General/Off-topic |
|
|
|
|
|
Is the UK going mad?
|
| 100. |
19 Sep 2007 Wed 08:30 pm |
|
Might I add, for which it cost over 50 million dollars to find out and prove?
Quoting KeithL: Quoting teaschip1: Well let's see, simply stated he sits next to Andrew Johnson as far as the two Presidents in American history who were impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives. At least Nixon had the dignity to resign before he was impeached. I could write out a least of his failures as well. As far as unemployment, do you really know anything about unemployment it basically does not exsist here in the U.S. I'm not sure where your getting your figures from, but they are not accurate. Have you ever heard of people spending way too much. I guess you want to blame the President for peoples vehicles getting repoed, are you serious? |
His impeachment was a game by republicans? Did they force him out? Of course not. His impeachment was politically motivated by the insane republican party. He was impeached over a blowjob for Christ's sake!!! If you believe that was worthy of impeachment, then certainly lying about the war in iraq and WMD is worthy of impeachment also. Thank God the dems had more morals than the republicans to sink so low.
So I knew your answer would be about the blowjob. What else would it be? Can you come up with a second reason? |
|
|
| 101. |
19 Sep 2007 Wed 08:57 pm |
|
Quoting KeithL: With a little fact-finding, you would have found that Turkey is among the highest home ownership rates in the world. And since until recently, all homes were paid for in cash up front, there were zero foreclosures since there were no mortgages. Try again catwoman. You can do better |
Thanks for enlightening me Keith, good job as always! The fact is that taking a mortgage in Turkey is probably close to impossible for an average Joe and most people live with their parents and grandparents most of their lives. People pay cash for almost everything in countries like Turkey, that's not an improvement.
If you did a little more fact-finding you'd know that people who are facing foreclosures now are people who shouldn't have gotten loans to begin with, but banks wanted to make money and lowered their requirements. They deserve what they are facing and it's just a result of greed, as always.
|
|
| 102. |
19 Sep 2007 Wed 09:10 pm |
|
How stupid of me. It is Clinton's fault for the plight of the turkish economy, isnt it?
|
|
| 103. |
19 Sep 2007 Wed 09:18 pm |
|
and like I said earlier, rather than address the real issue of the question, "why do you dislike Clinton?" the tables are turned on Turkey's bad economy.
Seriously, are the topics related somehow?
|
|
| 104. |
19 Sep 2007 Wed 09:19 pm |
|
Quoting KeithL: How stupid of me. It is Clinton's fault for the plight of the turkish economy, isnt it? |
Don't be so insecure Keith, I'm not in for an argument with you. And I didn't say anything about Clinton, other then the fact that I wouldn't be so uncritical about him, his politics was also dirty, though he managed to keep people happy. The things people hear in the media is not all that's going on, so just how popular he was is not an indicator of his politics. I'm definitely glad though that he didn't go to insane wars.
I totally agree with you that Bush should be impeached for lying about the WMD.
|
|
| 105. |
19 Sep 2007 Wed 09:21 pm |
|
I'm not looking for an argument either. just an answer It was suggested that Clinton was a bad President. I only asked why? Other than the sex incident.
|
|
| 106. |
19 Sep 2007 Wed 09:35 pm |
|
Quoting KeithL: I'm not looking for an argument either. just an answer It was suggested that Clinton was a bad President. I only asked why? Other than the sex incident. |
I wonder why you think that Clinton was a good president. I'm not challenging you and I'm not strongly supportive of either side, just would like to know what why you think so?
|
|
| 107. |
19 Sep 2007 Wed 09:37 pm |
|
Well of course Clinton had no morality. He had 3 chances to bring in Bin Laden and failed to do this. What about Saddam, he also never finished what he started in Iraq.
He also signed a 1996 bill making life more difficult for undocumented immigrants, while at the same time choosing to make it possible for millions more to enter the country and face horrific exploitation at the hands of U.S. corporations. What about his failures of the healthcare reform. But what the heck the economy was good, so who cares if he didn't have morals and a backbone..
|
|
| 108. |
19 Sep 2007 Wed 09:39 pm |
|
Quoting teaschip1: Well of course Clinton had no morality. |
I hope you're not implying that Bush has morals...
|
|
| 109. |
19 Sep 2007 Wed 09:40 pm |
|
Quoting alameda: Might I add, for which it cost over 50 million dollars to find out and prove?
Quoting KeithL: Quoting teaschip1: Well let's see, simply stated he sits next to Andrew Johnson as far as the two Presidents in American history who were impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives. At least Nixon had the dignity to resign before he was impeached. I could write out a least of his failures as well. As far as unemployment, do you really know anything about unemployment it basically does not exsist here in the U.S. I'm not sure where your getting your figures from, but they are not accurate. Have you ever heard of people spending way too much. I guess you want to blame the President for peoples vehicles getting repoed, are you serious? |
His impeachment was a game by republicans? Did they force him out? Of course not. His impeachment was politically motivated by the insane republican party. He was impeached over a blowjob for Christ's sake!!! If you believe that was worthy of impeachment, then certainly lying about the war in iraq and WMD is worthy of impeachment also. Thank God the dems had more morals than the republicans to sink so low.
So I knew your answer would be about the blowjob. What else would it be? Can you come up with a second reason? |
|
++1
I agree and what a waste of money this president put on the taxpayers all for his sexual pleasure.
|
|
| 110. |
19 Sep 2007 Wed 09:42 pm |
|
Quoting catwoman: Quoting teaschip1: Well of course Clinton had no morality. |
I hope you're not implying that Bush has morals... |
Did this statement at all imply that? I don't think I mentioned Bush.
|
|
|
