get very offended!

76.       catwoman
8933 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 09:10 pm

Quoting KeithL:

the words for Hitler and stalin should not be nationalist but fascist. very big difference...


Yes, exactly.

77.       KeithL
1455 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 09:14 pm

Quoting vineyards:

Many Polish friends I chatted online curse Turks. With so many Balkan countries cursing Turks (for example when you are playing a computer game) passes for a routine salutation which is solemnly made. They say (including some Kazakhs) Hey ....... Turk .... get the hell out of here. I rarely see any Turks showing this kind of a reaction to them. I believe their brains are washed in their families and in the churches they go. This problem is more evident among teenagers who don't know yet any systematic ways to exercise their hatred.

Nevertheless, there is a full district called Polonezköy in Istanbul. Our sultan opened up the doors to thousands of them in their difficult times. Today, all those Polish settlers enjoy a very good life in their new home. It is unbelievable why an avarage Pole should hate a Turk because our history is full of accounts of our troops helping them out of besieges and attacks. The same is true for the Jews too. We did make a number of outrageous mistakes too. For the time being none has been proven and research continues with all sorts of claims being made.

Today I am chatting with one Kazakh and a Polish girl whose only problem seem to be the anti western sentiment in Turkey. To put the record straight, I do have lots of friends in the Western world and I am a fan of their music, culture and heritage. What I am against is the nationalistic policies the so called falcons in American are following. For example, did any one of the debaters here ever read the National Defense Doctrine of the US government. After reading it you will realize why Bush can be categorized alongside Hitler. Because even Hitler could not dare pass such an aggressive defense doctrine in his hey day.



I agree with this. I have worked in Greece and Yugoslavia in the years before I came to Turkey. I had no association whatsoever with Turkey and any Turks at that time and I was shocked at how deep and widespread the hatred (masking as jealousy) of Turkey was. So many blame all the problems of their life on what happened in their lands 100+ years ago. Even while I was in university in the states, I went to school with Greeks, Serbs and Croats. This was the mid 80's and even then, the word turk was not spoken without a deragatory adjective in front of it.

78.       vineyards
1954 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 09:20 pm

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting vineyards:

Many Polish friends I chatted online curse Turks. With so many Balkan countries cursing Turks (for example when you are playing a computer game) passes for a routine salutation which is solemnly made. They say (including some Kazakhs) Hey ....... Turk .... get the hell out of here. I rarely see any Turks showing this kind of a reaction to them. I believe their brains are washed in their families and in the churches they go. This problem is more evident among teenagers who don't know yet any systematic ways to exercise their hatred.


Oh, so now YOU are generalizing EVERYBODY! Very interesting - looks like it's allowed to do that when it serves your purposes. I would again question what Poland now has to do with this conversation...

There is no generalization here. What I am saying concerns those people whom I chatted with and this point is laid out correctly. Furthermore, if that happens every now and then you may feel the need of reasoning it. We are not blind are we?

Quoting vineyards:

Nevertheless, there is a full district called Polonezköy in Istanbul. Our sultan opened up the doors to thousands of them in their difficult times. Today, all those Polish settlers enjoy a very good life in their new home. It is unbelievable why an avarage Pole should hate a Turk because our history is full of accounts of our troops helping them out of besieges and attacks. The same is true for the Jews too. We did make a number of outrageous mistakes too. For the time being none has been proven and research continues with all sorts of claims being made.



None of them has been proven...??? Did you hear about the killings of Christians in Malatya by the way?

Did you ever hear about the human rights violations in US controlled Iraq. Do you really care about those desacrating Muslims' holy book and those raping and torturing them? Plus I am not happy about whatever killing or massacre that happened on either side.

Quoting vineyards:

Today I am chatting with one Kazakh and a Polish girl whose only problem seem to be the anti western sentiment in Turkey. To put the record straight, I do have lots of friends in the Western world and I am a fan of their music, culture and heritage. What I am against is the nationalistic policies the so called falcons in American are following. For example, did any one of the debaters here ever read the National Defense Doctrine of the US government. After reading it you will realize why Bush can be categorized alongside Hitler. Because even Hitler could not dare pass such a vandalistic defense doctrine in his hey day.


Bush did not set up Holocaust where he's burning people alive!!! Get that straight! You are again not being fair. Nobody is defending Bush's politics, on the contrary - he is severely criticized in his own country. However, when it comes to criticizing the east and Turkey, you seem to get very offended!



