Language |
|
|
|
TURKISH LANGUAGE IS A MATHEMATICAL LANGUAGEl
|
60. |
25 Dec 2007 Tue 10:45 pm |
double post.
|
|
61. |
25 Dec 2007 Tue 10:48 pm |
Ayrıca kimi övüp kimi övmeyeceğime ben karar veririm.
|
|
62. |
25 Dec 2007 Tue 10:58 pm |
Turkish is really mathematical language, most of you dont know what ARUZ means, it is an order used to design poems in old turkish, no poets in our time can not (an is not capable) use ARUZ. ARUZ's base depens on if a syllabel "open" or "close",
an open syllabel ends with a vowel
a close syllabel ends with a consonant
so each line's all syllabels are in the same order if it is open or close. and pattern may vary for theme, the age, the poet or general mood of public.
|
|
63. |
25 Dec 2007 Tue 11:07 pm |
Guys! Stop wasting your breath here..
1. Half the people here do not speak or understand Turkish
(most of them can not really be proud of their English either).
2. The rest thinks Math is a small town in England.
See what I mean?
|
|
64. |
25 Dec 2007 Tue 11:13 pm |
in addition: in most languages used today, 1500 words used in public.
Somebody here said Yaşar Kemal used 3500 word in his books comparing victor Hugo used 40000 words in poems.
Yaşar Kemal is a public writer and used a simple language, so you cant get him for a language usage comparison
if you compare victor Hugo to someone try these poets
Fuzuli (1480-1556)
Baki (1526-160
Nefi (1572-1635)
Naili (1610-1666)
Nedim (1681-173
|
|
65. |
25 Dec 2007 Tue 11:14 pm |
Quoting someone here only to insult anything Turkish: Quoting si++: Quoting someone not so good at math: sunflowerseed stated the fact.
the fact that we all know, but not many have a courage to speak.
1I + 2love = 3 you
european languages order
1+2=3
2+1=3
turkic languages
1+2=3
2+1=3
and also
3+1=2
1+3=2
3+2=1
2+3=1
very mathematical and very logic
turkic languages are jungles
it doesnt mean i dont respect the languages, it means im stating the facts.
and i know i hurt the patriotic feelings of turkic nations.
but sorry, this is the naked truth of our reality.
i just cant stand self praising people that have no basis to boast.
|
Your math is terrible. |
oh dear, how shallow your thinking is!
gosh, i cant believe there are so many limited people on this earth! i just tried to draw how turkish can be used within the very simple math pattern namely 'a+b=c' (seemingly turks use another pattern 'a+b=ab').
but turkish logics differ from the very simple logics that rule in the world because it doesnt praise the turkishness.
if you just can understand, if you just could look beyond your turkishness you would have grasped the idea how limited you are with your false pride.
i give up you win turkish is great! turkish language is very mathematical and turkey is a soul and heart of the earth! turks rule!
but let me just after pretending! |
You're talking nonsense.
Apprerantly you're only here to attack (at times insult) anything Turkish.
A small lecture.
Turkish is a postfix language compared to those which are infix (IE).
In infix notation, one writes the mathematical expression (25 * 10 + 50 )
In postfix notation, it becomes 25 10 * 50 +
(or 25 ile 10 u çarp 50 ekle, this is exactly how Turkish order is, sometimes they call it RPN or reverse Polish notation)
Postfix notation is indeed more efficient and commonly used in calculators from Hewlett-Packard for example. Another example of how efficient is forth language (check it out).
|
|
66. |
25 Dec 2007 Tue 11:15 pm |
Quoting AlphaF: Guys! Stop wasting your breath here..
1. Half the people here do not speak or understand Turkish (
(most of them can not really be proud of their English either).
2. The rest thinks Math is a small town in England.
See what I mean? |
Yes you are right so Math is in England ha I am glad to learn it
|
|
67. |
25 Dec 2007 Tue 11:16 pm |
Quoting TURQuazman: in addition: in most languages used today, 1500 words used in public.
Somebody here said Yaşar Kemal used 3500 word in his books comparing victor Hugo used 40000 words in poems.
Yaşar Kemal is a public writer and used a simple language, so you cant get him for a language usage comparison
if you compare victor Hugo to someone try these poets
Fuzuli (1480-1556)
Baki (1526-160
Nefi (1572-1635)
Naili (1610-1666)
Nedim (1681-173 |
Turquazman i think you should read all. And it wasnt me who compared. I just translated an article. Just read the whole article please.
|
|
68. |
26 Dec 2007 Wed 12:52 am |
Quoting si++:
You're talking nonsense.
|
prove it
Quoting si++:
Apprerantly you're only here to attack (at times insult) anything Turkish.
|
bla blah
Quoting si++:
A small lecture.
Turkish is a postfix language compared to those which are infix (IE).
|
on what basis you claim one language is a postfix and another infix?
teach me more, pls.
Quoting si++:
In infix notation, one writes the mathematical expression (25 * 10 + 50 )
In postfix notation, it becomes 25 10 * 50 +
(or 25 ile 10 u çarp 50 ekle, this is exactly how Turkish order is, sometimes they call it RPN or reverse Polish notation)
Postfix notation is indeed more efficient and commonly used in calculators from Hewlett-Packard for example. Another example of how efficient is forth language (check it out). |
well, i checked out.
and how do you link rpn (may all glory go to jan lukasiewicz) to turkish?
on what basis?
|
|
69. |
26 Dec 2007 Wed 01:09 am |
Quoting si++: Quoting Someone good at Turkish: Quoting Prym: Quoting Dilara: Why do all threads here have to be spoiled with out-of-topic remarks I wonder...!!!!!! even interesting ones like this! |
I guess this is Turkish Class habit or traditon nobody cares to learn Turkish anymore. Senin gibi bir kaç kişi hariç. Cesaretin krılmasın çok iyi gidiyorsun. |
Tesekkur ederim Prym!
Turkçe ogrenmek isteyen birkaç kisi var... insanlarin çogu artik yardim etmek istemiyor galiba , sadece nahoş seyler yaziyorlar...
Neden burada olduklarini bilmiyorum... sen biliyor musun? |
Dilara, Türkçen harika. Takdir ettim. |
Tesekkur ederim si++ yavas yavas iyilesiyor...
|
|
70. |
26 Dec 2007 Wed 01:25 am |
Quoting Umut_Umut: Quoting TURQuazman: in addition: in most languages used today, 1500 words used in public.
Somebody here said Yaşar Kemal used 3500 word in his books comparing victor Hugo used 40000 words in poems.
Yaşar Kemal is a public writer and used a simple language, so you cant get him for a language usage comparison
if you compare victor Hugo to someone try these poets
Fuzuli (1480-1556)
Baki (1526-160
Nefi (1572-1635)
Naili (1610-1666)
Nedim (1681-173 |
Turquazman i think you should read all. And it wasnt me who compared. I just translated an article. Just read the whole article please. |
OK I am owner of MY WORDS, If I dont accept an idea I never think it is worthy, so something is NOT worthy there is NO NEED to SPEAK OUT
this means I read all passage
|
|
|