Welcome
Login:   Pass:     Register - Forgot Password - Resend Activation

Forum Messages Posted by Roswitha

(4132 Messages in 414 pages - View all)
<<  ... 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 [290] 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 ...  >>


Thread: Sex and the City

2891.       Roswitha
4132 posts
 28 Dec 2007 Fri 12:23 am

Portokal, are you in the mood for rock?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpzV_0l5ILI



Thread: Sex and the City

2892.       Roswitha
4132 posts
 27 Dec 2007 Thu 11:54 pm

Chaperone - a person (as a matron) who for propriety accompanies one or more young unmarried women in public or in mixed company
or an older person who accompanies young people at a social gathering to ensure proper behavior

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaperone



Thread: Sex and the City

2893.       Roswitha
4132 posts
 27 Dec 2007 Thu 11:31 pm

Scorsese/Hershey's Magdalene on Screen

[13]Frame by frame, Scorsese and Hershey reveal the implications of their complete disregard of Magdalene's being beyond the prostitute stock character. In The Last Temptation of Christ (LTC), Scorsese gives Magdalene more screen time than other biblical films, past or present. In fact, she and Judas function as main characters in the movie. Unfortunately, much like the fate of most female characters in Hollywood, LTC's Magdalene soon finds her place among the litany of Scorsese film women-wives, mothers or mistresses who mostly suffer in silence and provide temporary distractions for the male protagonists. In addition to historical inaccuracies, Magdalene's characterization on screen underscores how sexuality is represented differently for men and women, especially in Western Christianity. While Jesus (Man) can serve as universal signifier for humanity, his sexual drives the norm, women are not supposed to have sexual drives, the model for sexuality being the Virgin Mary (Woman), who remains unscathed by desire. Therefore, women associated with sexuality (Magdalene) must occupy the position of "fallen woman," a staple of Western patriarchal narratives. When Scorsese casts Magdalene within the discourse of "fallen woman," he renders her a symbol of men's temptation. Schaberg articulates the significance of this assignment: "Reduced to her sexuality, she is . . . blamed for provoking sexual desire . . ., often the target of male sexual aggression and hostility, moral outrage, and condemnation."40 Within this conceptual framework, Magdalene the prostitute is viewed as seductress, victim or entrepreneur, which not only greatly reduces the complexity surrounding prostitution but also the scholarly evidence about her apostolic authority. However, as Andrea Dworkin argues, even without demonizing prostitutes, most people are ambivalent and uncomfortable thinking about the nature of prostitution because of the realization that "male domination of the female body is the basic material reality of [all] women's lives."41 From this perspective, whatever agency Scorsese/Hershey may have envisioned for Magdalene as the world's most famous prostitute is quickly thwarted by the historical stigma she embodies in the popular imagination, making her an archetype of sin rather than spirituality and agency. Such a status not only diminishes Magdalene's significance and complexity, but also articulates far-reaching consequences for women trapped in the same one-dimensionality of being.

[14] Many third wave feminist scholars remind us that the concept of prostitute has meaning only within the patriarchal ideology in which such forms of work carry a stigma generated from double standards of sexual morality and negative attitudes to sex.42 Debra Satz, for example, argues that "if prostitution is wrong it is because of its effects on how men perceive women and on how women perceive themselves. In our society, prostitution represents women as the sexual servants of men."43 Satz conjectures that the negative image of women promoted by prostitution "shapes and influences the way women as a whole are seen"44 Satz's view is dramatized within the first five minutes of LTC when Magdalene's character is introduced. Magdalene appears as a marked body, immediately signifying the male gaze. A close-up of Magdalene's feet covered with henna tattoos transitions into a pan up her body into a close-up of her face as she spits in Jesus' face. The tattoos reinforce her inferior status and highlight how Jesus (and society) perceives her. Hershey used the tattoos as part of her backstory, explaining that Magdalene is trying to "make herself despicable because she's trying to be the lowest of the low."45The tattoos would give "a feeling of a woman marking herself. And yet, they were beautiful."46While one might read the tattoos as Magdalene's attempt to control her body under the most extreme circumstances, to express herself, mapping her rebellion onto a body bound by patriarchy, this interpretation ultimately disintegrates within the film's gendered environment.

http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-143027237.html



Thread: Sex and the City

2894.       Roswitha
4132 posts
 27 Dec 2007 Thu 11:00 pm

Mary Magdalene
http://www.thetruthaboutdavinci.com/faq/mary-magdalene-term.html


Brown’s treatment of Mary Magdalene is sheer delusion. In The Da Vinci Code, she’s no penitent whore but Christ’s royal consort and the intended head of His Church, supplanted by Peter and defamed by churchmen. She fled west with her offspring to Provence, where medieval Cathars would keep the original teachings of Jesus alive. The Priory of Sion still guards her relics and records, excavated by the Templars from the subterranean Holy of Holies. It also protects her descendants—including Brown’s heroine.