It is because I am neither a racist nor a nationalist. On the other hand, some of the remarks made by the certain gang members here can be categorized using more serious words than the ones you implied.

79.       catwoman
8933 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 09:28 pm

Quoting KeithL:

I agree with this. I have worked in Greece and Yugoslavia in the years before I came to Turkey. I had no association whatsoever with Turkey and any Turks at that time and I was shocked at how deep and widespread the hatred (masking as jealousy) of Turkey was. So many blame all the problems of their life on what happened in their lands 100+ years ago. Even while I was in university in the states, I went to school with Greeks, Serbs and Croats. This was the mid 80's and even then, the word turk was not spoken without a deragatory adjective in front of it.


Does that include Polish people though? I don't know about any anti-Turkish attitudes in Poland right now. I would guess that if there are any, it's because of the situation of Turks in Germany.

I am sure that there is hatred of Turkey in Balkan countries because of the past. Ottomans (Turks) invaded them! I don't know what the Turkish attitude in this sphere is, but I think that they should at least apologize for their past. I can understand these feelings because Poland has been under both Russian, German and Austrian invasion in the past and unless those countries reach out, it's hard to just move on and forget the past.

Vineyards seems to be very one-sided in this conversation. He is eager to criticize American imperialism, but as far as criticizing Turkish past, he says this:

Quoting vineyards:

We did make a number of outrageous mistakes too. For the time being none has been proven and research continues with all sorts of claims being made.



I would at least expect equal standards, but that's not what I gather from this conversation.

80.       vineyards
1954 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 09:29 pm

Catwoman follow this link to read the Polish account of what forced the Poles to come to Turkey and what happened to them here : http://www.polonezkoy.com/history.html


The we can discuss your remaining prejudices as well as the reasons why me and other Turks should be blatantly cursed by the Poles we meet.

Let me tell you beforehand, you have enough prejudices to fill the Earth.

81.       catwoman
8933 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 09:40 pm

Quoting vineyards:

Catwoman follow this link to read the Polish account of what forced the Poles to come to Turkey and what happened to them here : http://www.polonezkoy.com/history.html


Ok, so Turks have been nice to Polish people in the past. That's great, I wish there were more events like that.
Still, that is not a proof of complete Turkish purity in the past and to all nations. Don't forget that Ottomans also tried to invade the whole Europe, thankfully they were stopped in Viena.

82.       vineyards
1954 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 09:42 pm

It can never be anyway.

83.       catwoman
8933 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 09:43 pm

Quoting vineyards:

It can never be anyway.


We can't change the past, but at least let's be honest about it - and I'm not defending either side, just the truth.

84.       vineyards
1954 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 09:57 pm

Where we are supposed to be honest about our past, you are supposed to be honest about the present situation. It is the christiandom which sets you apart from the East. In our glorious past there were crusades. The crusades did not start with Turks. They came to Istanbul at the time of the Byzantine and pillaged the city doing unheard of malice, stealing the city's ornaments to put them on display in their own towns. Turks took up the sword to defend the muslim world and they succeeded in that as they reached the heart of Europe in Vienna. It is this threat that demonized Turks as the vandals from the East, the scorch of God. It is still that notion that keeps us apart. History is a bit tricky, there is not a single version of it. As a result, you can't claim you thoroughly know it.

85.       catwoman
8933 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 10:01 pm

Quoting vineyards:

Turks took up the sword to defend the muslim world and they succeeded in that as they reached the heart of Europe in Vienna.


Just one question - you don't call this an invasion of other countries???

86.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 10:07 pm

vineyards, you are still that boy who needs to grow up.
kazakhs cursed turks? oh, how dare they curse holy turks?
look, if we talk about internet, we meet different people on net. if i base my opinion on those whom i met on net, i should really have a disgusting attitude towards turks, greeks, arabs, spaniards as well as kazakhs and poles.
as for kazakhs who fought against turks relating to the oil business, i wouldnt touch the subject.
turks in my country, i mean males, i remember them as those who used to have good trading skills, or e.g. those who had cars (it was luxury to have one at those times) and were busy driving russian girls.
as for the attitude of kazakhs towards turks, unfortunately, the majority loves and respects turks, when ussr collapsed, kazakhs were very proud to study in turkey or establish new turkish high schools in the country. it was smth very prestigous. but i saw the results: the boys i knew, whom i really liked, became women haters due to the islamic brainwashing in the turkish universities, suddenly they stopped talking to me just because i was a woman.

as for poles, sorry, poles actually dont have a clue about turks and turkey. most of them recall turkey as a nice country where they were forced to travel to get cheap goods to sell in bazars.

