sevgili arkadaşım kimseye sensiz olmaz deme çünkü gün gelir olmaz dediklerinin hepsi olur olur gözüyle baktıkların ise olmaz

My dear friend. Don´t say to anybody "I can not be without you". Because one day the people to whom you said "I cant be with you" you can say "I can´t  be without you" and the people to whom you said "I cant be without you" you can say "I cant be with you"

Note: My translation is not very literal.

Wow. It was complicated. I hope it makes sense.

Thanks sashk for her help.

No, I still can´t understand it. I thought about it a long time: the language doesn´t look so difficult but I can´t catch the moral in it.

Try again, gokuyum.

Okay. I tried it again

Very tightly packed information. Thank you, gokuyum, the idea is understandable this way. But how it comes from this structure is not:

olmaz dediklerinin hepsi olur olur gözüyle baktıklarının ise olmaz

I guess subject (olmaz dediklerinin hepsi) is clear and the predicate olmaz is in the end. But what is the syntactic position of

bak|tık|ları|n|ın = stem + participle + poss pl 3^rd + -n- + gen

and what is ise ‘if’ doing here?

But. Maybe it is just too complicated for me. I will go back and sulk in my desk for the rest of the day.

 Why dont you send it to SARKOZY ? Do not start with "Dear friend".... 

Not every one in France shares the same opinion. I guess our friend lakklo even sent a post about it here somewhere...

 Maybe, but at the same time they dont show their reactions to their goverment. They are saying that to us only. If they dont share the same opinion, they must show that to their govenrment. Not only to us... Otherwise evrything is staying on the air.....  

Olmaz dediklerinin hepsi olur, olur gözüyle baktıklarının ise olmaz.

There are two predicates that means there are two subjects. 

First subject is clear as you said. But what is the second subject? There are two options:

1)It is "(senin) olur gözüyle baktıkların" So there is no need for a connection suffix after baktıkların ın   

2)It is "(senin) olur gözüyle baktıklarının hepsi". There must be "hepsi" after "baktıklarının".

You asked what "ise" doing there. "ise" is not "if" there, it is "as for" If you think like that it makes sense.

I am not sure but I guess if "ise" comes after a noun it gains "as for" meaning.

 I am in a mood to argue today 

goku, you used ..ermmmm.. let me count.......  "can" seven times in your translation.. but there is no word nor a suffix in the Turkish text equivalent to English "can".. 

sevgili arkadaşım kimseye sensiz olmaz deme çünkü gün gelir olmaz dediklerinin hepsi olur olur gözüyle baktıkların ise olmaz

Is there any?

Here goes my analysis.. so it kisses the hands of a native speaker of English to be put in a proper sentence )

sevgili arkadaşım - my dear friend 

kimseye - (to ) nobody 

"sensiz olmaz" deme - don´t say, "it is impossible without you"

çünkü - because

gün gelir - a day comes

olmaz dediklerinin hepsi- all the things you think that are impossible

olur- become (possible)

olur gözüyle baktıkların ise- and those you think that are possible

olmaz - become (impossible)

p.s. goku, with "arguing mood" I, of course, was kidding.. and for my analysis.. just wanted to open "another" window for some fresh air.. that´s all

Let me answer you Scalpel

First of all there is a note in my post saying my translation is not literal. I put such a note because I was expecting an attack from you

These "olur" and "olmaz" are adressing " sensiz olmaz deme". So I prefered to use "with" and "without"  In my first translation I translated "sensiz olmaz deme" as "dont say not without you" and others like that. But abla said she didnt understand. Then to make my translation more understandable I changed it as "Don´t say I can´t be without you" and others likewise.

As I mentioned before because I wrote a note about my translation that it was not literal, I took the oppurtinity to make it more understandable sacraficing its literality. And I took help from a native English speaker Sashk not to make a mistake.

So that is the history of my translation attempt.

The problem in my understanding was pretty much about splitting the wholeness into two sentences. It is even embarassing to say this but 2 x olur didn´t ring any bell...you Turks tend to repeat words for mysterious reasons anyway.

When there is talk about possible and impossible we are moving in the semantic area of can and cannot. It´s up to the translator of course to choose the means of expressing it.

Every attack is for a reason. If there is no reason there is no attack. I refuse to believe anything else. We are just talking because it is fun.

Thanks for the analyses.

I know dostum, I know I was just electrifying..

"basically it was a boring day all round, no matter where you look. It was boring here and it was boring in New York"

Fred Ketchen