Although many people still picture the Magdalen as a sinful woman who anointed Jesus and equate her with Mary of Bethany, that conflation is actually the later work of Pope St. Gregory the Great. The East has always kept them separate and said that the Magdalen, “apostle to the apostles,” died in Ephesus. The legend of her voyage to Provence is no earlier than the ninth century, and her relics weren’t reported there until the 13th. Catholic critics, including the Bollandists, have been debunking the legend and distinguishing the three ladies since the 17th century.

Brown uses two Gnostic documents, the Gospel of Philip and the Gospel of Mary, to prove that the Magdalen was Christ’s “companion,” meaning sexual partner. The apostles were jealous that Jesus used to “kiss her on the mouth” and favored her over them. He cites exactly the same passages quoted in Holy Blood, Holy Grail and The Templar Revelation and even picks up the latter’s reference to The Last Temptation of Christ. What these books neglect to mention is the infamous final verse of the Gospel of Thomas. When Peter sneers that “women are not worthy of Life,” Jesus responds, “I myself shall lead her in order to make her male.... For every woman who will make herself male will enter the Kingdom of Heaven.”




Thread: True Nature Of Altruism

2895.       Roswitha
4132 posts
 27 Dec 2007 Thu 09:20 pm

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/preview/q_3317_056.html



Thread: True Nature Of Altruism

2896.       Roswitha
4132 posts
 27 Dec 2007 Thu 09:00 pm

The Family and Me by Defne Aruoba
It's been over a year since I first met the Ulas family. Now that I'm writing about "these extraordinary people"—as most scientists like to call them—I wish I had kept a journal last summer. But then again, who had the time? Along with the scientists, the film crew, and the local people who were helping us, I was working 14-hour days, dealing with a wide range of problems, obstacles, and intense emotions.

I remember at first they felt "extraordinary" to me as well, but now they are my friends. Well, more than friends—friends usually don't change one as much. This experience has had such an enormous impact on how I think and feel about some of the most important issues in life, both in my personal life and in the life that exists on this planet in general.

The true nature of altruism
I now know from firsthand experience that justice is, in fact, just a concept. Altruism is really not practiced as much as it could be. The Ulas families of this world can be helped and their situation improved with very little effort from the more fortunate. Moreover, everybody is aware of this.

But somehow our daily lives don't allow us to remember and make room. We all feel the urge to give to others; even the most selfish person thinks about helping someone at some point. But then the phone rings or family or business matters intrude, and we are back in the little individual worlds we have created for ourselves. Those little worlds make us feel safe, as if we could never become ill, get old, or die. Especially in the more civilized parts of the world, the house, the money in the bank, the career, the fit body, the family, the lover make up the safety nets, the silk threads of our cocoons. This illusion of protection is at the root of our separation from the rest of life and, consequently, the cause of our misery.

“I didn’t want to be there as a ‘psychologist.’ I just wanted to be there for them.”

The remarkable thing about "altruism," which I discovered while I was spending time with the Ulas family, is that it is reciprocal. Altruism is not just about giving, or helping, or concern for the welfare of "others." It is also about opening yourself up to foreign territory and feeling that nothing/nobody is really "other" than you. It is about getting past the illusion of separation to a place of union, where it is no longer clear who is helping whom.

A feeling of protectiveness
I have lived my whole life in two of the most hectic, cosmopolitan, ambitious cities in the world: Istanbul and New York City. Just going to the remote Turkish village where the Ulas family resides was a very unusual experience for me.

I was the first one to arrive there, because the rest of the science and film crew were traveling in a different car. I approached the stairs that lead up to the family house dragging a suitcase full of old clothing I had brought for them. I had heard that these people were quite deprived, and I had seen an obscure one-minute video of one of the affected siblings. That was all. I didn't know what to expect—nobody did. As I went up the stairs, my initial feeling was one of fear. Fear of the unusual, and fear of my own boldness. It sounds like a contradiction, but that's how it was. I had no plans, no clue to what I was doing.