87.       Elisabeth
5732 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 10:14 pm

So, aside from the Nationalist Vs. Patriot debate...WHAT ARE YOUR INFORMAL THOUGHTS ON TURKISH CLASS?? lol

88.       portokal
2516 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 10:44 pm

I think the Balkans and Central Europe do keep rememberance of turkish invasions, rememberance that often takes form of a well preserved stereotype nowadays, including sometimes idioms, too.
Hungary keeps the memories of being beinkg pasalik. and as for Transylvania (formerly independent principate, alterning with inclusion in Habsburg Imperium, then Hungarian Kingdom, now included in Romania) rememberance of fights and paying tributes to the Ottoman Empire is quite alive. The material tributes and human sacrifices are the hardest to forget... If you ask macars, they will tell you about macar children kidnapped to be brought up as janissaries who eventually would end up fighting against christians, about the new-born girls to whom their parents had a cross burned on their forehead so that they would not be carried away by the turks.

But also, and i am speaking merely for Transylvania here, there is still alive the memory of Prince Rakoczi, the greatest ruler of Transilvania (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_II_R%C3%A1k%C3%B3czi) , who after being defeated in the kuruc - labancz war refuses polish krown offer , accepts Ottoman invitation and takes exile in Tekirdag, along with many macar noblemen. One of his followers is Ibrahim Muteferrika, a transylvanian converted to Islam, the first Muslim to run a printing press with movable Arabic type (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibrahim_Muteferrika). Muteferrika was born in my town .
Hystory in the Balkanians is tormented, sometimes swinging back and forth like a pendulum between the addherence at or the conquerence by the one of the two empires...i think it would be a nice change to overcome past and prejudices. Looking from a (my) Balkanian point of wiev, at first sight it is easy to have prejudices, at a second you will be in doubt of the former prejudices, several sights might strongly confuse you... Then again, hystory is like a turning wheel. It repeats itself. In the meanwhile, stereotypes lasts.

89.       alameda
3499 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 10:59 pm

Excuse me, but....:-S Just a little reminder:

Criticism of Ataturk is like holding a red flag in front of a bull....and you must know that. Without Ataturk there would be no Turkey. Including his name in relationship with Stalin or Hitler is insensitive to the extreme, or it is provocative. What on earth are you trying to do here?

9. Avoid personal disputes and arguments. Personal correspondence postings should be kept at a minimum. Personal attacks or insults directed towards other users will not be tolerated. Basically if you don't have anything nice to say then just don't say it all. If somebody posts an insulting comment do not reply to it. It will only result in starting a flame-war. Instead, send a Private Message to one of the forum moderators and they will take care of it.
10. Any discussion on politics or religion and religious matters is strictly prohibited.

As an administrator Catwoman, it seems you should be particularly sensitive to these matters, instead of fanning the flames.
In looking at this thread (and others), it appears you are injecting religious and political matters to the conversation.

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting teaschip1:

My only comment of course is to reference Bush in the same context as Hitler and Stalin. Just thought it was a little extreme.


Yes, I agree. If you're adding milder nationalists you should definitely add Ataturk before Bush.


90.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 11:04 pm

Quoting alameda:


Criticism of Ataturk is like holding a red flag in front of a bull....and you must know that. Without Ataturk there would be no Turkey. Including his name in relationship with Stalin or Hitler is insensitive to the extreme, or it is provocative. What on earth are you trying to do here?


the thing is that, we know it. (nobody here insulted ataturk!)
with all due respect to him but still hes not a god!

91.       catwoman
8933 posts
 27 Sep 2007 Thu 11:21 pm

Quoting alameda:

Criticism of Ataturk is like holding a red flag in front of a bull....and you must know that. Without Ataturk there would be no Turkey.


Alameda, I think you must have had a temporary mental blackout, so I'm forgiving you this time. I said:

Quoting catwoman:

Yes, I agree. If you're adding milder nationalists you should definitely add Ataturk before Bush.



