General/Off-topic |
|
|
|
|
|
Is the UK going mad?
|
| 110. |
19 Sep 2007 Wed 09:42 pm |
|
Quoting catwoman: Quoting teaschip1: Well of course Clinton had no morality. |
I hope you're not implying that Bush has morals... |
Did this statement at all imply that? I don't think I mentioned Bush.
|
|
| 111. |
19 Sep 2007 Wed 09:45 pm |
|
Quoting KeithL: I'm not looking for an argument either. just an answer It was suggested that Clinton was a bad President. I only asked why? Other than the sex incident. |
Also, please refresh my memory where I stated he was a bad president?
|
|
| 112. |
19 Sep 2007 Wed 09:48 pm |
|
Quoting alameda: Quoting teaschip1: Well you won't have to worry about Bush very soon. We all will have more problems to deal with here, if we Americans don't vote wisely the next time around..I was never a fan of Limbaugh either but Hannity & Ann Coulter I love. |
You love the person who said this?
"Airports scrupulously apply the same laughably ineffective airport harassment to Suzy Chapstick as to Muslim hijackers. It is preposterous to assume every passenger is a potential crazed homicidal maniac. We know who the homicidal maniacs are. They are the ones cheering and dancing right now. We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war."
I want facts, not opinion. With the facts I can make up my own mind. What ever happened to truth in reporting? This appears to be slander to me. Add to that the praise of a very questionable action. Really, praising the carpet bombing of German cities, killing civilians? I think Ann Coulter is a provacative person and should be charged with slander
Do you really love this woman who calls for this type of action? I strongly suggest we all search for facts, not opinion. ............and don't get me started on Hannity. |
Yes.....it's the truth.
|
|
| 113. |
19 Sep 2007 Wed 10:01 pm |
|
Quoting KeithL: Quoting teaschip1: Well let's see, simply stated he sits next to Andrew Johnson as far as the two Presidents in American history who were impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives. At least Nixon had the dignity to resign before he was impeached. I could write out a least of his failures as well. As far as unemployment, do you really know anything about unemployment it basically does not exsist here in the U.S. I'm not sure where your getting your figures from, but they are not accurate. Have you ever heard of people spending way too much. I guess you want to blame the President for peoples vehicles getting repoed, are you serious? |
His impeachment was a game by republicans? Did they force him out? Of course not. His impeachment was politically motivated by the insane republican party. He was impeached over a blowjob for Christ's sake!!! If you believe that was worthy of impeachment, then certainly lying about the war in iraq and WMD is worthy of impeachment also. Thank God the dems had more morals than the republicans to sink so low.
So I knew your answer would be about the blowjob. What else would it be? Can you come up with a second reason? |
Yes, because of the insane senate overturned it. Dems morals? 
|
|
| 114. |
19 Sep 2007 Wed 10:38 pm |
|
Quoting teaschip1:
We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity.
Yes.....it's the truth. |
Anyone who says this or agrees with this is a complete mental and moral zero...
|
|
| 115. |
19 Sep 2007 Wed 10:48 pm |
|
Quoting teaschip1: Quoting KeithL: I'm not looking for an argument either. just an answer It was suggested that Clinton was a bad President. I only asked why? Other than the sex incident. |
Also, please refresh my memory where I stated he was a bad president? |
I'll refresh your memory on what I asked. I asked you where Bill Clinton failed you as a President. Other than anything to do with his blowjob from Monica Lewinski, I genuinely want to know what you think.
|
|
| 116. |
19 Sep 2007 Wed 10:52 pm |
|
Quoting teaschip1: Well of course Clinton had no morality. He had 3 chances to bring in Bin Laden and failed to do this. What about Saddam, he also never finished what he started in Iraq.
He also signed a 1996 bill making life more difficult for undocumented immigrants, while at the same time choosing to make it possible for millions more to enter the country and face horrific exploitation at the hands of U.S. corporations. What about his failures of the healthcare reform. But what the heck the economy was good, so who cares if he didn't have morals and a backbone..
|
And I'll ask more from your posts.
1. If you are angry at Clinton for not taking Bin Ladin out, why are you not angry at Bush for not going after Bin ladin 6 years post 9/11?
2. Finished what he started? Did Clinton start Gulf war I? I always thought that was Bush I. I'll set down my crack pipe...
3. He did fail health care. He tried to push it through but the opposition in congress didn't back him. I am also disappointed this didn't happen. Why didn't the republicans back him? Are you saying you supported Clinton's health proposal back then?
|
|
| 117. |
20 Sep 2007 Thu 04:18 pm |
|
I don't need your personal attacks here. Call me mental, insane and no morals. So I'm going to make a sane decision and not continue to debate Clinton with you. I do find it ironic, you defending someone who clearly has no morals. I wonder what kind of character you are. 
|
|
| 118. |
20 Sep 2007 Thu 04:35 pm |
|
Me? I'm the kind of person that doesn't believe talk radio propaganda that says we need to make the world one big "Christian Club". Thats the kind of person I am.
And I'm also the kind of person that knows that not all members of the Repubican Party are moral and not all members of the Democratic Party are immoral.
But I know thats not what is "taught" by Hannity...
|
|
| 119. |
20 Sep 2007 Thu 04:54 pm |
|
Quoting KeithL: Me? I'm the kind of person that doesn't believe talk radio propaganda that says we need to make the world one big "Christian Club". Thats the kind of person I am.
And I'm also the kind of person that knows that not all members of the Repubican Party are moral and not all members of the Democratic Party are immoral.
But I know thats not what is "taught" by Hannity... |
Your also really good at making assumptions and accusations, a multi-talented individual you are.
|
|
| 120. |
20 Sep 2007 Thu 05:29 pm |
|
I never made any assumptions. Agreeing with a woman media person in America who thinks we should invade muslim countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity is dangerous and immoral.
Reverse the words christian and muslim (islam) in that sentence and I think people in America might consider that a terroristic comment. Publishing that statement in the newspaper might even get one arrested under the patriot act.
One more thing. Are you aware of what religion people that live in Turkey are by the way????
|
|
|
