Language |
|
|
|
... bir þekilde
|
20. |
19 Jan 2009 Mon 06:36 pm |
It´s not fair.. we were just joking 
hmmm.......and of course I was deadly serious! 
|
|
21. |
19 Jan 2009 Mon 07:49 pm |
hmmm.......and of course I was deadly serious! 

can i stop banging my head now? It really hurts.
|
|
22. |
20 Jan 2009 Tue 04:25 am |
i think there is some kind of conspiracy to your posts.. 
Some more of it then:
Consider the phrases "recliner", "chair", and "furniture". Recliner is a more specific category than chair; furniture is a more general category than chair. But the vast majority of chairs have a common use - you use the same sort of motor actions to sit down in them, and you sit down in them for the same sort of purpose (to take your weight off your feet while you eat, or read, or type, or rest). Recliners do not depart from this theme. "Furniture", on the other hand, includes things like beds and tables which have different uses, and call up different motor functions, from chairs.
In the terminology of cognitive psychology, "chair" is a basic-level category.
People have a tendency to talk, and presumably think, at the basic level of categorization - to draw the boundary around "chairs", rather than around the more specific category "recliner", or the more general category "furniture". People are more likely to say "You can sit in that chair" than "You can sit in that recliner" or "You can sit in that furniture".
And it is no coincidence that the word for "chair" contains fewer syllables than either "recliner" or "furniture". Basic-level categories, in general, tend to have short names; and nouns with short names tend to refer to basic-level categories. Not a perfect rule, of course, but a definite tendency. Frequent use goes along with short words; short words go along with frequent use.
|
|
23. |
20 Jan 2009 Tue 05:53 am |
Some more of it then:
Consider the phrases "recliner", "chair", and "furniture". Recliner is a more specific category than chair; furniture is a more general category than chair. But the vast majority of chairs have a common use - you use the same sort of motor actions to sit down in them, and you sit down in them for the same sort of purpose (to take your weight off your feet while you eat, or read, or type, or rest). Recliners do not depart from this theme. "Furniture", on the other hand, includes things like beds and tables which have different uses, and call up different motor functions, from chairs.
In the terminology of cognitive psychology, "chair" is a basic-level category.
People have a tendency to talk, and presumably think, at the basic level of categorization - to draw the boundary around "chairs", rather than around the more specific category "recliner", or the more general category "furniture". People are more likely to say "You can sit in that chair" than "You can sit in that recliner" or "You can sit in that furniture".
And it is no coincidence that the word for "chair" contains fewer syllables than either "recliner" or "furniture". Basic-level categories, in general, tend to have short names; and nouns with short names tend to refer to basic-level categories. Not a perfect rule, of course, but a definite tendency. Frequent use goes along with short words; short words go along with frequent use.
Haven´t we have thread about using cam instead of pencere couple weeks ago here? And it´s no coincidence either that cam is 1 syllable while pencere is 3.
http://www.turkishclass.com/forumTitle_37322
|
|
24. |
20 Jan 2009 Tue 03:21 pm |
Thank you very much Si++ for your explanations in this thread, I think you make an excellent point about using the forms that are easier or shorter to use. At this point I´m hoping to be somewhat understood no matter what form I use lol.
Thanks again
|
|
|