Quoting catwoman:

I also consider Ataturk a national hero as well as one of the greatest leaders that ever existed. That doesn't mean that he wasn't a nationalist. I understand why he began the nationalism in Turkey, but I think that Turkish people didn't carry on with Ataturk's ideas and are stagnated in a way. I'm sure that if Ataturk was alive now, he'd curb the nationalism and begin a more open-minded movement.




Aren't you offending Turkish people, by the way, by comparing them to bulls???

92.       vineyards
1954 posts
 28 Sep 2007 Fri 01:25 am

Catwoman are you really sending these posts for discussing something or is it just a pillow fight for you? If you are aware of a better form of hospitality and virteous treatment in your own history please quote it to me.

I believe in the decency of my own hospitable people and I am proud of being one of them. I don't think they deserve anyone of the disparagement you are trying to direct at them. You can't judge an entire nation with observations based on a few people.

93.       vineyards
1954 posts
 28 Sep 2007 Fri 01:30 am

Quoting femme_fatal:

Quoting alameda:


Criticism of Ataturk is like holding a red flag in front of a bull....and you must know that. Without Ataturk there would be no Turkey. Including his name in relationship with Stalin or Hitler is insensitive to the extreme, or it is provocative. What on earth are you trying to do here?


the thing is that, we know it. (nobody here insulted ataturk!)
with all due respect to him but still hes not a god!



Femme fatal how dare you talk about respect? You are one of the most irrespectful persons I have ever met.

94.       alameda
3499 posts
 28 Sep 2007 Fri 02:47 am

Quoting catwoman:

Aren't you offending Turkish people, by the way, by comparing them to bulls???



The bull is a noble animal.....but then, I didn't compare Turkish people to bulls...I compared your actions to someone who waves a red flag in front of a bull....there is a difference.


95.       portokal
2516 posts
 28 Sep 2007 Fri 03:41 am

Quoting Elisabeth:

So, aside from the Nationalist Vs. Patriot debate...WHAT ARE YOUR INFORMAL THOUGHTS ON TURKISH CLASS?? lol



I informally think that sometimes there is much ado about in topics.

96.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 28 Sep 2007 Fri 01:44 pm

I dont agree with you vine..
I dont think my satements were contradicting at all.
I was simply trying to say that there is a thin line between them and someone has to be very careful where it stands.
And all nationalists call them patriots (culture or country is nothing to do with it). When you hear some patriotic comments from a Turk, I always get a bit suspicious to be honest, thinking that 'OMG here comes another racist'. And, sadly, 99% of the time I am right.
The meaning of those words differ from culture to culture? They might.
But, however, racism is racism anywhere.


About my list: I was trying to say that all those leaders did/do these things for some reasons. They had/have patriotic reasons why they do or did.
They were all patriots in their definitions.
About Bush: Oh boy..He deserves to be in that list. If he will not be, what are we going to with nearly 1 million dead Iraqies or Afghans? What are we going to do with 4 million displaced people in Iraq? And all of these are STILL going on as we write/read here.

About Ataturk: He was a dictator sometimes. He did make mistakes. But dont forget he was a very good soldier lived in the last century's world.
He was a dictator to stop anybody being a dictator after him and he tried to creat a democratic society from ashes.
I dont think he should be in that list. But we, Turks, should not be cross with people critisising him either. Because we can easily defend him.

About racisim and nationalism in Turkey: There is a lot to say. We , Turks should know our past better. We should know how it all started, we should know how it was centuries ago (no racism I believe), how it was a century ago (rise of nationalism world wide) , how it was during and after WW2 (racist ideas, hitler, Nihal atsiz in Turkey) and where we are now after all.
We can not just say 'centuries ago we welcomed jews from spain' and forget 1915 , how we kicked out greeks, how we tried to call kurds 'turks living in mountains, walking on the snow and making sounds -kart-kurt'. We should face all our history without fear and without picking up some part of it only.
So we can move on.
....
Phew...
I looked at what i wrote..It looks pretty serious stuff (deaths/dictators etc)..
Lets forget all above
here is a link for people, who miss istanbul alot.

97.       vineyards
1954 posts
 28 Sep 2007 Fri 02:41 pm

There is again a thin line that seperates us in our definitions of certain concepts. You are describing chauvenist nationalists and categorizing them as patriots just because they call themselves as such. We musn't base on people's ow asssumptions as to who they are. We know that everyone thinks he is right so they chose the best sounding attributes when describing themselves.

I will cut it short because I don't want this one to go out of control too. If you want to discuss this we must either do that via PM's or through some other political forum.