At first the family members looked at me with questioning eyes. But as we started checking out the outfits, joking around with the girls, mostly with gestures, we all started to feel at ease and began having fun with one another. I was among friends, visiting them at their family house. These weren't scientific breakthroughs for me. They were Asiye, Miyase, Bayram, Cebrail, Hacer, Emos, Senem, Safiye, Huseyin, Gulin, Zeynep, and their parents. And from that point on my initial fear transformed into, and continues to be, a feeling of protectiveness towards these people. I knew within the first minutes of meeting the Ulas family that I didn't want to be there as a "psychologist." I just wanted to be there for them, in whatever capacity they needed me.

A father's concern
My main motivation for joining the team of scientists and the film crew had always been "How can this international exposure help the affected members of the Ulas family, medically and/or in any other way possible?" For exposure they have been getting.

Indeed, their discovery has caused a huge controversy in the scientific community. Over the past year I have watched each scientist approach the family with his or her own preoccupation, each wishing desperately that the results from the brain scans, neurological tests, DNA tests, and so on would prove his or her theory. I was asked, as a psychologist, to run some tests as well, in order to evaluate their level of intelligence; their cognitive, sensory, and motor skills; and their emotional, social, and behavioral adaptations. I did so, and the tests did reveal some important facts, but none that is conclusive.

“I don’t know what caused their disability. But I am positive that these people can be helped.”

The Ulas family remains a mystery to the scientific community, and the controversy surrounding them continues. Every once in a while, a new scientist appears in the village and offers a new treatment or asks for the father Resit's permission to do more testing. He doesn't say yes, and he doesn't say no. He is in complete surrender to what life brings. His only concern is the welfare of his disabled children after he dies. And he is right. These adult individuals are completely dependent, not because they lack the necessary skills to take care of their own basic needs, but because they haven't been rehabilitated.

Reaching out
If nothing else, I want to emphasize as a psychologist that these people learn, which is the most important, perhaps the only necessary skill for improving their quality of life. I don't know what caused their disability. I don't know if we can ever really know for sure what causes any disability. But I am positive that these people can be helped. We have been able to help in some practical and therapeutic ways, but their physical and living conditions certainly require further improvement. For this, initially they need an occupational therapist who is willing to spend sufficient time in the village with them to teach them how to take care of themselves.

Inspired by their last name "Ulas," which means "to reach" in English, I plan to establish a Ulas Foundation. My aim is to start with the affected Ulas individuals and then reach out to other families who are in need, in any kind of need. I am hoping that the Ulas Foundation will become, in its small way, a bridge of altruism that reaches across social boundaries, uniting the rich and the poor, the proactive and the submissive, the spiritual and the materialist, the educated and the uneducated, the doctor and the patient. In this way, the polarities of existence that we all experience inside and outside will merge into and nourish each other with their inherent wisdoms, reciprocally, without judgment.



Thread: Erdal Erzincan, Tolga Sag, Yilmaz Celik - ACILIN KAPILAR

2897.       Roswitha
4132 posts
 27 Dec 2007 Thu 08:42 pm

MUKEMMEL: http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=3_MITMWmaZ4&feature=related



Thread: please, dont betray us!

2898.       Roswitha
4132 posts
 27 Dec 2007 Thu 08:34 pm

http://www.seedwiki.com/wiki/wikifish/baby_with_the_bath_water?wpid=78331



Thread: Erdal Erzincan, Tolga Sag, Yilmaz Celik - ACILIN KAPILAR

2899.       Roswitha
4132 posts
 27 Dec 2007 Thu 08:28 pm

IS THERE A PLACE IN ISTANBUL OFFERING SIMILAR MUSIC??
http://tarafdehaidouks.calabashmusic.com/



Thread: Erdal Erzincan, Tolga Sag, Yilmaz Celik - ACILIN KAPILAR

2900.       Roswitha
4132 posts
 27 Dec 2007 Thu 08:26 pm

thanks so much for sharing! "Turceasca" must mean Turkey?



(4132 Messages in 414 pages - View all)
<<  ... 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 [290] 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 ...  >>



Turkish Dictionary
Turkish Chat
Open mini chat
New in Forums
Crossword Vocabulary Puzzles for Turkish L...
qdemir: You can view and solve several of the puzzles online at ...
Giriyor vs Geliyor.
lrnlang: Thank you for the ...
Local Ladies Ready to Play in Your City
nifrtity: ... - Discover Women Seeking No-Strings Attached Encounters in Your Ci...
Geçmekte vs. geçiyor?
Hoppi: ... and ... has almost the same meaning. They are both mean "i...
Intermediate (B1) to upper-intermediate (B...
qdemir: View at ...
Why yer gördüm but yeri geziyorum
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much, makes perfect sense!
Random Pictures of Turkey
Most commented