98.       teaschip
3870 posts
 28 Sep 2007 Fri 04:37 pm

I believe we are all guilty at one time or another in discussing political or religous topics. Even replying or posting in a forum where discussions on these topics are taking place is considered to be guilt by association. However, we all of the freedom to choose whether or not to partake in such discussions or reading these threads.

I personally find many of the posts to be hyprocritical from certain individuals here. It's ok to scrutinize, attack and insult others in your own manner. However when the table is turned, I see quotes by members reciting the rules here. How hyprocritical is that, I ask.

The same members who feel violated and insulted that their past, present government,leader and country is being thrown under the bus. Have no problem insulting another countries government or leader. The saying goes you reep what you sow. Don't expect people to give you the respect that you lack in the first place. You don't deserve it!

I hear more Bush bashing at this site than I hear in the media. The facts are we all live in countries where we have militaries who have led or participated in some form of violence. Whether it's current or in the past it's part of history now.

We all have our own opinions here on whats right and wrong. But if you continue to express yours here so freely, be prepared to get a reaction and this may not be the reaction your looking for either.


99.       KeithL
1455 posts
 28 Sep 2007 Fri 05:21 pm

Bush drunk at a wedding in 1992

Bush drunk at a wedding

100.       Elisabeth
5732 posts
 28 Sep 2007 Fri 06:41 pm

Quoting KeithL:

Bush drunk at a wedding in 1992

Bush drunk at a wedding




What's asshame is there is an entire section on YouTube devoted to what I call "Bushisms" lol It's sad that there is an entire "library" of him embarrassing himself and in reality embarrassing us all.

101.       teaschip
3870 posts
 28 Sep 2007 Fri 08:59 pm

I would drink too.

102.       Elisabeth
5732 posts
 28 Sep 2007 Fri 09:14 pm

Quoting teaschip1:

I would drink too.



I will buy the beer...do you like cans or bottles?

103.       Trudy
7887 posts
 28 Sep 2007 Fri 09:19 pm

Quoting Elisabeth:

I will buy the beer...do you like cans or bottles?



When it comes to the ideas of Bush: where is my glass, Elisabeth? (Or am I not allowed to say this as non-American? )

104.       teaschip
3870 posts
 28 Sep 2007 Fri 09:54 pm

I prefer a frosted mug with Heineken, please. Imagine that I prefer imports over domestic.

105.       Trudy
7887 posts
 28 Sep 2007 Fri 10:31 pm

Quoting teaschip1:

I prefer a frosted mug with Heineken, please. Imagine that I prefer imports over domestic.



Heineken! Tea, you're great! lol

106.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 28 Sep 2007 Fri 10:41 pm

Quoting vineyards:


Femme you should really reset your prejudices. You are insulting all the Easterners including your own Kazakhs collectively now. Do you have a spine? Or are you a jelly fish?


so said a person very respectful!
read all your insulting posts before you judge me

107.       CANLI
5084 posts
 30 Sep 2007 Sun 03:07 am

While we are celebrating our Holly month Ramazan,some of TC members were celebrating with us,by bashing
İslam,Muslims and Turkish people of course 'for they are guilty of being Muslims and Easterns too i guess'
and TC allowing it!

İ really dont know,what is your problem people ?!!

Muslim Flag In Venice
http://www.turkishclass.com/forumTitle_7_22021_-1

İs a relationship between turkish man and English woman possible ?
http://www.turkishclass.com/forumTitle_15_7864

We who we are,and you who you are, we didnt ask you to be like us,and we dont want to be like you too,we are Muslims,and you are Christians ,or Jewish ,..ect

Want to know eachothers?
Want to know about us ? Why criticise us then?
You disagree with our religion in many things ?we disagree with yours too,but we dont bash or attack!

WHAT İS YOUR POİNT ?!

We are bad ?! Ok dont be like us ..and THAT İS İT !
İslam is bad ?
Ok dont be Muslims !
Turkish men are bad ?
Ok then dont fall in love with them and dont marry them !

But have respect for who and what we are,as we have for who and what you are !

108.       alameda
3499 posts
 30 Sep 2007 Sun 05:27 am

Seeing as it seems you are referring to me in the below quote, I'd like to ask just where I attacked anyone. When a post seems inaccurate, I do scrutinize the contents. Pointing out inaccurate posts is not an attack.

Teaschip1 said "I personally find many of the posts to be hyprocritical from certain individuals here. It's ok to scrutinize, attack and insult others in your own manner. However when the table is turned, I see quotes by members
reciting the rules here. How hyprocritical is that, I ask."

Yes, I posted the forum rules here.....it seems they have been ignored. They are hard to find, so I was trying to make it easier for people to find.

Teaschip1 said "The same members who feel violated and insulted that their past, present government,leader and country is being thrown under the bus. Have no problem insulting another countries government or leader. The saying goes you reep what you sow. Don't expect people to give you the respect that you lack in the first place. You don't deserve it!"

I have never posted anything here that is not a proven fact. I am amazed at the ignorance of some of the members here and the inaccurate posts.

Teaschip1 said "I hear more Bush bashing at this site than I hear in the media. The facts are we all live in countries where we have militaries who have led or participated in some form of violence. Whether it's current or in the past it's part of history now.

We all have our own opinions here on whats right and wrong. But if you continue to express yours here so freely, be prepared to get a reaction and this may not be the reaction your looking for either."

I have not been expressing opinions. I have been reporting facts.

I am not anti-West, but I am distressed by the current trend towards commercialization and commodification of everything. Is nothing sacred? Is nothing part of the commons? Even peoples genome can be patented. What is that? Seeds from plants are infertile and they cross pollinate, making whole fields nonproductive, just so some coropration can profit on it? Even such a precious resource as water is being bought and sold. Where are we going with this?

Corporate Water Privitization:
http://www.sierraclub.org/committees/cac/water/

One-Fifth of Human Genes Have Been Patented, Study Reveals
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/10/1013_051013_gene_patent.html


109.       CANLI
5084 posts
 30 Sep 2007 Sun 06:14 am

Refering to me alameda ?
İ didnt mean you,those were my informal thoughts about TC in Ramadan !

110.       alameda
3499 posts
 30 Sep 2007 Sun 07:11 am

No, I was not referring to you Canli, I was responding to teaschip1. In my post I quoted her, not you. I too am very distressed with the vitrioic comments here.

Ramadan Mubarak!

Quoting CANLI:

Refering to me alameda ?
İ didnt mean you,those were my informal thoughts about TC in Ramadan !



111.       Müjde
posts
 30 Sep 2007 Sun 10:57 am

Quote:

We who we are,and you who you are, we didnt ask you to be like us,and we dont want to be like you too,we are Muslims,and you are Christians ,or Jewish ,..ect

Want to know eachothers?
Want to know about us ? Why criticise us then?
You disagree with our religion in many things ?we disagree with yours too,but we dont bash or attack!

WHAT İS YOUR POİNT ?!

We are bad ?! Ok dont be like us ..and THAT İS İT !
İslam is bad ?
Ok dont be Muslims !
Turkish men are bad ?
Ok then dont fall in love with them and dont marry them !

But have respect for who and what we are,as we have for who and what you are !


Canlı,Harikasın

112.       bod
5999 posts
 16 Oct 2007 Tue 01:31 am

Quoting Trudy:

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting catwoman:

Erdinc



Nooooooooooooooo!
That word is kryptonite to my superhuman powers!



I never had the pleasure of meeting Erdinc on this forum or feel the consequences of his posts/acts as a mod. I get the strong feeling I missed something.



For all of Erdinç's deleting/locking threads, there was something very appealling about him and his total passion for Türkiye and Türkçe. When Erdinç was involved in these forums he was one of the people I would have most liked to meet IRL. I am not sure that situation has changed but I know the opportunity has become alot less.......

(112 Messages in 12 pages - View all)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ...  >>
Thread locked by a moderator or admin.




Turkish Dictionary
Turkish Chat
Open mini chat
New in Forums
Crossword Vocabulary Puzzles for Turkish L...
qdemir: You can view and solve several of the puzzles online at ...
Giriyor vs Geliyor.
lrnlang: Thank you for the ...
Local Ladies Ready to Play in Your City
nifrtity: ... - Discover Women Seeking No-Strings Attached Encounters in Your Ci...
Geçmekte vs. geçiyor?
Hoppi: ... and ... has almost the same meaning. They are both mean "i...
Intermediate (B1) to upper-intermediate (B...
qdemir: View at ...
Why yer gördüm but yeri geziyorum
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much, makes perfect sense!
Random Pictures of Turkey
Most liked